Cited by 1,044Social and Intergroup PsychologyTeam Dynamics and PerformancePsychology of Social Influence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Isenberg, Daniel J.·1986·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article critically reviews recent (1974–1982) group polarization studies that address themselves to either one of the two primary explanatory mechanisms thought to underly group polarization, namely social comparison and persuasive argumentation processes. A summary of the effect sizes of 21 pu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Handbook of Social Psychology
DeLamater, J., & Ward, A. (2013) · Handbooks of sociology and social research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,590
Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984) · Cited by 3,925
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60009-x · Cited by 1,329
Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
Pettigrew, T. F., Suls, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1979) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2066199 · Cited by 1,164
The group polarization phenomenon.
Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602 · Cited by 1,102
The group as a polarizer of attitudes.
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027568 · Cited by 1,038
Combining results of independent studies.
Rosenthal, R. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185 · Cited by 910

Show all 62 references

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,000

Group Polarization on Corporate Boards: Theory and Evidence on Board Decisions about Acquisition Premiums, Executive Compensation, and Diversification.
Zhu, H. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 6
Higher-Order Risk Preferences in Social SettingsPreprint
Heinrich, T., & Mayrhofer, T. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2561325 · Cited by 6
Creativity in Teams
Thompson, L., & Wilson, E. R. (2015) · Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0056 · Cited by 6
On Rationality
Feldman, J. M., & Lindell, M. K. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2514-4_4 · Cited by 7
Democratic citizenship and polarization: Robert Talisse’s theory of democracy
Sharp, D. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10314-8 · Cited by 6
Malevolent Innovation in the Workplace: Laying the Foundation
d’Amato, A. L., & Hunter, S. T. (2025) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866251370355 · Cited by 5
Polarization in Blogging About the Paris Meeting on Climate Change
Elgesem, D. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_12 · Cited by 5
Agenda of Solutions to Mitigate the Challenge of Polarization of Extreme Positions in Social Media Environments
Pimentel, A. P., da Motta, C. L. R., Correia, A., & Schneider, D. (2023) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd57460.2023.10152674 · Cited by 5
Pivotal voting: The opportunity to tip group decisions skews juries and other voting outcomes
Davenport, D., & Winet, Y. K. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2108208119 · Cited by 4
Identifying and Characterizing New Expressions of Community Framing during Polarization
Sarmiento, H., Bravo-Márquez, F., Graells-Garrido, E., & Poblete, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19339 · Cited by 5
The Wisdom of the Crowd is not a Forgone Conclusion. Effects of Self-Selection on (Collaborative) Knowledge Construction
Krebs, M.-C., Oeberst, A., & von der Beck, I. (2023) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12647 · Cited by 7
NETEVOLVE: Social Network Forecasting using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Interpretable Features
Miyake, K., Ito, H., Faloutsos, C., Matsumoto, H., & Morishima, A. (2024) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3589334.3647982 · Cited by 9
What is Polarization in the Social Sciences? A Scoping Review of Reviews
Garzón‐Velandia, D. C., Barreto, I., & Cameselle, J. M. S. (2024) · Acta Colombiana de Psicología · doi:10.14718/acp.2024.27.2.11 · Cited by 10
Group Polarization of Trust in Technology
Xu, J., & Montague, E. N. H. (2013) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213571075 · Cited by 5
The aggregation of preferences in groups: Identity, responsibility, and polarization
Brady, M., & Wu, S. Y.-P. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.08.002 · Cited by 5
Polarization of Perceived Procedural Justice
Flint, D. H., Hernández‐Marrero, P., & Wielemaker, M. W. (2006) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.102.1.35-50 · Cited by 5
Effect of Word-List Consistency on the Correlation between Group Memory and Group Polarization
Arima, Y. (2013) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/01.07.17.pr0.112.2.375-389 · Cited by 5
The diversity puzzle
Mäs, M. (2010) · Cited by 5
Participatory Modeling and Community Dialog About Vulnerability of Lobster Fishing to Climate Change
Webler, T., Stancioff, E., Goble, R. L., & Whitehead, J. C. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25053-3_13 · Cited by 5
New Methods for the Steady-State Analysis of Complex Agent-Based Models
Camargo, C. Q. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00103 · Cited by 5
Argumentation and belief updating in social networks: a Bayesian approach
Masterton, G., & Olsson, E. J. (2013) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 5
Dissecting Discrimination
Villiger, D. (2021) · Entscheidungs- und Organisationstheorie · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-34569-3 · Cited by 6
Affective polarization in crosscutting communication networks: Offline and online evidence from Spain
Nordbrandt, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2022.921188 · Cited by 5
“Scholars like Sunstein (2002) and others (e.g., Isenberg, 1986; Farrar et al., 2009), argue that information sharing in politically homogeneous groups of likeminded people can cause attitudes to shift toward the extreme because of the social comparison and confirmation bias that such a form of…”
Background
Internal Auditors’ Perceptions of Information Technology-Related Risks: A Comparison Between General Auditors and Information Technology Auditors
Nuijten, A. L. P., Keil, M., & Zwiers, B. (2022) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-2020-040 · Cited by 7
The Role of Argument Strength and Informational Biases in Polarization and Bi-Polarization Effects
Proietti, C., & Chiarella, D. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5062 · Cited by 6
Is Modern Information Technology Enabling the Evolution of a More Direct Democracy?
Walton, D. C. (2007) · World Futures · doi:10.1080/02604020701402749 · Cited by 5
Dyads experience over confidence in hand‐eye coordination skills after placebo alcohol
Frings, D., Albery, I. P., Rolph, K., Leczfalvy, A., Smaczny, S., & Moss, A. C. (2016) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12418 · Cited by 5
Judicial decisions, intellectual virtues and the division of labour
Brasi, L. D. (2019) · The International Journal of Evidence & Proof · doi:10.1177/1365712719894007 · Cited by 6
Intelligent Playgrounds: Measuring and Affecting Social Inclusion in Schools
Lyra, O., Karapanos, E., & Kostakos, V. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23768-3_82 · Cited by 5
Comparing effect coded models of choice shifts
Hale, J. L., & Boster, F. J. (1988) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824098809359821 · Cited by 5
Shared Cognitions and Shared Theories: Telling More Than We Can Know by Ourselves?
Randolph-Seng, B., de Calvo, M. P. C., Zacchilli, T. L., & Cottle, J. L. (2010) · Cited by 5
Self-Deception and Deception in Capital Markets
Coval, J. D., Hirshleifer, D. A., & Teoh, S. H. (2004) · Cited by 5
Group decision making and social learning
Rahimian, M. A., & Jadbabaie, A. (2016) · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · doi:10.1109/cdc.2016.7799314 · Cited by 5
PERE: Evaluation and Improvement of Dependable Processes
Bloomfield, R., Bowers, J., Emmet, L., & Viller, S. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0937-2_28 · Cited by 5
GROUP POLARIZATION, SOCIAL INFLUENCE AND THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
von Solms, S. (2003) · ISAHP proceedings · doi:10.13033/isahp.y2003.024 · Cited by 5
Instructions for Reviewer 2: How to reject a manuscript for arbitrary reasonsPreprint
Dahlgren, P. M. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/t8jsm · Cited by 5
The “Less-Is-More” Effect in Group Decision Making
Luan, S., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Reimer, T. O. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0010 · Cited by 4
Does consulting with others affect answerability judgments of difficult questions?
Allwood, C. M., Karlsson, B. S. A., & Buratti, S. (2016) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2016.1140675 · Cited by 4
An Experimental Examination of the Combined Effects of Normative and Instrumental Commitments on Budgetary Slack Creation: Comparing Individuals versus Group Members
Nouri, H., & Kyj, L. S. (2013) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1474-7871(2013)0000022014 · Cited by 4
Data-Driven Models for Individual and Group Decision Making
Nguyen, C., Schlesinger, K. J., & Carlson, J. M. (2017) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3110025.3116204 · Cited by 4
Evidencing the Forecasting Performance of Predication Markets: An Empirical Comparative Study
Buckley, P. (2018) · The Journal of Prediction Markets · doi:10.5750/jpm.v11i2.1383 · Cited by 4
Attitude Change and Polarization
PytlikZillig, L. M., Hutchens, M. J., Muhlberger, P., Gonzalez, F. J., & Tomkins, A. J. (2018) · SpringerBriefs in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78160-0_4 · Cited by 4
Le rôle des minorités actives dans le processus d’intégration symbiotique post-acquisition. Une étude longitudinale d’une fusion dans le cadre du Grand Paris
Thelisson, A., & Meïer, O. (2020) · RIMHE Revue Interdisciplinaire Management Homme(s) & Entreprise · doi:10.3917/rimhe.040.0045 · Cited by 7
An opinion dynamics model of meta-contrast with continuous social influence forces
Weimer, C. W., Miller, J. O., Hill, R. R., & Hodson, D. D. (2021) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.126617 · Cited by 4
Research on the construction of quantitative index of microblog group polarization in university public opinion events
Wang, M., & Lei, G. (2021) · The Journal of Engineering · doi:10.1049/tje2.12113 · Cited by 4
Reducing polarization and increasing diverse navigability in graphs by inserting edges and swapping edge weights
Haddadan, S., Menghini, C., Riondato, M., & Upfal, E. (2022) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00875-8 · Cited by 7
Inward internationalisation
Laoghaire, T. Ó. (2023) · Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · doi:10.1080/13698230.2023.2168439 · Cited by 4
The effect of group polarisation on perceived invulnerability in general aviation pilots
Lee, S. Y., & Gilbey, A. (2012) · Griffith Research Online · Cited by 4
The effect of online political deliberation on the effectiveness of government response
Zhao, Y., Zhou, X., & Wang, T. (2020) · International Journal of Crowd Science · doi:10.1108/ijcs-04-2020-0009 · Cited by 4
The Geography of Online News Engagement
Saveski, M., Quercia, D., & Mantrach, A. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_20 · Cited by 4
Risk perception when the tsunami arrived
Guastello, S. J., Koehler, G., Koch, B., Koyen, J., Lilly, A., Stake, C., & Wozniczka, J. K. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220601013919 · Cited by 4
Effect of Group Performance on Subsequent Individual Performance: Does Influence Generalize Beyond the Issues Discussed by the Group?
Stasson, M. F., & Hawkes, W. (1995) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00515.x · Cited by 4
A Mixed Methods Approach to Measuring Depth of Group Information Processing in the Context of Deliberative Public Involvement
Seekamp, E., Harris, C. C., Hall, T. E., & Craig, T. Y. (2010) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689810370601 · Cited by 4
EFFECTS OF RESPONSIBILITY AND COHESIVENESS ON GROUP ESCALATION DECISIONS
Liao, W. M., Finley, D. R., & Shafer, W. E. (2004) · Advances in management accounting · doi:10.1016/s1474-7871(04)13010-4 · Cited by 4
Group polarization in virtual communities: The case of stock message boards
Chen, H. M. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · doi:10.9776/13174 · Cited by 4
Fox News and the polarization of attitudes in the U.S.
Wanta, W. (2008) · Central European Journal of Communication · Cited by 4
The Effect of a Quantitative Decision Aid – Analytic Hierarchy Process – on Group Polarization
Chen, C., Gustafson, D. H., & Lee, Y. (2002) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1023/a:1015624824288 · Cited by 4
Influence and Persuasion in Small GroupsPreprint
Nemeth, C. J., & Goncalo, J. A. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4
It's the Psychology, Stupid!! Understanding Human Cognition Biases to Inform Sustainable BehaviorPreprint
Engler, J., Abson, D. J., & von Wehrden, H. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3086532 · Cited by 4
Violent Dynamics: Exploring Responsibility - Attribution for Harms Inflicted During Spontaneous Group ViolencePreprint
du Bois-Pedain, A. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2729162 · Cited by 4
Democracy and authenticity: toward a theory of public justification
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1733 · Cited by 4
A Conceptualization of Mood Influences on Group Judgment and Decision Making: The Key Function of Dominant Cognitive Processing Strategies
Hinsz, V. B., & Robinson, M. D. (2024) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964241274124 · Cited by 3
Developing a Safety and Security AI Coach: A Second-Order Adaptive Network Model of Shared Mental Models in Hospital Teamwork
van Ments, L., Jan Treur, A., Klein, J., & Roelofsma, P. H. M. P. (2024) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72075-8_2 · Cited by 3
Unpacking the influence of group dynamics on tourism behaviour: a study of social media opinions, sentiments and destination popularity
Sun, L. M., Chen, Y., & Xu, Y. (2025) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2025.2552362 · Cited by 4
Polarization: linking loneliness and social media dependency
Rynarzewska, A. I., Waldsmith, C., & Nikolov, A. N. (2025) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-08-2025-0508 · Cited by 4
The Journal Editor as Academic Custodian
Edwards, J. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06519-4_13 · Cited by 3
Judging Better Together: Understanding the Psychology of Group Decision-Making on Panel Courts and Tribunals
Barry, B. M. (2023) · International Journal for Court Administration · doi:10.36745/ijca.479 · Cited by 3
Positioning analysis of Spanish politicians through their Twitter posts versus Spanish public opinion
Penelas‐Leguía, A., Núñez‐Barriopedro, E., López-Sanz, J. M., & Ravina-Ripoll, R. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01805-9 · Cited by 6
Behavioral Decision Research: Descriptive and Prescriptive Perspectives
Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2024) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44424-1_2 · Cited by 3
Unsupervised Framing Analysis for Social Media Discourse in Polarizing Events
Sarmiento, H., Córdova, R., Ortiz, J., Bravo-Márquez, F., dos Santos, M. L. B., & Valenzuela, S. (2025) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3711912 · Cited by 4
Visio Colletiva: The Role of Joint Fantasizing in Qualitative Social Research
Poppi, F. I. M., & Copes, H. (2025) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069251372391 · Cited by 3
Effects of social psychological phenomena on school psychologists’ ethical decision-making: a preliminary empirical analysis
Klose, L. M., Lasser, J. S., & Reardon, R. F. (2012) · Educational Psychology in Practice · doi:10.1080/02667363.2012.726922 · Cited by 3
Narcissism and punitiveness in a non-ego-threatening condition
Ng, H. K. S., Tam, K., & Shu, T. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.015 · Cited by 3
The Case for Group Heterogeneity
Margetts, T., & Holland, E. (2015) · Advances in finance, accounting, and economics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8611-3.ch008 · Cited by 3
Baby, It’s in Your Nature
Brogaard, B. “. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190084448.003.0006 · Cited by 4
Anxiety as a Positive Epistemic Emotion in Politics
Brasi, L. D., Guglielmetti-Serrano, F., & Rosati, A. (2021) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913811.2021.1924994 · Cited by 3
Bias, Prejudice and Shame in Predictive Policing: State-of-the-Art and Potential Interventions for Professionals
Mayer, C. (2021) · Shame 4.0 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59527-2_6
A model for optimizing article recommendation for reducing polarization
Rahaman, I., & Hosein, P. A. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3487351.3488349 · Cited by 3
Double valence coping strategies for damaged brands in the social media environment: From the perspective of group polarization theory
Xingang, W., Zulan, L., & Ting, Z. (2023) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.00709 · Cited by 3
POLARIZATION OF LOCAL COMMUNITY PERCEPTION ON SOCIO-CULTURAL DYNAMICS IN ECOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT OF BOPUNJUR, WEST JAVA
Widodo, G., Avenzora, R., Malihah, E., & Sunarminto, T. (2023) · Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research · doi:10.59465/ijfr.2023.10.1.113-134 · Cited by 7
Kollektive Informationsverarbeitung von Medieninhalten
Schindler, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-42534-0 · Cited by 5
Analysis of opinion evolution based on non-Bayesian social learning
Liu, Y., & Fang, A. (2023) · Applied Mathematics and Computation · doi:10.1016/j.amc.2023.128399 · Cited by 3
Similarity enhancement of heterogeneous networks by weighted incorporation of information
Baharifard, F., & Motaghed, V. (2024) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-023-02050-x · Cited by 3
Sifat Machiavelli, Tekanan Ketaatan dalam Keputusan Etis: Keputusan Individu dan Kelompok
Hapsari, A. N. S., Situmeang, A. S., & Utami, I. (2018) · Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis · doi:10.24815/jdab.v5i1.8030 · Cited by 3
Análisis comparativo del framing mediático en agencias internacionales de noticias Oriente-Occidente. Estudio de caso: Atentado al aeropuerto de Estambul
Civila, S., & Romero-Rodríguez, L. M. (2018) · Universitas · doi:10.17163/uni.n29.2018.06 · Cited by 3
Meta-Cognition Predicts Attitude Depolarization and Intentions to Engage With the Opposition Following Pro-Attitudinal Advocacy
Abeywickrama, R. S., & Laham, S. M. (2020) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000424 · Cited by 4
Theoretical Background of Violent Radicalisation. Research and Interventions from Different Perspectives
Meringolo, P. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52048-9_1 · Cited by 3
Can Simple Heuristics Explain Moral Inconsistencies?
Fleischhut, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0017 · Cited by 3
INFLUENCE, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & GROUP POLARIZATION: A FIELD STUDY OF A VIRTUAL TEAM
Peng, C.-H., & Slaughter, S. A. (2011) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 3
Autonomy: Risk Assessment
Brito, M. P., & Griffiths, G. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16649-0_24 · Cited by 3
An involvement moderated model of choice shifts
Mongeau, P. A., Hale, J. L., & Smith, M. D. (1993) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934219309367559 · Cited by 3
HUMAN VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES: AFFINITY AND COMMUNICATION DYNAMICS
Cini, A., & Guazzini, A. (2013) · Advances in Complex Systems · doi:10.1142/s0219525913500343 · Cited by 3
approaches to decision-making
Williams, K. (2007) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780080474700-21 · Cited by 3
Citizenry incompetence and the epistemic structure of society
Brasi, L. D. (2018) · Filosofia Unisinos · doi:10.4013/fsu.2018.193.03 · Cited by 3
Post-Truth, Polarization and Other Emotional Threats to Democracy
Giordano, A. (2020) · Nordicum-Mediterraneum · doi:10.33112/nm.15.2.2 · Cited by 3
“After the Discussion, I am Even More Confident in My Point of View”: An Overview of Studies of Group Polarization
Nevryuev, A. N., & Гагарина, М. А. (2021) · Review of Business and Economics Studies · doi:10.26794/2308-944x-2020-8-2-6-11 · Cited by 3
Collectivized Intellectualism
Smith, J. J., & Wald, B. (2019) · Res Philosophica · doi:10.11612/resphil.1766 · Cited by 3
The Benefits of Product Quality Disagreement - When Divergent Reviews Drive Online Word of MouthPreprint
Nagle, F., & Riedl, C. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2259055 · Cited by 3
Mitigating Escalation of Commitment: An Investigation of the Effects of Priming in Team Decision-Making SettingsPreprint
Dzuranin, A. C. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1662539 · Cited by 3
Designing within: Dr Bela H. Banathy's contributions to the self‐organization of public discourse
Walton, D. C. (2004) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.622 · Cited by 3

Authors: Isenberg, D. J.
Affiliations: Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author: Isenberg, Daniel J.
Venue: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1986-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 6
Pages: 1141-1151
ISSN: 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
1939-1315
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141
OpenAlex: W2042714524
Cited by: 1,044
References: 62
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 66
FWCI: 23.40
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords: group polarization, social comparison, persuasive argumentation, group decision making, effect size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks