Cited by 1,044Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Isenberg, Daniel J.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Handbook of Social Psychology
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910

Show all 62 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 1,000

Nomination Politics and Ideological Polarization: Assessing the Attitudinal Effects of Campaign Involvement
McCann, J. A. (1995) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2960273 · Cited by 61
Natural-Born Arguers: Teaching How to Make the Best of Our Reasoning Abilities
Mercier, H., Boudry, M., Fabio Paglieri, A., & Trouche, E. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207537 · Cited by 73
Psychology of Aid
Carr, S. C., MacLachlan, M., & McAuliffe, É. (2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203978948 · Cited by 63
A Review of Our Research on Group Polarization: Eleven Experiments on the Effects of Group Discussion on Risk Acceptance, Probability Estimation, and Negotiation Positions
Lamm, H. (1988) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1988.62.3.807 · Cited by 60
Collective Choice, Judgment, and Problem Solving
Stasser, G. L., & Dietz-Uhler, B. L. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch2 · Cited by 57
Sustaining Democracy
Talisse, R. B. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197556450.001.0001 · Cited by 64
Polarization is the psychological foundation of collective engagement
Smith, L. G. E., Thomas, E. F., Bliuc, A., & McGarty, C. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00089-2 · Cited by 76
Technology, culture and persuasiveness: a study of choice-shifts in group settings
El‐Shinnawy, M., & Vinzé, A. (1997) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1997.0138 · Cited by 58
Segmenting the Electorate: The Effects of Exposure to Political Extremism Online
Warner, B. R. (2010) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2010.497069 · Cited by 58
Focus Groups as Sites of Influential Interaction: Building Communicative Self-Efficacy and Effecting Attitudinal Change in Discussing Controversial Topics
Zorn, T. E., Roper, J., Broadfoot, K. J., & Weaver, C. K. (2006) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880600573965 · Cited by 59
Computational modeling of organisational learning by self-modeling networks
Canbaloğlu, G., Jan Treur, A., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2021) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.12.003 · Cited by 57
Opinion Formation and the Collective Dynamics of Risk Perception
Moussaïd, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084592 · Cited by 62
Small‐Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00065.x · Cited by 57
Scientific Testimony
Gerken, M. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198857273.001.0001 · Cited by 60
Evaluation of co-creation perspective in networked collaboration platforms
Mačiulienė, M., & Skaržauskienė, A. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.038 · Cited by 61
Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review
Bliuc, A., Bouguettaya, A., & Felise, K. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215 · Cited by 70
The Catastrophic Link Between the Importance and Extremity of Political Attitudes
Liu, J. H.-F., & Latané, B. (1998) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1024828729174 · Cited by 55
The communication of social stereotypes: The effects of group discussion and information distribution on stereotypic appraisals.
Bräuer, M., Judd, C. M., & Jacquelin, V. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.463 · Cited by 56
First Impression Bias: Evidence from Analyst Forecasts
Hirshleifer, D. A., Lourie, B., RUCHTI, T. G., & Truong, P. (2020) · European Finance Review · doi:10.1093/rof/rfaa015 · Cited by 53
Group cooperation under uncertainty
Gong, M., Baron, J., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2009) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-009-9080-2 · Cited by 52
Why do faultlines matter? A computational model of how strong demographic faultlines undermine team cohesion
Flache, A., & Mäs, M. (2007) · Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory · doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.020 · Cited by 53
On Traditional A frican Consensual Rationality
Ani, E. I. (2013) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/jopp.12013 · Cited by 52
Reviewing versus doing
Zhu, H., Dow, S. P., Kraut, R. E., & Kittur, A. (2014) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531718 · Cited by 55
Nominal versus Interacting Electronic Fraud Brainstorming in Hierarchical Audit Teams
Chen, C. X., Trotman, K. T., & Zhou, F. H. (2014) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50855 · Cited by 52
When Deliberation Produces Persuasion rather than Polarization: Measuring and modeling Small Group Dynamics in a Field Experiment
Esterling, K., Fung, A., & Lee, T. (2019) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123419000243 · Cited by 51
The group matters: A review of processes and outcomes in intelligence analysis.
Straus, S. G., Parker, A. M., & Bruce, J. B. (2011) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0022734 · Cited by 51
Valid theory-testing meta-analyses further question the negative state relief model of helping.
Miller, N., & Carlson, M. E. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.215 · Cited by 50
The Group in Society
Gastil, J. (2010) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452274676 · Cited by 49
Individual and organizational consequences of CEO claimed handicapping: What’s good for the CEO may not be so good for the firm
Siegel, P. A., & Brockner, J. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.08.003 · Cited by 50
Overconfidence at work: Does overconfidence survive the checks and balances of organizational life?
Meikle, N. L., Tenney, E. R., & Moore, D. A. (2016) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.005 · Cited by 59
Choice shift and group polarization.
Friedkin, N. E. (1999) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657407 · Cited by 100
The Potential for Bias in Videotaped Confessions1
Lassiter, G. D., Slaw, R. D., BRIGGS, M. A., & Scanlan, C. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00980.x · Cited by 50
Invited Article: The Construct of Suspicion and How It Can Benefit Theories and Models in Organizational Science
Bobko, P., Barelka, A. J., Hirshfield, L., & Lyons, J. B. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9360-y · Cited by 51
Pernicious virtual communities: Identity, polarisation and the Web 2.0
Parsell, M. (2008) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-008-9153-y · Cited by 53
We Need to Talk
Levendusky, M. S., & Stecula, D. A. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009042192 · Cited by 56
Individual and Group Biases in Value and Uncertainty Judgments
Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2017) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_15 · Cited by 54
Behavioural frameworks to understand public perceptions of and risk response to carbon dioxide removal
Shrum, T., Markowitz, E. M., Buck, H. J., Gregory, R., van der Linden, S., Attari, S. Z., & Leaf Van Boven, A. (2020) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2020.0002 · Cited by 53
Testing the Reciprocal Effects of Campaign Participation
Claassen, R. L. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9052-2 · Cited by 48
Are we taxing ourselves?
Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. (2010) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.10.002 · Cited by 47
Consequences of media information uptake and deliberation: focus groups’ symbolic coping with synthetic biology
Kronberger, N., Holtz, P., & Wagner, W. (2011) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662511400331 · Cited by 48
Adolescent and adult risk-taking in virtual social contexts
Haddad, A. D. M., Harrison, F., Norman, T. L., & Lau, J. Y. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01476 · Cited by 54
Conformity, Anticonformity and Polarization of Opinions: Insights from a Mathematical Model of Opinion Dynamics
Krueger, T., Szwabiński, J., & Weron, T. (2017) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e19070371 · Cited by 48
The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques.
Lidén, M., Gräns, M., & Juslin, P. (2018) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000287 · Cited by 46
Examining Psychometrics and Polarization in a Single‐Risk Case Study
Trumbo, C. W. (1996) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996.tb01477.x · Cited by 46
Nietzsche Against the Philosophical CanonPreprint
Leiter, B. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2254398 · Cited by 46
Group Polarization and Repeated Attitude Expressions: A New Take on an Old Topic
Bräuer, M., & Judd, C. M. (1996) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779643000010 · Cited by 45
Observing others’ behavior and risk taking in decisions from experience
Yechiam, E., Druyan, M., & Ert, E. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000760 · Cited by 44
Social construction of scientifically grounded climate change discussions
Swim, J. K., Geiger, N., Sweetland, J., & Fraser, J. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813130-5.00004-7 · Cited by 45
Task Conflict, Problem-Solving, and Yielding: Effects on Cognition and Performance in Functionally Diverse Innovation Teams
Weingart, L. R., Todorova, G., & Cronin, M. A. (2010) · Negotiation and Conflict Management Research · doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2010.00063.x · Cited by 45
Social cohesion, groupthink and ethical behavior of public procurement officers
Ntayi, J. M., Byabashaija, W., Eyaa, S., Ngoma, M., & Muliira, A. (2010) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-10-01-2010-b003 · Cited by 45
Attitudes, Norms, and Social Groups
Cooper, J., Kelly, K. A., & Weaver, K. D. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch11 · Cited by 47
Foundations of Non-Bayesian Social LearningPreprint
Molavi, P., Tahbaz-Salehi, A., & Jadbabaie, A. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2683607 · Cited by 45
"Everything I Disagree With is #FakeNews": Correlating Political Polarization and Spread of MisinformationPreprint
Ribeiro, M. H., Calais, P., Almeida, V. A. F., & Meira, W. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.05924 · Cited by 89
Strategic thinking in public goods games with teams
Cox, C. A., & Stoddard, B. V. (2018) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.03.007 · Cited by 45
False beliefs and confabulation can lead to lasting changes in political attitudes.
Strandberg, T., Sivén, D., Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Pärnamets, P. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000489 · Cited by 48
The effects of interaction on consumers' attitudes in focus groups
Bristol, T., & Fern, E. F. (2003) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10080 · Cited by 44
The Social Identity Politics of Peer Networks
Parsons, B. M. (2014) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x14546856 · Cited by 44
The complex link between filter bubbles and opinion polarization
Keijzer, M. A., & Mäs, M. (2022) · Data Science · doi:10.3233/ds-220054 · Cited by 49
Social Comparison and Influence in Groups
Forsyth, D. R. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_5 · Cited by 43
Testing the Selective Exposure–Polarization Hypothesis in Israel Using Three Indicators of Ideological News Exposure and Testing for Mediating Mechanisms
Tsfati, Y., & Chotiner, A. (2016) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv001 · Cited by 26
Fuzzy Opinion Networks: A Mathematical Framework for the Evolution of Opinions and Their Uncertainties Across Social Networks
Wang, L.-X., & Mendel, J. M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2015.2486816 · Cited by 43
EFFECTS OF CONSUMER SOCIAL INTERACTION ON TRUST IN ONLINE GROUP-BUYING CONTEXTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN CHINA
Zhang, Z., & Gu, C. (2015) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 42
Hatred
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.001.0001 · Cited by 53
Toward a Reconciliation of Diverging Perspectives on Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity: The Role of Procedural Interdependence
Wildschut, T., Lodewijkx, H. F. M., & Insko, C. A. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1452 · Cited by 41
Group Polarization in a Model of Information Aggregation
Roux, N., & Sobel, J. (2015) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.20140252 · Cited by 41
When and How User Comments Affect News Readers’ Personal Opinion: Perceived Public Opinion and Perceived News Position as Mediators
Lee, E., Jang, Y. J., & Chung, M. (2020) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1837638 · Cited by 41
Higher-order risk preferences in social settings
Heinrich, T., & Mayrhofer, T. (2017) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-017-9541-4 · Cited by 44
The behaviour of corporate actors: How much can we learn from the experimental literature?
Engel, C. (2010) · Journal of Institutional Economics · doi:10.1017/s1744137410000135 · Cited by 40
Human factors in requirements engineering:
Viller, S., Bowers, J., & Rodden, T. A. (1999) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/s0953-5438(98)00049-6 · Cited by 41
Household preference revisions and decision making: The role of disconfirmation
Bohlmann, J. D., & Qualls, W. J. (2001) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(01)00043-x · Cited by 42
Truth tracking performance of social networks: how connectivity and clustering can make groups less competent
Hahn, U., Hansen, J. U., & Olsson, E. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01936-6 · Cited by 58
Understanding participation dilemmas in community mobilisation: can collective action theory help?
Gram, L., Daruwalla, N., & Osrin, D. (2018) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2018-211045 · Cited by 34
The relationships between innovation and human and psychological capital in organizations: A review
Sartori, R., Favretto, G., & Ceschi, A. (2013) · The innovation journal · Cited by 39
How Do Terrorist Cells Self-Assemble: Insights from an Agent-Based Model of RadicalizationPreprint
Genkin, M., & Gutfraind, A. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1031521 · Cited by 39
Management of poor performance: A comparison of manager, group member, and group disciplinary decisions.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Judge, T. A., Sparrowe, R. T., Kraimer, M. L., & Franz, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.835 · Cited by 38
Differentiating stranger murders: profiling offender characteristics from behavioral styles
Salfati, C. G., & Canter, D. V. (1999) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3 · Cited by 223
Group Polarization in Board Decisions About CEO Compensation
Zhu, D. H. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0848 · Cited by 38
Group Consensus, Action Immediacy, and Opinion Confidence
Orive, R. (1988) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167288143016 · Cited by 38
Epidemic spreading in multiplex networks influenced by opinion exchanges on vaccination
Alvarez-Zuzek, L. G., Rocca, C. E. L., Iglesias, J. R., & Braunstein, L. A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186492 · Cited by 36
The influence of persuasion in opinion formation and polarization
la Rocca, C. E., Braunstein, L. A., & Vázquez, F. (2014) · CONICET Digital (CONICET) · Cited by 37
How Cross-Cutting News Exposure Relates to Candidate Issue Stance Knowledge, Political Polarization, and Participation: The Moderating Role of Political Sophistication
Kim, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edy032 · Cited by 44
Overdoing Democracy
Talisse, R. B. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190924195.001.0001 · Cited by 250
Group learning and performance: the role of communication and faultlines
Vora, D. E., & Markoczy, L. A. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.616523 · Cited by 38
The influence of persuasion in opinion formation and polarization
Rocca, C. E. L., Braunstein, L. A., & Vázquez, F. (2014) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/106/40004 · Cited by 38
Majority Influence Process in Group Judgment: Test of the Social Judgment Scheme Model in a Group Polarization Context
Ohtsubo, Y., Masuchi, A., & Nakanishi, D. (2002) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430202005003005 · Cited by 37
Evidence in Practice: A Framing of the Terrain
Spillane, J. P., & Miele, D. B. (2007) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810710901303 · Cited by 36
Group decision, choice shift, and polarization in consulting, political, and local political scenarios: An experimental investigation and theoretical analysis
Crott, H. W., Szilvas, K., & Zuber, J. A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90040-z · Cited by 36
Combining Probability Forecasts: 60% and 60% Is 60%, but Likely and Likely Is Very Likely
Mislavsky, R., & Gaertig, C. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3902 · Cited by 35
Risk‐Taking Behavior: An Experimental Analysis of Individuals and Dyads
DECK, C. A., Lee, J., Reyes, J. A., & Rosen, C. (2012) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2010.026 · Cited by 35
The Influence of Group Discussion on Performance Judgments: Rating Accuracy, Contrast Effects, and Halo
Palmer, J. K., & Loveland, J. M. (2008) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.3200/jrlp.142.2.117-130 · Cited by 35
Reducing Controversy by Connecting Opposing Views
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2018/731 · Cited by 39
The contrasting effects of negative word of mouth in the post‐consumption stage
Chan, H., & Cui, S. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.11.005 · Cited by 35
Interaction in Small Groups
Burke, P. J. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-36921-x_15 · Cited by 35
Effects of Alcohol on Risk-Seeking Behavior: A Group-Level Analysis.
Sayette, M. A., Kirchner, T., Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Travis, T. (2004) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.18.2.190 · Cited by 35
Will the Personalization of Online Social Networks Foster Opinion Polarization?Preprint
Mäs, M., & Bischofberger, L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2553436 · Cited by 39
Impossible decision? An investigation of risk trade-offs in the intensive care unit
Reader, T. W., Reddy, G., & Brett, S. J. (2018) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2017.1301573 · Cited by 36
The effects of disagreement and unfriending on political polarization: a moderated-mediation model of cross-cutting discussion on affective polarization via unfriending contingent upon exposure to incivility
Lin, H., Wang, Y., Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (2023) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmad022 · Cited by 34
Perceptions of intragroup conflict: The effect of coping strategies on conflict transformation and escalation
Pluut, H., & Curșeu, P. L. (2012) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430212453633 · Cited by 36
Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence
Meyers, R. A. (1989) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637758909390254 · Cited by 34
Towards a perspective theory of decision making and judgment
Montgomery, H. (1994) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90049-3 · Cited by 34

Authors: Isenberg, D. J.
Affiliations: Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Isenberg, Daniel J.
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1986-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 6
Pages: 1141-1151
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
OpenAlex: W2042714524
Cited by: 1,044
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
FWCI: 23.40
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks