Cited by 1,044Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Isenberg, Daniel J.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Handbook of Social Psychology
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910

Show all 62 references

Sorted by citations

The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7 · Cited by 1,789
Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing
Hirshleifer, D. A. (2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00379 · Cited by 2,430
Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.
Murphy, M., Black, Lamping, McKee, M., Sanderson, Askham, & Marteau (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2030 · Cited by 2,076
Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.
Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.9.741 · Cited by 1,758
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 · Cited by 1,558
THE NORMALIZATION OF CORRUPTION IN ORGANIZATIONS
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(03)25001-2 · Cited by 1,548
PUBLIC DELIBERATION, DISCURSIVE PARTICIPATION, AND CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · Cited by 1,502
The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress
Brockner, J. (1992) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1992.4279568 · Cited by 1,064
Uncertainty–identity theory
Hogg, M. A. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8 · Cited by 990
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x · Cited by 1,346
Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects
Druckman, J. N. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404041413 · Cited by 992
Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x · Cited by 1,399
From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact.
Nowak, A. K., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.362 · Cited by 975
Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139 · Cited by 1,051
Delphi: A reevaluation of research and theory
Rowe, G., Wright, G., & Bolger, F. (1991) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-i · Cited by 733
Behavioral strategy
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D. P., & Fox, C. R. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.968 · Cited by 774
Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures
Friedkin, N. E. (1991) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229694 · Cited by 700
Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation
Glynn, M. A. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9704071864 · Cited by 689
Violence, aggression, & coercive actions
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1220 · Cited by 642
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307304092 · Cited by 754
Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779108401862 · Cited by 382
Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700205 · Cited by 550
The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314308 · Cited by 531
Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051 · Cited by 841
The group interview in social research
Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/0362-3319(91)90003-m · Cited by 524
Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed
Dan Ariely, C., & Levav, J. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/317585 · Cited by 520
Organizational learning from performance feedback a behavioral perspective on innovation and change
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cited by 468
The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”
Christopherson, K. M. (2006) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001 · Cited by 469
Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351441 · Cited by 449
Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2005) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280440000062 · Cited by 482
Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks
Baumann, F., Lorenz-Spreen, P., Sokolov, I. M., & Starnini, M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.048301 · Cited by 427
Hidden Profiles: A Brief History
Stasser, G. L., & Titus, W. (2003) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2003.9682897 · Cited by 434
Glass Breaking, Strategy Making, and Value Creating: Meta-Analytic Outcomes of Women as CEOs and TMT members
Jeong, S., & Harrison, D. A. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0716 · Cited by 459
THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Mendelberg, T. (2009) · Cited by 421
Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation
Moussaïd, M., Kämmer, J. E., Analytis, P. P., & Neth, H. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078433 · Cited by 407
Cultural Differences in Expectations of Change and Tolerance for Contradiction: A Decade of Empirical Research
Spencer‐Rodgers, J., Williams, M. J., & Peng, K. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868310362982 · Cited by 392
Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting versus Balancing
Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379903600103 · Cited by 357
THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE
Skarlicki, D. P., & Kulik, C. T. (2004) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(04)26005-1 · Cited by 369
Group Polarization and Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Communication Cues, Social Presence, and Anonymity
Sia, C. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.70.92 · Cited by 345
Individuality and Social Influence in Groups: Inductive and Deductive Routes to Group Identity.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T., & Novak, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747 · Cited by 381
Marketing Agility: The Concept, Antecedents, and a Research Agenda
Kalaignanam, K., Tuli, K. R., Kushwaha, T., Lee, L., & Gal, D. (2020) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242920952760 · Cited by 384
Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups
Kugler, T., Kausel, E. E., & Kocher, M. G. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1184 · Cited by 315
Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Process
(2002) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1111/b.9781405106535.2002.x · Cited by 296
Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation
Mercier, H., & Landemore, H. E. (2012) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00873.x · Cited by 318
No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions
Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12325 · Cited by 291
Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials
Grant, A., Altman, D. G., Babiker, A. G., Campbell, M., Clemens, F., Darbyshire, J. H., Elbourne, D. R., McLeer, S., Parmar, M., Pocock, S., et al. (2005) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta9070 · Cited by 273
The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities
Lind, E. A., Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2785 · Cited by 273
Quest for Significance and Violent Extremism: The Case of Domestic Radicalization
Jaśko, K., Lafree, G. D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2016) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12376 · Cited by 293
A Laboratory Study of Group Polarisation in the Team Dictator Game
Cason, T. N., & Mui, V. (1997) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00058.x · Cited by 251
Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups
Weisband, S. P. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90070-n · Cited by 250
Does Enclave Deliberation Polarize Opinions?
Grönlund, K., Herne, K., & Setälä, M. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9304-x · Cited by 171
Who counts as an American?: the boundaries of national identity
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5334 · Cited by 246
Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes – Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences
Grover, P., Kar, A. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Janssen, M. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.009 · Cited by 251
Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda
Furst‐Holloway, S., Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B. (1999) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00064.x · Cited by 244
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency.
MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21 · Cited by 230
Differentiation without Distancing. Explaining Bi-Polarization of Opinions without Negative Influence
Mäs, M., & Flache, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074516 · Cited by 226
An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups.
Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.877 · Cited by 238
Social and Cognitive Influences on the Development of Religious Beliefs and Commitment in Adolescence
Ozorak, E. W. (1989) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386576 · Cited by 225
The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group‐based interaction
Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2008) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466608x313774 · Cited by 223
Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela
Morales, A. J., Borondo, J., Losada, J. C., & Benito, R. M. (2015) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.4913758 · Cited by 232
Narcissism, director selection, and risk‐taking spending
Zhu, D. H., & Chen, G. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2322 · Cited by 221
Biases in future-oriented Delphi studies: A cognitive perspective
Winkler, J., & Moser, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021 · Cited by 230
Culture and socialization in work groups.
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10096-011 · Cited by 218
Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace.
Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351397 · Cited by 215
Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks
Santos, F. P., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Levin, S. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2102141118 · Cited by 250
Does Communicating (Flood) Risk Affect (Flood) Risk Perceptions? Results of a Quasi‐Experimental Study
Terpstra, T., Lindell, M. K., & Gutteling, J. M. (2009) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01252.x · Cited by 209
Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks
Casella, A., Rauch, J. E., & Burt, R. S. (2001) · Cited by 199
Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends
Guilbeault, D., Becker, J. A., & Centola, D. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1722664115 · Cited by 204
No Substitute for Experience: Presidents, Advisers, and Information in Group Decision Making
Saunders, E. (2017) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s002081831600045x · Cited by 86
Social Categorization, Depersonalization, and Group Behavior
Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470998458.ch3 · Cited by 208
Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Group Identification, Public-Self-Awareness, and Perceived Argument Quality
Lee, E.-J. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00348.x · Cited by 211
The potential for social contextual and group biases in team decision-making: biases, conditions and psychological mechanisms
Jones, P. E., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084914 · Cited by 193
The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision‐making groups: the effects of pre‐discussion dissent
Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.74 · Cited by 192
Risk Preference Differentials of Small Groups and Individuals
Shupp, R., & Williams, A. W. (2007) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02112.x · Cited by 177
Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group based approaches
MacMillan, D. C., Philip, L. J., Hanley, N. D., & Farizo, B. Á. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00182-9 · Cited by 188
A Measure of Polarization on Social Media Networks Based on Community Boundaries
Guerra, P., Meira, W., Cardie, C., & Kleinberg, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v7i1.14421 · Cited by 195
Structured elicitation of expert judgments for threatened species assessment: a case study on a continental scale using email
McBride, M. F., Garnett, S. T., Szabo, J. K., Burbidge, A. H., Butchart, S. H. M., Christidis, L., Dutson, G., FORD, H. A., Loyn, R., Watson, D. M., et al. (2012) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00221.x · Cited by 191
Contagious Justice: Exploring The Social Construction of Justice in Organizations
Degoey, P. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22003-0 · Cited by 187
Polarized Norms and Social Frames of Reference: A Test of the Self-Categorization Theory of Group Polarization
Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1101_6 · Cited by 314
Group Behavior and Performance
Hackman, J. R., & Katz, N. R. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002032 · Cited by 187
Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization
Strandberg, K., Himmelroos, S., & Grönlund, K. (2019) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/0192512117692136 · Cited by 135
Is It Better Not to Talk? Group Polarization, Extended Contact, and Perspective Taking in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo
Paluck, E. L. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210379868 · Cited by 185
Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics
Friedkin, N. E., & Johnsen, E. C. (2014) · Cited by 176
The Prospects for Prospect Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of International Relations Applications of Framing and Loss Aversion
Boettcher, W. A. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00375.x · Cited by 180
Group Emotions: Cutting the Gordian Knots Concerning Terms, Levels of Analysis, and Processes
Menges, J. I., & Kilduff, M. J. (2015) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2015.1033148 · Cited by 194
Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases
Oeberst, A., & Imhoff, R. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221148147 · Cited by 200
Measuring and moderating opinion polarization in social networks
Matakos, A., Terzi, E., & Tsaparas, P. (2017) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-017-0527-9 · Cited by 164
Moving Opportunism to the Back Seat: Bounded Rationality, Costly Conflict, and Hierarchical Forms
Foss, N. J., & Weber, L. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0105 · Cited by 171
Conflict, Delegitimization, and Violence
Bar‐Tal, D., & Hammack, P. L. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747672.013.0003 · Cited by 162
Factors Affecting the Use of Information in the Evaluation of Marketing Communications Productivity
Low, G. S., & Mohr, J. J. (2001) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070301291005 · Cited by 161
Reducing Controversy by Connecting Opposing Views
Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3018661.3018703 · Cited by 165
Friends' influence on adolescents' academic achievement motivation: An experimental study.
Berndt, T. J., Laychak, A. E., & Park, K. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.664 · Cited by 160
Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all?
Kilduff, M. J., Crossland, C., Tsai, W., & Krackhardt, D. M. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.003 · Cited by 161
Sociocognitive Analysis of Group Decision Making among Consumers
Ward, J. C., & Reingen, P. H. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208555 · Cited by 156
Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the "social facilitation" of prejudice in anticipated public contexts.
Lambert, A. J., Payne, B. K., Jacoby, L. L., Shaffer, L. M., Chasteen, A. L., & Khan, S. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.84.2.277 · Cited by 155
Identity, Conflict, and Coexistence
Hammack, P. L. (2006) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/0743558406289745 · Cited by 157
Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government
Jaeger, P. T. (2005) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.01.012 · Cited by 151
Making the Most of Failure Experiences: Exploring the Relationship between Business Failure and the Identification of Business Opportunities
Mueller, B. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2014) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12116 · Cited by 172
ASSESSING THE INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OVER AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL DATA IN PREDICTING TEAM EFFECTIVENESS
Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2001) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00226.x · Cited by 147
Partisanship in a Social Setting
Klar, S. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12087 · Cited by 290

Authors: Isenberg, D. J.
Affiliations: Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Isenberg, Daniel J.
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1986-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 6
Pages: 1141-1151
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
OpenAlex: W2042714524
Cited by: 1,044
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
FWCI: 23.40
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks