Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Statistical principles in experimental design.

Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137

A theory of social comparison processes

Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926

Handbook of Social Psychology

DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590

Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis

Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925

Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior

JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760

Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena

Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329

Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.

Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164

The group polarization phenomenon.

Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102

The group as a polarizer of attitudes.

Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038

Combining results of independent studies.

Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910

Individual Versus Collaborative Information Processing: The Case of Biases in Wikipedia

Oeberst, A., Creß, U., Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_9 · Cited by 19

Values and Corruption

Kravtsova, M., Oshchepkov, A., & Welzel, C. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116677579 · Cited by 26

IT managers’ vs. IT auditors’ perceptions of risks: An actor–observer asymmetry perspective

Nuijten, A. L. P., Keil, M., van der Pijl, G., & Commandeur, H. R. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.04.002 · Cited by 22

The Effect of Group Polarization on Opposition to Donald Trump

Bekafigo, M. A., Stepanova, E. V., Eiler, B. A., Noguchi, K., & Ramsey, K. L. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12584 · Cited by 21

Transitions between polarization and radicalization in a temporal bilayer echo-chamber model

Gajewski, Ł. G., Sienkiewicz, J., & Hołyst, J. A. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.105.024125 · Cited by 21

Social responsibility and stakeholder influence: Does technology matter during stakeholder deliberation with high-impact decisions?

King, R. C., Hartzel, K. S., Schilhavy, R. A. M., Melone, N. P., & McGuire, T. W. (2009) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.11.004 · Cited by 19

Beware of organizational saints: how a moral self-concept may foster immoral behavior

Ashforth, B. E., & Lange, D. A. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316338827.012 · Cited by 19

Simple Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Social Behavior

Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0001 · Cited by 20

Sources of the discontinuity effect: Playing against a group versus being in a group

Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.01.002 · Cited by 19

Ethics, evolution and culture

Mesoudi, A., & Danielson, P. A. (2008) · Theory in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12064-008-0027-y · Cited by 21

Simulating buying center decision processes: propositions and methodology

McNally, R. C. (2002) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/08858620210419790 · Cited by 19

Member Preferences for Discussion Content in Anticipated Group Decisions: Effects of Type of issue and Group Interactive Goal

Kaplan, M. F., Schaefer, E. G., & Zinkiewicz, L. (1994) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1504_6 · Cited by 19

Behavioral Antitrust: A New Approach to the Rule of Reason after LeeginPreprint

Tor, A., & Rinner, W. J. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1522948 · Cited by 19

How algorithmically curated online environments influence users’ political polarization: Results from two experiments with panel data

Kelm, O., Neumann, T., Behrendt, M., Brenneis, M., Gerl, K., Marschall, S., Meißner, F., Stefan Harmeling, B., Vowe, G., & Ziegele, M. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100343 · Cited by 31

Determinants of group-level overconfidence in teams: A quasi-experimental investigation of diversity and tenure

Meißner, P., Schubert, M., & Wulf, T. (2017) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2017.11.002 · Cited by 18

Behavioral Challenges in Policy Analysis with Conflicting Objectives

Montibeller, G. (2018) · doi:10.1287/educ.2018.0182 · Cited by 20

Why Rational People Polarize

Dorst, K. M. (2019) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 18

Political polarization: Radicalism and immune beliefs

Almagro, M. (2022) · Philosophy & Social Criticism · doi:10.1177/01914537211066859 · Cited by 21

Social Robots Outdo the Not-So-Social Media for Self-Disclosure: Safe Machines Preferred to Unsafe Humans?

Luo, R., Zhang, T. X. Y., Chen, D. H.-C., Hoorn, J. F., & Huang, I. S. (2022) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics11050092 · Cited by 18

Intellectual Humility and Political Polarization: An Exploration of Social Networks, Attitudes, and Affect

Sgambati, T. J., & Ayduk, O. (2023) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12890 · Cited by 14

Cognitive perspectives on opinion dynamics: the role of knowledge in consensus formation, opinion divergence, and group polarization

Mueller, S. T., & Tan, Y.-Y. S. (2017) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-017-0004-7 · Cited by 19

Dense and influential core promotion of daily viral information spread in political echo chambers

Asatani, K., Yamano, H., Sakaki, T., & Sakata, I. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86750-w · Cited by 18

Strategic Polarization in Group Interactions

Iyer, G. V., & Yoganarasimhan, H. (2021) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437211016389 · Cited by 18

Infostorms

Hansen, P. G., Hendricks, V. F., & Rendsvig, R. K. (2013) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12028 · Cited by 18

Communication via Internet et dynamiques identitaires : une analyse psychosociale

Guegan, J., & Michinov, E. (2011) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2011.09.001 · Cited by 24

Unanimous versus Majority Influences on Group Polarization in Business Decision Making

Williams, S., & Taormina, R. J. (1993) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712137 · Cited by 18

Buying group choice: The effect of individual group member's prior decision frame

Stoddard, J. E., & Fern, E. F. (2001) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.1002 · Cited by 19

News Diffusion in Social Networks and Stock Market ReactionsPreprint

Hirshleifer, D. A., Peng, L., & Wang, Q. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3824022 · Cited by 18

Learning from diversity: Public reason and the benefits of pluralism

Siscoe, L. (2024) · Politics Philosophy & Economics · doi:10.1177/1470594x241256977 · Cited by 19

The Dark Side of Morality: Group Polarization and Moral Epistemology

Arvan, M. (2019) · The Philosophical Forum · doi:10.1111/phil.12213 · Cited by 19

Behavioral interventions for sustainable transportation: an overview of programs and guide for practitioners

Sussman, R., Tan, L. Q., & Kormos, C. E. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815965-1.00014-4 · Cited by 17

Politics and Prejudice: How Political Discussion With Peers Is Related to Attitudes About Immigrants During Adolescence

Bohman, A., Hjerm, M., & Eger, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2019.00070 · Cited by 20

A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D

Thomas, M. A., Yan, L., Sistenich, V., Diango, K., & Kabongo, D. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24703 · Cited by 17

Categories, Balancing, and Fake News: The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

Sardo, A. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence · doi:10.1017/cjlj.2020.5 · Cited by 17

Emergence of learning in computer-supported, large-scale collective dynamics

Kapur, M., Hung, D. W. L., Jacobson, M. J., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C. K., & Victor, C. D.-T. (2007) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.3115/1599600.1599662 · Cited by 17

Opinion dynamics in two dimensions: domain coarsening leads to stable bi-polarization and anomalous scaling exponents

Velásquez-Rojas, F., & Vázquez, F. (2018) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/aab1b4 · Cited by 17

Can Group-and Issue-Related Factors Predict Choice Shift?

BarNir, A. (1998) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496498293002 · Cited by 17

Multi-Agents are Social Groups: Investigating Social Influence of Multiple Agents in Human-Agent Interactions

Song, T., Tan, Y., Zhu, Z., Feng, Y., & Lee, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757633 · Cited by 34

Polarización artificial: cómo los discursos expresivos inflaman la percepción de polariza-ción política en internet

Zafrilla, P. J. P. (2021) · Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi · doi:10.6035/recerca.4661 · Cited by 25

Defaults, normative anchors, and the occurrence of risky and cautious shifts

Jagau, S., & Offerman, T. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-018-9282-6 · Cited by 16

Pathways to Violence in Civil Wars: Combatant Socialization and the Drivers of Participation in Civilian Targeting

Cantin, M.-O. (2021) · International Studies Review · doi:10.1093/isr/viab026 · Cited by 16

Escalation of commitment to unprofitable projects: An experimental investigation of the effect of conformity pressure and self-esteem

Chong, V. K., & Syarifuddin, I. (2010) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) · Cited by 16

Decision rules, escalation of commitment and sensitivity to framing in group decision-making

Curșeu, P. L., Schruijer, S. G. L., & Fodor, O. C. (2016) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2015-0253 · Cited by 20

Small group processes relevant to data monitoring committees in controlled clinical trials: an overview of reviews

Walker, A. E., McLeer, S., & DAMOCLES group (2004) · Clinical Trials · doi:10.1191/1740774504cn023oa · Cited by 16

Measurement and Decision Making

Berry, M. A., & Aurum, A. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-29263-2_8 · Cited by 16

Exploring the effects of some display and task factors on GSS user groups

Sia, C. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. (1996) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/0378-7206(95)00043-7 · Cited by 16

GROUPTHINK THEORY AND RESEARCH: IMPLICATIONS FOR DECISION MAKING IN GERIATRIC HEALTH CARE TEAMS

Heinemann, G. D., Farrell, M. P., & Schmitt, M. H. (1994) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/0360127940200106 · Cited by 16

Judicial Decisionmaking: A Behavioral PerspectivePreprint

Teichman, D., & Zamir, E. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 16

The value of customized insurance for farmers in rural BangladeshPreprint

Clarke, D., Das, N., de Nicola, F., Hill, R. V., Kumar, N., & Mehta, P. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 16

Do computer simulations support the Argument from Disagreement?

Vallinder, A., & Olsson, E. J. (2012) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-012-0107-x · Cited by 15

Understanding Cross-National Differences in Risk Through a Localized Cultural Perspective

Park, J., Kim, D., & Zhang, C. (2015) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/1069397115609560 · Cited by 16

Polarization on Social Media: When Group Dynamics Leads to Societal Divides

Rychwalska, A., & Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, M. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.263 · Cited by 15

Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence

Garlick, R., & Mongeau, P. A. (1993) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570319309374455 · Cited by 15

Performance Characteristics of Individual vs. Team Managed Mutual FundsPreprint

Bliss, R. T., Potter, M. E., & Schwarz, C. G. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.932948 · Cited by 15

Measuring crisis decision making for public health emergencies

Parker, A. M., Nelson, C., Shelton, S. R., Dausey, D. J., Lewis, M. W., Pomeroy, A., & Leuschner, K. J. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e660202010-001 · Cited by 15

Team Decision Making

Reader, T. W. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118909997.ch12 · Cited by 16

Political Partisanship and Anti-Science Attitudes in Online Discussions about Covid-19Preprint

Rao, A., Morstatter, F., Hu, M., Chen, E., Burghardt, K., Ferrara, E., & Lerman, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.08498 · Cited by 15

Dynamical networks of influence in small group discussions

Moussaïd, M., Noriega-Campero, A., & Almaatouq, A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190541 · Cited by 15

Reflexionsspiele

Albrecht, S. (2010) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.14361/transcript.9783839415221 · Cited by 16

Biases in the production and reception of collective knowledge: the case of hindsight bias in Wikipedia

Oeberst, A., von der Beck, I., Back, M., Cress, U., & Nestler, S. (2017) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0865-7 · Cited by 14

Otherness as a form of intersubjective social exclusion

Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., Civila, S., & Aguaded, I. (2020) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-11-2019-0130 · Cited by 14

The disposition effect and its manifestations in South African investor teams

Shandu, P., & Alagidede, P. (2022) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/rbf-01-2022-0027 · Cited by 17

Befriended to polarise? The impact of friend identity on review polarisation—A quasi‐experiment

Wang, L., Wang, C., & Yao, X. (2023) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12425 · Cited by 16

THE EFFECT OF IN-GROUP FAVORITISM ON THE COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS' OPINIONS

Alizadeh, M., Cioffi‐Revilla, C. A., & Crooks, A. T. (2015) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525915500022 · Cited by 14

Polarized Ukraine 2014: opinion and territorial split demonstrated with the bounded confidence XY model, parametrized by Twitter data

Romenskyy, M., Spaiser, V., Ihle, T., & Lobaskin, V. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.171935 · Cited by 16

Decision‐Making Models, Decision Support, and Problem Solving

Lehto, M. R., Nah, F. F., & Yi, J. S. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118131350.ch7 · Cited by 15

Networks of Beliefs: An Integrative Theory of Individual- and Social-Level Belief DynamicsPreprint

Dalege, J., Galešić, M., & Olsson, H. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/368jz · Cited by 14

Analyzing the extremization of opinions in a general framework of bounded confidence and repulsion

Giráldez-Cru, J., Zarco, C., & Cordón, Ó. (2022) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.164 · Cited by 16

Is There a Limit to Resemblances?

Park, W., & Brock, R. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00394-4 · Cited by 13

Behavioral biases in pension fund trustees’ decision making

Weiss‐Cohen, L., Ayton, P., Clacher, I., & Thoma, V. (2019) · Review of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1108/rbf-05-2018-0049 · Cited by 17

The Boom and the Bust: Can Theories from Social Psychology and Related Disciplines Account for One Country's Economic Crisis?

Þórisdóttir, H., & Karólínudóttir, K. E. (2014) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12051 · Cited by 15

Assimilation or Contrast? Status Inequality, Judgment of Product Quality, and Product Choices in Markets

Huang, Z., & Washington, M. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1007 · Cited by 13

Endowment Effect in negotiations: group versus individual decision-making

Galin, A. (2012) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-012-9350-3 · Cited by 13

Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia

Greenstein, S. M., & Zhu, F. (2014) · Cited by 13

For better or for worse: Social influences on risk-taking

McCoy, S. S., & Natsuaki, M. N. (2017) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1294139 · Cited by 13

Detecting polarization in ratings: An automated pipeline and a preliminary quantification on several benchmark data sets

Badami, M., Nasraoui, O., Sun, W., & Shafto, P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258231 · Cited by 13

Mediated Skewed Diffusion of Issues Information: A Theory

McEwan, B. L., Carpenter, C. J., & Hopke, J. E. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118800319 · Cited by 13

PrCP: Pre-recommendation Counter-Polarization

Badami, M., Nasraoui, O., & Shafto, P. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management · doi:10.5220/0006938702820289 · Cited by 13

Does Social Disagreement Attenuate Partisan Motivated Reasoning? A Test Case Concerning Economic Evaluations

Robison, J. (2018) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000315 · Cited by 14

Human murmuration: Group polarisation as compression in interaction-language dynamics captured by large language models

Durrheim, K. L., & Quayle, M. (2025) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2025.2499332 · Cited by 19

Moving beyond the business case for female leaders: A longitudinal panel study of the impact of female leadership on corporate social responsibility

Tichenor, J. M., Green, A. I., West, J., & Croom, R. M. (2022) · Business and Society Review · doi:10.1111/basr.12287 · Cited by 12

Opposing positions, dividing interactions, and hostile affect: A systematic review and conceptualization of “online climate change polarization”

van Eck, C. W. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.906 · Cited by 13

A Chat about Insurance: Experimental Results from Rural Bangladesh

Clarke, D., de Nicola, F., Hill, R. V., Kumar, N., & Mehta, P. (2014) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/ppu041 · Cited by 12

Scanning for satisfaction or digging for dismay? Comparing findings from a postal survey with those from a focus group-study

Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-134 · Cited by 14

How Modeling Methods for Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Can Benefit From Psychology Research

Mkhitaryan, S., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2021) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc52266.2021.9715408 · Cited by 12

Funding ventures similar to one of us: How status dynamics within heterogeneous groups affect venture evaluation

Shen, X., Kim, H., & Li, J. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3400 · Cited by 12

The Process of The Transfer of Hate Speech to Demonization and Social Polarization

Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., Castillo-Abdul, B., & Valiño, P. C. (2023) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v11i2.6663 · Cited by 12

Depolarization of opinions on social networks through random nudges

Pal, R., Kumar, A., & Santhanam, M. S. (2023) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.108.034307 · Cited by 12

Changing channels? A comparison of Fox and MSNBC in 2012, 2016, and 2020

Lanning, K., Wetherell, G. A., Warfel, E. A., & Boyd, R. L. (2021) · Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy · doi:10.1111/asap.12265 · Cited by 16

Questionnaire Development

Dong, Y. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2765-6_4 · Cited by 12

When Will We Meet Again? Regularities of Social Connectivity and Their Reflections in Memory and Decision Making

Pachur, T., Schooler, L. J., & Stevens, J. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0007 · Cited by 12

Simple Heuristics in a Social Game

Hertwig, R., Fischbacher, U., & Bruhin, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0002 · Cited by 12

Pre‐deliberation moderation on choice dilemmas: proposing a moderation–elasticity theory of choice shift

Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2004) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/0363775032000104568 · Cited by 12

Modelling the Emergence of Shared Attitudes from Group Dynamics Using an Agent‐Based Model of Social Comparison Theory

Rooy, D. V., Wood, I. B., & Tran, E. (2014) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2321 · Cited by 12

The Is and Ought of Sharing: The Equality Heuristic Across the Lifespan

Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Canz, T., Gigerenzer, G., & Takezawa, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0006 · Cited by 12

Social signaling in decision making

Caneel, R. (2005) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 12

Will Distributed GSS Groups Make More Extreme Decisions? An Empirical Study

Sia, C. L., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. (1996) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 12

What makes people more polarized? The effects of anonymity, being with like-minded others, and the moderating role of need for approval

Lee, S. Y., & Kim, J.-H. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101922 · Cited by 13

Echo chambers, polarization, and “Post-truth”: In search of a connection

Munroe, W. (2023) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2174426 · Cited by 15

Structural power of female executives and retailer profitability: A contingent resource-based perspective

Feng, C., & Xiang, K. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114137 · Cited by 11

Studies on polarization of judgments: I. Group effects on person perception

Moscovici, S., Zavalloni, M., & Louis‐Guerin, C. (1972) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420020110 · Cited by 19

Discussion effects on militarism-pacifism: A test of the group polarization hypothesis.

Myers, D. G., & Bach, P. J. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037532 · Cited by 25

Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account

Sieber, J., & Ziegler, R. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219833389 · Cited by 21

Attitude polarization: The relative influence of discussion group structure and reference group norms.

Cvetkovich, G. T., & Baumgardner, S. R. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034448 · Cited by 30

The group as a polarizer of attitudes.

Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038