Cited by 1,044Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Isenberg, Daniel J.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Handbook of Social Psychology
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910

Show all 62 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings
Levy, N. L. (2017) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1477-x · Cited by 162
Groupthink Reconsidered
Whyte, G. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279001 · Cited by 149
A Social Values Analysis of Self–Other Differences in Decision Making Involving Risk
Stone, E. R., & Allgaier, L. (2008) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530802208832 · Cited by 142
Sociocognition in Work Groups
Gruenfeld, D. H., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496493243006 · Cited by 142
Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums
Zhu, D. H. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2039 · Cited by 141
Influence and Leadership
Hogg, M. A. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002031 · Cited by 138
Recent Progress of Polarization‐Sensitive Perovskite Photodetectors
Hou, H., Tian, S., Ge, H., Chen, J., Li, Y., & Tang, J. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202209324 · Cited by 135
Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes
Whyte, G. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2761 · Cited by 136
Does social media use really make people politically polarized? Direct and indirect effects of social media use on political polarization in South Korea
Lee, C., Shin, J., & Hong, A. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.005 · Cited by 131
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
In the Short Term We Divide, in the Long Term We Unite: Demographic Crisscrossing and the Effects of Faultlines on Subgroup Polarization
Mäs, M., Flache, A., Takács, K., & Jehn, K. A. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0767 · Cited by 127
Will a Five-Minute Discussion Change Your Mind? A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France
Pons, V. (2018) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20160524 · Cited by 124
Modelling opinion dynamics in the age of algorithmic personalisation
Perra, N., & Rocha, L. E. C. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-43830-2 · Cited by 139
Group Processes and Intergroup Relations
Hogg, M. A., & Gaffney, A. M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn414 · Cited by 139
Sequential Adoption Theory: A Theory for Understanding Herding Behavior in Early Adoption of Novel Technologies
Walden, E. A., & Browne, G. J. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00181 · Cited by 128
Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2015) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430215612217 · Cited by 138
Repairing trust with individuals vs. groups
Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.08.004 · Cited by 126
A Rhetorical Model of Institutional Decision Making: The Role of Rhetoric in the Formation and Change of Legitimacy Judgments
Hoefer, R. L., & Green, S. E. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0330 · Cited by 140
Media Effects, Selective Exposure, and Fahrenheit 9/11
Stroud, N. (2007) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600701641565 · Cited by 136
The Micro-Foundations of International Relations Theory: Psychology and Behavioral Economics
Stein, J. G. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818316000436 · Cited by 124
Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
BROOKES, S. T., Macefield, R. C., Williamson, P. R., McNair, A., Potter, S., Blencowe, N., Strong, S., & Blazeby, J. M. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1479-x · Cited by 127
Reducing Status Effects with Computer-Mediated Communication: Evidence from Two Distinct National Cultures
Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K., Watson, R. T., & Walczuch, R. M. (1998) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1998.11518199 · Cited by 124
How Directors' Prior Experience with Other Demographically Similar CEOs Affects Their Appointments onto Corporate Boards and the Consequences for CEO Compensation
Zhu, D. H., & Westphal, J. D. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0590 · Cited by 122
Polarization and social media: A systematic review and research agenda
Arora, S. D., Singh, G. P., Chakraborty, A., & Maity, M. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121942 · Cited by 163
From Groupthink to Teamthink: Toward the Creation of Constructive Thought Patterns in Self-Managing Work Teams
Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (1994) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679404700804 · Cited by 120
Experimental Research on Jury Decision-Making
MacCoun, R. J. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.244.4908.1046 · Cited by 117
Implicit coordination: Sharing goals with similar others intensifies goal pursuit
Shteynberg, G., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.012 · Cited by 117
The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1996) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(95)00658-3 · Cited by 117
Change the Referent? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Direct and Referent-Shift Consensus Models for Organizational Climate
Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B., Paul, J. B., Burke, M. J., Christian, M. S., & Eissa, G. M. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206313484520 · Cited by 131
I hate what you love: brand polarization and negativity towards brands as an opportunity for brand management
Ramírez, S. A. O., Veloutsou, C. A., & Morgan‐Thomas, A. (2019) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-03-2018-1811 · Cited by 125
The Paradox of Corrupt Networks: An Analysis of Organizational Crime at Enron
Aven, B. L. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0983 · Cited by 109
Does Disagreement Mitigate Polarization? How Selective Exposure and Disagreement Affect Political Polarization
Kim, Y. (2015) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699015596328 · Cited by 109
Do social media undermine social cohesion? A critical review
González‐Bailón, S., & Yphtach Lelkes, B. (2022) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12091 · Cited by 143
Blindfolding the Jury to Verdict Consequences: Damages, Experts, and the Civil Jury
Diamond, S. S., & Casper, J. D. (1992) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053737 · Cited by 113
Rational Polarization
Dorst, K. M. (2021) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.1215/00318108-10469499 · Cited by 122
Nonlinear consequences of promotive and prohibitive voice for managers’ responses: The roles of voice frequency and LMX.
Huang, X., Xu, E., Huang, L. V., & Liu, W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000326 · Cited by 114
Choice Shift and Group Polarization
Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511976735.010 · Cited by 107
No Safety in Numbers
Houghton, S. M., Simon, M., Aquino, K. F., & Goldberg, C. (2000) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601100254002 · Cited by 110
Good Reasons Sell: Reason-Based Choice Among Group and Individual Investors in the Stock Market
Barber, B. M., Heath, C., & Terrance Odean, B. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.12.1636.25109 · Cited by 109
A Continuous Opinion Dynamics Model Based on the Principle Of Meta-contrast
Salzarulo, L. (2006) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 105
Seeing Media as Group Members: An Evaluation of Partisan Bias Perceptions
Stroud, N. J., Muddiman, A., & Lee, J. K. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12110 · Cited by 105
Are N+1 heads better than one?
Prather, L. J., & Middleton, K. L. (2002) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00172-x · Cited by 105
Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. R. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1988 · Cited by 103
OK Boomer: A decade of generational differences in feelings about climate change
Swim, J. K., Aviste, R., Lengieza, M. L., & Fasano, C. J. (2022) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102479 · Cited by 107
Who Takes the Lead in Risky Decision Making? Effects of Group Members' Risk Preferences and Prototypicality
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & van Dijk, E. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2907 · Cited by 102
Polarization and Persuasive Argumentation: A Study of Decision Making in Group Settings1
El‐Shinnawy, M., & Vinzé, A. (1998) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249394 · Cited by 104
When Experts Become Liabilities: Domain Experts on Boards and Organizational Failure
Almandoz, J., & Tilcsik, A. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1211 · Cited by 101
Effects of group arguments on rumor belief and transmission in online communities: An information cascade and group polarization perspective
Wang, Q., Yang, X., & Xi, W. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.10.004 · Cited by 100
The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review
Iandoli, L., Primario, S., & Zollo, G. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 · Cited by 122
Exposure to Ideological News and Perceived Opinion Climate
Tsfati, Y., Stroud, N., & Chotiner, A. (2014) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161213508206 · Cited by 104
Group diversity and decision quality: Amplification and attenuation of the framing effect
Yaniv, I. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.009 · Cited by 97
Use Cases for Design Personas: A Systematic Review and New Frontiers
Salminen, J., Wenyun Guan, K., Jung, S.-G., & Jansen, B. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517589 · Cited by 140
Barking up the right tree: Are small groups rational agents?
Cox, J. C., & Hayne, S. C. (2006) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9123-3 · Cited by 96
Influences of Friends and Friendships: Myths, Truths, and Research Recommendations
Berndt, T. J., & Murphy, L. M. (2003) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80044-1 · Cited by 95
Social Influences on Risk Attitudes: Applications in Economics
Trautmann, S. T., & Vieider, F. M. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_22 · Cited by 93
Structuring Interactions for Large-Scale Synchronous Peer Learning
Coetzee, D., Lim, S., Fox, A., Hartmann, B., & Hearst, M. A. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675251 · Cited by 95
Emergence of Polarized Ideological Opinions in Multidimensional Topic Spaces
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011012 · Cited by 104
Self-organization in Communicating Groups: The Emergence of Coordination, Shared References and Collective Intelligence
Heylighen, F. (2012) · Understanding complex systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32817-6_10 · Cited by 94
What drives the polarisation and moderation of opinions? Evidence from a Finnish citizen deliberation experiment on immigration
Lindell, M., Bächtiger, A., Grönlund, K., Herne, K., Setälä, M., & Wyss, D. (2016) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12162 · Cited by 87
Are Independent Audit Committee Members Objective? Experimental Evidence
Magilke, M. J., Mayhew, B. W., & Pike, J. E. (2009) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.6.1959 · Cited by 87
The time for causal designs: Review and evaluation of empirical support for mechanisms of political radicalisation
Gøtzsche‐Astrup, O. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.003 · Cited by 85
How Do You Manage Change in Organizations? Training, Development, Innovation, and Their Relationships
Sartori, R., Costantini, A., Ceschi, A., & Tommasi, F. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00313 · Cited by 95
Public Attitudes to Contingent Valuation and Public Consultation 1
Brouwer, R., Powe, N. A., Turner, R. K., Bateman, I. J., & Langford, I. H. (1999) · Environmental Values · doi:10.1177/096327199900800303 · Cited by 82
Psychological Factors in Radicalization
Webber, D. J., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118923986.ch2 · Cited by 87
How to Achieve Tax Compliance by the Wealthy: A Review of the Literature and Agenda for Policy
Gangl, K., & Torgler, B. (2019) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12065 · Cited by 111
Social Psychology and Health Education
Kok, G., Schaalma, H. P., de Vries, H., Parcel, G. S., & Paulussen, T. G. (1996) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779643000038 · Cited by 81
Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking
Nussbaum, E. M. (2020) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1845173 · Cited by 103
Performance Characteristics of Individually-Managed versus Team-Managed Mutual Funds
Bliss, R. T., Potter, M. E., & Schwarz, C. G. (2008) · The Journal of Portfolio Management · doi:10.3905/jpm.2008.706248 · Cited by 79
Does Discussion Group Composition Affect Policy Preferences? Results from Three Randomized Experiments
Farrar, C., Green, D., Green, J., Nickerson, D. W., & Shewfelt, S. (2009) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00717.x · Cited by 84
Experimental auctions, collective induction and choice shift: willingness-to-pay for rice quality in Senegal
Demont, M., Rutsaert, P., Ndour, M., Verbeke, W., Seck, P. A., & Tollens, E. F. (2012) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbs021 · Cited by 78
Framing, Public Diplomacy, and Anti-Americanism in Central Asia
Schatz, E. A. D., & Levine, R. (2010) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00612.x · Cited by 77
Cognition through a social network: The propagation of induced forgetting and practice effects.
Coman, A., & Hirst, W. C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0025247 · Cited by 77
Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections about Sexual Minorities
Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x · Cited by 80
The tragedy of the commons revisited: The importance of group decision-making
Gillet, J., Schram, A. J. H. C., & Joep Sonnemans, A. (2009) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.02.001 · Cited by 76
A systems approach to cultural evolution
Buskell, A., Enquist, M., & Jansson, F. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0343-5 · Cited by 81
Modelling how social network algorithms can influence opinion polarization
de Arruda, H. F., Cardoso, F. M., de Arruda, G. F., Hernández, A. R., Costa, L. D. F., & Moreno, Y. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.12.069 · Cited by 79
Going to extremes for one's group: the role of prototypicality and group acceptance
Goldman, L., & Hogg, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12382 · Cited by 75
Decision-making, leadership and performance links in private education institutes
Torlak, N. G., Demir, A., & Budur, T. (2021) · Rajagiri Management Journal · doi:10.1108/ramj-10-2020-0061 · Cited by 74
TRUST, RISK, AND DECISION-MAKING IN ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
Dávid, L. D., & Hackman, K. (2016) · Public Administration Quarterly · Cited by 73
THE EFFECTS OF GROUP DECISIONS AND GROUP-SHIFTS ON USE OF THE ANCHORING AND ADJUSTMENT HEURISTIC
Rutledge, R. W. (1993) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.1993.21.3.215 · Cited by 76
A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation and Polarization
Olsson, E. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0_6 · Cited by 83
Reasoning as a Social Competence
Sperber, D., & Mercier, H. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511846427.016 · Cited by 74
Silencing historical trauma: The politics and psychology of memory and voice.
Liem, R. (2007) · Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology · doi:10.1080/10781910701271200 · Cited by 70
Arousal, Capacity, and Intense Indoctrination
Baron, R. S. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0403_3 · Cited by 71
Jury decision making research: Are researchers focusing on the mouse and not the elephant in the room?
Nunez, N. L., McCrea, S. M., & Culhane, S. E. (2011) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.967 · Cited by 69
Peer Group Influence
Friedkin, N. E., & Cook, K. S. (1990) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124190019001006 · Cited by 68
It's the Psychology, Stupid!! Understanding Human Cognition Biases to Inform Sustainable Behavior
Engler, J., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2017) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1100-5 · Cited by 80
Word‐of‐mouth transmission in settings with multiple opinions: The impact of other opinions on WOM likelihood and valence
Ryu, G., & Han, J. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.04.003 · Cited by 65
The disposition effect in team investment decisions: Experimental evidence
Rau, H. A. (2015) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.09.015 · Cited by 71
Effects of a mass media intervention on HIV-related stigma: 'Radio Diaries' program in Malawi
Creel, A. H., Rimal, R. N., Mkandawire, G., Böse, K., & Brown, J. W. (2011) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyr012 · Cited by 65
Behavioural operational research: Towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions
White, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.032 · Cited by 65
INTRA‐HOUSEHOLD EXPERIMENTS: A SURVEY
Munro, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/joes.12196 · Cited by 64
Talking nets: A multiagent connectionist approach to communication and trust between individuals.
Overwalle, F. V., & Heylighen, F. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.606 · Cited by 64
The Effects of Time Pressure and Task Differences on Influence Modes and Accuracy in Decision-Making Groups
Kelly, J. R., Jackson, J. W., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. L. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167297231002 · Cited by 64
How to get the timing right. A computational model of the effects of the timing of contacts on team cohesion in demographically diverse teams
Flache, A., & Mäs, M. (2008) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-008-9019-1 · Cited by 63
Anonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication: More Contrarian Ideas with Less Influence
Haines, R. P., Hough, J. R., Cao, L., & Haines, D. (2012) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9318-2 · Cited by 63
Environmental Decision-Making in Times of Polarization
Judge, M., Kashima, Y., Steg, L., & Dietz, T. M. (2023) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-115339 · Cited by 73
Individual Differences in Attitude Change
Turnes, P., & Petty, R. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612823.ch14 · Cited by 85
The Double-Edged Sword of Genetic Accounts of Criminality
Cheung, B. Y., & Heine, S. J. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215610520 · Cited by 62
Beyond Left and Right: Real-World Political Polarization in Twitter Discussions on Inter-Ethnic Conflicts
Bodrunova, S. S., Blekanov, I. S., Smoliarova, A., & Litvinenko, A. (2019) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v7i3.1934 · Cited by 66

Authors: Isenberg, D. J.
Affiliations: Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Isenberg, Daniel J.
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1986-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 6
Pages: 1141-1151
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
OpenAlex: W2042714524
Cited by: 1,044
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
FWCI: 23.40
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks