Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice.

Lowery, Brian S., Hardin, Curtis D., Sinclair, Stacey·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Although most research on the control of automatic prejudice has focused on the efficacy of deliberate attempts to suppress or correct for stereotyping, the reported experiments tested the hypothesis that automatic racial prejudice is subject to common social influence. In experiments involving actual interethnic contact, both tacit and expressed social influence reduced the expression of automatic prejudice, as assessed by two different measures of automatic attitudes. Moreover, the automatic social tuning effect depended on participant ethnicity. European Americans (but not Asian Americans) exhibited less automatic prejudice in the presence of a Black experimenter than a White experimenter (Experiments 2 and 4), although both groups exhibited reduced automatic prejudice when instructed to avoid prejudice (Experiment 3). Results are consistent with shared reality theory, which postulates that social regulation is central to social cognition.

Cites (7)

  1. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
    Greenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 1995 · Psychological Review
  2. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
    Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. A model of dual attitudes.
    Wilson, Timothy D., Lindsey, Samuel, Schooler, Tonya Y. · 2000 · Psychological Review
  4. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?
    Fazio, Russell H., Jackson, Joni R., Dunton, Bridget C., Williams, Carol J. · 1995 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.
    Galinsky, Adam D., Moskowitz, Gordon B. · 2000 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  6. Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures.
    Wittenbrink, Bernd, Judd, Charles M., Park, Bernadette · 1997 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  7. Prejudice with and without compunction
    Devine, Patricia G., Monteith, Margo J., Zuwerink, Julia R., Elliot, Andrew J. · 1991 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 7 references

Cited by (27)

  1. Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
    Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira · 2010 · Psychological Review
  2. Untitled work
    2003 · 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
  3. A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures
    Hofmann, Wilhelm, Gawronski, Bertram, Gschwendner, Tobias, Le, Huy, Schmitt, Manfred · 2005 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  4. The Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice
    Blair, Irene V. · 2002 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  5. Attitudes as Object–Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength
    Fazio, Russell H. · 2007 · Social Cognition

See all 460

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.842
The paper
Lowery, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.842

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.