Cited by 1,850Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Stasser, Garold, Titus, William·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Psychology of Group Influence
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Progress in social psychology
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation

Show all 16 references

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,000

Analytical Democratic Theory: A Microfoundational Approach
Farrell, H. J., Mercier, H., & Schwartzberg, M. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000715 · Cited by 32
Analyzing Collaborative Interactions Across Domains and Settings: An Adaptable Rating Scheme
Rummel, N., Deiglmayr, A., Spada, H., Kahrimanis, G., & Avouris, N. M. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7710-6_17 · Cited by 32
A Self‐regulation Perspective on Hidden‐profile Problems: If–Then Planning to Review Information Improves Group Decisions
Thürmer, J. L., Wieber, F., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1832 · Cited by 33
Thinking inside the box: How conformity promotes creativity and innovation
Kaplan, S. A., Brooks-Shesler, L., King, E. B., & Zaccaro, S. (2009) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2009)0000012012 · Cited by 34
Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Related to Customer Complaints About Service Experiences
Susskind, A. M. (2000) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365000027003004 · Cited by 32
It's the Thought that Counts: The Mediating Effects of Information Processing in Virtual Team Decision Making
McNamara, K., Dennis, A. R., & Carte, T. A. (2008) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530701777123 · Cited by 31
Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making
Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.011 · Cited by 31
An Interactive Input–Process–Output Model of Social Influence in Decision-Making Groups
Pavitt, C. (2014) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414548353 · Cited by 36
Social Comparison and Information Transmission in the Work Context
Fischer, P., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., & Peus, C. V. (2009) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00428.x · Cited by 31
Effect of Cohesion on the Curvilinear Relationship Between Team Efficacy and Performance
Park, W.-W., Kim, M. S., & Gully, S. M. (2017) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496417709933 · Cited by 36
Barriers, Biases and Opportunities of Communication and Cooperation with Computers: Introduction and Overview
Bromme, R., Hesse, F. W., & Spada, H. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-24319-4_1 · Cited by 31
The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Kirschner, P. A., Kirschner, F., & Janssen, J. J. H. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.027 · Cited by 33
An Information-Processing Approach to Participation in Small Groups
Bonito, J. A. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028003002 · Cited by 31
Competitive positioning strategies mirroring sellers’ and buyers’ perceptions?
de Chernatony, L., Daniels, K., & Johnson, G. (1994) · Journal of Strategic Marketing · doi:10.1080/09652549400000012 · Cited by 31
Holding Shared Versus Unshared Information: Its Impact on Perceived Member Influence in Decision-Making Groups
Larson, J. R., Sargis, E. G., Elstein, A. S., & Schwartz, A. (2002) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2402_6 · Cited by 31
Small-Group Communication
Frey, L. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0037 · Cited by 33
The psychological costs of knowledge specialization in groups: Unique expertise leaves you out of the loop
Jones, E. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.02.002 · Cited by 30
The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Enhances Information Sharing and Group Decision Making Quality
de Wilde, T. R. W., Velden, F. S. T., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40622 · Cited by 32
CrowdIA
Li, T., Luther, K., & North, C. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274374 · Cited by 30
Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee
Duitsman, M. E., Fluit, C. R. M. G., van der Velden, J. A. E. M., de Visser, M., ten Kate-Booij, M., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C., & Graaf, J. D. (2019) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-018-0490-1 · Cited by 31
Are Cyber Attackers Thinking Fast and Slow? Exploratory Analysis Reveals Evidence of Decision-Making Biases in Red Teamers
Gutzwiller, R. S., Ferguson-Walter, K. J., & Fugate, S. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181319631096 · Cited by 34
Variance in Group Ability to Transform Resources into Performance, and the Role of Coordinated Attention
Mayo, A. T., & Woolley, A. W. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0231 · Cited by 32
Cooperation Versus Competition Effects on Information Sharing and Use in Group Decision‐Making
Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12191 · Cited by 30
Systemic design for improving team learning climate and capability: A case study
Yang, J., & Chen, C.-Y. (2005) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783360500077658 · Cited by 29
Dispersed knowledge work – implications for knowledge intensive firms
Assudani, R. H. (2009) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/13673270910997169 · Cited by 33
Role of social loafing in predeliberation decision making.
Henningsen, D. D., Cruz, M. G., & Miller, M. L. (2000) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.4.2.168 · Cited by 30
Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence
Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., Taylor, N. J., & Polito, A. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1997.665464 · Cited by 30
Perspective—A New Look at Conflict Management in Work Groups
Carton, A. M., & Tewfik, B. A. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1085 · Cited by 33
Self-Enhancing Transmission Bias and Active InvestingPreprint
Hirshleifer, D. A. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1571326 · Cited by 30
MeetScript: Designing Transcript-based Interactions to Support Active Participation in Group Video Meetings
Chen, X., Li, S., Liu, S., Fowler, R., & Wang, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610196 · Cited by 29
Effective Team Reflection: The Role of Quality and Quantity
Otte, K., Konradt, U., & Oldeweme, M. (2018) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496418804898 · Cited by 32
Open-mindedness in diverse team performance: investigating a three-way interaction
Mitchell, R. J., Parker, V., & Giles, M. (2012) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.654807 · Cited by 29
Complexity of health care needs and interactions in multidisciplinary medical teams
Molleman, E., Broekhuis, M., Stoffels, R., & Jaspers, F. C. A. (2009) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x478467 · Cited by 29
Complex Problem Solving after Unstructured Discussion: Effects of Information Distribution and Experience
Meyer, B. M., & Schöll, W. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209105045 · Cited by 30
Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making
Toma, C., Vasiljevic, D., Oberlé, D., & Butera, F. (2012) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x · Cited by 29
Achieving Understanding in Face-to-Face and Video-Mediated Multiparty Interactions
Anderson, A. H. (2006) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4103_2 · Cited by 29
Member Awareness of Expertise, Information Sharing, Information Weighting, and Group Decision Making
Baumann, M. R., & Bonner, B. L. (2013) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496413494415 · Cited by 29
Member Status and Information Exchange in Decision-Making Groups
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2005) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(05)07007-6 · Cited by 29
Does communication matter in social influence during small group discussion? Five positions
Pavitt, C. (1993) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510979309368396 · Cited by 29
Groupthink and uncertainty orientation: Personality differences in reactivity to the group situation.
Hodson, G., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1997) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.1.2.144 · Cited by 29
Offering a prognosis in lung cancer: when is a team of experts an expert team?
Kee, F., Owen, T., & Leathem, R. (2007) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2005.044917 · Cited by 29
Information Utilization in Small Group Decision Making
Propp, K. M. (1997) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496497283006 · Cited by 29
Why It's OK to Speak Your Mind
Joshi, H. (2021) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 28
When Accuracy Isn’t Everything
Harvey, S. (2015) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601114561786 · Cited by 24
Elaborating on Team-Member Disagreement: Examining Patterned Dispersion in Team-Level Constructs
Loignon, A. C., Woehr, D. J., Loughry, M. L., & Ohland, M. (2018) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601118776750 · Cited by 32
Influence of need for cognition and psychological safety climate on information elaboration and team creativity
Huang, C.-Y., & Liu, Y. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2021.1932815 · Cited by 34
Sustainable Communication as an Inter- and Transdisciplinary Discipline
Godemann, J. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1697-1_4 · Cited by 30
Attributions in Virtual Groups
Bazarova, N. N., & Walther, J. B. (2008) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496408328490 · Cited by 28
Redundant Heterogeneity and Group Performance
Smith, E. B., & Hou, Y. H. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0932 · Cited by 30
Voice Climate, TMX, and Task Interdependence: A Team-Level Study
Duan, J., Xu, Y. Q., & Frazier, M. L. (2018) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496418805855 · Cited by 30
Bridging the Gap Between Media Synchronicity and Task Performance
Münzer, S., & Holmer, T. (2008) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650208326464 · Cited by 27
Reducing Bias through Board Decision-Making: An Information-Processing Model of Board Decision Synergy
Krause, R. A., Withers, M. C., & Waller, M. J. (2024) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2022.0271 · Cited by 27
“A debriefer must be neutral” and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing
Seelandt, J., Walker, K., & Kolbe, M. (2021) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-021-00161-5 · Cited by 34
Socially Situated Transmission: The Bias to Transmit Negative Information is Moderated by the Social Context
Fay, N., Walker, B., Kashima, Y., & Perfors, A. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13033 · Cited by 27
How to get better at flatter designs: considerations for shaping and leading organizations with less hierarchy
Reitzig, M. G. (2022) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1007/s41469-022-00109-7 · Cited by 40
Experiential Learning in an Undergraduate Course in Group Communication and Decision Making
McLeod, P. L. (2013) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496413488217 · Cited by 27
Overcoming Collaborative Inhibition through Error Correction: A Classroom Experiment
Gadgil, S., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1843 · Cited by 23
Do You Want to Convince Me or to Be Understood?
Faber, N. S., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212458707 · Cited by 27
Effects of inter-group status on the pursuit of intra-group status
Chang, J. W., Chow, R. M., & Woolley, A. W. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.12.001 · Cited by 27
Supporting Cooperative Dialogue in Heterogeneous Groups in Elementary Education
van Dijk, A. M., Eysink, T. H. S., & de Jong, T. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419879978 · Cited by 27
Facilitating Group Decision-Making: Facilitator's Subjective Theories on Group Coordination
Kolbe, M., & Boos, M. (2009) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-10.1.1244 · Cited by 27
Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis
Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199607)26:4 · Cited by 1,134
Task Adaptive Behavior and Performance in Groups
Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., Nägele, C., & Gurtner, A. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003004003 · Cited by 28
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Thing to Do When Sharing Information: Revealing, Concealing and Lying Depend on Social Motivation, Distribution and Importance of InformationPreprint
Steinel, W., Koning, L. F., & Utz, S. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1615040 · Cited by 27
Pseudocontingencies—A key paradigm for understanding adaptive cognition
Fiedler, K. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199216093.003.0008 · Cited by 26
Does talking matter? A quasi-experiment assessing the impact of deliberation and information on opinion change
O’Malley, E., Farrell, D. M., & Suiter, J. (2019) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512118824459 · Cited by 26
Combinatorial multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A decision analysis and consensus-building approach for cooperative groups
Goers, J., & Horton, G. (2022) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2022.12.002 · Cited by 26
Colloquy: Do Interacting Groups Perform Better Than Aggregates of Individuals?.
Pavitt, C. (2003) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00857.x · Cited by 26
Putting the cart before the horse: The benefits of arbitrating before mediating.
Conlon, D. E., Moon, H. K., & Ng, K. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.5.978 · Cited by 26
Building sense out of situational complexity
Guarana, C. L. O., & Hernandez, M. (2014) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614543345 · Cited by 31
Participatory assessment: tools for empowering, learning and legitimating?
Hisschemoller, M., & Cuppen, E. H. W. J. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781783477043.00013 · Cited by 28
Evidence-Based Principles and Strategies for Optimizing Team Functioning and Performance in Science Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_21 · Cited by 29
Interdisciplinarity and Team Innovation: The Role of Team Experiential and Relational Resources
Vestal, A., & Mesmer‐Magnus, J. (2020) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496420928405 · Cited by 33
Taking the easy way out: Preference diversity, decision strategies, and decision refusal in groups.
Nijstad, B. A., & Kaps, S. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.860 · Cited by 26
Computer-mediated and face-to-face groups: who makes riskier decisions?
Valacich, J. S., Sarker, S., Pratt, J., & Groomer, M. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.993870 · Cited by 26
Hidden profiles and the consensualization of social stereotypes: how information distribution affects stereotype content and sharedness
Klein, O., Jacobs, A., Gemoets, S., Licata, L., & Lambert, S. M. (2003) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.168 · Cited by 26
An Experimental Investigation of the Positive and Negative Effects of Mutual Observation
Bloomfield, R. J., & Hales, J. (2009) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.331 · Cited by 26
An Information-Processing Model of Jury Decision Making
Boster, F. J., Hunter, J. E., & Hale, J. L. (1991) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365091018004004 · Cited by 26
Differential Access to Information and Anticipated Group Interaction: Impact on Individual Reasoning.
Augustinova, M., Oberlé, D., & Stasser, G. L. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.619 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
An Analysis of the Group Dynamics Surrounding Internal Control Assessment in Information Systems Audit and Assurance Domains
O’Donnell, E., Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (2000) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/jis.2000.14.s-1.97 · Cited by 26
Stories in Action.
Walsh, J., Vaida, N., Coman, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2022) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/15291006231161337 · Cited by 26
“This bias could be due to people’s preference to discuss shared information, relative to unshared information (Stasser & Titus, 1985).”
Background
Methods of Small Group Research
Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481.013 · Cited by 25
Organizational Experience and Performance: A Systematic Review and Contingency Framework
MAULA, M. V. J., Heimeriks, K. H., & Keil, T. J. (2022) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2021.0073 · Cited by 37
Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context
Yildiz, H. E., Murtic, A., & Zander, U. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123039 · Cited by 33
Promoting good decisions: How regulatory focus affects group information processing and decision-making
Burtscher, M. J., & Meyer, B. M. (2014) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430214522138 · Cited by 25
Collaborative problem-solving with distributed information: The role of inferences from interdependent information
Deiglmayr, A., & Spada, H. (2010) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209342259 · Cited by 25
The effects of ethical climate on group and individual level deception in negotiation
Stawiski, S. A., Tindale, R. S., & Dykema‐Engblade, A. (2009) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/10444060910974894 · Cited by 27
Perspectives: Examining Communication as Macrocognition in STS
Keyton, J., & Beck, S. J. (2010) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720810371338 · Cited by 25
Information reliability and team reflection as contingencies of the relationship between information elaboration and team decision quality
Breugst, N., Preller, R., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2298 · Cited by 28
Argumentation and Emotional Processes in Group Decision-Making: Illustration of a Multilevel Interaction Process Analysis Approach
Beck, D., & Fisch, R. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002005 · Cited by 26
Collective Action Control by Goals and Plans: Applying a Self-Regulation Perspective to Group Performance
Wieber, F., Thürmer, J. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2012) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.3.0275 · Cited by 25
Surrogate Decision Making: Do We Have to Trade Off Accuracy and Procedural Satisfaction?
Frey, R., Hertwig, R., & Herzog, S. M. (2014) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12471729 · Cited by 24
The Epistemic Significance of Social Pressure
Joshi, H. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2022.39 · Cited by 24
Toward an understanding of collective intellectual humility
Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., Pärnamets, P., Bland, S., Astola, M., Cichocka, A. K., de Ridder, J., Mercier, H., Meyer, M., O’Connor, C., Porter, T., et al. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.006 · Cited by 27
The Role of Coordination in Preventing Harm in Healthcare Groups: Research Examples from Anaesthesia and an Integrated Model of Coordination for Action Teams in Health Care
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Manser, T., Künzle, B., & Grote, G. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15355-6_5 · Cited by 24
Risk of Avalanche Involvement in Winter Backcountry Recreation: The Advantage of Small Groups
Zweifel, B., Procter, E., Techel, F., Strapazzon, G., & Boutellier, R. (2016) · Wilderness and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2015.12.001 · Cited by 24
An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure? Two experiments on in-process interventions in decision-making groups
Fisher, C. M. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.004 · Cited by 24
Can agents sensitive to cultural, organizational and environmental issues avoid herding?
Blasco, N., Corredor, P., & Ferreruela, S. (2017) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2017.01.006 · Cited by 24
DenseNet with Up-Sampling block for recognizing texts in images
Tang, Z., Jiang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, M., Zhang, L., & Wang, M. (2019) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-019-04285-8 · Cited by 26
Does task-related conflict mediate the board gender diversity–organizational performance relationship?
van den Oever, K., & Beerens, B. (2020) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.008 · Cited by 27

Authors: Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
Affiliations: Miami University (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1985-06
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 1467-1478
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
OpenAlex: W2153691814
Cited by: 1,850
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
FWCI: 14.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks