The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion
Abstract
Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This bias could be due to people’s preference to discuss shared information, relative to unshared information (Stasser & Titus, 1985).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Stasser & Titus, 1985
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.003 · Cited by 150
How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management
Curșeu, P. L., Schalk, R., & Wessel, I. (2008) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940810894729 · Cited by 149
Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.4.451 · Cited by 144
Swaab, R. I., Schaerer, M., Anicich, E. M., Ronay, R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614537280 · Cited by 152
Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4 · Cited by 152
Motivating Organizations to Learn
Chadwick, I. C., & Raver, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312443558 · Cited by 166
Contextualizing person perception: Distributed social cognition.
Smith, E. R., & Collins, E. C. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0015072 · Cited by 142
Dalal, S. R., Khodyakov, D., Srinivasan, R., Straus, S. G., & Adams, J. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.021 · Cited by 138
Time pressure and group performance: Exploring underlying processes in the Attentional Focus Model
Kelly, J. R., & Loving, T. J. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00094-5 · Cited by 141
Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms
Mansilla, V. B., Lamont, M., & Sato, K. (2015) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915614103 · Cited by 161
Social Conflict: The Emergence and Consequences of Struggle and Negotiation
Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002027 · Cited by 144
Investigating the Encoding Process of Transactive Memory Development in Group Training
Rulke, D. L., & Rau, D. (2000) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601100254004 · Cited by 140
Information Exchange and Use in GSS and Verbal Group Decision Making: Effects of Minority Influence
Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1997) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1997.11518175 · Cited by 140
Hogg, M. A. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002031 · Cited by 138
The Tools of Policy Formulation
Howlett, M., Tan, S. L., Migone, A., WELLSTEAD, A. M., & Evans, B. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781783477043 · Cited by 226
The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance
Greer, L. L., Caruso, H. M., & Jehn, K. A. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.005 · Cited by 142
Hauer, K. E., ten Cate, O., Boscardin, C., Iobst, W. F., Holmboe, E. S., Chesluk, B. J., Baron, R. B., & O’Sullivan, P. (2016) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-15-00144.1 · Cited by 136
Beyond Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups
Stroebe, W., Nijstad, B. A., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)43004-x · Cited by 142
Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.506 · Cited by 144
`I'm Out of the Loop': Ostracism Through Information Exclusion
Jones, E. E., Carter‐Sowell, A. R., Kelly, J. R., & Williams, K. D. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430208101054 · Cited by 139
Helping Teams to Help Themselves: Comparing two Team‐Led Debriefing Methods
Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2013) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12041 · Cited by 136
The impact of subgroup type and subgroup configurational properties on work team performance.
Carton, A. M., & Cummings, J. N. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033593 · Cited by 142
A Social‐Cognitive Framework of Multidisciplinary Team Innovation
Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01029.x · Cited by 145
How Data ScientistsWork Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations
Mao, Y., Wang, D., Muller, M. J., Varshney, K. R., Baldini, I., Dugan, C., & Mojsilović, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3361118 · Cited by 160
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
Shared leadership, diversity, and information sharing in teams
Hoch, J. E. (2014) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-02-2012-0053 · Cited by 128
Lee, J., Lee, H., & Park, J.-G. (2014) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2012-0115 · Cited by 136
The Role of Openness to Cognitive Diversity and Group Processes in Knowledge Creation
Mitchell, R. J., Nicholas, S., & Boyle, B. (2009) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496409338302 · Cited by 131
Emergent States in Virtual Teams: A Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective
Curșeu, P. L. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000077 · Cited by 130
Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group Memory
Tindale, R. S., & Sheffey, S. (2002) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430202005001535 · Cited by 127
Applied decision making with fast-and-frugal heuristics.
Hafenbrädl, S., Waeger, D., Marewski, J. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2016) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.011 · Cited by 140
Games Managers Play: Play as a Form of Leadership Development
Kark, R. (2011) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0048 · Cited by 125
Information sharing and decision‐making in multidisciplinary crisis management teams
Uitdewilligen, S., & Waller, M. J. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2301 · Cited by 142
Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.005 · Cited by 125
Increasing Learning and Time Efficiency in Interorganizational New Product Development Teams*
Bstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. (2010) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00731.x · Cited by 136
Zhang, Z., & Peterson, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023254 · Cited by 129
A Multilevel Model of Team Cultural Diversity and Creativity: The Role of Climate for Inclusion
Li, C., Lin, C., Tien, Y., & Chen, C. (2015) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.93 · Cited by 126
Baumeister, R. F., Ainsworth, S. E., & Vohs, K. D. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x15000618 · Cited by 131
Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects
Nijstad, B. A., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2012) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004 · Cited by 129
Hoozée, S., & Bruggeman, W. (2010) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2010.01.003 · Cited by 120
Nixon, N., Nixon, T. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1102-z · Cited by 134
Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model
Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Hauser, S. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9054-4 · Cited by 130
Shared Cognition as a Product of, and Precursor to, Shared Identity in Negotiations
Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T., van Beest, I., & Spears, R. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206294788 · Cited by 135
THE REAPPROPRIATION OF STIGMATIZING LABELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL IDENTITY
Galinsky, A. D., Hugenberg, K., Groom, C. J., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(02)05009-0 · Cited by 123
Minas, R. K., Potter, R. F., Dennis, A. R., Bartelt, V. L., & Bae, S. (2014) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222300403 · Cited by 119
On the Diversity of Diversity: Tidy Logic, Messier Realities
Klein, K. J., & Harrison, D. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2007.27895337 · Cited by 119
Knowing others' preferences degrades the quality of group decisions.
Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017627 · Cited by 115
What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition
Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Bang, D., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., & Frith, C. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0420 · Cited by 118
Knoll, M. S., Hall, R. J., & Weigelt, O. (2018) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000143 · Cited by 128
Devine, D. J. (1999) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649649903000506 · Cited by 117
Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Körndle, H. (2015) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1038540 · Cited by 133
Heyden, M. L. M., Doorn, S. V., Reimer, M., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612470229 · Cited by 119
A participatory approach to social impact assessment: the interactive community forum
Becker, D. R., Harris, C. C., McLaughlin, W. J., & Nielsen, E. A. (2003) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(02)00098-7 · Cited by 113
Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts
Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2012) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z · Cited by 116
Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T., Neijens, P. C., Kiers, M. H., & Dumay, A. C. M. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045708 · Cited by 113
System dynamics and organizational interventions
Rouwette, E. A. J. A., & Vennix, J. A. M. (2006) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.772 · Cited by 114
Mennecke, B. E., & Valacich, J. S. (1998) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518213 · Cited by 112
Expertise, extraversion and group interaction styles as performance indicators in virtual teams
Balthazard, P. A., Potter, R. E., & Warren, J. (2004) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/968464.968469 · Cited by 111
From individual preference construction to group decisions: Framing effects and group processes
Milch, K. F., Weber, E. U., Appelt, K. C., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Krantz, D. H. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.11.003 · Cited by 111
Wong, S. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.490 · Cited by 111
Socially Situated Cognition in Perspective
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2013) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.125 · Cited by 117
Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups
Wittenbaum, G. M. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498291003 · Cited by 112
Mayo, A. T., & Woolley, A. W. (2016) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.stas2-1609 · Cited by 123
Heerdink, M. W., van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Fischer, A. H. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033362 · Cited by 110
Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects
Potter, R. E., & Balthazard, P. A. (2002) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1001 · Cited by 109
Supporting controversial CSCL discussions with augmented group awareness tools
Buder, J., & Bodemer, D. (2008) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9037-5 · Cited by 120
Gebert, D. R., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2006) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320600826314 · Cited by 112
Diversity as a Basis for Shared Organizational Identity: The Norm Congruity Principle
Rink, F. A., & Ellemers, N. (2007) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00523.x · Cited by 109
Sibert, A. (2006) · International Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2362.2006.00180.x · Cited by 105
Social Networks as a Shortcut to Correct Voting
Ryan, J. B. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00528.x · Cited by 107
Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M. J., & Spahn, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037877 · Cited by 116
Using enterprise social media to investigate the effect of workplace conflict on employee creativity
Pitafi, A. H., Khan, A., Khan, N. A., & Ren, M. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101451 · Cited by 107
The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion
Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1995) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/0747-5632(94)00019-e · Cited by 103
Trusting Judgements: How to Get the Best out of Experts
Burgman, M. A. (2015) · Cited by 104
Kadous, K., Magro, A. M., & Spilker, B. C. (2008) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.133 · Cited by 103
Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective
Coman, A., Brown, A. D., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. C. (2009) · International Journal of Politics Culture and Society · doi:10.1007/s10767-009-9057-9 · Cited by 101
Creative idea generation: harmony versus stimulation
Nemeth, C. J., & Ormiston, M. E. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.373 · Cited by 102
Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams.
Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Abbott, A. S., & Franz, T. M. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.315 · Cited by 341
Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation
Galešić, M., Barkoczi, D., Berdahl, A. M., Biro, D., Carbone, G., Giannoccaro, I., Goldstone, R. L., González, C., Kandler, A., Kao, A. B., et al. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0736 · Cited by 121
To agree or not to agree? consensus and performance in new ventures
West, G. P., & Meyer, G. D. (1998) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00037-2 · Cited by 100
Schittekatte, M., & Hiel, A. V. (1996) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496496273006 · Cited by 99
The Functional Perspective as a Lens for Understanding Groups
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hollingshead, A. B., Paulus, P. B., Hirokawa, R. Y., Ancona, D. G., Peterson, R. S., Jehn, K. A., & Yoon, K. (2004) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403259459 · Cited by 98
Greitemeyer, T., Schulz‐Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.12.1.31 · Cited by 99
Pearsall, M. J., & Venkataramani, V. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038315 · Cited by 98
Creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data: The Ward method
Schielke, H. J., Fishman, J., Osatuke, K., & Stiles, W. B. (2009) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503300802621180 · Cited by 97
Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.854 · Cited by 91
When What You KnowCanHurt You: A Study of Experiential Effects on Group Discussion and Performance
Kim, P. H. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2680 · Cited by 94
Interdependent sampling and social influence.
Denrell, J. C., & Mens, G. L. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.398 · Cited by 97
Ellwart, T., Happ, C., Gurtner, A., & Rack, O. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2014.1000873 · Cited by 102
Constructing the Team: The Antecedents and Effects of Membership Model Divergence
Mortensen, M. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0881 · Cited by 95
How Audit Committee Chairs Address Information-Processing Barriers
Free, C. W., Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T. (2020) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-2018-0379 · Cited by 92
Sawyer, R. K., & Henriksen, D. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197747537.001.0001 · Cited by 121
Kameda, T., Tindale, R. S., & Davis, J. H. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609978.016 · Cited by 92
Gibson, C. B., Waller, M. J., Carpenter, M. A., & Conte, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.445 · Cited by 97
Cruz, M. G., Henningsen, D. D., & SMITH, B. A. (1999) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365099026003004 · Cited by 93
When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making
Fraidin, S. N. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.003 · Cited by 90
Recognition of Expertise in Decision-Making Groups
Littlepage, G. E., & Silbiger, H. (1992) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496492233005 · Cited by 90
Team Negotiation: Social, Epistemic, Economic, and Psychological Consequences of Subgroup Conflict
Halevy, N. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208324102 · Cited by 91
Framing innovation: negotiating shared frames during early design phases
Hey, J. H. G., Joyce, C. K., & Beckman, S. L. (2007) · J of Design Research · doi:10.1504/jdr.2007.015564 · Cited by 96
Stereotypes and Shifting Standards
Biernat, M. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394286-9.00001-9 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1478
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2153691814
- Cited by
- 1,850
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 14.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review