The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion
Abstract
Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This bias could be due to people’s preference to discuss shared information, relative to unshared information (Stasser & Titus, 1985).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Stasser & Titus, 1985
Citations
Cites
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Training for fostering knowledge co-construction from collaborative inference-drawing
Deiglmayr, A., & Spada, H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.004 · Cited by 24
A Local Model of Information Sharing in Small Groups
Bonito, J. A. (2007) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00295.x · Cited by 24
Categorization by groups and individuals
Hamilton, R. W., Puntoni, S., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.01.002 · Cited by 24
Shared knowledge and subgroup influence during decision‐making discussions
Larson, J. R., Sargis, E. G., & Bauman, C. W. (2004) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.462 · Cited by 24
Developing a serious game to evaluate and train group decision making skills
Linehan, C., Lawson, S. W., Doughty, M., & Kirman, B. J. (2009) · International Academic Mindtrek Conference (Mindtrek) · doi:10.1145/1621841.1621861 · Cited by 28
Keck, S., & Tang, W. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3688 · Cited by 22
Collaborative everyday problem solving among same-gender friends in early and later adulthood.
Strough, J., McFall, J. P., Flinn, J. A., & Schuller, K. L. (2008) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0012830 · Cited by 23
Understanding coordination in computer-mediated versus face-to-face groups
Stone, N. J., & Posey, M. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.014 · Cited by 23
Strub, T., & McKimmie, B. M. (2015) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2015.1080151 · Cited by 23
Empowering Physics Students’ Performance in a Group Discussion Through two Types of Peer Assessment
Handayani, R. D., Genisa, M. U., & Triyanto, T. (2018) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.29333/iji.2019.12142a · Cited by 24
Diversity and Group Creativity
Paulus, P. B., van der Zee, K. I., & Kenworthy, J. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190648077.013.3 · Cited by 23
Developing complex group products: Idea combination in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups
Cummings, A., Schlosser, A. E., & Arrow, H. (1996) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/bf00749748 · Cited by 23
Kreamer, L. M., Rogelberg, S. G., Tankelevitch, L., & Rintel, S. (2024) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104015 · Cited by 25
Functional product development: what information should be shared during the development process?
Lindström, J., Löfstrand, M., Karlberg, M., & Karlsson, L. (2012) · International Journal of Product Development · doi:10.1504/ijpd.2012.049059 · Cited by 22
The Influence of Unique Information in Briefs on Supreme Court Opinion Content
Hazelton, M. L. W., Hinkle, R. K., & Spriggs, J. F. (2019) · Justice System Journal · doi:10.1080/0098261x.2019.1613202 · Cited by 22
Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process
Marcoci, A., Vercammen, A., Bush, M., Hamilton, D. G., Hanea, A. M., Hemming, V., Wintle, B. C., Burgman, M. A., & Fidler, F. M. (2022) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-022-06016-0 · Cited by 24
Collective Intelligence in Human-AI Teams: A Bayesian Theory of Mind Approach
Westby, S., & Riedl, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25755 · Cited by 33
Education for collective intelligence
Hogan, M., Barton, A., Twiner, A., James, C. C., Ahmed, F., Casebourne, I., Steed, I., Hamilton, P., Shi, S., Zhao, Y., et al. (2023) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2023.2250309 · Cited by 33
Suspending Group Debate and Developing Concepts
Stam, D. A., de Vet, A. J., Barkema, H. G., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12063 · Cited by 22
Grading Hampers Cooperative Information Sharing in Group Problem Solving
Hayek, A.-S., Toma, C., Oberlé, D., & Butera, F. (2015) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000232 · Cited by 22
Mindful communication: A novel approach to improving delegation and increasing patient safety
Anthony, M. K., & Vidal, K. (2010) · The online journal of issues in nursing · doi:10.3912/ojin.vol15no02mano2 · Cited by 22
The Evolutionary Rationality of Social Learning
McElreath, R. L., Wallin, A., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0014 · Cited by 23
The effects of team strategic orientation on team process and information search
Woolley, A. W., Bear, J. B., Chang, J. W., & DeCostanza, A. H. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.06.002 · Cited by 22
Instructional Support for Collaboration in Desktop Videoconference Settings
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-24319-4_4 · Cited by 23
Mitigating the Common Information Sampling Bias Inherent in Small-Group Discussion (Retracted)
Hunton, J. E. (2001) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.171 · Cited by 22
RetractedAnother View of Group Polarizing: The “Reasons for” One-Sided Oral Argumentation
Pavitt, C. (1994) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365094021005004 · Cited by 22
Observation and Analysis of Group Interaction Over Time: some Methodological and Strategic Choicess
McGrath, J. E., & Altermatt, T. W. (2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch22 · Cited by 22
Preparing the Self for Team Entry: How Relational Affirmation Improves Team PerformancePreprint
Lee, J. J., & Gino, F. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2753160 · Cited by 26
Computer‐mediated communication: synchronicity and compensatory effort
Münzer, S., & Borg, A. (2008) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1387 · Cited by 21
Review article: A scoping review of human factors in avalanche decision-making
Hetland, A., Hetland, R. A., Skille, T. T., & Mannberg, A. (2025) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-25-929-2025 · Cited by 36
Zercher, D., Jussupow, E., Benke, I., & Heinzl, A. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2898 · Cited by 39
Effects of rationale awareness in online ideation crowdsourcing tasks
Xiao, L. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23079 · Cited by 21
Analyzing the flow of knowledge in computer mediated teams
Introne, J. E., & Drescher, M. A. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441816 · Cited by 22
Pooling decisions decreases variation in response bias and accuracy
Kurvers, R. H. J. M., Herzog, S. M., Hertwig, R., Krause, J., & Wolf, M. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102740 · Cited by 23
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10400.001.0001 · Cited by 22
The Integrative Team Knowledge Building Training Strategy in Distributed Problem-Solving Teams
Rentsch, J. R., Delise, L. A., Mello, A. L., & Staniewicz, M. J. (2014) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414537690 · Cited by 21
The cognitive complexity of groups. A critical look at team cognition research
Curșeu, P. L. (2005) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 21
For the Win: Risk‐Sensitive Decision‐Making in Teams
Gonzales, J., Mishra, S., & Camp, R. D. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1965 · Cited by 25
Cordes, S. C. (2016) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2016.08.037 · Cited by 22
Optimal sharedness of mental models for effective group performance
Boos, M. (2007) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880601170776 · Cited by 21
Murrell, A. J., Stewart, A. C., & Engel, B. T. (1993) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/002194369303000402 · Cited by 21
Deiglmayr, A., & Spada, H. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9119-6 · Cited by 21
Mennecke, B. E., Hoffer, J. A., & Valacich, J. S. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1995.375734 · Cited by 21
Effects of an Approaching Group Discussion on Product Responses
Schlosser, A. E., & Shavitt, S. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0804_02 · Cited by 21
Computer-mediated idea generation: the effects of group size and group heterogeneity
Valacich, J. S., Mennecke, B. E., Wachter, R. M., & Wheeler, B. C. (2002) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1993.284177 · Cited by 21
Wellens, A. R. (1989) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/62.35664 · Cited by 21
Yu, S., & Greer, L. L. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1560 · Cited by 24
Suitability of Software Architecture Decision Making Methods for Group Decisions
Smrithi Rekha, V., & Muccini, H. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_2 · Cited by 21
The Impact of Team Characteristics on the Course and Outcome of Intergroup Price Negotiations
Backhaus, K., van Doorn, J., & Wilken, R. (2008) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/15470620802325773 · Cited by 20
A Model and Exploratory Field Study on Team Creativity
de Vreede, T., Boughzala, I., de Vreede, G., & Reiter‐Palmon, R. (2012) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.66 · Cited by 20
Clinical judgement in violence risk assessment
Murray, J., & Thomson, M. E. (2010) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v6i1.175 · Cited by 20
Larson, J. R., & Harmon, V. M. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207078692 · Cited by 20
Minority Influence in Virtual Groups
Bazarova, N. N., Walther, J. B., & McLeod, P. L. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211399752 · Cited by 20
Social influence protects collective decision making from equality bias.
Hertz, U., Romand-Monnier, M., Kyriakopoulou, K., & Bahrami, B. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000145 · Cited by 23
Untapped potential of collective intelligence in conservation and environmental decision making
Vercammen, A., & Burgman, M. A. (2019) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13335 · Cited by 21
The Value of Task Conflict to Group Decisions
Boyle, P. J., Hanlon, D., & Russo, J. E. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.725 · Cited by 20
TIME PRESSURE AND TEAM PERFORMANCE: AN ATTENTIONAL FOCUS INTEGRATION
Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (2004) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(03)06009-2 · Cited by 20
Stimulating thinking in group decision making
Hilmer, K. M., & Dennis, A. R. (2005) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2000.926612 · Cited by 20
Shim, S.-H., Livingston, R. W., Phillips, K. W., & Lam, S. S. K. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.1507 · Cited by 19
Chan, T. M., Oswald, A., Hauer, K. E., Caretta‐Weyer, H. A., Nousiainen, M. T., Cheung, W. J., & Collaborators, O. B. O. T. I. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1925101 · Cited by 22
A Multilevel Study of Group Affective Tone and Team Innovation: A Moderated Mediation Model
Huang, L., Liu, Y., Cheung, G. W., & Sun, J. (2021) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011211029411 · Cited by 23
Trust-Your-Doctor: A Simple Heuristic in Need of a Proper Social Environment
Wegwarth, O., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0003 · Cited by 20
Instant Messenger-Facilitated Knowledge Sharing and Team Performance
Ou, C. X., Davison, R. M., & Leung, D. (2014) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE CONTENT DEVELOPMENT & TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.5865/ijkct.2014.4.2.005 · Cited by 19
The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition
Meade, M. L., & Gigone, D. (2011) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2011.583928 · Cited by 19
Assessing group-level participation in fluid teams: Testing a new metric
Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0070-3 · Cited by 20
Lower‐Status Participation and Influence:Task Structure Matters
Alexander, M. G., Chizhik, A. W., Chizhik, E. W., & Goodman, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01604.x · Cited by 19
Continuous decisions by a committee: Median versus average mechanisms
Rosar, F. (2015) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2015.05.010 · Cited by 19
Hoozée, S., & Ngo, Q. (2017) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2017.1375417 · Cited by 21
Swol, L. M. V., Prahl, A., & Kolb, M. R. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1610022 · Cited by 19
Ludwig, J., Jaudas, A., & Achtziger, A. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2152 · Cited by 21
Simple Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Social Behavior
Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0001 · Cited by 20
Group judgment processes and outcomes in video-conferencing vs. face-to-face groups
Sniezek, J. A., & Credé, M. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2002.993904 · Cited by 19
Riggins, F. J., & Slaughter, K. T. (2006) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2006.479 · Cited by 19
Strauß, S., Tunnigkeit, I., Eberle, J., Avdullahu, A., & Rummel, N. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09430-7 · Cited by 23
Automating Discovery of Dominance in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication
Samuel, J., Holowczak, R. D., Benbunan‐Fich, R., & Levine, I. (2014) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.636 · Cited by 18
Meißner, P., Schubert, M., & Wulf, T. (2017) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.11.002 · Cited by 18
Angel investor network pitch meetings: The pull and push of peer opinion
Wood, M., Long, A., & Artz, K. (2020) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.008 · Cited by 14
Public Participation in Policy Making: Evidence from a Citizen Advisory Panel
Chan, Y. E., Krishnamurthy, R., Mann, J., & Sabherwal, R. (2022) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2022.2062398 · Cited by 27
Andrews‐Todd, J., Steinberg, J., Flor, M., & Forsyth, C. M. (2022) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence10030039 · Cited by 18
Beyond Fatiguing Virtual Meetings: How Should Virtual Meetings for Workplaces Be Supported?
Lim, C. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2231279 · Cited by 22
Group Cognition: Collective Information Search and Distribution
Levine, J. M., & Smith, E. R. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199730018.013.0030 · Cited by 18
Getting Down to Business: Using Speedstorming to Initiate Creative Cross‐Disciplinary Collaboration
Joyce, C. K., Jennings, K. E., Hey, J. H. G., Grossman, J. C., & Kalil, T. A. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2009.00538.x · Cited by 18
The Impact of Group Model Building on Behavior
Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-53551-1_11 · Cited by 18
Information-Pooling Bias in Collaborative Security Incident Correlation Analysis
Rajivan, P., & Cooke, N. J. (2018) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720818769249 · Cited by 21
Klein, M., & Fülbier, R. U. (2018) · Accounting in Europe · doi:10.1080/17449480.2018.1501502 · Cited by 18
Super, J. F., Betts, T. K., Keller, H., & Humphreys, J. R. (2020) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878120943255 · Cited by 19
Diagnosing Collaboratively: A Theoretical Model and a Simulation-Based Learning Environment
Radkowitsch, A., Sailer, M., Fischer, M. R., Schmidmaier, R., & Fischer, F. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89147-3_10 · Cited by 18
Sometimes One is More Than Two: When Collaboration Inhibits Knowledge Construction
Toomela, A. (2007) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9015-x · Cited by 18
Effectiveness of group model building in discovering hidden profiles in strategic decision-making
McCardle-Keurentjes, M. H. F., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., & Vennix, J. A. M. (2008) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 18
Swol, L. M. V., & Seinfeld, E. (2006) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00008.x · Cited by 18
Case study of a structural model to explore the effects of knowledge sharing on intellectual capital
Akhavan, P., & Khosravian, F. (2016) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-07-2015-0040 · Cited by 18
Cognitive processes in interdisciplinary groups: Problems and possibilities
O’Donnell, A. M., DuRussel, L. A., & Derry, S. J. (1997) · Cited by 18
Sharing your view: A distributed user interface approach for reviewing emergency plans
Díez, D., Tena, S., Romero-Gómez, R., Dı́az, P., & Aedo, I. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.04.008 · Cited by 18
The Process of Information Sharing in Small Groups: Application of a Local Model
Bonito, J. A., DeCamp, M. H., & Ruppel, E. K. (2008) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750802082078 · Cited by 18
Buying group choice: The effect of individual group member's prior decision frame
Stoddard, J. E., & Fern, E. F. (2001) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.1002 · Cited by 19
The Role of Design Team Interaction Structure on Individual and Shared Mental Models
Wood, M. D., Chen, P., Fu, K. K., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_12 · Cited by 17
Kee, K., Nies, H. L. G. R., van Wieringen, M., & Beersma, B. (2023) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.7446 · Cited by 19
Kolbe, M., Strack, M., Stein, A., & Boos, M. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15355-6_11 · Cited by 17
Self-disclosure: Beneficial for cohesion in demographically diverse work groups?
Dumas, T. L., Rothbard, N. P., & Phillips, K. W. (2008) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(08)11007-6 · Cited by 18
An Experimental Comparison of 3D Virtual Environments and Text Chat as Collaboration Tools
Schmeil, A., Eppler, M. J., & Gubler, M. (2009) · Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1985-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1467-1478
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2153691814
- Cited by
- 1,850
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 14.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review