The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion
Abstract
Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This bias could be due to people’s preference to discuss shared information, relative to unshared information (Stasser & Titus, 1985).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Stasser & Titus, 1985
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP AND TEAM CREATIVITY: UNDERSTANDING THE DIRECT-INDIRECT PATH
Adeel, A., Batool, S., & Ali, R. (2018) · Verslas teorija ir praktika · doi:10.3846/btp.19.27649 · Cited by 17
Yahosseini, K. S., & Moussaïd, M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59946-9 · Cited by 14
The Impacts of Empowerment on the Teamwork Performance: Evidence from Commercial Banks in Vietnam
Ha, V. D. (2020) · Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business · doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no4.267 · Cited by 17
Future Internet-based Collaboration in Factory Planning
Weidig, C., Galambos, P., Csapó, Á., Zentay, P. Z., & Bárányi, P. (2014) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.11.07.2014.07.10 · Cited by 13
How Newly Acquainted Dyads Develop Shared Stereotypic Impressions through Conversation
Ruscher, J. B., Cralley, E. L., & O'Farrell, K. J. (2005) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430205053942 · Cited by 13
Common Ground? How the Encoding of Specialist Vocabulary Affects Peer-to-Peer Online Discourse
Paus, E., & Jucks, R. (2012) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2012.711671 · Cited by 13
Research Team Design and Management for Centralized R&D
Griffith, T. L., & Sawyer, J. E. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2009.2023132 · Cited by 13
How to Design Support for Collaborative E-Learning
Diziol, D., & Rummel, N. (2010) · Advances in social networking and online communities book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-729-9.ch009 · Cited by 13
Proceedings of the Second Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science
Hovy, D., Volkova, S., Bamman, D., Jurgens, D., O'connor, B., Tsur, O., & Doğruöz, A. S. (2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-29 · Cited by 13
Communication style drives emergent leadership attribution in virtual teams
Rennie, S. M., Prieur, L., & Platt, M. L. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1095131 · Cited by 13
Rouwette, E. A. J. A., & Franco, L. A. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003404200 · Cited by 14
Kane, A. A., & Emich, K. J. (2024) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011241282703 · Cited by 13
Martín, Á. S., Swaab, R. I., Sinaceur, M., & Vasiljevic, D. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.002 · Cited by 12
Tolston, M. T., Riley, M. A., Mancuso, V. F., Finomore, V., & Funke, G. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1132-6 · Cited by 13
Rising to the Top: Motivational Forces Influencing Status Conflict in Sourcing Teams
Franke, H., Eckerd, S., & Foerstl, K. D. (2021) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13590 · Cited by 12
Group decision-making theories for child and family social work
Alfandari, R., Taylor, B. J., Enosh, G., Killick, C., McCafferty, P., Mullineux, J. C., Przeperski, J., Rölver, M., & Whittaker, A. (2022) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2021.2016651 · Cited by 14
Sohrab, G., Uitdewilligen, S., & Waller, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2592 · Cited by 15
Gender Diversity in Führungsteams und Unternehmensperformanz: Eine Metaanalyse
Reinwald, M., Hüttermann, H., Kröll, J., & Boerner, S. (2015) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/bf03372925 · Cited by 12
Distributed Mental Models: Mental Models in Distributed Cognitive Systems
Banks, A. P., & Millward, L. J. (2009) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) · Cited by 12
The Effect of Shared Mental Models on Consensus
de Vreede, T., Reiter‐Palmon, R., & de Vreede, G. (2013) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2013.517 · Cited by 12
When and How Are Multiple Leaders Most Effective? It's Complex
Dust, S. B., & Ziegert, J. C. (2012) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01473.x · Cited by 12
Polya’s bees: A model of decentralized decision-making
Golman, R., Hagmann, D., & Miller, J. H. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500253 · Cited by 13
Cross-level impact of team goal orientation and individual goal orientation on individual creativity
Zhang, J., Ji, M., Anwar, C. M., Li, Q., & Fu, G. (2018) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.6 · Cited by 14
Deconstructing Information Elaboration: The Critical Role of Framing and Initial Dialogue
Sanner, B., & Evans, K. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419853019 · Cited by 12
Too Much Trust in Group Decisions: Uncovering Hidden Profiles by Groups and Markets
Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1363 · Cited by 11
Sequential collaboration: The accuracy of dependent, incremental judgments.
Mayer, M., & Heck, D. W. (2022) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000193 · Cited by 12
Pachur, T., Schooler, L. J., & Stevens, J. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0007 · Cited by 12
Simple Heuristics in a Social Game
Hertwig, R., Fischbacher, U., & Bruhin, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0002 · Cited by 12
Factors influencing design development time of commercial properties in Singapore
Pheng, L. S., & T’ng, D. L. L. (1998) · Facilities · doi:10.1108/02632779810195848 · Cited by 12
Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis
Mesmer‐Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. A. (2012) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2012.6172774 · Cited by 12
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/0363775032000104568 · Cited by 12
The Is and Ought of Sharing: The Equality Heuristic Across the Lifespan
Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Canz, T., Gigerenzer, G., & Takezawa, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0006 · Cited by 12
Uhka vai mahdollisuus : moniammatillista yhteistyötä kehittämässä
Isoherranen, K. (2012) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 12
Self and shared leadership in decision quality: a tale of two sides
Cristofaro, M., Neck, C. P., Giardino, P. L., & Neck, C. B. (2023) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2022-0735 · Cited by 11
Singer, D. J. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197660386.001.0001 · Cited by 11
On the neural networks of self and other bias and their role in emergent social interactions
Forbes, C. E. (2024) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2024.05.002 · Cited by 11
Effects of Process and Outcome Accountability on Idea Generation
Häusser, J. A., Frisch, J. U., Wanzel, S. K., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000368 · Cited by 11
Cromwell, J. R., & Gardner, H. K. (2019) · Journal of Professions and Organization · doi:10.1093/jpo/joz017 · Cited by 12
Deliberation and Epistemic Democracy
Ding, H., & Pivato, M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.02.020 · Cited by 14
Building effective inside-outside sales rep dyads: A collaboration perspective
Shi, H., Sridhar, S., & Grewal, R. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-023-00960-4 · Cited by 11
Enhancing Architecture Design Decisions Evolution with Group Decision Making Principles
Malavolta, I., Muccini, H., & Smrithi Rekha, V. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12241-0_2 · Cited by 11
Network-aware support for mobile distributed teams
van der Kleij, R., de Jong, A., Brake, G. M. T., & de Greef, T. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.001 · Cited by 11
Can instant messaging empower teams at work?
Ou, C. X., Zhong, X., Davison, R. M., & Liang, Y. (2010) · International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) · doi:10.1109/rcis.2010.5507296 · Cited by 11
Social Validation of Shared and Nonvalidation of Unshared Information in Group Discussions
Boos, M., Schauenburg, B., Strack, M., & Belz, M. (2013) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496413484068 · Cited by 11
Democratic deliberation: why we should promote debate rather than just discussion
Manin, B. (2005) · HAL · Cited by 12
The Path to Independence: Board Cohesion, Cognitive Conflict, and Information Sharing
Du, F., & Xu, K. (2017) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-51834 · Cited by 11
The Cognitive Sciences of Cyber-Security: A Framework for Advancing Socio-Cyber Systems
McNeese, M. D., & Hall, D. L. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61152-5_7 · Cited by 11
Confirmation as coping with competition
Butera, F., Sommet, N., & Toma, C. (2018) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2018.1539908 · Cited by 12
Measuring teachers’ competence to monitor student interaction in collaborative learning settings
Wiedmann, M., Kaendler, C., Leuders, T., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2019) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-019-00047-6 · Cited by 11
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research in CSCL
Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kollar, I. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_27 · Cited by 15
Information Similarity as a Moderator of the Effect of Gender on Participation in Small Groups
Bonito, J. A., & Lambert, B. L. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404266164 · Cited by 11
Impact of decision‐making in a multidisciplinary perinatal team
Bijma, H. H., van der Heide, A., Wildschut, H. I. J., van der Maas, P. J., & Wladimiroff, J. W. (2006) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.1598 · Cited by 11
Neither Here nor There: Knowledge Sharing and Transfer with Proactive Structuration
Griffith, T. L., Fuller, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. (2007) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2007.396 · Cited by 11
Borkenau, P., Leising, D., & Fritz, U. (2013) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000188 · Cited by 11
Project selection and execution in teams
Vidal, J. B. I., & Möller, M. (2016) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/1756-2171.12122 · Cited by 11
Nemeth, C. J., & O’Connor, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.5 · Cited by 11
A Review and Technological Consideration of the Bona Fide Group Perspective
Beck, S. J., Bourdeaux, R., DiTunnariello, N., & Paskewitz, E. A. (2016) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496416665703 · Cited by 11
The Viability of Alternative Call Centre Production Models
Batt, R., & Moynihan, L. M. (2004) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230288805_2 · Cited by 12
Roodenrijs, J. C. M., Hegger, D. L. T., Mees, H. L. P., & Driessen, P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12052097 · Cited by 11
Group Composition and Decision Making
George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199290468.003.0019 · Cited by 10
The Mind as an Intuitive Pollster: Frugal Search in Social Spaces
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0009 · Cited by 11
“Invisible Whispering”: Restructuring Meeting Processes with Instant Messaging
Rennecker, J. A., Dennis, A. R., & Hansen, S. (2010) · Advances in group decision and negotiation/Advances in group decision and negotation · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9097-3_3 · Cited by 12
Selecting Research Topics: Personal Experiences and Speculations For the Future
Alter, S., & Dennis, A. R. (2002) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.00821 · Cited by 11
Salazar, A. J. (1997) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570319709374561 · Cited by 11
Rosen, M. A. (2010) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 11
Decision Making in Groups and Organizations
Tindale, R. S., & Kluwe, K. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch30 · Cited by 11
Group Structure and Information Distribution on the Emergence of Collective Intelligence
Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2023) · Decision Analysis · doi:10.1287/deca.2022.0466 · Cited by 11
Ishikawa, J. (2024) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2024.2353773 · Cited by 11
A Multilevel, Emergent Journey to Unpack Team Process Dynamics
Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2024) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964241281347 · Cited by 15
Defining the common feature: task-related differences as the basis for dyadic identity.
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466606x154872 · Cited by 9
Homayounfar, K., de Mey, D., Boos, M., Gaedcke, J., & Ghadimi, M. B. (2015) · Forum · doi:10.1007/s12312-015-1301-9 · Cited by 10
Distributed Knowledge in Crowds: Crowd Performance on Hidden Profile Tasks
Tausczik, Y., & Boons, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15005 · Cited by 10
Social Network Analyses of Learning at Workplaces
Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7012-6_15 · Cited by 10
Milicevic, M., Asli, N. B., Tihanyi, D., & Behdinan, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5781 · Cited by 10
Do Groups Know What They Don't Know? Dealing With Missing Information in Decision-Making Groups
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2007) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650207305594 · Cited by 10
(2017) · Saint Mary's University Institutional Repository (Saint Mary's University) · Cited by 10
Otte, K., Knipfer, K., & Schippers, M. C. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795872.013.44 · Cited by 10
Dayeh, V., & Morrison, B. W. (2020) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-020-09701-2 · Cited by 10
Le tournant délibératif de la démocratie
Manin, B. (2021) · Presses de Sciences Po eBooks · doi:10.3917/scpo.blond.2021.01.0117 · Cited by 13
Leader subjective ambivalence: Enabling team task performance via information‐seeking processes
Guarana, C. L. O., Rothman, N. B., & Melwani, S. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12516 · Cited by 10
Collaboration and feeling of flow with an online interactive H5P video experiment on viscosity
Kosmača, J., & Siiman, L. A. (2022) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/ac9ae0 · Cited by 10
Social psychology and modern organizations: balancing between innovativeness and comfort
van der Zee, K. I., & Paulus, P. (2008) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801921.012 · Cited by 10
Leadership and conflict: Using power to manage conflict in groups for better rather than worse
Peterson, R. S., & Harvey, S. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511626562.018 · Cited by 11
Health Communication and Knowledge Construction
Ginman, M., Ek, S., Eriksson‐Backa, K., Mustonen, M., Torkkola, S., Tuominen, K., & Wikgren, M. C. (2003) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458203094007 · Cited by 10
The Roles of Shared Stereotypes and Shared Processing Goals on Mock Jury Decision Making
Stawiski, S. A., Dykema‐Engblade, A., & Tindale, R. S. (2012) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.637467 · Cited by 10
Review panel consensus and post-decision commercial performance: a study of early stage technologies
Galbraith, C. S., DeNoble, A. F., Ehrlich, S. B., & Mesmer‐Magnus, J. (2009) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9122-6 · Cited by 10
Virtual and Face‐to‐Face Teamwork Differences in Culturally Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Teams
Takeuchi, J., Kass, S. J., Schneider, S. K., & VanWormer, L. A. (2013) · Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture · doi:10.1002/jpoc.21112 · Cited by 11
How do children share information in groups?
Gummerum, M., Leman, P. J., & Hollins, T. S. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037144 · Cited by 10
Motivated information processing and group decision refusal
Nijstad, B. A., & Oltmanns, J. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212454588 · Cited by 10
The Consensualization of Stereotypes in Small Groups
Klein, O., Tindale, S., Bräuer, M., & Pascal, U. B. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203809990-21 · Cited by 10
Wissen und Problemlösekompetenz
Sassenberg, K., Boos, M., & Klapproth, F. (2001) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.32.1.45 · Cited by 10
Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving: Acquisition and Effects
Thalemann, S., & Strube, G. (2004) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10
Updating as Part of Everyday Work: An Interactional Perspective.
Christianson, M. K. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 10
Hassall, S. (2009) · QUT Business School · Cited by 10
DECISION‐MAKING MODELS, DECISION SUPPORT, AND PROBLEM SOLVING
Lehto, M. R., Nanda, G., & Nanda, G. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119636113.ch6 · Cited by 11
Lu, Y., Li, K.-R., Sun, Z., Ma, N., & Sun, Y.-F. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11674-z · Cited by 9
Intellectual Humility and Humbling Environments
Bland, S. (2024) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-024-00732-1 · Cited by 11
Gender, ethnic and nationality board diversity and firm performance: a meta-analysis
Torchia, M., & Solarino, A. M. (2025) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/cg-08-2023-0332 · Cited by 14
Human-Machine Teaming and Cyberspace
Maymí, F., & Thomson, R. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91470-1_25 · Cited by 9
Multi-agent discussion gains less when dissent is withheld
Mansuri, C. S., Wang, X., Li, M., Acton, B., Eckardt, R., Patel, D., & Kojaku, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.38324 · Cited by 1
“…model, that discussion recovers a team from an incorrect initial majority only while the withholding rate c stays below c ∗ , using the hidden profile task (Stasser & Titus, 1985), where only sharing private information allows a group to find the correct answer (Stasser & Titus, 1985; 2003) (Fig.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1478
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2153691814
- Cited by
- 1,850
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 14.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
