The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another class of models describe polarization by introducing repulsive interactions, in which users reject opinions that differ from their own [24-26], but this mechanism combined with homophily leads to a decrease of polarization [27, 28].”
From Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Group Decisions and Asymmetric Payoffs: Risky Tax Avoidance in the LaboratoryPreprint
Matthaei, E., & Kiesewetter, D. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3626982 · Cited by 1
Ideological Motives and Group Decision-MakingPreprint
Engl, F. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3738759 · Cited by 1
Intensified Ideological Online Clashes with Group Political BiasPreprint
Han, X., & Hu, M. M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3692571 · Cited by 1
Ideological Motives and Group Decision-MakingPreprint
Engl, F. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3744605 · Cited by 1
Internet Use and Political Polarization: A ReviewPreprint
Deri, S. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u3xyb · Cited by 2
Brasi, L. D. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_198-1 · Cited by 1
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.004 · Cited by 1
Computational Models of Social Influence and Collective BehaviorPreprint
MacCoun, R. J. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2673093 · Cited by 1
Morton, A. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat03853 · Cited by 1
The Effect of Reputation Concerns on the Conjunction Fallacy: A Field Experiment on FacebookPreprint
Devetag, G., & Calluso, C. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4326572 · Cited by 1
The Bystander Effect: Why Do Witnesses Refrain from Acting in Cyberbullying Cases?Preprint
You, L. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zrqp6 · Cited by 1
Esterling, K., Fung, A., & Lee, T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2301191 · Cited by 1
Political Homophily and the Role of Retweeters in the French Twitter Network
Gurchani, U. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a55e3860z6c58z4523zb78fz72fe84028fba · Cited by 2
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.006
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.003
Hermenêutica e desvios cognitivos
Freitas, J. (2014) · Revista de Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais · doi:10.18759/rdgf.v0i13.416
Avoiding Dysfunctional Behaviour in Building Highly Cohesive TeamsPreprint
Radhi, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2295325
Essays on group decision making under risk
Nieboer, J. (2013) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.007
Experiments on choice under uncertainty
Lahno, A. M. (2014) · Elektronische Hochschulschriften der LMU München (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) · doi:10.5282/edoc.17577
An Empirical Investigation of Chinese Online Consumer Ethics
Lu, D. M., & Ye, T. (2015) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2015.310022
Flynn, M. A. (2012) · ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University)
Hewstone, M. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60197-9
Eisele, P. (2006) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.103.1.165-176
Chen, C., Gustafson, D. H., & Lee, Y.-D. (2001) · Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers · doi:10.1080/10170660109509506
The Effect of Intragroup Communication on Preference Shifts in GroupsPreprint
Brady, M. P., & Wu, S. Y.-P. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.23668/psycharchives.9026
Essays on network dynamics and informational value of virtual communities
Chen, H.-W. (2008) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)
Two pilots may be safer than one: The effect of group discussion on perceived invulnerability.
Gilbey, A., & Lee, S. Y. (2011) · Massey Research Online (Massey University)
Comparison of Risky Decision Making Processes in Dyads and Individuals
Mukherjee, M. (2010) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Probleemid grupis otsustamisel (Eesti organisatsioonide näitel)
Varkki, E. (2004) · DSpace repository (University of Tartu)
Brady, M. P., Roe, B. E., & Wu, S. Y.-P. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.21056
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.005
Recommendations for the Internet Governance Forum
Malcolm, J. (2007)
Dottorato in Informatica, Sistemi e Telecomunicazioni
Bagnoli, F. (2013)
Rich Communication and Coordinated Resistance against Divide-and-Conquer: A Laboratory Investigation
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (2010)
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.002
Exploring the Origins of Prejudice with Agent-Based Modeling
Rooy, D. V. (2015) · Agent-based social systems · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55236-9_2
Bad Corporate Marriages: Waking Up in Bed the Morning AfterPreprint
Cai, Y., & Shefrin, H. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2372248
Smethurst, A. J., Wilson, C., & Collins, K. L. (2015) · Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University)
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139.001
Models of Groupthink: A Search for a Proper Perspective of the Groupthink Causal ChainPreprint
Munuswamy, S., & Venkataraman, A. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2297772
Modelle sozialer Beeinflussung
Mäs, M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-01164-2_34
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING IN COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS: EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION IN A NK LANDSCAPE
Bocanet, A., Iandoli, L., Ponsiglione, C., & GIUSEPPE, Z. (2012) · Congress of the International Association for Fuzzy-Set Management and Economy (SIGEF) · doi:10.1142/9789814415774_0026
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ™ Managing Editors:
Gavriletea, M. D. (2014)
Cognitive Styles in Two Cognitive Sciences
Myers, J. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Betydelsen av inre och yttre arbetsmotivation för mäklarstudenter och lärarstudenter
Bjerre, R., & Henziger, A. (2016)
Peer interaction influence on decision-making in ten-year-old children
Jošić, S. M., Budjevac, N., & Baucal, A. (2012) · Psiholoska istrazivanja · doi:10.5937/psistra1202185j
Hahn, D., Block, J., Keith, M. J., & Vinzé, A. (2010) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-723-2.ch003
Group Argument, Social Pressure, and the Making of Group Decisions
Boster, F. J. (1990) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.1990.11678759
The Nature of Collective Reactions to Potential Transgressions
Kim, P. H., & Harmon, D. J. (2012) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2012)0000015008
Promoting high-performance teamwork
Geller, E. S. (2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315273983-17
Partisan "New Media" and Opinion Change, 2002-2004
Jones, D. A. (2009) · American Review of Politics · doi:10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2009.30.0.1-16
Rogers, N. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/9005855
Mobile Communication Group Polarization: Effects of Communication Cues and Anonymity
서응교 (2016) · Journal of Distribution Science · doi:10.15722/jds.14.8.201608.101
Bewsell, D., Small, B., & Rijswijk, K. (2014) · 11th European IFSA Symposium, Farming Systems Facing Global Challenges: Capacities and Strategies, Proceedings, Berlin, Germany, 1-4 April 2014
Polarization and Dissatisfaction in Group Settings
El‐Shinnawy, M., & Vinzé, A. (2006) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2006.11645941
SOCIALINFLUENCES ONRISKATTITUDES:APPLICATIONS IN ECONOMICS *
Trautmann, S. T. (2011)
Holzhausen, K. G. (1993) · ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)
I samme båt eller på hvert sitt nes?
Thesen, G. (2017) · Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning · doi:10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2017-02-02
Acosta, N. D. (2017) · CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino)
Running Head; Self-Control Deindividuation Context
Ryu, J. (2012) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Examining How Perception of External Threat Influences the Popularity of Government Leaders
Bernard, M. L., & Naugle, A. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60747-4_13
Group versus individual risk choices in female workgroups in Ethiopia.
Bayissa, F. W., Smits, J. P. J. M., & Ruben, R. (2017) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000068
The Danger of Contempt in Universities and in Modern Society
Sternberg, R. J. (2017) · Journal of College and Character · doi:10.1080/2194587x.2017.1338578
Beslutsfattande - En studie om rekrytering med stereotypers inverkan
Heijkenskjöld, C., & Aspegren, A. (2013) · Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University)
Thematic Analysis of Experience and Learning Effects in Acquisitions
Galavotti, I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94980-2_6
박치성, Myung, S.-J., & 마크윌딩 (2013) · Korea Journal · doi:10.25024/kj.2013.53.4.107
Defaults, Normative Anchors and the Occurrence of Risky and Cautious ShiftsPreprint
Jagau, S., & Offerman, T. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3035400
Reducing Controversy by Connecting Opposing ViewsPreprint
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.00172
The effect of a text-based discussion on attitude changes: Bayesian ANOVA-based comparisons
Matsuki, Y. (2019) · THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY · doi:10.2130/jjesp.1822
Rambing, Y. C., Utami, I., & Kristianti, I. P. (2019) · Journal of Economics Business and Accountancy Ventura · doi:10.14414/jebav.v22i2.1204
Impact of independence on polarization of opinionsPreprint
Szwabiński, J., & Weron, T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.05036
Talisse, R. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190924195.003.0005
Talisse, R. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190924195.003.0003
Talisse, R. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190924195.003.0002
Talisse, R. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190924195.003.0007
The Political Saturation of Social Space
Talisse, R. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190924195.003.0004
The effect of groups on trust violation and recovery
Friedrich, M. P. A., Basso, K., Espartel, L. B., & Corte, V. F. D. (2019) · ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing · doi:10.5585/remark.v18i3.16364
Organizational Justice and Affective Commitment: A Multilevel Study
Ohana, M. (2012) · HAL
Effect of Relationship Closeness on Group-Induced Choice Shifts Among Chinese Students
Park, J., Kim, D., Cheng, C., & Lee, D. (2020) · Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies · doi:10.29333/ejecs/331
Decision-Making Modules for the RSS-POD Supply Management Game
Parker, A. M., Shelton, S. R., Dreyer, P. A., Nelson, C., Chan, E., Maletic, A. L., & Lewis, M. W. (2009)
Miller, C., & Poston, M. (2020)
Networked Deliberation across Political Difference
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0007
Mechanisms of Symbolic Support for Deliberation
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0003
Mechanisms of External Public Spectacle
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0006
Mechanisms of Internal Deliberation
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0004
Mechanisms of Deliberating Together
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0005
Message Repetition and Epistemic Overinclusion
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0009
Sensitive Issues and Pluralistic Ignorance
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0008
CITIZENS AND COLLECTIVE DELIBERATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE
Brasi, L. D. (2020) · Manuscrito · doi:10.1590/0100-6045.2020.v43n3.lb
Mechanisms of Deliberation in the Formal Political System
Tanasoca, A. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851479.003.0002
Behavioral Differences between Collective and Individual Players in the Public Goods Game
Sauermann, J., & Glassmann, U. (2008) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Metadata
- Authors
- Isenberg, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Isenberg, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1986-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1141-1151
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2042714524
- Cited by
- 1,044
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
- FWCI
- 23.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review