Cited by 1,850Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Stasser, Garold, Titus, William·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Psychology of Group Influence
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Progress in social psychology
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation

Show all 16 references

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

The theoretical description of interdependence by means of transition lists.
Kelley, H. H. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.956 · Cited by 89
Pseudocontingencies: An integrative account of an intriguing cognitive illusion.
Fiedler, K., Freytag, P., & Meiser, T. (2009) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0014480 · Cited by 89
Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink: Backward and Forward
McCauley, C. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2759 · Cited by 87
Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies
Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Randall, K. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.03.005 · Cited by 95
Shared Cognition in Small Groups
Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema‐Engblade, A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch1 · Cited by 87
Regulatory Uncertainty, Corporate Structure, and Strategic Agendas: Evidence from the U.S. Renewable Electricity Industry
Dutt, N., & Joseph, J. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0682 · Cited by 88
Multi-step ranking of alternatives in a multi-criteria and multi-expert decision making environment
Tsiporkova, E., & Boeva, V. (2005) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2005.11.010 · Cited by 85
The Dark Side of Structural Holes
Bizzi, L. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312471385 · Cited by 85
Employee agility and enterprise social media: The Role of IT proficiency and work expertise
Pitafi, A. H., Rasheed, M. I., Kanwal, S., & Ren, M. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101333 · Cited by 84
The Renaissance Man is not dead! The role of generalists in teams of inventors
Melero, E., & Palomeras, N. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.005 · Cited by 83
The role of functional and demographic diversity on new product creativity and the moderating impact of project uncertainty
Dayan, M., Ozer, M., & Almazrouei, H. S. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.016 · Cited by 86
Effects of empowering leadership on performance in management team
Tung, H., & Chang, Y. (2011) · Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management · doi:10.1108/20408001111148720 · Cited by 98
Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains
Lount, R. B., & Phillips, K. W. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.03.002 · Cited by 81
Principles of Regulating Interaction in Teams Practicing Face-To-Face Communication Versus Teams Practicing Computer-Mediated Communication
Becker-Beck, U., Wintermantel, M., & Borg, A. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277182 · Cited by 82
Participation in Small Groups
Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1997.11678943 · Cited by 82
Using group support systems to discover hidden profiles: an examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality
Mennecke, B. E. (1997) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1997.0136 · Cited by 81
The Interactive Effects of Mood and Trait Negative Affect in Group Decision Making
van Knippenberg, D., Bode, H. J. M. K., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0461 · Cited by 81
Ethnic diversity and distributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration.
Bode, H. J. M. K., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2008) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.12.4.307 · Cited by 81
The Dynamics of Personal and Social Identity Formation
Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2006) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446211946.n12 · Cited by 83
Decision-Making Groups Attenuate the Discussion Bias in Favor of Shared Information: A Meta-Analysis
Reimer, T. O., Reimer, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2010) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903514318 · Cited by 80
The Diversity Gap: When Diversity Matters for Knowledge
Sulik, J., Bahrami, B., & Deroy, O. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211006070 · Cited by 80
The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups
Cruz, M. G., Boster, F. J., & Rodríguez, J. I. (1997) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365097024003004 · Cited by 80
Category assignment and relatedness in the group ideation process
Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.007 · Cited by 85
Impact of meeting procedures on meeting effectiveness
Nixon, C. T., & Littlepage, G. E. (1992) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf01126771 · Cited by 79
Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes
Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1 · Cited by 198
Self-citation
Factors that May Affect the Difficulty of Uncovering Hidden Profiles
Swol, L. M. V., Savadori, L., & Sniezek, J. A. (2003) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302030063005 · Cited by 79
Exploring the Dynamic Team Cohesion–Performance and Coordination–Performance Relationships of Newly Formed Teams
Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496420907157 · Cited by 97
Gender Composition, Situational Strength, and Team Decision-Making Accuracy: A Criterion Decomposition Approach
LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Colquitt, J. A., & Ellis, A. P. J. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2986 · Cited by 78
How to achieve synergy in group decision making: Lessons to be learned from the hidden profile paradigm
Schulz‐Hardt, S., & Mojzisch, A. (2012) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.744440 · Cited by 77
Is our knowledge of voice and silence in organizations growing? Building bridges and (re)discovering opportunities
Knoll, M. S., Wegge, J., Unterrainer, C., da Silva, S. A., & Jønsson, T. (2016) · German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift für Personalforschung · doi:10.1177/2397002216649857 · Cited by 88
Improving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systems.
Lam, S. S. K., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.565 · Cited by 77
A social validation explanation for mutual enhancement
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00091-x · Cited by 76
Time for temporal team mental models: Expanding beyond “what” and “how” to incorporate “when”
Mohammed, S., Hamilton, K., Tesler, R., Mancuso, V., & McNeese, M. D. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1024664 · Cited by 76
Group leadership and shared task representations in decision making groups
van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.008 · Cited by 82
Capturing the multilevel dynamics of emergence
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2016) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614547955 · Cited by 76
The impact of information distribution, ownership, and discussion on group member judgment: The differential cue weighting model
Chernyshenko, O. S., Miner, A. G., Baumann, M. R., & Sniezek, J. A. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00533-2 · Cited by 75
Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Strategic Foresight: A Representational Approach
Csaszar, F. A., & Martinez, D. L. (2018) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2018.0063 · Cited by 70
Team Cognition at a Crossroad: Toward Conceptual Integration and Network Configurations
Mohammed, S., Rico, R., & Alipour, K. K. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0159 · Cited by 87
Team Cognition
Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., & Winner, J. L. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470713181.ch10 · Cited by 78
The Role of Information Exchange in Predicting Group Accuracy on a Multiple Judgment Task
Lavery, T. A., Lavery, T. A., Franz, T. M., Lavery, T. A., Franz, T. M., Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R. (1999) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2104_2 · Cited by 73
Understanding and facilitating group problem structuring and formulation: Mental representations, interaction, and representation aids
Massey, A. P., & Wallace, W. A. (1996) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/0167-9236(96)00004-8 · Cited by 73
Knowledge sharing and institutionalism in the healthcare industry
Kim, Y., Newby‐Bennett, D., & Song, H.-J. (2012) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673271211238788 · Cited by 84
Cognitive Loafing, Social Conformity and Judicial Review of Agency RulemakingPreprint
Seidenfeld, M. B. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.280251 · Cited by 73
Let the Weakest Link Go! Empirical Explorations on the Relative Importance of Weak and Strong Ties on Social Networking Sites
Krämer, N. C., Rösner, L., Eimler, S. C., Winter, S., & Neubaum, G. (2014) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc4040785 · Cited by 72
When Critical Knowledge Is Most Critical
Huang, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2011) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496411410073 · Cited by 77
Information Sampling and Confidence Within Groups and Judge Advisor Systems
Savadori, L., Swol, L. M. V., & Sniezek, J. A. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028006002 · Cited by 72
Team Learning: A Theoretical Integration and Review
Bell, B. S., Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Blawath, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0026 · Cited by 77
A Configural Approach to Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams1
Kudaravalli, S., Faraj, S. A., & Johnson, S. L. (2017) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.03 · Cited by 72
The Cognitive-Ecological Approach to Rationality in Social Psychology
Fiedler, K., & Wänke, M. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.699 · Cited by 72
Twelve tips to maximize the value of a clinical competency committee in postgraduate medical education
Kinnear, B., Warm, E. J., & Hauer, K. E. (2018) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2018.1474191 · Cited by 73
An Investigation of Team Information Processing in Service Teams: Exploring the Link between Teams and Customers
Deeter‐Schmelz, D. R., & Lagace, R. R. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070303255382 · Cited by 71
12 HRM and Distributed Work
MacDuffie, J. P. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/078559817 · Cited by 75
Mentalizing during social InterAction: A four component model
Wu, H., Liu, X., Hagan, C. C., & Mobbs, D. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.031 · Cited by 71
The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Jonassen, D. H., Lee, C. B., Yang, C.-C., & Laffey, J. M. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.017 · Cited by 72
Information Exchange in Group Decision Making: The Hidden Profile Problem Reconsidered
Lightle, J. P., Kagel, J. H., & Arkes, H. R. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0975 · Cited by 70
Social valuation of mangroves in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria
James, G. K., Adegoke, J. O., Osagie, S. O., Saba, E., Nwilo, P. C., & Akinyede, J. (2013) · International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management · doi:10.1080/21513732.2013.842611 · Cited by 70
Human Self as Information Agent: Functioning in a Social Environment Based on Shared Meanings
Baumeister, R. F., Maranges, H. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2017) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000114 · Cited by 77
Bias, Fairness, and Validity in Graduate-School Admissions: A Psychometric Perspective
Woo, S. E., LeBreton, J. M., Keith, M. G., & Tay, L. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211055374 · Cited by 94
In Defense of Exclusionary Deliberation: Communication and Voting with Private Beliefs and Values
Meirowitz, A. (2007) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951629807077572 · Cited by 69
Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?
Nunez, N. L., McCrea, S. M., & Culhane, S. E. (2011) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.967 · Cited by 69
Improving situation awareness in crisis response teams: An experimental analysis of enriched information and centralized coordination
de Walle, B. V., Brugghemans, B., & Comes, T. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.001 · Cited by 69
The Impact of Presentation Form, Entrepreneurial Passion, and Perceived Preparedness on Obtaining Grant Funding
Galbraith, C. S., McKinney, B. C., DeNoble, A. F., & Ehrlich, S. B. (2013) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651913513902 · Cited by 68
Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance
Woolley, A. W., Hackman, J. R., Jerde, T. E., Chabris, C. F., Bennett, S. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2007) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910701363041 · Cited by 68
Creativity and cognitive processes: Multi-level linkages between individual and team cognition
Reiter‐Palmon, R., Herman, A. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2008) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1016/s1475-9144(07)00009-4 · Cited by 70
Reevaluating media richness: cues, feedback, and task
Kinney, & Dennis (1994) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1994.323503 · Cited by 68
Comment on “Heuristics in the strategy context” by Bingham and Eisenhardt (2011)
Vuori, N., & Vuori, T. O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2259 · Cited by 69
Knowledge and information awareness for initiating transactive memory system processes of computer-supported collaborating ad hoc groups
Schreiber, M., & Engelmann, T. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.019 · Cited by 67
An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making
Yue, Z. (2012) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.008 · Cited by 67
Ultimatum Bargaining with a Group: Underestimating the Importance of the Decision Rule
Messick, D. M., Moore, D. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2678 · Cited by 67
Delegation Mechanism-Based Large-Scale Group Decision Making With Heterogeneous Experts and Overlapping Communities
Tang, M., Liao, H., & Fujita, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2021.3070902 · Cited by 66
Does Avatar Appearance Matter? How Team Visual Similarity and Member-Avatar Similarity Influence Virtual Team Performance
van der Land, S. F., Schouten, A. P., Feldberg, F., Huysman, M., & van den Hooff, B. (2014) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12044 · Cited by 72
The Social Context of Decisions
Larrick, R. P. (2016) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062445 · Cited by 72
A comparison of strategies for reducing interval overconfidence in group judgments.
Plous, S. (1995) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.80.4.443 · Cited by 66
Gender Differences in the Intentional Use of Information in Competitive Negotiations
Deal, J. J. (2000) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640003100604 · Cited by 65
Collaborative Medical Decision Making
Christensen, C., & Larson, J. R. (1993) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9301300410 · Cited by 69
A novel approach to lean six sigma project management: a conceptual framework and empirical application
Sreedharan, V. R., & Vijaya Sunder, M. (2018) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1492042 · Cited by 65
Shared mental models—linking team cognition and performance
Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Kohler, P., & Badke‐Schaub, P. (2007) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880601170891 · Cited by 64
An empirical investigation of the drivers of software outsourcing decisions in Japanese organizations
Bush, A. A., Tiwana, A., & Tsuji, H. (2007) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2007.08.006 · Cited by 64
chapter 3 Evidence in Practice: A Framing of the Terrain
Spillane, J. P., & Miele, D. B. (2007) · Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00097.x · Cited by 64
Transactive memory directories in small work units
Peltokorpi, V. (2004) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480410539515 · Cited by 66
Talking nets: A multiagent connectionist approach to communication and trust between individuals.
Overwalle, F. V., & Heylighen, F. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.606 · Cited by 64
Security practitioners in context: Their activities and interactions with other stakeholders within organizations
Werlinger, R., Hawkey, K., Botta, D., & Beznosov, K. (2009) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.03.002 · Cited by 64
Exploring the Hidden-Profile Paradigm
Sohrab, G., Waller, M. J., & Kaplan, S. A. (2015) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496415599068 · Cited by 78
Scenario-based strategizing: Advancing the applicability in strategists' teams
Lehr, T., Lorenz, U., Willert, M., & Rohrbeck, R. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.026 · Cited by 64
Introduction
McGrath, J. E. (1993) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496493243002 · Cited by 64
A multilevel model of minority opinion expression and team decision-making effectiveness.
Park, G., & DeShon, R. P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019939 · Cited by 66
The Impact of Experts on Information Sharing During Group Discussion
Franz, T. M., & Larson, J. R. (2002) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640203300401 · Cited by 63
Non-cooperative behavior management in group decision making by a conflict resolution process and its implementation for pharmaceutical supplier selection
Liao, H., Kuang, L., Liu, Y., & Tang, M. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.03.010 · Cited by 62
The Dynamics of Team Learning: Harmony and Rhythm in Teamwork Arrangements for Innovation
Harvey, J., Cromwell, J. R., Johnson, K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2023) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392231166635 · Cited by 77
The Language of Coalition Formation in Online Multiparty Negotiations
Huffaker, D. A., Swaab, R. I., & Diermeier, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x10387102 · Cited by 64
Differences are Different: Examining the Effects of Communication Media on the Impacts of Racial and Gender Diversity in Decision-Making Teams
Robert, L., Dennis, A. R., & Ahuja, M. K. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0773 · Cited by 62
Robot-Assisted Tower Construction—A Method to Study the Impact of a Robot’s Allocation Behavior on Interpersonal Dynamics and Collaboration in Groups
Jung, M. F., DiFranzo, D. J., Shen, S., Stoll, B., Claure, H., & Lawrence, A. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3394287 · Cited by 77
Squeezed in the middle: The middle status trade creativity for focus.
Duguid, M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0039569 · Cited by 53
Examining Social Influence in Information-Sharing Contexts
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2003) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496403251933 · Cited by 64
A Lifespan Perspective on Creativity and Innovation at Work
Rietzschel, E. F., Zacher, H., & Stroebe, W. (2016) · Work Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/waw005 · Cited by 63
Collective choice, collaboration, and communication
Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103211 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Collaborative problem solving: a study of MathOverflow
Tausczik, Y. R., Kittur, A., & Kraut, R. E. (2014) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531690 · Cited by 78
Knowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: a multiple case study in Turkey
Akgün, A. E., Keski̇n, H., Ayar, H., & Okunakol, Z. (2017) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-04-2016-0081 · Cited by 70
Can Online Juries Make Consistent, Repeatable Decisions?
Hu, X. E., Whiting, M. E., & Bernstein, M. S. (2021) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445433 · Cited by 62
The Influence of Time and Task Demonstrability on Decision-Making in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Groups
Campbell, J., & Stasser, G. L. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406288976 · Cited by 59
Self-citation

Authors: Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
Affiliations: Miami University (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1985-06
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 1467-1478
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
OpenAlex: W2153691814
Cited by: 1,850
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
FWCI: 14.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks