The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the century, feedback interventions (FIs) produced negative—but largely ignored—effects on performance. A meta-analysis (607 effect sizes; 23,663 observations) suggests that FIs improved performance on average (d =.41) but that over '/3 of the FIs decreased perfor-mance. This finding cannot be explained by sampling error, feedback sign, or existing theories. The authors proposed a preliminary FI theory (FIT) and tested it with moderator analyses. The central assumption of FIT is that FIs change the locus of attention among 3 general and hierarchically organized levels of control: task learning, task motivation, and meta-tasks (including self-related) processes. The results suggest that FI effectiveness decreases as attention moves up the hierarchy closer to the self and away from the task. These findings are further moderated by task characteristics that are still poorly understood. To relate feedback directly to behavior is very confusing. Results are contradictory and seldom straight-forward. (Ilgen, Fisher, & Taylor, 1979, p. 368) The effects of manipulation of KR [knowledge of results] on motor learning...reveal... some violent contradictions to earlier beliefs about KR, and some glaring absences in our knowledge. (Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter, 1984, p. 378). Feedback does not uniformly improve performance. (Balcazar,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comprehensive review of research studies of feedback showed that feedback improved performance in 60% of them.In the cases where it was not helpful, the feedback turned out to be merely a judgment or grading with no indication of how to improve (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The need to motivate pupils is evident, but it is often assumed that this is best done by offering such extrinsic rewards as merits, grades, gold stars and prizes.There is ample evidence that challenges this assumption.”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The inclusion criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent findings about the power of feedback is the remarkable variability of effects.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The existing research has identified several relevant moderators like timing and specificity of the goals and task complexity (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996)”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“However, the efficacy of peer assessment, like traditional feedback, is likely to be contingent on a range of factors including characteristics of the learning environment, the student, and the assessment itself (Kluger and DeNisi 1996; Ossenberg et al. 2018).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi 1996
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi (1996), in their presentation of feedback intervention theory, used grading as an example of an external intervention likely to render metatask processes concerning self-goals, such as performance goals, salient at the expense of task-related goals.”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“but when A&F comes from a regulatory body, the recipient may be more likely to activate affective processes (e.g., distress) which distract attention from the specific task requiring change.”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [10] suggests that feedback that captures the recipient’s attention and directs it toward a specific behaviour is more likely to be successful”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This crucial aspect of formative assessment that has been often discussed but too rarely studied is students' responses to feedback, or the internal mechanisms involved in the reception of feedback and their influences on learning and achievement (Butler and Winne, 1995;Kluger and DeNisi, 1996;Shute, 2008;Draper, 2009;Bennett, 2011;Dann, 2014;Panadero and Lipnevich, 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“For example, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported a mean effect size of 0.41 for formative feedback on performance, but 38% of these effects were negative.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi (1996)
In the citing paper
“For example, norm-referenced feedback promotes maladaptive attributional thinking (e.g., attributing failure to lack of ability) that demotivates efforts on subsequent tasks (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that assessment enhances performance when self-efficacy is high and impedes performance when self-efficacy is low (Beckmann, Beckmann, & Elliott, 2009;Birney, Beckmann, Beckmann, & Double, 2017;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Variations in the effect of feedback have been related to content, form and timing of the feedback, and studies have indeed found variations based on these factors”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, feedback does not always result in student improvement, and may in some cases inhibit learning rather than promote it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“General information unrelated to the performance, comments about a good or poor performance or compliments are less effective than specific comments [27, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi’s feedback intervention theory, derived from their meta-analysis of over 130 studies of feedback interventions in various settings, also posits that feedback becomes less effective as attention shifts away from the task and toward the individual; in short, feedback that is threatening to self-esteem is unlikely to be effective [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“feedback is most effective when directed at the task level and may assist in ‘deep processing and mastery of tasks’ when it is about processing of tasks or self-regulation.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Grades are a clear and non-nuanced form of feedback which can trigger both promotion and prevention responses in trainees [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“positive feedback is more effective in motivating performance improvement for learners in promotion focus, while negative feedback is more useful in motivating performance improvement for learners in prevention focus [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [28] posits that feedback which threatens self-esteem is much less likely to be effective.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to Kluger and de Nisi’s meta-analysis, some feedback recipients feel content to be ‘good enough’ or become helpless when told they are not making the grade, to the detriment of their performance [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that feedback becomes less effective as its focus moves away from the task and toward the self [13, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There are studies which have found learner preferences for group feedback [90] and for individual feedback [1] and it is clear that the context matters [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The results showed greater effectiveness with increasing frequency of the feedback,”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
In the citing paper
“Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger 1996), which suggests that feedback that directs attention towards acceptable and familiar tasks (as opposed to those that generate emotional responses or cause deep self‐reflection) seem most likely to lead to improvement.”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,033
Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: The role of negative affectivity.
Lam, S. S. K., Yik, M., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.192 · Cited by 107
Mitchell, T. R., & Daniels, D. (2003) · Handbook of Psychology · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1210 · Cited by 96
Polite web-based intelligent tutors: Can they improve learning in classrooms?
McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.019 · Cited by 98
Feedback Dialogues That Stimulate Students' Reflective Thinking
van der Schaaf, M. F., Baartman, L. K. J., Prins, F. J., Oosterbaan, A. E., & Schaap, H. (2011) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.628693 · Cited by 95
Student engagement with feedback and attainment: the role of academic self-efficacy
Adams, A.-M., Wilson, H. K., Money, J., Palmer-Conn, S., & Fearn, J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1640184 · Cited by 111
Reyes, D. L., Dinh, J., Lacerenza, C. N., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101311 · Cited by 102
Searching for Gambles: Gambling Sentiment and Stock Market Outcomes
Chen, Y., Kumar, A., & Zhang, C. (2015) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109020000496 · Cited by 95
The Effect of Upward Feedback on Managerial Behavior
Heslin, P. A., & Latham, G. P. (2003) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00159.x · Cited by 102
National numeracy review report
Stanley, G. V. (2008) · Cited by 95
eRegistries: Electronic registries for maternal and child health
Frøen, J. F., Myhre, S. L., Frost, M. J., Chou, D., Mehl, G. L., Say, L., Cheng, S., Fjeldheim, I., Friberg, I. K., French, S. D., et al. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0801-7 · Cited by 98
Don’t Get It Misconstrued: Executive Construal-Level Shifts and Flexibility in the Upper Echelons
Steinbach, A. L., Gamache, D. L., & Johnson, R. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2017.0273 · Cited by 97
Interruptions and Task Transitions: Understanding Their Characteristics, Processes, and Consequences
Leroy, S., Schmidt, A. M., & Madjar, N. Y. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0146 · Cited by 104
A Platform for AI-Enabled Real-Time Feedback to Promote Digital Collaboration
Porter, B., & Grippa, F. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su122410243 · Cited by 102
Effects of Feedback on Students’ Motor Skill Learning in Physical Education: A Systematic Review
Zhou, Y., Shao, W., & Wang, L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18126281 · Cited by 94
Higbee, J. L., & Goff, E. (2008) · Cited by 94
Designing Effective Training Programs for Investigative Interviewers of Children
Powell, M. B. (2008) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2008.12035804 · Cited by 96
Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2012) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.631647 · Cited by 100
The crucial role of motivation and emotion in classroom learning
Boekaerts, M. (2010) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/9789264086487-6-en · Cited by 99
Tillema, H., Smith, K., & Leshem, S. (2011) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2010.543672 · Cited by 93
Mayo, M. C., Kakarika, M., Pastor, J. C., & Brutus, S. (2012) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0069 · Cited by 99
Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education
Tekian, A. S., Watling, C., Roberts, T. E., Steinert, Y., & Norcini, J. J. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1372564 · Cited by 93
Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement
Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429507533 · Cited by 103
Skipper, Y., & Douglas, K. M. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x · Cited by 106
Harmon, C., Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Slade, K., & Whipple, J. L. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20109 · Cited by 93
McCalley, L. T. (2004) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.024 · Cited by 93
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92
Mobile Intervention Design in Diabetes: Review and Recommendations
Mulvaney, S. A., Ritterband, L. M., & Bosslet, L. (2011) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-011-0230-y · Cited by 92
Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R. F., Penuel, W. R., Javitz, H., Emery, D., et al. (2007) · National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance · Cited by 92
Antecedents and consequences of monitoring domestic electricity consumption
Webb, T. L., Benn, Y., & Chang, B. P. I. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.001 · Cited by 96
Agricola, B. T., Prins, F. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1688764 · Cited by 103
THE IMPACT OF TELECOMMUTING DESIGN ON SOCIAL SYSTEMS, SELF-REGULATION, AND ROLE BOUNDARIES
Allen, D. G., Renn, R. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2004) · Research in personnel and human resources management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22003-x · Cited by 92
Supervisory coaching in a logistics context
Ellinger, A. E., Ellinger, A. D., & Keller, S. B. (2005) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/09600030510634562 · Cited by 92
Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance
Parkes, J., Abercrombie, S., & McCarty, T. A. (2012) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-012-9377-9 · Cited by 92
Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.004 · Cited by 92
Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks
Ajjawi, R., Kent, F., Broadbent, J., Tai, J. H.-M., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2022) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115 · Cited by 91
Toward a Learning Science for Complex Crowdsourcing Tasks
Doroudi, S., Kamar, E. S., Brunskill, E., & Horvitz, E. (2016) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858268 · Cited by 91
Vattøy, K.-D. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100828 · Cited by 99
Chai, F., Ma, J., Wang, Y., Zhu, J., & Han, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1221177 · Cited by 103
Gabriel, A. S., Frantz, N. B., Levy, P. E., & Hilliard, A. W. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12060 · Cited by 106
Liao, J., Huang, M., & Xiao, B. (2016) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.013 · Cited by 96
Why husbands matter: Review of spousal influence on women entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa
Wolf, K., & Fresé, M. (2018) · Africa Journal of Management · doi:10.1080/23322373.2018.1428019 · Cited by 95
Tagliabue, M., Sigurjonsdottir, S. S., & Sandaker, I. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2020.1796647 · Cited by 101
Kubiak, E. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100792 · Cited by 100
Psychology and social networks: A dynamic network theory perspective.
Westaby, J. D., Pfaff, D. L., & Redding, N. S. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0036106 · Cited by 98
Smither, J. W., & Walker, A. G. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.575 · Cited by 97
Gleacher, A. A., Olin, S.-C. S., Nadeem, E., Pollock, M., Ringle, V. A. M., Bickman, L., Douglas, S. R., & Hoagwood, K. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0642-0 · Cited by 96
An Integrative Model Linking Feedback Environment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Peng, J.-C., & Chiu, S.-F. (2010) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224540903365455 · Cited by 99
Web‐based feedback after summative assessment: how do students engage?
Harrison, C., Könings, K. D., Molyneux, A., Schuwirth, L., Wass, V., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12209 · Cited by 95
When Does 360-Degree Feedback Create Behavior Change? And How Would We Know It When It Does?
Bracken, D. W., & Rose, D. S. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9218-5 · Cited by 90
Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: Feedback at the crossroads
Watling, C. (2014) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2014.889812 · Cited by 90
Classroom Strategies to Enhance Academic Engaged Time
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. J. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_31 · Cited by 89
(2015) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 89
Galton, M., & Williamson, J. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203392713-15 · Cited by 89
Making the smart meter social promotes long-term energy conservation
Dominicis, S. D., Sokoloski, R., Jaeger, C. M., & Schultz, P. W. (2019) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0254-5 · Cited by 97
A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender
Smith‐Jentsch, K. A., Scielzo, S. A., Yarbrough, C. S., & Rosopa, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.004 · Cited by 89
Blair, B. (2007) · Art Design & Communication in Higher Education · doi:10.1386/adch.5.2.83_1 · Cited by 89
Levy, P. E., Cober, R. T., & Miller, T. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02771.x · Cited by 89
Budworth, M.-H. E., Latham, G. P., & Manroop, L. (2014) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21618 · Cited by 101
Causal ordering of academic self‐concept and achievement: Effects of type of achievement measure
Pinxten, M., Fraine, B. D., Damme, J. V., & D’Haenens, E. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709910x493071 · Cited by 89
Validation of Assessment for Learning Questionnaires for teachers and students
Pat‐El, R., Tillema, H., Segers, M. S. R., & Vedder, P. H. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02057.x · Cited by 89
Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Valdivia, I. M. Á., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835772 · Cited by 89
Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment
Timmers, C. F., den Broek, J. B.-V., & van den Berg, S. M. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.007 · Cited by 97
Nachreiner, M., Mack, B., Matthies, E., & Tampe-Mai, K. (2015) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.016 · Cited by 88
Lyon, A. R., Lewis, C. C., Boyd, M. R., Hendrix, E., & Liu, F. F. (2016) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0719-4 · Cited by 91
Technology-enhanced human interaction in psychotherapy.
Imel, Z. E., Caperton, D. D., Tanana, M., & Atkins, D. C. (2017) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000213 · Cited by 94
Sijbom, R. B. L., Anseel, F., Crommelinck, M., Beuckelaer, A. D., & Stobbeleir, K. E. M. D. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2235 · Cited by 88
Intensive Interventions for Students Struggling in Reading and Mathematics. A Practice Guide.
Vaughn, S. R., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., & Roberts, G. (2012) · Cited by 88
Jawahar, I. M. “. (2010) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601110378294 · Cited by 88
Managing five paradoxes of 360-degree feedback
Ghorpade, J. V. (2000) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2000.2909846 · Cited by 88
Pygmalion and Employee Learning: The Role of Leader Behaviors
Bezuijen, X. M., van den Berg, P. T., van Dam, K., & Thierry, H. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308329966 · Cited by 94
Challenge Is Key: An Investigation of Affective Organizational Commitment in Undergraduate Interns
Dixon, M. A., Cunningham, G. B., Sagas, M., Turner, B. A., & Kent, A. (2005) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.3200/joeb.80.3.172-180 · Cited by 88
Liu, L., & Yetton, P. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2007.906852 · Cited by 88
Performance feedback, power retention, and the gender gap in leadership
Bear, J. B., Cushenbery, L. D., London, M., & Sherman, G. D. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.003 · Cited by 99
Peifer, C., Schönfeld, P., Wolters, G., Aust, F., & Margraf, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01008 · Cited by 87
Kicken, W., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Education and Training · doi:10.1080/13636820802305561 · Cited by 92
Lourenço, S. M. (2015) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51148 · Cited by 94
Mabbe, E., Soenens, B., Muynck, G. D., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.01.008 · Cited by 95
Implementing Automated Writing Evaluation in Different Instructional Contexts: A Mixed-Methods Study
Palermo, C., & Wilson, J. (2020) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.04 · Cited by 94
Feedback Models for Learning, Teaching and Performance
Molloy, E., & Boud, D. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_33 · Cited by 95
Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 · Cited by 87
The role of guidance in children's discovery learning
Honomichl, R. D., & Chen, Z. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1199 · Cited by 87
Theories Related to Changing Clinician Practice
Riemer, M., Rosof-Williams, J., & Bickman, L. (2005) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2004.05.002 · Cited by 93
The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Training, Development, and Performance Improvement
Passmore, J., Kraiger, K., dos Santos, N. R., & Malvezzi, S. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118736982 · Cited by 92
Some Further Thoughts on the Entrepreneurial Personality
DeNisi, A. S. (2015) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12168 · Cited by 87
Self-citationGame elements improve performance in a working memory training task
Ninaus, M., Pereira, G., Stefitz, R., Prada, R., Paiva, A., Neuper, C., & Wood, G. (2015) · International Journal of Serious Games · doi:10.17083/ijsg.v2i1.60 · Cited by 86
van Sonsbeek, M. A., Hutschemaekers, G. G., Veerman, J. W., & Tiemens, B. B. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-3 · Cited by 86
Negative emotions in informal feedback: The benefits of disappointment and drawbacks of anger
Johnson, G., & Connelly, S. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726714532856 · Cited by 84
Students' perceptions and outcome of teacher feedback: a systematic review
Brandmo, C., & Gamlem, S. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1572950 · Cited by 86
Extending the Classroom through Second Life.
Wang, Y., & Braman, J. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 86
Threat of resource loss: The role of self-regulation in adaptive task performance.
Niessen, C., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000049 · Cited by 93
Mental Models in Project Management Coaching
Berg, M. E., & Karlsen, J. T. (2007) · Engineering Management Journal · doi:10.1080/10429247.2007.11431736 · Cited by 86
Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Estrella, G., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.012 · Cited by 86
Chapter 2: Assessment as a Policy Tool
Hamilton, L. S. (2003) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x027001025 · Cited by 86
Academic background and credibility in executive coaching effectiveness
Bozer, G., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-10-2013-0171 · Cited by 100
Integrating self-regulation theories of work motivation into a dynamic process theory
Vancouver, J. B. (2008) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.02.001 · Cited by 91
The Relationship Between Leaders’ Personality and Their Reactions to and Use of Multisource Feedback
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Richmond, K. R. (2005) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601103254912 · Cited by 90
Promoting sustainable consumption: the risks of using financial incentives
Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781783471270.00033 · Cited by 94
Duijn, C. C. M. A., Welink, L. S., Mándoki, M., Kremer, W. D. J., ten Cate, O., & Bok, H. G. J. (2017) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0361-1 · Cited by 86
Resident Self-Other Assessor Agreement
Lipsett, P. A. (2011) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2011.172 · Cited by 85
Therapists’ and clients’ perceptions of routine outcome measurement in the NHS: A qualitative study
Unsworth, G., Cowie, H., & Green, A. (2011) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/14733145.2011.565125 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Kluger, Avraham N.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-284
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2030441548
- Semantic Scholar
- 97cce81ca813ed757e1e76c0023865c7dbdc7308
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 369 · 2020: 432 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 302 · 2017: 334 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 354 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- feedback interventions, performance improvement, feedback effectiveness, feedback intervention theory, task learning, task motivation, knowledge of results, motor learning, task characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
