The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The case for motivated reasoning.
Abstract
It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely to arrive at conclusions that they want to arrive at, but their ability to do so is constrained by their ability to construct seemingly reasonable justifications for these conclusions. These ideas can account for a wide variety of research concerned with motivated reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When people try to reason through an issue, they often work hard to find evidence that confirms their initial perspective 55-58 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Khatun et al. (2022) and Ahsan et al. (2022) identify involuntary non-migrants in Bangladesh using retrospective, self-reported survey data, which run the risk of motivated reasoning (Kunda 1990).”
From Trapped by climate change? (In)voluntary immobility in Bangladesh (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“People may process information in a manner that is consistent with their partisan identities, prior beliefs, and motivations, a process known as motivated cognition (34–37).”
From Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media (2021) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“The processing of false information is likely to be motivated by a confirmation bias (e.g., Hameleers et al., 2024): People are more likely to uncritically accept information when it reassures their worldviews and political attitudes, and critically scrutinize information when it does not confirm their existing worldviews (e.g., Kunda, 1990).”
From How persuasive are political cheapfakes disseminated via social media? The effects of out-of-context visual disinformation on message credibility and issue agreement (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Based on various theories, such as the theory of motivated reasoning, which explains that decisions are often based on pre-determined goals and desirability rather than an accurate reflection of the evidence (Kunda, 1990), researchers have identified a few individual variables that may motivate the person to believe misinformation they are exposed to.These include political orientation (Chen et al”
From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“the reason being people's motivated reasoning (Grossman, 2014; Kunda, 1990)-the tendency to interpret reality in a self-serving way.”
From The Consequences of Participating in the Sharing Economy: A Transparency-Based Sharing Framework (2021) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“It is proposed that there are two distinct but coexisting human motivations that account for citizens' choice and consumption of political information: directional vs. accuracy (Kunda, 1990, or defensive vs. accuracy in Hart et al., 2009, or cognitive consistency vs. understanding in Holbert et al., 2013).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The underlying reason for the reinforcing tendency of algorithms is that algorithms are naturally designed to operate with, not against, human tendencies, one of which is that people feel more comfortable with consistency and confirmation (Kunda, 1990).”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Yet, given the human tendency toward psychological consistency (Kunda, 1990), cognitive salience of counter-attitudinal ideas in the user mind would not be strong enough to drive routine searches online.”
From Do Search Algorithms Endanger Democracy? An Experimental Investigation of Algorithm Effects on Political Polarization (2020) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“The self has a powerful need to see itself as having integrity, but it must do so within the constraints of reality (Adler 2012, Kunda 1990, Pennebaker & Chung 2011, Wilson 2011).”
From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Kunda 1990
In the citing paper
“One kind of less epistemically rational but more epistemically committal belief in AI consciousness may manifest when AI users continue to attribute consciousness to chatbots even when strong evidence suggests otherwise, because their reasoning processes are distorted by cognitive or motivational biases.”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“many motivationally biased beliefs aren't yet fully insulated from counterevidence but depend on what has been called an”
From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“These mechanisms are best characterized as cognitive–motivational, insofar as they involve the goal-directed (motivational) use of information processing (cognition), as described in several classic social psychological theories88,96,97.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [97]
In the citing paper
“It is also important to emphasize that many of these top-down influences occur automatically and without awareness (Kunda, 1990; Nickerson, 1998; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Wilson & Brekke, 1994).”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
In the citing paper
“Thus, such use of reference materials causes motivation and expectations that then can bias the observations and interpretation of the actual evidence”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Kunda, 1990
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9 · Cited by 9,984 · cited 2×
“In several studies, incentives or admonitions to be accurate did not eliminate bias ( Fischhoff, 1977 ; Kahneman & Tversky, 1972a ; Lord, Lepper, & Preston, 1984 ; Tversky & Kahneman, 1973 ).”
BackgroundThe Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 2×
“Bem (1972) argued that the findings could also result from self-perception: The subjects, who have limited direct ac-”
BackgroundUnrealistic optimism about future life events
Weinstein, N. D. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · Cited by 4,999
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 8,601–8,700 of 9,025
When the Crowd Agrees(or Not): Topic Effects and Reason Distributions in X's Community Notes
Sumioku, H., & Shibuya, Y. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata66926.2025.11400973
Gong, Z., Peng, D., Cui, J., & Lv, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1751670 · Cited by 3
Bahtişen, G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6276259
Gao, L., & Strömbäck, J. (2026) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051261429392
Carmona‐López, C., Urbiola, A., Navas, M. C. D., & de Lemus, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0340982
Onishi, W. (2026) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/20531680261428570
Kim, Y. J. (2026) · International Political Science Review · doi:10.1177/01925121251410597
Vaupotič, N., Vitale, V., Grellier, J., Martin, L., Abeln, F., Boehmert, C., Link, S., Schulz, C., Kojimahara, N., & White, M. P. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6427310
From Citizen Input to Elite Legitimation: The Logic of Will-Confirmation in Constitution-Making
Martin, M. J. (2026) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041526x17731675177333
Behavioral Agency Problems and Solutions: A Research Agenda for Organizational Law and Beyond
Tor, A. (2026) · Economic analysis of law in European legal scholarship · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19624-8_1
Zhu, X., Kim, Y., & Chen, H.-Y. (2026) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502261430969
Fischer, H., Erhardt, F., Krämer, O., Holzschuh, N., Leßmöllmann, A., & Utz, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6446868
Syropoulos, S., Law, K. F., Li, C., Leidner, B., & Young, K. (2026) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302261425955
Maintaining Reality Contact in Bounded Systems: Suppression, Distortion, and Proxy HijackPreprint
Fong, K. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6347299
Singh, V., Maheshwari, N., Khekare, G. S., & Rana, S. S. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5467-5.ch003
Personality Traits and Social Validation: Orientation and Interpretation of Ambiguous FeedbackPreprint
Song, B., & Orosz, G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6478683
Trusting the Gatekeeper: Why and When Do we Trust State Audit Institutions?
Krup, D. N., Mizrahi, S., & Vigoda‐Gadot, E. (2026) · Regulation & Governance · doi:10.1111/rego.70153
Rofiqi, R., Fikri, I. F., & Sugianto, H. (2026) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/10511431.2026.2646003
La duperie de soi et le problème de l'irrationalité
Correia, V. S. N. (2008) · doi:10.70675/1a483f67zce5bz46d0z8a02z8a847c7cd2cd
Wang, W., Jia, Y. D., & Grabe, M. E. (2026) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-08-2025-0666
van der Goot, E. S., Jacobs, L., Bundi, P., Varone, F., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Vliegenthart, R., Sheffer, L., & Fernandes, J. M. (2026) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1017/s1475676526100966
Confirmation bias in young children’s information seeking and evaluation of novel foods
Nakamichi, N. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106514
La rationalité des mortels : les pensées de mort perturbent les processus analytiques
Trémolière, B. (2013) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9bfa750dz244dz4ac1za9adz8ccd26a9dac2 · Cited by 1
Memory, Archives, History: The Intellectual Legacies of Carter J. Eckert
Lynn, H. G. (2026) · The journal of Korean studies · doi:10.1215/07311613-12178368
Who is Misinformed About the EU?
Kritzinger, S., Partheymüller, J., Voith, V., & Plescia, C. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780191996191.003.0011
Hubbard, T. D., Markoczy, L. A., & Zaandam, A. (2026) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2024.0347
Raisonnement et Argumentation : une approche interculturelle et développementale
Castelain, T. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/efa0737fze71dz42d0zad8cz315bcc27aa8e · Cited by 1
Muting the Liars: A Democratic Response to Disinformation
Huang, Y.-H. (2026) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123425101294
Dilemmas in Science Communication
Gerken, M. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780192585325.003.0015
Impact of AI on Trust in the Media
Kolo, C., Mütterlein, J., & Schmid, S. A. (2026) · Future of business and finance · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07605-2_8
Determinants of verification behavior in generative search: Evidence from a conjoint experiment
Knor, E. L., Reiss, M. V., Möller, J. E., & Merten, L. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101056 · Cited by 5
Le mérite : signification, possibilité et valeur
Allard, A. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e98aad6fza722z4881z851az56086d26634d
Evaluation of cognitive biases in procurement decisions : an empirical analysis
Delaume, R. C. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/bf567d9bz25a7z4d0aza3f1z8634cc118e43
The anxious inquirer : emotions and epistemic uncertainty
Vazard, J. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a4461588zdb39z4eafza9efz887c07dad202
On Sharing Benefits Created by Costly Help
Kugler, T., Avrahami, J., Budescu, D. V., Kareev, Y., Shmuell, T., & Tzameret, V. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70078
Kruikemeier, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2026) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x261436572
Networking behaviors under the microscope : examining networking actions from different perspectives
Ziani-Franclet, Z. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7a4e09eezaa34z455dz8bb3zb1989e8ccca3
La genèse de la représentation de soi : une approche néo-humienne
Charrier, A. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f7bf6301za687z402czb3cdz355d6f893cc1
Caroti, D. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b247f1e8zeb02z4318z8ee2ze6eb1417241c · Cited by 1
Interferences between decisional variables : behavioural and computational studies
Bioud, E. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5a7bf3b9zcb60z48bdz8ea4z5effd60bb856
Influences on Dual-Process Ethical Decision-Making and the Development of Moral Automaticity
Warner, C. H. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/af8190a8za7e8z4c5azac44z52ca0ad8e270
Updating in parallel under threat : cues, emotions, frames, and memories
Georgarakis, G. N. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e0cecd3az44daz4250za25czc075b31d59ab
Gender in language and gender in the social mind
Xiao, H. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2f0e7468z39d6z489cz8c94z236e77a630f5
Understanding misinformation and fighting for information
Altay, S. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2e02b9cfz3b17z4c05za865zfcbe3a9fb6e4
The price of ethnic marginalization: the peril of ethnic exclusion in times of public health crisis
Hatungimana, W., Youn, L. H., Liu, R., & Nagao, H. (2026) · European Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s1755773926100344
Spatial Sources of Inequalities and Determinants of Redistribution
Brunetti, R. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2fada326z8b36z4ee1zae0dz5a1f255260f3
Souma, Y., Shibata, Y., Tsujimoto, M., Cui, Q., Nakazawa, T., Tatsumi, T., Arima, Y., & Ohnuma, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346574
Ideology on Trial: How CEO Political Leanings Shape Firms' Propensity to Litigate Over Patents
Radfard, A., & Pistilli, L. (2026) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.70046
Three essays in the economics of information
Barreto, D. M. A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/cf40e9a2z18adz41abzb2f9z442f6a5f09f2
Three essays in information and mechanism design
Augias, V. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/a9666486z2f09z4cd8zbeb4z06cf63c7309c
Marambio, A., & Navia, P. D. (2026) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-026-10283-4
The Role of Metacognition in Occupational Pursuits : Evidence from Laboratory Experiments
Cavalan, Q. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7fb86a89zd36fz4d73zae75zb74f435a571f
Choi, G., & Kim, B.-H. (2026) · 행정논총 · doi:10.24145/kjpa.64.1.1
Balancing visibility with vigilance: The neutral advantage in framing transgender athletes
Hopkins, A., & Saks, J. (2026) · News Research Journal · doi:10.1177/30497841261438430
Appuhami, R., Jia, J., & Li, Z. (2026) · International Journal of Auditing · doi:10.1111/ijau.70036
Can AI Deliberate? Evaluating Deliberative Quality and Stance Flow in Multi-Agent LLMs
Zhuang, K., YUHENG, W., & Zhang, W. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3798877
Individual in online polarization: Development of the online polarized aggression scale (OPAS)
Li, H., Zhou, Z., Cui, X., & Zhao, N. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113815
Conspiracy beliefs and populist radical right attitudes: A comparative European analysis
Darder, A. B., & Kenny, J. (2026) · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations · doi:10.1177/13691481261433379
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0006
Creating Ignorance through Absences
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0010
Pattnaik, S., Jain, C., & Pinsky, E. (2026) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8040098 · Cited by 1
Closing Gaps and Making Connections
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0012
Smithson, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.002.0005
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0009
Smithson, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.002.0004
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0002
Creating Ignorance through Falsehoods
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0011
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0005
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0007
Smithson, M. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0004
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0008
Ignorance Studies, Where Is Psychology?
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0001
Trusting Generative AI for Health Advice: A Pre-Registered Survey Experiment (Preprint)Preprint
Landrum, A. R., Verma, N., & Kehrberg, A. K. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.97882
What Do We Think Others Are Missing?
Smithson, M. J. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198960614.003.0003
Debiasing accounting judgment and decision-making
Camilli, R., Cristofaro, M., Hristov, I., & Sargiacomo, M. (2026) · Accounting Forum · doi:10.1080/01559982.2026.2616586
Theoretical Discourses of Misinformation
Dick, M. J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15508-5_2
Determinants of Verification Behavior in Generative Search: Evidence from a Conjoint ExperimentPreprint
Reiss, M. V., & Knor, E. L. (2026) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
The Mechanism of Filter Bubbles, Algorithms, and Perception Management in Security
Ağırdil, O. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6566-4.ch005
Elaboration Drift: How Human–LLM Interaction Erodes Epistemic TractionPreprint
Lee, J. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6480298
Chen, Y.-C., & Hou, Y. (2026) · Research in Transportation Business & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101682
(2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83742-061-220261010
Gender, Political Orientation, and Public Reactions to Ministerial Comebacks after Scandals
Muriaas, R. L., & Stavenes, T. (2026) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-026-10143-w
Kim, N. K., Nam, Y., Yang, J., & Cho, W. (2026) · Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00323217261431497
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunda, Z.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kunda, Ziva
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-498
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2149893809
- Cited by
- 9,022
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 542 · 2025: 609 · 2024: 519 · 2023: 583 · 2022: 640 · 2021: 606 · 2020: 642 · 2019: 631 · 2018: 483 · 2017: 372 · 2016: 331 · 2015: 321 · 2014: 299 · 2013: 231 · 2012: 258
- FWCI
- 23.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh042239-03)
- National Institute of Mental Health (1 RO1 MH42239-01A1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- motivated reasoning, motivation, belief evaluation, cognitive strategies, accuracy motivation, confirmation bias, justification
- MeSH terms
- Attitude, Concept Formation, Humans, Motivation, Problem Solving, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
