Cited by 1,044Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Isenberg, Daniel J.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Handbook of Social Psychology
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910

Show all 62 references

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 1,000

The Polarizing Effect of a Partisan Workplace
Jones, D. A. (2013) · PS · doi:10.1017/s1049096512001254 · Cited by 12
Rethinking current models in social psychology: A Bayesian framework to understand dramatic social change
de la Sablonnière, R., Lina, J., & Cárdenas, D. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12273 · Cited by 12
The Meaning of Links: On the interpretation of hyperlinks in the study of polarization in blogging about climate change
Elgesem, D. (2019) · Nordicom review/NORDICOM review · doi:10.2478/nor-2019-0014 · Cited by 11
Opinion Evolution in Divided Community
Weron, T., & Szwabiński, J. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24020185 · Cited by 11
Opening up the black box in GSS research: explaining group decision outcome with group process
Huang, W. W., & Li, D. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.036 · Cited by 11
The Mind as an Intuitive Pollster: Frugal Search in Social Spaces
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0009 · Cited by 11
Revitalizing the Public Sphere: The Current System of Discourse and the Need for the Participative Design of Social Action
Walton, D. (2007) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-007-9073-5 · Cited by 11
Exposure to Controversy in an Information Society
Garrett, R. (2005) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 11
Group polarization in decision making: a study of selected secondary school disciplinary panels in Rongo District of Kenya
Aloka, P. J. O. (2012) · UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) · Cited by 11
Polarization, Political
Wojcieszak, M. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc168 · Cited by 12
Validating Argument-Based Opinion Dynamics with Survey Experiments
Banisch, S., & Shamon, H. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5305 · Cited by 13
Cautious Defection: Group Representatives Cooperate and Risk Less than Individuals
Atanasov, P. D., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1880 · Cited by 10
Rational inference strategies and the genesis of polarization and extremism
Kvam, P. D., Alaukik, A., Mims, C. E., Martemyanova, A., & Baldwin, M. W. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-11389-0 · Cited by 13
How Polarization Extends to New Topics: An Agent-Based Model Derived from Experimental Data
Carpentras, D., Lueders, A., Maher, P. J., O’Reilly, C., & Quayle, M. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5105 · Cited by 9
Exploring cognitive bias: expert ratings of business schools
Pleggenkuhle‐Miles, E. G., Khoury, T. A., DEEDS, D. L., & Markoczy, L. A. (2013) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-12-2012-0877 · Cited by 10
The Rise and Fall of Securitization
Chernenko, S. V., Hanson, S., & Sunderam, A. (2013) · Cited by 10
Seeing differently from others: the impact of relationship conflict asymmetry and realization on team performance
Wang, S. V. (2021) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-03-2021-0040 · Cited by 11
EXAMINING THE SOCIAL INFLUENCE ON COLLEGE STUDENTS FOR PLAYING ONLINE GAME: GENDER DIFFERENCES AND IMPLICATIONS
Yang, D.-J., Chiu, J.-Z., & Chen, Y.-K. (2011) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 10
Allport's “Living Inkblots”: The Role of Defensive Projection in Stereotyping and Prejudice
Newman, L. S., & Caldwell, T. L. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470773963.ch23 · Cited by 10
DECISION‐MAKING MODELS, DECISION SUPPORT, AND PROBLEM SOLVING
Lehto, M. R., Nanda, G., & Nanda, G. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119636113.ch6 · Cited by 11
Social psycological influence of ICT's on society and their policy implications
Postmes, T. (2000) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 10
Citizens at the forefront of the constitutional debate: Voluntary citizen participation determinants and emergent content in Chile
Raveau, M. P., Couyoumdjian, J. R., Fuentes-Bravo, C., Rodríguez‐Sickert, C., & Candia, C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267443 · Cited by 17
Let’s (not) talk about race: comparing mock jurors’ verdicts and deliberation content in a case of lethal police use of force with a White or Indigenous victim
Ewanation, L. A., & Maeder, E. M. (2023) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2023.2219814 · Cited by 14
Modeling the opinion dynamics of superstars in the film industry
Giráldez-Cru, J., Vázquez, A. S., Zarco, C., & Cordón, Ó. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123750 · Cited by 9
Explicit and implicit stock investment: Differences in psychological characteristics and risky behavior between college students majoring in financial engineering or business
Park, J., Kim, D., & Oh, S. (2019) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00555-9 · Cited by 9
Moral discourse boosts confidence in moral judgments
Heinzelmann, N. C., Höltgen, B. T. A., & Tran, V. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1959026 · Cited by 10
Роль социальных медиа в формировании регионального экологического протеста в России
Klimova, A., Куликов, С., & Чмель, К. Ш. (2021) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2024 · Cited by 13
Opinion dynamics within a virtual small group: the stubbornness effect
Guazzini, A., Cini, A., Bagnoli, F., & Ramasco, J. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2015.00065 · Cited by 9
Who’s in Charge Here? The Team Leadership Implications of Authority Structure
Day, D. V., Wageman, R., & Fisher, C. M. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.022 · Cited by 10
Testing the group polarization hypothesis by using logit models
Rodrigo, M. F., & Ato, M. (2001) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.86 · Cited by 9
Group influences upon preferences for personal protection: A simulation study
Bradley, G. L. (1995) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/0022-4375(95)00009-f · Cited by 9
Effort and Performance: What Distinguishes Interacting and Noninteracting Groups from Individuals?
Besedeš, T., DECK, C. A., Quintanar, S. M., Sudipta Sarangi, B., & Shor, M. (2012) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2013.020 · Cited by 15
Public Perception of Overcrowding and Management Alternatives in a Multi-purpose Open Access Resource
Brouwer, R., Turner, R. K., & Voisey, H. (2001) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669580108667415 · Cited by 9
A step into the anarchist’s mind: examining political attitudes and ideology through event-related brain potentials
Dhont, K., Hiel, A. V., Pattyn, S., Onraet, E., & Severens, E. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsr009 · Cited by 9
Judging Deliberation: An Assessment of the Crowdsourced Icelandic Constitutional Project
Popescu, D., & Loveland, M. T. (2022) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.974 · Cited by 8
Psychological processes underlying normative transformation and social change
González, R., Carvacho, H., & Tausch, N. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00448-8 · Cited by 9
Schlechte Nachrichten: "Fake News" in Politik und Öffentlichkeit
Jaster, R., & Lanius, D. (2020) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748901334-245 · Cited by 8
Does Social Media Use Promote Political Mass Polarization?
Ludwig, K., & Müller, P. (2022) · Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · doi:10.5771/9783748928232-118 · Cited by 10
Deaf Effect for Risk Warnings A Causal Examination applied to Information Systems Projects ARNO NUIJTEN - Deaf Effect for Risk Warnings
Nuijten, A. L. P. (2012) · Cited by 8
Safety climate and increased risk: The role of deadlines in design work
Daniels, K., Beesley, N., Cheyne, A., & Wimalasiri, V. (2016) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726715612900 · Cited by 8
Persuasion without polarization? Modelling persuasive argument communication in teams with strong faultlines
Feliciani, T., Flache, A., & Mäs, M. (2020) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-020-09315-8 · Cited by 9
Decision making dyads and judgement overconfidence: Implications for high-risk industries
Gilbey, A., Walmsley, S., Tani, K., & Reweti, S. L. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103529 · Cited by 11
Collective Intelligence
Malone, T. W., & Woolley, A. W. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108770422.033 · Cited by 10
VII—Can Arguments Change Minds?
Novaes, C. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1093/arisoc/aoad006 · Cited by 8
Intelligence-Led Policing in Honduras: Applying Sleipnir and Social Psychology to Understand Gang Proliferation
Ratcliffe, J. H., Sorg, E. T., & Rose, J. W. (2014) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-014-9143-4 · Cited by 8
Reasoning about opinion dynamics in social networks
Hansen, J. U. (2015) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/exv083 · Cited by 8
Collective Problem-Solving: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Skill, and Prior Knowledge
Geifman, D., & Raban, D. R. (2015) · Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning · doi:10.28945/2319 · Cited by 8
Statistical mechanics of influence maximization with thermal noise
Lynn, C. W., & Lee, D. D. (2017) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/117/66001 · Cited by 8
The Dynamics of Group Polarization
Proietti, C. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55665-8_14 · Cited by 8
Voldelig transnational aktivisme: Islamisk Stat, foreign fighters og radikalisering
Lindekilde, L. E., & Bertelsen, P. (2015) · Dansk Sociologi · doi:10.22439/dansoc.v26i4.5035 · Cited by 9
Participation and Persuasion via Computer-Mediated Communication: Anonymous versus Identified Comments
Haines, R. P., Cao, L., & Haines, D. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 8
Countering Sectarianism in the Middle East
Rizkallah, A., Gengler, J. J., Reedy, K., & Carpenter, A. C. (2019) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rr2799 · Cited by 8
Argumentative Deliberation and the Development of Intellectual Humility and Autonomy in the Classroom
Brasi, L. D. (2020) · Cogency · doi:10.32995/cogency.v12i1.339 · Cited by 9
Mind The Gap! The Role of Political Identity and Attitudes in the Emergence of Belief Gaps
Saldaña, M., McGregor, S. C., & Johnson, T. (2021) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edab006 · Cited by 8
The Experiment and Foreign Policy Decision Making
Hermann, M. G., & Özkeçeci‐Taner, B. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511921452.030 · Cited by 8
An Emergentist Account of Collective Cognition in Collaborative Problem Solving
Voiklis, J., Kapur, M., Kinzer, C. K., & Black, J. (2009) · CogPrints (University of Southampton) · doi:10.7916/d87w6jhs · Cited by 8
The Lives of Others: Social Rationality in Animals
Stevens, J. R., & King, A. J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0015 · Cited by 8
The effects of time on computer-mediated communication group meetings: an exploratory study using an evaluation task
Wong, Z., & Aiken, M. W. (2006) · International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management · doi:10.1504/ijiscm.2006.010321 · Cited by 8
Information Collection Strategic Design in Experts-assisted Decision Making Paradigm
Mostaghimi, M. (2001) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1011884222444 · Cited by 8
Balancing Opposing Views to Reduce Controversy.Preprint
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 8
Group Information Behavioural Norms and the Effective Use of a Collaborative Information System: A Case Study
Furness, C. D. (2011) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 8
Co-evolving networks for opinion and social dynamics in agent-based models
Conrad, N. D., Vu, N. Q., & Nagel, S. (2024) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/5.0226054 · Cited by 7
Teaching bystander action: forming identities that promote opposition to prejudice towards Muslim people
Thomas, E. F., Clark, A. J., & Pedersen, A. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09553-3 · Cited by 7
Individuals, Collectives, and Individuals in Collectives: The Ineliminable Role of Dependence
Hahn, U. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231198479 · Cited by 11
The likes that bind: Even novel opinion sharing can induce opinion‐based identification
O’Reilly, C., Maher, P. J., & Quayle, M. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12773 · Cited by 7
Brexit, the failure of the British political class, and the case for greater diversity in UK political recruitment
Lees, C. (2020) · British Politics · doi:10.1057/s41293-020-00136-6 · Cited by 7
An Agent-Based Model of Deliberative Democracy and Polarization
Lee, B., Kim, Y., Lee, K. M., & Yang, J. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.2020.1836625 · Cited by 7
The diversity advantage: An explanatory framework for personality traits
Pringle, T. A., & Robinson, M. D. (2024) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070241228327 · Cited by 9
Probabilistic Persuasion: A Brunswikian Theory of Argumentation
Reimer, T. O., Hertwig, R., & Sipek, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0004 · Cited by 9
Cultural Behavioral Finance in Emerging Markets
Lucey, B. M., & Dowling, M. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-411549-1.00014-4 · Cited by 7
The dynamics of polarization and compromise in conflict situations: The interaction between cultural traits and majority–minority influence
Kim, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2015) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1075655 · Cited by 8
Social Media, Participation, and Attitudes
Holmes, J. W., & McNeal, R. S. (2016) · Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9879-6.ch001 · Cited by 7
Emotions, Choice, and Crime
Benson, M. L., & Livelsberger, T. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747238.013.0026 · Cited by 7
Two routes for bipolar information processing, and a blind spot in between
Bonnefon, J. (2008) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.20300 · Cited by 7
Social Learning: A Route to Good Cue Orders
García‐Retamero, R., Takezawa, M., Woike, J. K., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0012 · Cited by 7
Beyond compliance and acceptance: Influence outcomes as a function of norm plausibility and processing mode.
Holzhausen, K. G., & McGlynn, R. P. (2001) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037//1089-2699.5.2.136 · Cited by 7
Angewandte Sozialpsychologie
Jonas, K. W., & Lebherz, C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71633-4_15 · Cited by 7
Social comparison and persuasive arguments as determinants of group polarization
Mongeau, P. A., & Garlick, R. (1988) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824098809359812 · Cited by 7
Bayesian Heuristics for Group DecisionsPreprint
Rahimian, M. A., & Jadbabaie, A. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01006 · Cited by 7
Polarization in social media
Zhang, C., Wang, X., Min, Y., Yu, S., Wu, Y., Xuan, Q., & Fu, C. (2025) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.130487 · Cited by 8
Mathematical Theory of Social Conformity I: Belief Dynamics, Propaganda Limits, and Learning Times in Networked Societies
Volchenkov, D., & Putkaradze, V. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13101625 · Cited by 6
Social polarization promoted by sparse higher-order interactions
Pérez-Martínez, H., Lamata-Otín, S., Malizia, F., Floría, L. M., Gómez‐Gardeñes, J., & Soriano‐Paños, D. (2025) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02413-6 · Cited by 9
Resisting knowledge, realizing values, and reasoning in complex contexts: Ecological reflections
Hodges, B. H. (2019) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354319852423 · Cited by 6
Crowding out the field: External Support to Insurgents and the Intensity of Inter-rebel Fighting in Civil Wars
Stein, A., & Cantin, M.-O. (2021) · International Interactions · doi:10.1080/03050629.2021.1922899 · Cited by 6
Group Effect Aspects in Digitalisation Production Contexts
de Carvalho, A. F. P., Reichel, S., Martin, M. M. S., Allen, E. S., & Schweitzer, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3567560 · Cited by 6
Echo chamber formation sharpened by priority users
Ferraz de Arruda, H., Andrade Oliveira, K., & Moreno, Y. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111098 · Cited by 6
Greater than the Sum of its Parts: Exploring Social Influence of Multi-Agents
Song, T., Tan, Y., Zhu, Z., Feng, Y., & Lee, Y. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719973 · Cited by 9
The Heart Has Its Reasons: Social Rationality in Mate Choice
Lenton, A. P., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0016 · Cited by 6
Factors in Recommending Contrarian Content on Social Media
Garimella, K., Morales, G. D. F., Gionis, A., & Mathioudakis, M. (2017) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3091478.3091515 · Cited by 6
Meta-analytic magic, ivermectin, and socially responsible reporting
Parrish, A., Blockman, M., Cohen, K., Dawood, H., de Waal, R., Gray, A., Kredo, T., Leong, T. D. D., Nel, J. S., Rees, H., et al. (2021) · South African Medical Journal · doi:10.7196/samj.2021.v111i10.16021 · Cited by 6
Is Intellectual Humility an Antidote for Our Polarized Nation?
Sgambati, T. J., & Ayduk, Ö. N. (2022) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/08901171221125326d · Cited by 8
Group Polarization in Board Decisions about Strategic Change: Evidence from Chinese Publicly Listed Companies (2008–2018)
Zhang, M., Ma, X., Chen, W., & Lan, H. (2023) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2022.58 · Cited by 6
Joint consumption challenges in groups
Marchand, A. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-06-2014-1001 · Cited by 6
The validity of choice dilemma response scales
Hale, J. L., Boster, F. J., & Mongeau, P. A. (1991) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934219109367518 · Cited by 6
Cooperate with Equals: A Simple Heuristic for Social Exchange
Johnson, T., & Smirnov, O. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0005 · Cited by 6
Group Polarization on Business Decisions in Singapore
Williams, S., & Taormina, R. J. (1992) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1992.9922979 · Cited by 6
Response Scale Ambiguity as a Moderator of the Choice Shift
Boster, F. J., & Hale, J. L. (1989) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365089016004004 · Cited by 6
Crisis Management And Civil Unrest: Seeing The La Riots Through An Industrial Lens
Pearson, C. M., & Kirby, M. (1993) · Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly · doi:10.1177/108602669300700401 · Cited by 6
Tax Salience, Voting, and DeliberationPreprint
Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1292731 · Cited by 6
Small Group Studies of Regulatory Decision‐Making for Power‐Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields
Hester, G. L., Morgan, M. G., Nair, I., & Florig, K. (1990) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb01043.x · Cited by 6

Authors: Isenberg, D. J.
Affiliations: Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Isenberg, Daniel J.
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1986-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 6
Pages: 1141-1151
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
OpenAlex: W2042714524
Cited by: 1,044
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
FWCI: 23.40
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks