The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the century, feedback interventions (FIs) produced negative—but largely ignored—effects on performance. A meta-analysis (607 effect sizes; 23,663 observations) suggests that FIs improved performance on average (d =.41) but that over '/3 of the FIs decreased perfor-mance. This finding cannot be explained by sampling error, feedback sign, or existing theories. The authors proposed a preliminary FI theory (FIT) and tested it with moderator analyses. The central assumption of FIT is that FIs change the locus of attention among 3 general and hierarchically organized levels of control: task learning, task motivation, and meta-tasks (including self-related) processes. The results suggest that FI effectiveness decreases as attention moves up the hierarchy closer to the self and away from the task. These findings are further moderated by task characteristics that are still poorly understood. To relate feedback directly to behavior is very confusing. Results are contradictory and seldom straight-forward. (Ilgen, Fisher, & Taylor, 1979, p. 368) The effects of manipulation of KR [knowledge of results] on motor learning...reveal... some violent contradictions to earlier beliefs about KR, and some glaring absences in our knowledge. (Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter, 1984, p. 378). Feedback does not uniformly improve performance. (Balcazar,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comprehensive review of research studies of feedback showed that feedback improved performance in 60% of them.In the cases where it was not helpful, the feedback turned out to be merely a judgment or grading with no indication of how to improve (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The need to motivate pupils is evident, but it is often assumed that this is best done by offering such extrinsic rewards as merits, grades, gold stars and prizes.There is ample evidence that challenges this assumption.”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The inclusion criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent findings about the power of feedback is the remarkable variability of effects.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The existing research has identified several relevant moderators like timing and specificity of the goals and task complexity (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996)”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“However, the efficacy of peer assessment, like traditional feedback, is likely to be contingent on a range of factors including characteristics of the learning environment, the student, and the assessment itself (Kluger and DeNisi 1996; Ossenberg et al. 2018).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi 1996
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi (1996), in their presentation of feedback intervention theory, used grading as an example of an external intervention likely to render metatask processes concerning self-goals, such as performance goals, salient at the expense of task-related goals.”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“but when A&F comes from a regulatory body, the recipient may be more likely to activate affective processes (e.g., distress) which distract attention from the specific task requiring change.”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [10] suggests that feedback that captures the recipient’s attention and directs it toward a specific behaviour is more likely to be successful”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This crucial aspect of formative assessment that has been often discussed but too rarely studied is students' responses to feedback, or the internal mechanisms involved in the reception of feedback and their influences on learning and achievement (Butler and Winne, 1995;Kluger and DeNisi, 1996;Shute, 2008;Draper, 2009;Bennett, 2011;Dann, 2014;Panadero and Lipnevich, 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“For example, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported a mean effect size of 0.41 for formative feedback on performance, but 38% of these effects were negative.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi (1996)
In the citing paper
“For example, norm-referenced feedback promotes maladaptive attributional thinking (e.g., attributing failure to lack of ability) that demotivates efforts on subsequent tasks (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that assessment enhances performance when self-efficacy is high and impedes performance when self-efficacy is low (Beckmann, Beckmann, & Elliott, 2009;Birney, Beckmann, Beckmann, & Double, 2017;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Variations in the effect of feedback have been related to content, form and timing of the feedback, and studies have indeed found variations based on these factors”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, feedback does not always result in student improvement, and may in some cases inhibit learning rather than promote it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“General information unrelated to the performance, comments about a good or poor performance or compliments are less effective than specific comments [27, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi’s feedback intervention theory, derived from their meta-analysis of over 130 studies of feedback interventions in various settings, also posits that feedback becomes less effective as attention shifts away from the task and toward the individual; in short, feedback that is threatening to self-esteem is unlikely to be effective [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“feedback is most effective when directed at the task level and may assist in ‘deep processing and mastery of tasks’ when it is about processing of tasks or self-regulation.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Grades are a clear and non-nuanced form of feedback which can trigger both promotion and prevention responses in trainees [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“positive feedback is more effective in motivating performance improvement for learners in promotion focus, while negative feedback is more useful in motivating performance improvement for learners in prevention focus [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [28] posits that feedback which threatens self-esteem is much less likely to be effective.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to Kluger and de Nisi’s meta-analysis, some feedback recipients feel content to be ‘good enough’ or become helpless when told they are not making the grade, to the detriment of their performance [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that feedback becomes less effective as its focus moves away from the task and toward the self [13, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There are studies which have found learner preferences for group feedback [90] and for individual feedback [1] and it is clear that the context matters [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The results showed greater effectiveness with increasing frequency of the feedback,”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
In the citing paper
“Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger 1996), which suggests that feedback that directs attention towards acceptable and familiar tasks (as opposed to those that generate emotional responses or cause deep self‐reflection) seem most likely to lead to improvement.”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,033
Relationships between Feedback and Self-Development
London, M., Larsen, H. H., & Thisted, L. N. (1999) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601199241002 · Cited by 135
Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. A. (2014) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5 · Cited by 134
Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative
Kluger, A. N., & Van Dijk, D. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03849.x · Cited by 134
Self-citation2. Developing adaptability: A theory for the design of integrated-embedded training systems
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Toney, R. J., Mullins, M. E., Weissbein, D. A., Brown, K. G., & Bell, B. S. (2004) · Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research · doi:10.1016/s1479-3601(01)01004-9 · Cited by 134
Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites
Bickman, L., Douglas, S. R., de Andrade, A. R. V., Tomlinson, M. M., Gleacher, A. A., Olin, S.-C. S., & Hoagwood, K. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0647-8 · Cited by 139
Helfrich, C. D., Rose, A. J., Hartmann, C. W., van Bodegom‐Vos, L., Graham, I. D., Wood, S., Majerczyk, B. R., Good, C. B., POGACH, L. M., Ball, S. L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.12855 · Cited by 138
Improving the Effectiveness of Students in Groups With a Centralized Peer Evaluation System
Brutus, S., & Donia, M. B. L. (2010) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2010.56659882 · Cited by 134
van Woerkom, M., & Sanders, K. (2009) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9136-y · Cited by 139
Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self‐esteem
Ilieș, R., de Pater, I. E., & Judge, T. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710778459 · Cited by 142
Narciss, S. (2004) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.214 · Cited by 133
Atkinson, A. R., Watling, C., & Brand, P. L. P. (2021) · European Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s00431-021-04118-8 · Cited by 133
Rivals or allies: How performance‐prove goal orientation influences knowledge hiding
Zhu, Y., Chen, T., Wang, M., Jin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2372 · Cited by 138
Students evaluating teachers: exploring the importance of faculty reaction to feedback on teaching
Moore, S., & Kuol, N. (2004) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/1356251052000305534 · Cited by 132
Actionable feedback: Unlocking the power of learning and performance improvement
Cannon, M. D., & Witherspoon, R. (2005) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.2005.16965107 · Cited by 132
A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF UPWARD FEEDBACK
REILLY, R. R., Smither, J. W., & Vasilopoulos, N. L. (1996) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01586.x · Cited by 135
The impact of emotional intelligence on accuracy of self‐awareness and leadership performance
Bratton, V. K., Dodd, N. G., & Brown, F. W. (2011) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437731111112971 · Cited by 131
Dynamics of Social Capital: Effects of Performance Feedback on Network Change
Parker, A., Halgin, D. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (2015) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840615613371 · Cited by 130
When Leadership Powers Team Learning: A Meta-Analysis
Koeslag‐Kreunen, M., den Bossche, P. V., Hoven, M., van der Klink, M. R., & Gijselaers, W. (2018) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496418764824 · Cited by 144
London, M., Smither, J. W., & Adsit, D. J. (1997) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601197222003 · Cited by 131
Evaluating an online stress management intervention for college students.
Hintz, S., Frazier, P. A., & Meredith, L. (2015) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000014 · Cited by 128
Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback
ATWATER, L. E., & Brett, J. F. (2004) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.003 · Cited by 133
A meta-review of the student role in feedback
der Kleij, F. M. V., Adie, L. E., & Cumming, J. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005 · Cited by 150
Interactions with the public: Bridging job design and emotional labor perspectives
Grandey, A. A., & Diamond, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.637 · Cited by 133
Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge.
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle‐Johnson, B. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000053 · Cited by 155
The Evolution of Performance Management: Searching for Value
Pulakos, E. D., Mueller-Hanson, R. A., & Arad, S. (2018) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015009 · Cited by 152
on behalf of the EPOCH trial group, Stephens, T., Peden, C. J., Pearse, R. M., Shaw, S. E., Abbott, T. E. F., Jones, E. L., Kocman, D., & Martin, G. P. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9 · Cited by 127
“It’s yours to take”: generating learner feedback literacy in the workplace
Noble, C., Billett, S. R., Armit, L., Collier, L., Hilder, J., Sly, C., & Molloy, E. (2019) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-019-09905-5 · Cited by 138
The design features of forecasting support systems and their effectiveness
Fildes, R. A., Goodwin, P. B., & Lawrence, M. J. (2005) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.01.003 · Cited by 132
Business ethics across cultures: A social cognitive model
Stajković, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1997) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/s1090-9516(97)90023-7 · Cited by 127
The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters.
Fyfe, E. R., Rittle‐Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028389 · Cited by 142
Moving beyond job search quantity
van Hooft, E. A. J., Wanberg, C. R., & Hoye, G. V. (2012) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386612456033 · Cited by 145
JOHNSON, J., & Ferstl, K. L. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00162.x · Cited by 129
Kluger, A. N., & Nir, D. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.08.002 · Cited by 135
Self-citationLuyten, H., Visscher, A. J., & Witziers, B. (2005) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243450500114884 · Cited by 126
What is the role for ICT‐based assessment in universities?
Gipps, C. V. (2005) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070500043176 · Cited by 126
Written Feedback in Mathematics: Mediated by Students' Perception, Moderated by Goal Orientation
Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002 · Cited by 125
Student – Feedback Interaction Model: Revised
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2022) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101208 · Cited by 125
Serious games for health: three steps forwards
Drummond, D., Hadchouel, A., & Tesnière, A. (2017) · Advances in Simulation · doi:10.1186/s41077-017-0036-3 · Cited by 135
Hoever, I. J., Zhou, J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0642 · Cited by 125
Multisource feedback: Lessons learned and implications for practice
ATWATER, L. E., Brett, J. F., & Charles, A. C. (2007) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20161 · Cited by 132
Dahling, J. J., Taylor, S. R., Chau, S. L., & Dwight, S. A. (2015) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12123 · Cited by 124
Pupil commentary on assessment for learning
Cowie, B. (2005) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585170500135921 · Cited by 124
Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation: A meta-analysis
Buckley, P. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106635 · Cited by 124
The Impact of Gamification on Learning Outcomes of Computer Science Majors
Ahmad, A., Zeshan, F., Khan, M. S., Marriam, R., Ali, A., & Samreen, A. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3383456 · Cited by 135
Debriefing Methods for Simulation in Healthcare
Duff, J. P., Morse, K. J., Seelandt, J., Gross, I. T., Lydston, M., Sargeant, J. M., Dieckmann, P., Allen, J. A., Rudolph, J. W., & Kolbe, M. (2024) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000765 · Cited by 124
Brown, G., Harris, L. R., & Harnett, J. A. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.003 · Cited by 124
de Vries, M. F. R. K., Vrignaud, P., & Florent‐Treacy, E. (2004) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519042000181214 · Cited by 124
Action Regulation Theory: Foundations, Current Knowledge and Future Directions
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2018) · The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781473914957.n7 · Cited by 124
Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms
OECD (2005) · doi:10.1787/9789264007413-en · Cited by 123
High-Stakes Testing: Can Rapid Assessment Reduce the Pressure?
Yeh, S. S. (2006) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00663.x · Cited by 123
Chorpita, B. F., Bernstein, A., & Daleiden, E. L. (2007) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0151-x · Cited by 126
Coyle, Y., Guirao, J. C., & de Larios, J. R. (2018) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002 · Cited by 60
Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence
Gude, W. T., Brown, B. C., van der Veer, S. N., Colquhoun, H. L., Ivers, N. M., Brehaut, J., Landis‐Lewis, Z., Armitage, C. J., de Keizer, N. F., & Peek, N. B. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0887-1 · Cited by 132
Subject departments as professional communities?
Visscher, A. J., & Witziers, B. (2004) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192042000279503 · Cited by 123
Feedback Specificity, Learning Opportunities, and Learning.
Goodman, J. S., & Wood, R. E. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.809 · Cited by 123
Patchan, M. M., & Puranik, C. S. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.007 · Cited by 122
Sonnentag, S. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.04.001 · Cited by 151
Siegel, R., König, C. J., & Lazar, V. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100227 · Cited by 121
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., José, I. J., Hermida, R., Chen, T. R., Vega, R. P., Brooks, C. K., & Khare, V. P. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311425613 · Cited by 125
Hysteresis affects approximate number discrimination in young children.
Odic, D., Hock, H. S., & Halberda, J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0030825 · Cited by 121
The Shame of It All: A Review of Shame in Organizational Life
Daniels, M., & Robinson, S. L. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318817604 · Cited by 140
Overcoming the dark side of worker flexibility
Schultz, K. L., McClain, J. O., & Thomas, L. J. (2002) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(02)00040-2 · Cited by 121
Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: Use the entire menu of constructs
Brehaut, J. C., & Eva, K. W. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-114 · Cited by 120
Reddy, S. T., Zegarek, M. H., Fromme, H. B., Ryan, M. S., Schumann, S.-A., & Harris, I. B. (2015) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-14-00461.1 · Cited by 120
Kimball, S. M., & Milanowski, A. (2009) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x08327549 · Cited by 120
Rank Incentives: Evidence from a Randomized Workplace Experiment
Barankay, I. (2012) · Cited by 122
How to foster perceived partner responsiveness: High‐quality listening is key
Itzchakov, G., Reis, H. T., & Weinstein, N. (2021) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12648 · Cited by 132
Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback
ATWATER, L. E., Waldman, D. A., & Brett, J. F. (2002) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.10031 · Cited by 125
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019 · Cited by 122
Coping With Customer Complaints
Bell, S. J., & Luddington, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670505283785 · Cited by 119
Marinova, D., Ye, J., & Singh, J. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.2.28 · Cited by 119
Addas, S., & Pinsonneault, A. (2015) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12064 · Cited by 118
Attali, Y., & van der Kleij, F. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.012 · Cited by 119
Fired up or burned out? How developmental challenge differentially impacts leader behavior.
Courtright, S. H., Colbert, A. E., & Choi, D. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035790 · Cited by 135
Lecce, S., Caputi, M., & Hughes, C. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.011 · Cited by 104
McLeod, B. D., Southam‐Gerow, M. A., Tully, C., Rodríguez, A., & Smith, M. M. (2013) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12020 · Cited by 132
Employee perceptions of their workplaces as learning environments
Coetzer, A. (2007) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/13665620710819375 · Cited by 127
Konradt, U., Schippers, M. C., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1005608 · Cited by 132
A Within-Person Examination of Correlates of Performance and Emotions While Working
Fisher, C. D., & Noble, C. S. (2021) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429187636-2 · Cited by 119
Lörwald, A. C., Lahner, F.-M., Nouns, Z. M., Berendonk, C., Norcini, J., Greif, R., & Huwendiek, S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198009 · Cited by 117
Dannels, D. P., & Martin, K. N. (2008) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651907311923 · Cited by 131
An analysis of shared leadership, diversity, and team creativity in an e-learning environment
Lee, D. S., Lee, K. C., Seo, Y. W., & Choi, D. Y. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.064 · Cited by 117
Toward a Goal Orientation–Based Feedback-Seeking Typology
Gong, Y., Wang, M., Huang, J., & Cheung, S. Y. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314551797 · Cited by 123
Organizational justice and employee satisfaction in performance appraisal
Palaiologos, A., Papazekos, P., & Panayotopoulou, L. (2011) · Journal of European Industrial Training · doi:10.1108/03090591111168348 · Cited by 117
(2004) · Cited by 117
Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment
Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9 · Cited by 116
Tournaments to Crowdsource Innovation: The Role of Moderator Feedback and Participation Intensity
Camacho, N., Nam, H., Kannan, P. K., & Stremersch, S. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242918809673 · Cited by 119
How leaders stimulate employee learning: A leader-member exchange approach
Bezuijen, X. M., van Dam, K., Berg, P., & Thierry, H. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x468099 · Cited by 107
Lechermeier, J., & Faßnacht, M. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0136-8 · Cited by 115
Positive Approach To Leadership (PAL) Implications for Today's Organizations
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M., & Luthans, B. C. (2001) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190100800201 · Cited by 115
Initial knowledge states about assessment: novice teachers’ conceptualisations
Maclellan, E. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.008 · Cited by 115
(2011) · Cited by 115
Payne, V. L., & Hysong, S. J. (2016) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1486-3 · Cited by 122
Mayfield, J. R., & Mayfield, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66930-4 · Cited by 122
Adarkwah, M. A. (2021) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-021-00086-w · Cited by 136
Pei, J.-L., Wang, H.-L., Peng, Q., & Liu, S. (2024) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22226 · Cited by 91
Feedback about Teaching in Higher Ed: Neglected Opportunities to Promote Change
Gormally, C. L., Evans, M., & Brickman, P. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0235 · Cited by 123
Early-stage business model experimentation and pivoting
Burnell, D., Stevenson, R. M., & Fisher, G. (2023) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106314 · Cited by 113
How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations
Kayandé, U., Bruyn, A. D., Lilien, G. L., Rangaswamy, A., & van Bruggen, G. H. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0198 · Cited by 125
The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback
Gnepp, J., Klayman, J., Williamson, I. O., & Barlas, S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234444 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Kluger, Avraham N.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-284
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2030441548
- Semantic Scholar
- 97cce81ca813ed757e1e76c0023865c7dbdc7308
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 369 · 2020: 432 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 302 · 2017: 334 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 354 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- feedback interventions, performance improvement, feedback effectiveness, feedback intervention theory, task learning, task motivation, knowledge of results, motor learning, task characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
