Cited by 1,850Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformanceDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Stasser, Garold, Titus, William·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Decision-making groups can potentially benefit from pooling members' information, particularly when members individually have partial and biased information but collectively can compose an unbiased characterization of the decision alternatives. The proposed biased sampling model of group discussion, however, suggests that group members often fail to effectively pool their information because discussion tends to be dominated by (a) information that members hold in common before discussion and (b) information that supports members' existent preferences. In a political caucus simulation, group members individually read candidate descriptions that contained partial information biased against the most favorable candidate and then discussed the candidates as a group. Even though groups could have produced unbiased composites of the candidates through discussion, they decided in favor of the candidate initially preferred by a plurality rather than the most favorable candidate. Group members' pre- and postdiscussion recall of candidate attributes indicated that discussion tended to perpetuate, not to correct, members' distorted pictures of the candidates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Untitled work
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Victims of Groupthink
Janis, I. L. (1972) · Cited by 2,382
Group process and productivity
Steiner, I. D. (1972) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,106
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
Psychology of Group Influence
Paulus, P. B. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 857
Progress in social psychology
Fishbein, M. (1980) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 760
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.
Davis, J. H. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0033951 · Cited by 685
Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 · Cited by 351
Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process
Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 335
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
Stasser, G. L., & Davis, J. H. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.6.523 · Cited by 156
Self-citation

Show all 16 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Exploring the influence of social media on employee work performance
Cao, X., Guo, X., Vogel, D., & Zhang, X. (2016) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-11-2014-0299 · Cited by 330
Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation
Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2004 · Cited by 304
Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information.
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.967 · Cited by 296
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Process
(2002) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1111/b.9781405106535.2002.x · Cited by 296
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
Mercier, H., & Landemore, H. E. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.x · Cited by 318
Socially Shared Cognition, Affect, and Behavior: A Review and Integration
Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_1 · Cited by 290
Teacher Competencies for the Implementation of Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: a Framework and Research Review
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9 · Cited by 306
Group learning
Wilson, J. M., Goodman, P. S., & Cronin, M. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585724 · Cited by 306
Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models
Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nägele, C. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.002 · Cited by 315
Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help?
Phillips, K., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. (2006) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430206067557 · Cited by 284
Friends Without Benefits: Understanding the Dark Sides of Workplace Friendship
Pillemer, J., & Rothbard, N. P. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0309 · Cited by 319
Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making
Sniezek, J. A. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90048-c · Cited by 282
Why People Gossip: An Empirical Analysis of Social Motives, Antecedents, and Consequences
Beersma, B., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00956.x · Cited by 289
8. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory
Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A. (2001) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(01)23009-3 · Cited by 288
Past, present, and potential future of team diversity research: From compositional diversity to emergent diversity
van Knippenberg, D., & Mell, J. N. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.007 · Cited by 298
A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams
Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00021-3 · Cited by 279
The viability of alternative call centre production models
Batt, R., & Moynihan, L. M. (2002) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2002.tb00075.x · Cited by 276
Making Transparency Transparent: The Evolution of Observation in Management Theory
Bernstein, E. S. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0076 · Cited by 299
CROSS-UNDERSTANDING: IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUP COGNITION AND PERFORMANCE.
HUBER, G. P., & Lewis, K. (2010) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.45577787 · Cited by 272
Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions.
Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322 · Cited by 268
Pattern Identification and Industry-Specialist Auditors
Hammersley, J. S. (2006) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.309 · Cited by 258
Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands
Cuppen, E. H. W. J., Breukers, S., Hisschemoller, M., & Bergsma, E. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.005 · Cited by 283
What makes a good team player? Personality and team effectiveness.
Driskell, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & O'Shea, P. G. (2006) · Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.10.4.249 · Cited by 260
Distribution of Knowledge, Group Network Structure, and Group Performance
Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.5.612.12052 · Cited by 364
Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context.
Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y., & Takezawa, M. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.296 · Cited by 257
Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups
Weisband, S. P. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90070-n · Cited by 250
Integrating Knowledge Activities for Team Innovation: Effects of Transformational Leadership
Jiang, Y., & Chen, C. C. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316628641 · Cited by 286
Information Suppression and Status Persistence in Group Decision Making The Effects of Communication Media
Hollingshead, A. B. (1996) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00392.x · Cited by 245
Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making.
Winquist, J. R., & Jr. Larson James, R. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.371 · Cited by 246
Twenty-Five Years of Hidden Profiles in Group Decision Making
Lu, L., Yu, Y., & McLeod, P. L. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311417243 · Cited by 265
Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds
Csaszar, F. A. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1969 · Cited by 243
Voodoo Correlations Are Everywhere—Not Only in Neuroscience
Fiedler, K. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611400237 · Cited by 248
Valuing Multiple Trajectories of Knowledge: A Critical Review and Agenda for Knowledge Management Research
Barley, W. C., Treem, J. W., & Kuhn, T. R. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0041 · Cited by 258
Design Considerations for Collaborative Visual Analytics
Heer, J., & Agrawala, M. (2007) · IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST) · doi:10.1109/vast.2007.4389011 · Cited by 240
The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion.
McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.706 · Cited by 241
By Whom and When Is Women’s Expertise Recognized? The Interactive Effects of Gender and Education in Science and Engineering Teams
Joshi, A. (2014) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839214528331 · Cited by 251
What Do Groups Learn from Their Worldliest Members? Direct and Indirect Influence in Dynamic Teams
Gruenfeld, D. H., Martorana, P. V., & Fan, E. T. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2886 · Cited by 233
A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002 · Cited by 234
A SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION OF COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING
Lu, S. C.-Y., ElMaraghy, W. H., Schuh, G., & Wilhelm, R. G. (2007) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.010 · Cited by 232
Ensuring patient safety through effective leadership behaviour: A literature review
Künzle, B., Kolbe, M., & Grote, G. (2009) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.06.004 · Cited by 229
Reality at Odds With Perceptions: Narcissistic Leaders and Group Performance
Nevicka, B., Ten Velden, F. S., De Hoogh, A. H. B., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417259 · Cited by 228
Team Reflexivity as an Antidote to Team Information-Processing Failures
Schippers, M. C., Edmondson, A. C., & West, M. A. (2014) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414553473 · Cited by 258
‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups
Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002002 · Cited by 225
Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together?
Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210701811862 · Cited by 226
Emotional and informational support from different sources and employee creativity
Madjar, N. Y. (2007) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317907x202464 · Cited by 231
The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team
Baba, M. L., Gluesing, J. C., Ratner, H. H., & Wagner, K. H. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.259 · Cited by 224
FUNCTIONAL BACKGROUND IDENTITY, DIVERSITY, AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE IN CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS.
Randel, A. E., & Jaussi, K. S. (2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/30040667 · Cited by 222
Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods
Cuppen, E. H. W. J. (2011) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9141-7 · Cited by 246
Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making
Dennis, A. R. (1996) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496496274003 · Cited by 220
Culture and socialization in work groups.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10096-011 · Cited by 218
A different perspective: The multiple effects of deep level diversity on group creativity
Harvey, S. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.004 · Cited by 239
When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams
Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. O. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004 · Cited by 225
Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis.
Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.5.627 · Cited by 219
Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation
Godemann, J. (2008) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620802469188 · Cited by 213
Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters
Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2007) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2007.01.008 · Cited by 213
So Right It's Wrong: Groupthink and the Ubiquitous Nature of Polarized Group Decision Making
Baron, R. S. (2005) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37004-3 · Cited by 212
Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change
Leonardi, P. M. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0284 · Cited by 222
Withholding the Ace: The Individual- and Unit-Level Performance Effects of Self-Reported and Perceived Knowledge Hoarding
Evans, J. M., Hendron, M. G., & Oldroyd, J. B. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0945 · Cited by 223
Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making
Stasser, G. L. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(88)90028-5 · Cited by 210
Self-citation
The dynamics of team cognition: A process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams.
Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., Kuljanin, G., Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Chao, G. T. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000136 · Cited by 210
Group Preference and Convergent Tendencies in Small Groups: A Content Analysis of Group Brainstorming Performance
Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1203_2 · Cited by 212
Let's Dance! Elastic Coordination in Creative Group Work: A Qualitative Study of Modern Dancers
Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0343 · Cited by 213
Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts.
Mueller, J., & Kamdar, D. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021574 · Cited by 215
Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research
Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.007 · Cited by 218
Collaborative Creativity—Group Creativity and Team Innovation
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., & Kohn, N. W. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374714-3.00014-8 · Cited by 218
The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions
Kray, L. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2003) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00534-4 · Cited by 200
Deliberating Groups versus Prediction Markets (or Hayek's Challenge to Habermas)
Sunstein, C. R. (2006) · Episteme · doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.3.192 · Cited by 200
Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict
de Wit, F., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. T. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.002 · Cited by 215
Integrating Diversity at Different Levels: Multilevel Human Capital, Social Capital, and Demographic Diversity and Their Implications for Team Effectiveness
Nielsen, S., & Hillman, A. J. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0396 · Cited by 197
The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision‐making groups: the effects of pre‐discussion dissent
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.74 · Cited by 192
When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups
Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Phillips, K. W. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204271186 · Cited by 202
Flowing Toward Correct Contributions During Group Problem Solving: A Statistical Discourse Analysis
Chiu, M. M. (2008) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400802224830 · Cited by 189
Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”
Stasser, G. L. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90049-d · Cited by 189
Self-citation
Group Decision Making: The Effects of Initial Preferences and Time Pressure
Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. J. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167299259002 · Cited by 189
Making better decisions in groups
Bang, D., & Frith, C. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170193 · Cited by 210
Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining.
Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Brodt, S. E. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.66 · Cited by 207
Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction.
Greer, L. L., & Kleef, G. A. V. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020373 · Cited by 190
Top management team faultlines and firm performance: Examining the CEO-TMT interface
Georgakakis, D., Greve, P., & Ruigrok, W. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.03.004 · Cited by 178
Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: towards a research agenda
Janssen, J. J. H. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5 · Cited by 218
Group Behavior and Performance
Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. R. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032 · Cited by 187
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 217
The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge
Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., & O’Neill, H. M. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1944 · Cited by 185
Not so above average after all: When people believe they are worse than average and its implications for theories of bias in social comparison
Moore, D. A. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.005 · Cited by 177
Leadership Style and the Discussion of Shared and Unshared Information in Decision-Making Groups
Larson, J. R., Foster‐Fishman, P. G., & Franz, T. M. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167298245004 · Cited by 177
Decision performance and diversity structure: Comparing faultlines in convergent, crosscut, and racially homogeneous groups
Sawyer, J. E., Houlette, M. A., & Yeagley, E. (2005) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.08.006 · Cited by 175
The impact of information on small group choice.
Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.132 · Cited by 176
Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs About the Moon Landings
Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Tran, U. S., Nader, I. W., Stieger, S., & Voracek, M. (2012) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2873 · Cited by 162
The emergence of team creative cognition: the role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution
Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2008) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.40 · Cited by 164
Expertise dissimilarity and creativity: The contingent roles of tacit and explicit knowledge sharing.
Huang, X., Hsieh, J. P.-A., & He, W. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036911 · Cited by 172
Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future.
McGrath, J. E. (1997) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.1.1.7 · Cited by 159
Editorial Overview—The Interplay Between Digital and Social Networks
Agarwal, R., Gupta, A. K., & Kraut, R. E. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0200 · Cited by 161
Bounded awareness: what you fail to see can hurt you
Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2007) · Mind & Society · doi:10.1007/s11299-006-0020-4 · Cited by 167
Social network analysis in the science of groups: Cross-sectional and longitudinal applications for studying intra- and intergroup behavior.
Wölfer, R., Faber, N. S., & Hewstone, M. (2015) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000021 · Cited by 164
Organizational Behavior: Group Structure, Process, and Effectiveness
Gist, M. E., Locke, E. A., & Taylor, M. S. (1987) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638701300204 · Cited by 156
Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on postnegotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance.
Beersma, B., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.358 · Cited by 155
The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information
Steinel, W., Utz, S., & Koning, L. F. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.07.001 · Cited by 154
The Catalyst Effect: The Impact of Transactive Memory System Structure on Team Performance
Mell, J. N., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0589 · Cited by 163
Hidden Profiles and Concealed Information: Strategic Information Sharing and Use in Group Decision Making
Toma, C., & Butera, F. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209333176 · Cited by 153
Information Sharing in Face-to-Face, Teleconferencing, and Electronic Chat Groups
Graetz, K. A., Boyle, E. S., Kimble, C. E., Thompson, P., & Garloch, J. L. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498296003 · Cited by 148
Group Processes in Organizational Contexts
McGrath, J. E., & Argote, L. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch25 · Cited by 149

Authors: Stasser, G., & Titus, W.
Affiliations: Miami University (US)
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1985-06
Volume: 48
Issue: 6
Pages: 1467-1478
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
OpenAlex: W2153691814
Cited by: 1,850
References: 16
Citations by year: 2026: 38 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 110
FWCI: 14.68
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords: group decision making, information pooling, group discussion, incomplete information, biased information, candidate evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks