The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the century, feedback interventions (FIs) produced negative—but largely ignored—effects on performance. A meta-analysis (607 effect sizes; 23,663 observations) suggests that FIs improved performance on average (d =.41) but that over '/3 of the FIs decreased perfor-mance. This finding cannot be explained by sampling error, feedback sign, or existing theories. The authors proposed a preliminary FI theory (FIT) and tested it with moderator analyses. The central assumption of FIT is that FIs change the locus of attention among 3 general and hierarchically organized levels of control: task learning, task motivation, and meta-tasks (including self-related) processes. The results suggest that FI effectiveness decreases as attention moves up the hierarchy closer to the self and away from the task. These findings are further moderated by task characteristics that are still poorly understood. To relate feedback directly to behavior is very confusing. Results are contradictory and seldom straight-forward. (Ilgen, Fisher, & Taylor, 1979, p. 368) The effects of manipulation of KR [knowledge of results] on motor learning...reveal... some violent contradictions to earlier beliefs about KR, and some glaring absences in our knowledge. (Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter, 1984, p. 378). Feedback does not uniformly improve performance. (Balcazar,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comprehensive review of research studies of feedback showed that feedback improved performance in 60% of them.In the cases where it was not helpful, the feedback turned out to be merely a judgment or grading with no indication of how to improve (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The need to motivate pupils is evident, but it is often assumed that this is best done by offering such extrinsic rewards as merits, grades, gold stars and prizes.There is ample evidence that challenges this assumption.”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The inclusion criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent findings about the power of feedback is the remarkable variability of effects.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The existing research has identified several relevant moderators like timing and specificity of the goals and task complexity (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996)”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“However, the efficacy of peer assessment, like traditional feedback, is likely to be contingent on a range of factors including characteristics of the learning environment, the student, and the assessment itself (Kluger and DeNisi 1996; Ossenberg et al. 2018).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi 1996
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi (1996), in their presentation of feedback intervention theory, used grading as an example of an external intervention likely to render metatask processes concerning self-goals, such as performance goals, salient at the expense of task-related goals.”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“but when A&F comes from a regulatory body, the recipient may be more likely to activate affective processes (e.g., distress) which distract attention from the specific task requiring change.”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [10] suggests that feedback that captures the recipient’s attention and directs it toward a specific behaviour is more likely to be successful”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This crucial aspect of formative assessment that has been often discussed but too rarely studied is students' responses to feedback, or the internal mechanisms involved in the reception of feedback and their influences on learning and achievement (Butler and Winne, 1995;Kluger and DeNisi, 1996;Shute, 2008;Draper, 2009;Bennett, 2011;Dann, 2014;Panadero and Lipnevich, 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“For example, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported a mean effect size of 0.41 for formative feedback on performance, but 38% of these effects were negative.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi (1996)
In the citing paper
“For example, norm-referenced feedback promotes maladaptive attributional thinking (e.g., attributing failure to lack of ability) that demotivates efforts on subsequent tasks (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that assessment enhances performance when self-efficacy is high and impedes performance when self-efficacy is low (Beckmann, Beckmann, & Elliott, 2009;Birney, Beckmann, Beckmann, & Double, 2017;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Variations in the effect of feedback have been related to content, form and timing of the feedback, and studies have indeed found variations based on these factors”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, feedback does not always result in student improvement, and may in some cases inhibit learning rather than promote it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“General information unrelated to the performance, comments about a good or poor performance or compliments are less effective than specific comments [27, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi’s feedback intervention theory, derived from their meta-analysis of over 130 studies of feedback interventions in various settings, also posits that feedback becomes less effective as attention shifts away from the task and toward the individual; in short, feedback that is threatening to self-esteem is unlikely to be effective [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“feedback is most effective when directed at the task level and may assist in ‘deep processing and mastery of tasks’ when it is about processing of tasks or self-regulation.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Grades are a clear and non-nuanced form of feedback which can trigger both promotion and prevention responses in trainees [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“positive feedback is more effective in motivating performance improvement for learners in promotion focus, while negative feedback is more useful in motivating performance improvement for learners in prevention focus [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [28] posits that feedback which threatens self-esteem is much less likely to be effective.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to Kluger and de Nisi’s meta-analysis, some feedback recipients feel content to be ‘good enough’ or become helpless when told they are not making the grade, to the detriment of their performance [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that feedback becomes less effective as its focus moves away from the task and toward the self [13, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There are studies which have found learner preferences for group feedback [90] and for individual feedback [1] and it is clear that the context matters [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The results showed greater effectiveness with increasing frequency of the feedback,”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
In the citing paper
“Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger 1996), which suggests that feedback that directs attention towards acceptable and familiar tasks (as opposed to those that generate emotional responses or cause deep self‐reflection) seem most likely to lead to improvement.”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,033
Current developments in transformational leadership: Research and applications.
Bass, B. M. (1999) · The Psychologist-Manager Journal · doi:10.1037/h0095852 · Cited by 85
Doran, D. M., & Sidani, S. (2007) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00073.x · Cited by 84
Winstone, N., Hepper, E. G., & Nash, R. A. (2019) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2019.1693510 · Cited by 89
Framing of feedback impacts student’s satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance
van de Ridder, J. M. M., Peters, C. M. M., Stokking, K. M., de Ru, J. A., & ten Cate, O. (2014) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9567-8 · Cited by 90
Lam, L. W., Peng, K. Z., Wong, C., & Lau, D. C.-S. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315581661 · Cited by 84
Making sense of feedback experiences: a multi‐school study of medical students' narratives
Urquhart, L. M., Rees, C. E., & Ker, J. S. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12304 · Cited by 83
Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students’ perceptions about feedback.
Murdoch‐Eaton, D., & Sargeant, J. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04291.x · Cited by 83
The Impact of Indiana’s System of Interim Assessments on Mathematics and Reading Achievement
Konstantopoulos, S., Miller, S., & van der Ploeg, A. J. (2013) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713498930 · Cited by 90
Volante, L., & Beckett, D. (2011) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 83
Casas‐Arce, P., Lourenço, S. M., & Martínez-Jerez, F. A. (2017) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12184 · Cited by 87
Leveraging chatbots to improve self-guided learning through conversational quizzes
Pereira, J. (2016) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3012430.3012625 · Cited by 83
The misdirection of public policy: comparing and combining standardised effect sizes
Simpson, A. P. (2017) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1280183 · Cited by 83
Arguel, A., Lockyer, L., Kennedy, G. E., Lodge, J. M., & Pachman, M. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1457544 · Cited by 89
Supervisor negative feedback and employee motivation to learn: An attribution perspective
Xing, L., Sun, J., Jepsen, D. M., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267211038514 · Cited by 89
Learning by Teaching Human Pupils and Teachable Agents: The Importance of Recursive Feedback
Okita, S. Y., & Schwartz, D. (2013) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.807263 · Cited by 86
Effects of peer feedback on contribution
Zhu, H., Zhang, A. X., He, J., Kraut, R. E., & Kittur, A. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2481311 · Cited by 83
Agreement in Self–Other Ratings of Leader Effectiveness: The role of demographics and personality
Vecchio, R. P., & Anderson, R. J. (2009) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00460.x · Cited by 83
Szalma, J. L., Hancock, P. A., Dember, W. N., & Warm, J. S. (2006) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712605x62768 · Cited by 83
A feedback model for data-rich learning experiences
Pardo, A. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1356905 · Cited by 82
Quantifying the dynamics of failure across science, startups and security
Yin, Y., Wang, Y., Evans, J. A., & Wang, D. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1725-y · Cited by 86
Harari, D., Parke, M. R., & Marr, J. C. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0049 · Cited by 87
Demographic Differences and Reactions to Performance Feedback
Geddes, D., & Konrad, A. M. (2003) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267035612003 · Cited by 82
Sparr, J. L., Knipfer, K., & Willems, F. (2016) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21263 · Cited by 98
Self-Assessment of Linguistic Skills by Bilingual Hispanics
Delgado, P., Guerrero, G., Goggin, J. P., & Ellis, B. B. (1999) · Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1177/0739986399211003 · Cited by 82
De Muynck, G.-J., Vansteenkiste, M., Delrue, J., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L., & Soenens, B. (2017) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2015-0326 · Cited by 81
Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: Reconceptualising Assessment for Learning
Hargreaves, E. (2013) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.787922 · Cited by 81
Designing for Citizen Data Analysis
Tinati, R., Kleek, M. G. V., Simperl, E. P. B., Luczak–Roesch, M., Simpson, R. J., & Shadbolt, N. (2015) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2702123.2702420 · Cited by 85
The Influence of Managerial Accounts on Employees’ Reactions to Negative Feedback
Tata, J. (2002) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601102238358 · Cited by 81
Students’ Perceptions of Oral Screencast Responses to Their Writing
Anson, C. M., Dannels, D. P., Laboy, J. I., & Carneiro, L. (2016) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651916636424 · Cited by 93
Hao, Q., Smith, D. H., Ding, L., Ko, A. J., Ottaway, C., Wilson, J., Arakawa, K., Turcan, A., Poehlman, T., & Greer, T. (2021) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2020.1860408 · Cited by 90
Stovner, R. B., & Klette, K. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103593 · Cited by 104
Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education
Gierl, M. J., Latifi, S., Lai, H., Boulais, A., & De Champlain, A. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12517 · Cited by 80
Competing mindsets in entrepreneurship: The cost of doubt
Mathisen, J.-E., & Arnulf, J. K. (2013) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2013.03.003 · Cited by 80
Designing Effective Feedback Messages in Serious Games and Simulations: A Research Review
Johnson, C. I., Bailey, S. K. T., & Buskirk, W. L. V. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_7 · Cited by 89
The development of gamified learning activities to increase student engagement in learning
Poondej, C., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2016) · Australian educational computing · Cited by 80
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.012 · Cited by 80
Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533 · Cited by 79
Many cheers make light the work: how social support triggers process gains in teams
Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2011) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683941111112631 · Cited by 87
The Evolution and Devolution of 360° Feedback
Bracken, D. W., Rose, D. S., & Church, A. H. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2016.93 · Cited by 79
Successive Open Innovation Contests and Incentives: Winner‐Take‐All or Multiple Prizes?
Hofstetter, R., Zhang, J. Z., & Herrmann, A. P. (2017) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12424 · Cited by 79
Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.011 · Cited by 90
Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Sun, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196 · Cited by 80
Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2005) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320500349961 · Cited by 89
Wegge, J. (2006) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci2103_1 · Cited by 82
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2016) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770 · Cited by 79
The longitudinal effects of peer feedback in the development and transfer of student teamwork skills
Donia, M. B. L., O’Neill, T., & Brutus, S. (2017) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.012 · Cited by 85
Self-tracking of Physical Activity in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kooiman, T. J. M., de Groot, M., Hoogenberg, K., Krijnen, W. P., van der Schans, C. P., & Kooy, A. (2018) · CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000443 · Cited by 78
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 · Cited by 78
Independent reading: The relationship of challenge, non‐fiction and gender to achievement
Topping, K. J., Samuels, J., & Paul, T. (2008) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920701609380 · Cited by 78
Learning intentions and success criteria: learners' and teachers' views
Crichton, H., & McDaid, A. (2015) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1103278 · Cited by 78
Sanguinetti, A., Dombrovski, K., & Sikand, S. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.001 · Cited by 78
Rognstad, K., Wentzel‐Larsen, T., Neumer, S., & Kjøbli, J. (2022) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-022-01236-9 · Cited by 78
Evidence-based answers to 15 questions about leveraging 360-degree feedback.
Nowack, K. M., & Mashihi, S. (2012) · Consulting psychology journal · doi:10.1037/a0030011 · Cited by 86
Evaluating a large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning in Sweden
Jönsson, A., Lundahl, C., & Holmgren, A. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.970612 · Cited by 78
Social Comparisons to Motivate Contributions to an Online Community
Harper, F. M., Li, S. X., Chen, Y., & Konstan, J. A. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_20 · Cited by 78
Master’s thesis projects: student perceptions of supervisor feedback
de Kleijn, R. A. M., Mainhard, T., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.777690 · Cited by 78
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78
Dynamic Decision Making: Learning Processes and New Research Directions
González, C., Fakhari, P., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2017) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720817710347 · Cited by 89
Tailoring Feedback to Users’ Actions in a Persuasive Game for Household Electricity Conservation
Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Jacucci, G., Tusa, G., Mikkola, T., Zamboni, L., & Hoggan, E. E. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_9 · Cited by 78
Kluger, A. N., & Tikochinsky, J. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.408 · Cited by 78
Self-citationMianda, S., & Voce, A. S. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3561-4 · Cited by 77
Assessing user interface needs of post-editors of machine translation
O’Brien, J. M. A. S. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9781315648934-17 · Cited by 77
Brooks, C., Burton, R., der Kleij, F. M. V., Ablaza, C., Carroll, A., Hattie, J., & Neill, S. (2021) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103387 · Cited by 77
Progress feedback effects on students' writing mastery goal, self-efficacy beliefs, and performance
Duijnhouwer, H., Prins, F. J., & Stokking, K. M. (2010) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611003711393 · Cited by 83
Emotion blocks the path to learning under stereotype threat
Mangels, J. A., Good, C., Whiteman, R. C., Maniscalco, B., & Dweck, C. S. (2011) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq100 · Cited by 77
Using audit and feedback to health professionals to improve the quality and safety of health care
Flottorp, S. A., Jamtvedt, G., Gibis, B., & McKee, M. (2010) · Cited by 77
Taylor, E., & Tyler, J. H. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16877 · Cited by 79
Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A., & Harks, B. (2008) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.111 · Cited by 76
Do we self-regulate actions or perceptions? A test of two computational models
Vancouver, J. B., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2008) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-008-9021-7 · Cited by 76
The effects of peer judgements on teamwork and self-assessment ability in collaborative group work
Sridharan, B., & Boud, D. J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1545898 · Cited by 76
Analytics for Student Engagement
Vytasek, J., Patzak, A., & Winne, P. H. (2019) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_3 · Cited by 79
Panadero, E. (2023) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2023.2223642 · Cited by 76
Pedagogical Practices to Support Classroom Cultures of Scientific Inquiry
Herrenkohl, L. R., Tasker, T., & White, B. Y. (2011) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.534309 · Cited by 76
Overeem, K., Lombarts, K. M. J. M. H., Arah, O. A., Klazinga, N., Grol, R. P. T. M., & Wollersheim, H. C. H. (2010) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/01421590903144128 · Cited by 76
Feng, M., Heffernan, N. T., & Koedinger, K. R. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11774303_4 · Cited by 77
Setting the Record Straight on “High-Yield” Strategies
Marzano, R. J. (2009) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172170909100105 · Cited by 75
Leadership coach effectiveness as fostering self-determined, sustained change
Taylor, S. N., Passarelli, A. M., & Oosten, E. B. V. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101313 · Cited by 92
How managerial coaching promotes employees' affective commitment and individual performance
Ribeiro, N. M. P., Nguyen, T. T., Duarte, A. P., de Oliveira, R. T., & Faustino, C. M. S. (2020) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-10-2018-0373 · Cited by 97
Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire
Strijbos, J.-W., Pat‐El, R., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100980 · Cited by 87
The Köhler Group Motivation Gain: How to Motivate the ‘Weak Links’ in a Group
Kerr, N. L., & Hertel, G. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00333.x · Cited by 75
King, P. E., Young, M. J., & Behnke, R. R. (2000) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520009379224 · Cited by 75
Online Learning Based on Essential Concepts and Formative Assessment
Lawton, D. T., Vye, N. J., Bransford, J. D., Sanders, E. A., Richey, M., French, D., & Stephens, R. (2012) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x · Cited by 79
Zhang, Q., & Sapp, D. A. (2012) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.727008 · Cited by 75
New Directions in Formative Feedback in Interactive Learning Environments
Goldin, I. M., Narciss, S., Foltz, P. W., & Bauer, M. I. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0135-7 · Cited by 75
Automated, adaptive guidance for K-12 education
Gerard, L. F., Matuk, C. F., McElhaney, K. W., & Linn, M. C. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.001 · Cited by 83
Feedback in surgical education
Boghdady, M. E., & Alijani, A. (2016) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2016.06.006 · Cited by 74
Alam, M., & Singh, P. (2019) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100740 · Cited by 87
Participation in the design of performance management systems: a quasi‐experimental field study
Kleingeld, A., van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., & Algera, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.266 · Cited by 74
Feedback by technology: Attitudes and opinions of truck drivers
Huang, Y.-H., Roetting, M., McDevitt, J. R., Melton, D., & Smith, G. S. (2005) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.005 · Cited by 74
Building personal resources through interventions: An integrative review
Gilbert, E. K., Foulk, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2198 · Cited by 81
Development of Immersive Personalized Training Environment for Construction Workers
Jeelani, I., Han, K. K., & Albert, A. (2017) · ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (i3CE) · doi:10.1061/9780784480830.050 · Cited by 74
Steinert, S., Avila, K. E., Ruzika, S., Kuhn, J., & Küchemann, S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00354-1 · Cited by 73
Moore, D. A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.02.005 · Cited by 73
Fereday, J. A., & Muir‐Cochrane, E. (2006) · Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia · doi:10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60511-9 · Cited by 73
The Interactive Effects of Goal Orientation and Feedback Specificity on Task Performance
Davis, W. D. (2005) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1804_7 · Cited by 73
GENSI: A new graphical tool to collect ego-centered network data
Stark, T., & Krosnick, J. A. (2016) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2016.07.007 · Cited by 73
Students' and teachers' views of written feedback at undergraduate level: A literature review
Agius, N. M., & Wilkinson, A. (2014) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.005 · Cited by 72
You Think Failure Is Hard? So Is Learning From It
Eskreis-Winkler, L., & Fishbach, A. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211059817 · Cited by 71
The Effects of Financial Statement Information Proximity and Feedback on Cash Flow Forecasts
Hodge, F. D., Hopkins, P. E., & Wood, D. A. (2010) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01003.x · Cited by 72
Vancouver, J. B., Tamanini, K. B., & Yoder, R. J. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308321550 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Kluger, Avraham N.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-284
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2030441548
- Semantic Scholar
- 97cce81ca813ed757e1e76c0023865c7dbdc7308
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 369 · 2020: 432 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 302 · 2017: 334 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 354 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- feedback interventions, performance improvement, feedback effectiveness, feedback intervention theory, task learning, task motivation, knowledge of results, motor learning, task characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
