Cited by 1,850Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Stasser, Garold, Titus, William·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Psychology of Group Influence
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Progress in social psychology
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation

Show all 16 references

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 1,000

The Unforeseen Costs of Extraordinary Experience
Cooney, G., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614551372 · Cited by 60
If you Fight with Me, I'll Get Mad! A Social Model of Entrepreneurial Affect
Breugst, N., & Shepherd, D. A. (2015) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12211 · Cited by 70
Do extrinsic motivation and organisational culture additively strengthen intrinsic motivation in online knowledge sharing?
Nguyen, M. (2019) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-02-2019-0019 · Cited by 60
Collective Choice, Judgment, and Problem Solving
Stasser, G. L., & Dietz-Uhler, B. L. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch2 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Meta-Cognitive Myopia and the Dilemmas of Inductive-Statistical Inference
Fiedler, K. (2012) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394293-7.00001-7 · Cited by 66
Who's the Boss at the Top? A Micro‐Level Analysis of Director Expertise, Status and Conformity Within Boards
Veltrop, D. B., Molleman, E., Hooghiemstra, R. B. H., & van Ees, H. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12276 · Cited by 63
Comparing Audit Team Effectiveness via Alternative Modes of Computer-Mediated Communication
Murthy, U. S., & Kerr, D. S. (2004) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.141 · Cited by 58
Synergetic effects in working teams
Hertel, G. (2011) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941111112622 · Cited by 56
Fostering sharing of unshared knowledge by having access to the collaborators’ meta-knowledge structures
Engelmann, T., & Hesse, F. W. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.002 · Cited by 58
When less is more: the downside of customer knowledge sharing in new product development teams
Tang, Y., & Marinova, D. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00646-w · Cited by 58
From Boundary Spanning to Intergroup Knowledge Integration: The Role of Boundary Spanners’ Metaknowledge and Proactivity
Mell, J. N., van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2022) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12797 · Cited by 57
The Use of Cognitive Mapping in Eliciting and Evaluating Group Cognitions
Curșeu, P. L., Schalk, R., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00618.x · Cited by 57
Opinion Formation and the Collective Dynamics of Risk Perception
Moussaïd, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084592 · Cited by 62
Temporary Versus Permanent Group Membership: How the Future Prospects of Newcomers Affect Newcomer Acceptance and Newcomer Influence
Rink, F. A., & Ellemers, N. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209333177 · Cited by 58
Designing Mobile Experiences for Collocated Interaction
Lundgren, S., Fischer, J. E., Reeves, S., & Torgersson, O. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675171 · Cited by 57
A Complex Adaptive Systems Approach to Real-Life Team Interaction Patterns, Task Context, Information Sharing, and Effectiveness
Hoogeboom, M., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2019) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601119854927 · Cited by 70
Extreme members and group polarization
Swol, L. M. V. (2009) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510802584368 · Cited by 56
Team Training in China: Testing and Applying the Theory of Cooperation and Competition1
Lu, J., Tjosvold, D., & Shi, K. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00565.x · Cited by 59
Biased evaluation of information during discussion: Disentangling the effects of preference consistency, social validation, and ownership of information
Mojzisch, A., Grouneva, L., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2009) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.660 · Cited by 56
When two heads are better than one and when they can be worse: The amplification hypothesis.
Koriat, A. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000092 · Cited by 62
Use of expert knowledge to anticipate the future: Issues, analysis and directions
Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (2017) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2016.11.001 · Cited by 52
Reviewing Work Team Design Characteristics Across Industries: Combining Meta-Analysis and Comprehensive Synthesis
Carter, K. M., Mead, B. A., Stewart, G. L., Nielsen, J. D., & Solimeo, S. L. (2018) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496418797431 · Cited by 61
Taking the Interface between Mind and Environment Seriously
Fiedler, K., & Juslin, P. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614576.001 · Cited by 54
A balance theory approach to group problem solving
Adejumo, G., Duimering, P. R., & Zhong, Z. (2007) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2007.09.001 · Cited by 60
Review and Application of Knowledge Management and Knowledge Sharing in Tourism
Yiu, M., & Law, R. (2013) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2013.812128 · Cited by 57
Examining the Symptoms of Groupthink and Retrospective Sensemaking
Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., Eden, J., & Cruz, M. G. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405281772 · Cited by 63
The effect of team empowerment on team performance
Jiang, X., Flores, H. R., Leelawong, R., & Manz, C. C. (2016) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-07-2014-0048 · Cited by 69
Information Sharing during Auditors' Fraud Brainstorming: Effects of Psychological Safety and Auditor Knowledge
Gissel, J. L., & Johnstone, K. M. (2016) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-51519 · Cited by 57
The Contingent Impact of Contextualization on Computer-Mediated Collaboration
Katz, A., & Te’eni, D. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0237 · Cited by 56
From Thinking About What Might Have Been to Sharing What We Know: The Role of Counterfactual Mind-Sets in Information Sharing in GroupsPreprint
Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.305163 · Cited by 55
Team Decision Making in Virtual and Face-to-Face Environments
O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2016) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9465-3 · Cited by 54
Expanding the Conversation: Multiplier Effects From a Deliberative Field Experiment
Lazer, D. M. J., Sokhey, A. E., Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K., & Kennedy, R. (2015) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1017032 · Cited by 54
Empowering employees through instant messaging
Ou, C. X., Davison, R. M., Zhong, X., & Liang, Y. (2010) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/09593841011052165 · Cited by 54
The communication of social stereotypes: The effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals.
Bräuer, M., Judd, C. M., & Jacquelin, V. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.463 · Cited by 56
A Social‐Cognitive Perspective on Team Functioning in Sport
Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9781118270011.ch12 · Cited by 54
Leveraging Knowledge Diversity in Hierarchically Differentiated Teams: The Critical Role of Hierarchy Stability
Gray, S., Bunderson, J. S., van der Vegt, G. S., Rink, F. A., & Gedik, Y. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1136 · Cited by 54
The Effect of Relational and Team Characteristics on Individual Performance: A Social Network Perspective
Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2013) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21539 · Cited by 56
Good Effects of Bad Feelings: Negative Affectivity and Group Decision‐making
Bode, H. J. M. K., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2009) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00675.x · Cited by 51
An Experimental Examination of Biological Sex as a Status Cue in Decision-Making Groups and Its Influence on Information Use
Propp, K. M. (1995) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496495264001 · Cited by 53
The Ecological Rationality of Simple Group Heuristics: Effects of Group Member Strategies on Decision Accuracy
Reimer, T. O., & Hoffrage, U. (2006) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-005-4750-2 · Cited by 54
The role of political affiliation in employment decisions: A model and research agenda.
Roth, P. L., Goldberg, C., & Thatcher, J. B. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000232 · Cited by 57
Meetings as Networks: Applying Social Network Analysis to Team Interaction
Sauer, N. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2013) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.760729 · Cited by 52
“Why Am I Out of the Loop?” Attributions Influence Responses to Information Exclusion
Jones, E. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210380406 · Cited by 52
Models of Bounded Rationality: The Approach of Fast and Frugal Heuristics
Hoffrage, U., & Reimer, T. O. (2004) · management revue · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2004-4-437 · Cited by 58
Disagreement and the division of epistemic labor
Hallsson, B. G., & Kappel, K. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1788-6 · Cited by 53
Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach.
Ellis, A. P. J., Mai, K. M., & Christian, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033725 · Cited by 51
The group matters: A review of processes and outcomes in intelligence analysis.
Straus, S. G., Parker, A. M., & Bruce, J. B. (2011) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0022734 · Cited by 51
The Pursuit of Information Sharing: Expressing Task Conflicts as Debates vs. Disagreements Increases Perceived Receptivity to Dissenting Opinions in Groups
Tsai, M., & Bendersky, C. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1025 · Cited by 54
Knowledge Diversity, Turnover, and Organizational‐Unit Productivity: An Empirical Analysis in a Knowledge‐Intensive Context
Narayanan, S., Swaminathan, J. M., & Talluri, S. (2013) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12039 · Cited by 49
Overconfidence at work: Does overconfidence survive the checks and balances of organizational life?
Meikle, N. L., Tenney, E. R., & Moore, D. A. (2016) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.005 · Cited by 59
Some things are better left unseen: Toward more effective communication and team performance in video-mediated interactions
Hassell, M. D., & Cotton, J. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.039 · Cited by 50
Vortex of Corruption: Longitudinal Analysis of Normative Pressures in Top Global Companies
Orudzheva, L., Salimath, M. S., & Pavur, R. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4022-z · Cited by 49
Common Ground and Cultural Prominence
Fast, N. J., Heath, C., & Wu, G. (2009) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02387.x · Cited by 50
Functional Diversity and Group Creativity
Zhang, Y. (2015) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886315591364 · Cited by 49
Stimulating Thinking: Cultivating Better Decisions with Groupware Through Categorization
Dennis, A. R. (2000) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2000.11045649 · Cited by 49
A Cognitive Three-Process Model of Computer-Mediated Group Interaction
Whitworth, B., Gallupe, B., & McQueen, R. (2000) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1008780324737 · Cited by 51
Wise teamwork: Collective confidence calibration predicts the effectiveness of group discussion
Silver, I., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104157 · Cited by 47
Decision Making of Clinical Teams:
Christensen, C., Larson, J. R., Abbott, A., Ardolino, A., Franz, T. M., & Pfeiffer, C. A. (2000) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x0002000106 · Cited by 48
Developing a model for examining the effect of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing on organizational performance based on EFQM approach
Allameh, S. M., Pool, J. K., Jaberi, A., & Soveini, F. M. (2014) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-05-2014-0025 · Cited by 49
The Psychology of Global Warming
Newell, B. R., & Pitman, A. J. (2010) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/2010bams2957.1 · Cited by 48
Effects of time pressure and communication environment on team processes and outcomes in dyadic planning
van der Kleij, R., Lijkwan, J. T. E., Rasker, P. C., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.11.005 · Cited by 48
A social choice approach to expert consensus panels
Gabel, M. J., & Shipan, C. R. (2004) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.004 · Cited by 48
Patterns of interaction in multidisciplinary child protection teams in New Jersey
Bell, L. (2001) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(00)00224-6 · Cited by 48
A Polarized Discourse: Effects of Opinion Differentiation and Structural Differentiation on Communication
Koudenburg, N., & Kashima, Y. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211030816 · Cited by 56
Happily putting the pieces together: A test of two explanations for the effects of mood on group‐level information processing
Bramesfeld, K. D., & Gasper, K. (2007) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712607x218295 · Cited by 50
Consequences of media information uptake and deliberation: focus groups’ symbolic coping with synthetic biology
Kronberger, N., Holtz, P., & Wagner, W. (2011) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662511400331 · Cited by 48
Group rewards, group composition and information sharing: A motivated information processing perspective
Super, J. F., Li, P., Ishqaidef, G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.04.002 · Cited by 49
Staying Alive: Toward a Diverging Consensus Model of Overcoming a Bias Against Novelty in Groups
Harvey, S., & Mueller, J. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1384 · Cited by 50
Exploring the rabbit hole of possibilities by myself or with my group: The benefits and liabilities of activating counterfactual mind‐sets for information sharing and group coordination
Liljenquist, K. A., Galinsky, A. D., & Kray, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.479 · Cited by 47
Status Differentiation and Information Exchange in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Idea Generation
Silver, S. D., Cohen, B. P., & Crutchfield, J. H. (1994) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2786705 · Cited by 47
Naïve Groups Can Solve the Hidden-Profile Problem
Reimer, T. O., Reimer, A., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01383.x · Cited by 46
Transforming Conservation
Amano, T., Bako, L. A., Best, M., Boenisch, N., Boersch‐Supan, P. H., Browne, D., Buckley, Y. M., Burgman, M., Cadotte, M. W., Canessa, S., et al. (2022) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0321 · Cited by 61
Social validation in group decision-making: Differential effects on the decisional impact of preference-consistent and preference-inconsistent information
Mojzisch, A., Schulz‐Hardt, S., Kerschreiter, R., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.012 · Cited by 46
Misattribution in Virtual Groups: The Effects of Member Distribution on Self-Serving Bias and Partner Blame
Walther, J. B., & Bazarova, N. N. (2007) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00286.x · Cited by 46
Time Pressure, Performance, and Productivity
Moore, D. A., & Tenney, E. R. (2012) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2012)0000015015 · Cited by 49
Dense Residual Network: Enhancing global dense feature flow for character recognition
Zhang, Z., Tang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhan, C., Zha, Z.-J., & Wang, M. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.02.005 · Cited by 46
Group-to-Individual Problem-Solving Transfer
Laughlin, P. R., Carey, H. R., & Kerr, N. L. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430208090645 · Cited by 47
Creating cognitive tutors for collaborative learning: steps toward realization
Harrer, A., McLaren, B. M., Walker, E., Bollen, L., & Sewall, J. (2006) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-006-9007-4 · Cited by 46
Antecedents and the Performance Outcome of Transactive Memory in Daycare Work Groups
Peltokorpi, V., & Manka, M.-L. (2008) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.103 · Cited by 47
Maintaining Transient Diversity Is a General Principle for Improving Collective Problem Solving
Smaldino, P. E., Moser, C. J., Velilla, A. P., & Werling, M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231180100 · Cited by 52
Group Augmentation in Realistic Visual-Search Decisions via a Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface
Valeriani, D., Cinel, C., & Poli, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-08265-7 · Cited by 47
Prioritizing options for multi-objective agricultural development through the Positive Deviance approach
Steinke, J., Mgimiloko, M. G., Graef, F., Hammond, J., van Wijk, M. T., & van Etten, J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212926 · Cited by 45
The Sequence Effect in Panel Decisions: Evidence from the Evaluation of Research and Development Projects
Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. J. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1413 · Cited by 47
People and Information Matter: Task Support Satisfaction from the other Side
Bharati, P. (2003) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2003.11647091 · Cited by 45
How to Improve Decision Making in Small Groups
Klocke, U. (2007) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496407301974 · Cited by 45
Tasks matter: modeling group task processes in experimental CSCW research
Mennecke, B. E., & Wheeler, B. C. (1993) · [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.1993.284167 · Cited by 56
Tapping into past design experiences: knowledge sharing and creation during novice–expert design consultations
Deken, F., Kleinsmann, M. S., Aurisicchio, M., Lauche, K., & Bracewell, R. H. (2011) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-011-0123-8 · Cited by 46
Knowledge-based Decision Support System Quality Function Deployment (KBDSS-QFD) tool for assessment of building envelopes
Singhaputtangkul, N., Low, S. P., Teo, A. L., & Hwang, B. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.017 · Cited by 44
The Effects of Incentives on Information Exchange and Decision Quality in Groups
Kelly, K. O. (2010) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2010.22.1.43 · Cited by 44
Impact of transformational leadership on team performance: an empirical study in UAE
Rao, A. S., & Abdul, W. K. (2015) · Measuring Business Excellence · doi:10.1108/mbe-07-2014-0022 · Cited by 59
Eliciting teamwork with game attributes: A systematic review and research agenda
Marlow, S. L., Salas, E., Landon, L. B., & Presnell, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.028 · Cited by 45
Enhancement of Group Perception via a Collaborative Brain–Computer Interface
Valeriani, D., Poli, R., & Cinel, C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2598875 · Cited by 45
Communication in Theory and Research on Transactive Memory Systems: A Literature Review
Peltokorpi, V., & Hood, A. C. (2018) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12359 · Cited by 51
The Social Identity Perspective on Small Groups
Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., Hinkle, S., & Otten, S. (2005) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483328935.n4 · Cited by 42
Benefiting from deep-level diversity: How congruence between knowledge and decision rules improves team decision making and team perceptions
Rink, F. A., & Ellemers, N. (2010) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209344866 · Cited by 43
Prediction Markets as institutional forecasting support systems
van Bruggen, G. H., Spann, M., Lilien, G. L., & Skiera, B. (2010) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.05.002 · Cited by 42
Sleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance
Faber, N. S., Häusser, J. A., & Kerr, N. L. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868315609487 · Cited by 46
What good leaders actually do: micro-level leadership behaviour, leader evaluations, and team decision quality
Meyer, B. M., Burtscher, M. J., Jonas, K. W., Feese, S., Bert Arnrich, A., Tröster, G., & Schermuly, C. C. (2016) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2016.1189903 · Cited by 54
Information sharing as strategic behaviour: the role of information display, social motivation and time pressure
Bălău, N., & Utz, S. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1267263 · Cited by 43
Cultural Diversity and Team Creativity
Paulus, P. B., van der Zee, K. I., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_4 · Cited by 43

Authors: Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
Affiliations: Miami University (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1985-06
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 1467-1478
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
OpenAlex: W2153691814
Cited by: 1,850
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
FWCI: 14.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks