Cited by 1,850Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Stasser, Garold, Titus, William·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Psychology of Group Influence
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Progress in social psychology
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation

Show all 16 references

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,000

The Impact of Psychological Empowerment of Project-Oriented Employees on Project Success: A Moderated Mediation Model
Khan, J., Malik, M., & Saleem, S. (2020) · Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja · doi:10.1080/1331677x.2020.1756374 · Cited by 56
An Agent-Based Model of Collective Decision-Making: How Information Sharing Strategies Scale With Information Overload
van Veen, D., Kudesia, R. S., & Heinimann, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2020.2986161 · Cited by 32
Perceived Importance of Information: The Effects of Mentioning Information, Shared Information Bias, Ownership Bias, Reiteration, and Confirmation Bias
Swol, L. M. V. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207074730 · Cited by 43
Informational Centrality and Member Participation During Group Decision Making
Sargis, E. G., & Larson, J. R. (2002) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430202005004005 · Cited by 43
Effects of Task Language Demands and Task Complexity on Computer-Mediated Work Groups
Farmer, S. M., & Hyatt, C. W. (1994) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496494253001 · Cited by 43
Does information sharing always improve team decision making? An examination of the hidden profile condition in new product development
Xiao, Y., Zhang, H., & Basadur, T. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.014 · Cited by 43
A new method to assess the quality of collaborative process in CSCL
Spada, H., Deiglmayr, A., Rummel, N., & Hauser, S. (2005) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.4324/9781351226905-82 · Cited by 43
Defining Problems Fast and Slow: The U‐shaped Effect of Problem Definition Time on Project Duration
Choo, A. S. (2014) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12219 · Cited by 47
Leveraging the potential of geospatial annotations for collaboration: a communication theory perspective
Hopfer, S., & MacEachren, A. M. (2007) · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · doi:10.1080/13658810701377780 · Cited by 42
The presence of norms in the absence of groups? The impact of normative influence under hidden-profile conditions
Cruz, M., Henningsen, D. D., & Williams, M. (2000) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00752.x · Cited by 52
Can Words Get in the Way? The Effect of Deliberation in Collective Decision Making
Iaryczower, M., Shi, X., & Shum, M. (2017) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/696228 · Cited by 40
The role of CEO emotional stability and team heterogeneity in shaping the top management team affective tone and firm performance relationship
Ormiston, M. E., Wong, E. M., & Ha, J. (2021) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101543 · Cited by 45
A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy
Cuppen, E. H. W. J. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.006 · Cited by 45
The Consequences of Educational Specialty and Nationality Faultlines for Project Teams
Jiang, Y., Jackson, S. E., Shaw, J. B., & Chung, Y. (2012) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496412453943 · Cited by 41
What Can You Expect? The Influence of Gender Diversity in Dyads on Work Goal Expectancies and Subsequent Work Commitment
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2006) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430206067560 · Cited by 42
Emotional Intelligence, Information Elaboration, and Performance
Wang, S. V. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496415578010 · Cited by 58
Seeing Oneself as a Valued Contributor: Social Worth Affirmation Improves Team Information Sharing
Lee, J., Gino, F., Cable, D. M., & Staats, B. R. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0790 · Cited by 45
The Effect of Contributing Substantively on Perceptions of Participation
Bonito, J. A. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100502 · Cited by 41
The behaviour of corporate actors: How much can we learn from the experimental literature?
Engel, C. (2010) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137410000135 · Cited by 40
Soliciting user-input during the development of an accounting information system: investigating the efficacy of group discussion
Hunton, J. E., & Gibson, D. (1999) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(99)00023-9 · Cited by 41
Being Different, But Close: How and When Faultlines Enhance Team Learning
Rupert, J., Blomme, R. J., Dragt, M. J., & Jehn, K. A. (2016) · European Management Review · doi:10.1111/emre.12083 · Cited by 41
Delay and Deadlines: Freeriding and Information Revelation in Partnerships
Campbell, A., Ederer, F., & Spinnewijn, J. (2014) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.6.2.163 · Cited by 58
Strategic Business Management: A Practical Framework and Causal Model of Empowering Leadership, Team Cohesion, Knowledge-Sharing Behavior, and Team Performance
Kasemsap, K. (2013) · Journal of Social and Development Sciences · doi:10.22610/jsds.v4i3.740 · Cited by 41
Embracing Paradox: TMT paradoxical processes as a steppingstone between TMT reflexivity and organizational ambidexterity
van Neerijnen, P., Tempelaar, M. P., & van de Vrande, V. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406211058640 · Cited by 40
Human-AI teaming: leveraging transactive memory and speaking up for enhanced team effectiveness
Bienefeld, N., Kolbe, M., Camen, G., Huser, D., & Buehler, P. K. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1208019 · Cited by 53
A meta-analysis of team reflexivity: Antecedents, outcomes, and boundary conditions
Leblanc, P., Harvey, J., & Rousseau, V. (2024) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101042 · Cited by 56
The antecedents and consequences of a strong professional identity among medical specialists
Molleman, E., & Rink, F. A. (2014) · Social Theory & Health · doi:10.1057/sth.2014.16 · Cited by 40
Towards a contextualized model of team learning processes and outcomes
van der Haar, S., Segers, M. S. R., & Jehn, K. A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.04.001 · Cited by 47
Microfoundations of Knowledge Recombination: Peripheral Knowledge and Breakthrough Innovation in Teams
Haas, M. R., & Ham, W. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-332220150000032002 · Cited by 40
Potential benefits of model use in group model building: insights from an experimental investigation
McCardle-Keurentjes, M. H. F., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Vennix, J. A. M., & Jacobs, E. (2018) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.1603 · Cited by 41
Group judgment processes and outcomes in video-conferencing versus face-to-face groups
Credé, M., & Sniezek, J. A. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.07.001 · Cited by 40
Facilitating Knowledge Building in Teams: Can a New Team Training Strategy Help?
Rentsch, J. R., Delise, L. A., Eduardo Salas, A., & Letsky, M. (2010) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410369563 · Cited by 40
Can Simple Group Heuristics Detect Hidden Profiles in Randomly Generated Environments?
Reimer, T. O., & Hoffrage, U. (2005) · Swiss Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1024/1421-0185.64.1.21 · Cited by 39
Who's Driving this Conversation? Systematic Biases in the Content of Online Consumer Discussions
Hamilton, R. W., Schlosser, A. E., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0012 · Cited by 39
Hidden Profiles in Corporate Prediction Markets: The Impact of Public Information Precision and Social Interactions1
Qiu, L., Cheng, H. K., & Pu, J. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.4.11 · Cited by 37
The Benefits of Not Seeing Eye to Eye with Leadership: Divergence in Risk Preferences Impacts Multiteam System Behavior and Performance
Lanaj, K., Foulk, T. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0946 · Cited by 39
The anchoring-bias in groups
de Wilde, T. R. W., Velden, F. S. T., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.001 · Cited by 39
Differentiated versus integrated transactive memory effectiveness: It depends on the task.
Gupta, N., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2010) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0019992 · Cited by 39
Balanced Decision Making in Child Welfare: Structured Processes Informed by Multiple Perspectives
Crea, T. M. (2010) · Administration in Social Work · doi:10.1080/03643101003609529 · Cited by 39
Persuasive arguments theory: a test of assumptions
Meyers, R. (1989) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00189.x · Cited by 39
Effects of the Information Environment on Group Discussions and Decisions in the Hidden-Profile Paradigm
Reimer, T. O., Kuendig, S., Hoffrage, U., Park, E., & Hinsz, V. B. (2007) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750701209947 · Cited by 38
Impact of Team Collaboration on Cybersecurity Situational Awareness
Rajivan, P., & Cooke, N. J. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61152-5_8 · Cited by 38
The Effect of Individual Difference Variables on Information Sharing in Decision-Making Groups
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/30.4.540 · Cited by 38
Group rationale, collective sense: Beyond intergroup bias
Spears, R. (2010) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466609x481308 · Cited by 38
Management of poor performance: A comparison of manager, group member, and group disciplinary decisions.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Judge, T. A., Sparrowe, R. T., Kraimer, M. L., & Franz, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.835 · Cited by 38
Using technological functions on a multi-touch table and their affordances to counteract biases and foster collaborative problem solving
Bause, I. M., Brich, I. R., Wesslein, A., & Hesse, F. W. (2018) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4 · Cited by 38
Modeling the Entry of Shared and Unshared information into Group Discussion
Larson, J. R. (1997) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496497283007 · Cited by 38
From Town-Halls to Wikis: Exploring Wikipedia’s Implications for Deliberative Democracy
Klemp, N. J., & Forcehimes, A. T. (2010) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.108 · Cited by 37
How shared reality is created in interpersonal communication
Echterhoff, G., & Schmalbach, B. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.005 · Cited by 37
Emotional intelligence, psychological safety, and team decision making
Zhou, W., Zhu, Z., & Vredenburgh, D. J. (2020) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-10-2019-0105 · Cited by 48
Review of Experimental Studies in Social Psychology of Small Groups When an Optimal Choice Exists and Application to Operating Room Management Decision-Making
Prahl, A., Dexter, F., Braun, M., & Swol, L. M. V. (2013) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3182a0eed1 · Cited by 37
Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
Kim, P. H., Kotha, R. R., Fourné, S. P. L., & Coussement, K. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.004 · Cited by 37
Teams as a sub‐process for knowledge management
Turner, J. R., Zimmerman, T. D., & Allen, J. (2012) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673271211276227 · Cited by 45
Communication and Group Perception: Extending the `Saying is Believing' Effect
Hausmann, L. R. M., Levine, J. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430208095405 · Cited by 37
Element Finding: The Impact of a Group Support System on a Crucial Phase of Sense Making
Massey, A. P., & Clapper, D. L. (1995) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1995.11518063 · Cited by 37
Nationality Heterogeneity and Interpersonal Relationships at Work
Tröster, C. (2006) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 37
The Effects of Framing on Inter-group Negotiation
Curșeu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2007) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-007-9098-2 · Cited by 36
Innovation: A Review of Research in Organizational Behavior
Sawyer, R. K., & Bunderson, S. (2013) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789814343558_0002 · Cited by 37
Recognizing Expertise
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2015) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215605154 · Cited by 42
On Ladders and Pyramids: Hierarchy’s Shape Determines Relationships and Performance in Groups
Yu, S., Greer, L. L., Halevy, N., & van Bunderen, L. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219842867 · Cited by 40
Social contagion effects in experiential information exchange on bulletin board systems
Huang, L. (2010) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/02672571003594770 · Cited by 36
Evidence in Practice: A Framing of the Terrain
Spillane, J. P., & Miele, D. B. (2007) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810710901303 · Cited by 36
Skill and Collaboration in the Evolution of Human Cognition
Sutton, J. D. (2013) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-013-0097-z · Cited by 35
Comparing cooperative geometric puzzle solving in ants versus humans
Dryer, T., Haluts, A., Korman, A., Gov, N. S., Fonio, E., & Feinerman, O. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2414274121 · Cited by 37
Effects of implicit sharing in collaborative analysis
Goyal, N., Leshed, G., Cosley, D., & Fussell, S. R. (2014) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557229 · Cited by 35
Enhancing Group Decision Making: An Exercise to Reduce Shared Information Bias
Baker, D. F. (2009) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562909343553 · Cited by 35
Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited
Faber, N. S., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2010) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430210369143 · Cited by 35
Vertical educational diversity and innovation performance
Bolli, T., Renold, U., & Wörter, M. (2017) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438599.2017.1314075 · Cited by 35
Mirror, Mirror: Guided Storytelling and Team Reflexivity’s Influence on Team Mental Models
Tesler, R., Mohammed, S., Hamilton, K., Mancuso, V., & McNeese, M. D. (2017) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496417722025 · Cited by 41
Flexibility mindsets: Reducing biases that result from spontaneous processing
Sassenberg, K., Winter, K., Becker, D., Ditrich, L., Scholl, A., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2021) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1959124 · Cited by 47
It's Good to Be Leader: The Influence of Randomly and Systematically Selected Leaders on Decision-Making Groups.
Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., Jakobsen, L., & Borton, I. M. (2004) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.62 · Cited by 35
Styles of group discussion in computer‐mediated decision making
REID, F. J. M., Ball, L. J., Morley, A. M., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (1997) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01130.x · Cited by 35
On being peripheral and paying attention: Prototypicality and information processing in intergroup conflict.
Kleef, G. A. V., Steinel, W., & Homan, A. C. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030988 · Cited by 40
Self-Enhancing Transmission Bias and Active InvestingPreprint
Han, B., & Hirshleifer, D. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2032697 · Cited by 49
On Organizations and Oligarchies
Tolbert, P. S., & Hiatt, S. R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199535231.003.0008 · Cited by 32
The Role of Narratorship and Expertise in Social Remembering
Brown, A. D., Coman, A., & Hirst, W. C. (2009) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.119 · Cited by 34
Decision Structure and the Problem of Scale in Deliberation
Pingree, R. J. (2006) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00268.x · Cited by 32
Time Pressure Affects Process and Performance in Hidden-Profile Groups
Bowman, J. M., & Wittenbaum, G. M. (2012) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496412440055 · Cited by 34
Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
Tweed, M., & WILKINSON, T. J. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1583-1 · Cited by 36
Macrocognition: a communication perspective
Keyton, J., Beck, S. J., & Asbury, M. B. (2010) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639221003729136 · Cited by 34
Avoiding bias in medical ethical decision-making. Lessons to be learnt from psychology research
Schleger, H. A., Oehninger, N. R., & Reiter-Theil, S. (2010) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-010-9263-2 · Cited by 34
The impact of status and audio conferencing technology on business meetings
France, E. F., Anderson, A. H., & GARDNER, M. (2001) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2001.0464 · Cited by 34
The influence of regulatory focus and group vs. individual goals on the evaluation bias in the context of group decision making
Sassenberg, K., Landkammer, F., & Jacoby, J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.009 · Cited by 34
Who’s bringing the donuts: The role of affective patterns in group decision making
Emich, K. J. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.001 · Cited by 35
Relationship Conflict Improves Team Performance Assessment Accuracy: Evidence From a Multilevel Study
Breugst, N., Patzelt, H., Shepherd, D. A., & Aguinis, H. (2012) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0032 · Cited by 40
Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence
Meyers, R. A. (1989) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758909390254 · Cited by 34
Information Exchange in Context: Effects of Gender Composition of Group, Accountability, and Intergroup Perception on Group Decision Making1
Hiel, A. V., & Schittekatte, M. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01360.x · Cited by 34
Status and Power in Organizational Group Research: Acknowledging the Pervasiveness of Hierarchy
Mannix, E. A., & Sauer, S. J. (2006) · Advances in group processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(06)23006-6 · Cited by 34
Interpersonal heart rate synchrony predicts effective information processing in a naturalistic group decision-making task
Sharika, K. M., Thaikkandi, S., Nivedita, & Platt, M. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2313801121 · Cited by 33
Expertise Diversity, Informal Leadership Hierarchy, and Team Knowledge Creation: A study of pharmaceutical research collaborations
He, V. F., von Krogh, G., & Sirén, C. A. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406211026114 · Cited by 41
CONFIDE: A Collective Decision-Making Procedure Using Confidence Estimates of Individual Judgements
Slevin, D. P., Boone, L. W., Russo, E. M., & Allen, R. S. (1998) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1008650524782 · Cited by 33
Stereotypes in the communication and translation of person impressions
Collins, E. C., Biernat, M., & Eidelman, S. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.005 · Cited by 33
Establishing team knowledge coordination from a learning perspective
Gabelica, C., den Bossche, P. V., Fiore, S. M., Segers, M. S. R., & Gijselaers, W. (2016) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2015.1120304 · Cited by 38
The forms and use of intuition in top management teams
Samba, C., Williams, D. W., & Fuller, R. M. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101349 · Cited by 38
Group Decision-Making in Multi-User Immersive Virtual Reality
Moser, I., Chiquet, S., Strahm, S. K., Mast, F. W., & Bergamin, P. B. (2020) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0065 · Cited by 33
Markets as a structural solution to knowledge-sharing dilemmas
Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.005 · Cited by 33
Goal Instructions, Response Format, and Idea Generation in Groups
Goldenberg, O., Larson, J. R., & Wiley, J. (2013) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496413486701 · Cited by 33
Information Sampling in Group Decision Making: Sampling Biases and Their Consequences
Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614576.013 · Cited by 33
Multiteam Membership in Relation to Multiteam Systems
O’Leary, M. B., Woolley, A. W., & Mortensen, M. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203814772-15 · Cited by 33
Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice
Swalve, T. (2022) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/jels.12308 · Cited by 31

Authors: Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
Affiliations: Miami University (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1985-06
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 1467-1478
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
OpenAlex: W2153691814
Cited by: 1,850
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
FWCI: 14.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks