The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the century, feedback interventions (FIs) produced negative—but largely ignored—effects on performance. A meta-analysis (607 effect sizes; 23,663 observations) suggests that FIs improved performance on average (d =.41) but that over '/3 of the FIs decreased perfor-mance. This finding cannot be explained by sampling error, feedback sign, or existing theories. The authors proposed a preliminary FI theory (FIT) and tested it with moderator analyses. The central assumption of FIT is that FIs change the locus of attention among 3 general and hierarchically organized levels of control: task learning, task motivation, and meta-tasks (including self-related) processes. The results suggest that FI effectiveness decreases as attention moves up the hierarchy closer to the self and away from the task. These findings are further moderated by task characteristics that are still poorly understood. To relate feedback directly to behavior is very confusing. Results are contradictory and seldom straight-forward. (Ilgen, Fisher, & Taylor, 1979, p. 368) The effects of manipulation of KR [knowledge of results] on motor learning...reveal... some violent contradictions to earlier beliefs about KR, and some glaring absences in our knowledge. (Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter, 1984, p. 378). Feedback does not uniformly improve performance. (Balcazar,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comprehensive review of research studies of feedback showed that feedback improved performance in 60% of them.In the cases where it was not helpful, the feedback turned out to be merely a judgment or grading with no indication of how to improve (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The need to motivate pupils is evident, but it is often assumed that this is best done by offering such extrinsic rewards as merits, grades, gold stars and prizes.There is ample evidence that challenges this assumption.”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The inclusion criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent findings about the power of feedback is the remarkable variability of effects.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The existing research has identified several relevant moderators like timing and specificity of the goals and task complexity (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996)”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“However, the efficacy of peer assessment, like traditional feedback, is likely to be contingent on a range of factors including characteristics of the learning environment, the student, and the assessment itself (Kluger and DeNisi 1996; Ossenberg et al. 2018).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi 1996
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi (1996), in their presentation of feedback intervention theory, used grading as an example of an external intervention likely to render metatask processes concerning self-goals, such as performance goals, salient at the expense of task-related goals.”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“but when A&F comes from a regulatory body, the recipient may be more likely to activate affective processes (e.g., distress) which distract attention from the specific task requiring change.”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [10] suggests that feedback that captures the recipient’s attention and directs it toward a specific behaviour is more likely to be successful”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This crucial aspect of formative assessment that has been often discussed but too rarely studied is students' responses to feedback, or the internal mechanisms involved in the reception of feedback and their influences on learning and achievement (Butler and Winne, 1995;Kluger and DeNisi, 1996;Shute, 2008;Draper, 2009;Bennett, 2011;Dann, 2014;Panadero and Lipnevich, 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“For example, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported a mean effect size of 0.41 for formative feedback on performance, but 38% of these effects were negative.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi (1996)
In the citing paper
“For example, norm-referenced feedback promotes maladaptive attributional thinking (e.g., attributing failure to lack of ability) that demotivates efforts on subsequent tasks (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that assessment enhances performance when self-efficacy is high and impedes performance when self-efficacy is low (Beckmann, Beckmann, & Elliott, 2009;Birney, Beckmann, Beckmann, & Double, 2017;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Variations in the effect of feedback have been related to content, form and timing of the feedback, and studies have indeed found variations based on these factors”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, feedback does not always result in student improvement, and may in some cases inhibit learning rather than promote it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“General information unrelated to the performance, comments about a good or poor performance or compliments are less effective than specific comments [27, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi’s feedback intervention theory, derived from their meta-analysis of over 130 studies of feedback interventions in various settings, also posits that feedback becomes less effective as attention shifts away from the task and toward the individual; in short, feedback that is threatening to self-esteem is unlikely to be effective [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“feedback is most effective when directed at the task level and may assist in ‘deep processing and mastery of tasks’ when it is about processing of tasks or self-regulation.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Grades are a clear and non-nuanced form of feedback which can trigger both promotion and prevention responses in trainees [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“positive feedback is more effective in motivating performance improvement for learners in promotion focus, while negative feedback is more useful in motivating performance improvement for learners in prevention focus [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [28] posits that feedback which threatens self-esteem is much less likely to be effective.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to Kluger and de Nisi’s meta-analysis, some feedback recipients feel content to be ‘good enough’ or become helpless when told they are not making the grade, to the detriment of their performance [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that feedback becomes less effective as its focus moves away from the task and toward the self [13, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There are studies which have found learner preferences for group feedback [90] and for individual feedback [1] and it is clear that the context matters [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The results showed greater effectiveness with increasing frequency of the feedback,”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
In the citing paper
“Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger 1996), which suggests that feedback that directs attention towards acceptable and familiar tasks (as opposed to those that generate emotional responses or cause deep self‐reflection) seem most likely to lead to improvement.”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,033
ATWATER, L. E., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, D. C., & Cartier, P. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00202.x · Cited by 214
Disruptive innovations for designing and diffusing evidence-based interventions
Rotheram-Borus, M. J., Swendeman, D., & Chorpita, B. F. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0028180 · Cited by 210
Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation.
Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023911 · Cited by 210
Hatala, R. A., Cook, D. A., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S. J., & Brydges, R. (2013) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9462-8 · Cited by 221
Gaddis, B. H., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2004) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.011 · Cited by 220
Nesbit, P. (2012) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484312439196 · Cited by 245
Gottlieb, M. A., Chan, T. M., Zaver, F., & Ellaway, R. (2021) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14592 · Cited by 210
Sidey-Gibbons, C. J., Porter, I. H., Gonçalves, D. C., Stoilov, S., Ricci‐Cabello, I., Tsangaris, E., Gangannagaripalli, J., Davey, A. F., Gibbons, E. J., Kotzeva, A., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011589.pub2 · Cited by 220
Moving Toward a Comprehensive Assessment System: A Framework for Considering Interim Assessments
Perie, M., Marion, S. F., & Gong, B. (2009) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00149.x · Cited by 214
Supovitz, J. A. (2009) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9105-2 · Cited by 206
A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development.
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028244 · Cited by 204
The Role of Leader-Member Exchange in the Performance Appraisal Process
Elicker, J. D., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306286622 · Cited by 203
Ashford, S. J., Stobbeleir, K. E. M. D., & Nujella, M. (2016) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062314 · Cited by 216
Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: A meta-analysis
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Nassrelgrgawi, A. S. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9578-2 · Cited by 202
Feedback Specificity, Exploration, and Learning.
Goodman, J. S., Wood, R. E., & Hendrickx, M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.248 · Cited by 201
Ehren, M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2013) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4 · Cited by 200
van Ginkel, S. O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.002 · Cited by 221
Validity in Formative Assessment
Stobart, G. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250808.n14 · Cited by 200
Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance.
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0017841 · Cited by 199
Schippers, M. C., Homan, A. C., & van Knippenberg, D. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1784 · Cited by 199
The Depth of History and Explanation as Benefit and Bane for Psychological Control Theories.
Vancouver, J. B. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.38 · Cited by 202
van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A., & Fox, J. (2016) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831216637346 · Cited by 185
Glaub, M., Fresé, M., Fischer, S., & Hoppe, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2013.0234 · Cited by 242
Expertise in professional software design: A process study.
Sonnentag, S. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.703 · Cited by 200
An Assessment of the Magnitude of Effect Sizes
Paterson, T. A., Harms, P. D., Steel, P., & Credé, M. (2015) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051815614321 · Cited by 211
Data-based decision making in education: challenges and opportunities
Schildkamp, K., Lai, M., & Earl, L. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3 · Cited by 211
Neubert, M. J. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1104_2 · Cited by 203
Leadership Models, Methods, and Applications
Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1212 · Cited by 196
Hermsen, S., Frost, J., Renes, R. J., & Kerkhof, P. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.023 · Cited by 194
Trautner, B. W., Grigoryan, L., Petersen, N. J., Hysong, S. J., Cadena, J., PATTERSON, J. E., & Naik, A. D. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1878 · Cited by 194
Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation
Dijkstra, A. (2005) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyh014 · Cited by 193
Berson, Y., Halevy, N., Shamir, B., & Erez, M. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.011 · Cited by 192
Marr, J. C., & Thau, S. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0909 · Cited by 200
Bednall, T. C., Sanders, K., & Runhaar, P. R. (2013) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0162 · Cited by 206
Ajayi, S. O., & Oyedele, L. O. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.075 · Cited by 192
Instructional principles for self-regulation
Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504930 · Cited by 202
PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance
Kulkarni, C. E., Bernstein, M. S., & Klemmer, S. R. (2015) · Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/2724660.2724670 · Cited by 192
Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x · Cited by 190
Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024 · Cited by 201
(2010) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851-12 · Cited by 190
A Look Back and a Leap Forward: A Review and Synthesis of the Individual Work Performance Literature
Carpini, J. A., Parker, S. K., & Griffin, M. A. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0151 · Cited by 217
An Inductive Study of Feedback Interactions over the Course of Creative Projects
Harrison, S. H., & Rouse, E. D. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0737 · Cited by 214
Does Training Improve the Detection of Deception? A Meta-Analysis
Hauch, V., Sporer, S. L., Michael, S. W., & Meissner, C. A. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650214534974 · Cited by 202
Raine, R., Fitzpatrick, R. M., Barratt, H., Bevan, G., Black, N. A., Boaden, R., Bower, P., Campbell, M., Denis, J., Devers, K. J., et al. (2016) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr04160 · Cited by 197
Stress as Offense to Self: a Promising Approach Comes of Age
Semmer, N. K., Tschan, F., Jacobshagen, N., Beehr, T. A., Elfering, A., Kälin, W., & Meier, L. L. (2019) · Occupational Health Science · doi:10.1007/s41542-019-00041-5 · Cited by 214
Developing Self-Awareness: Learning Processes for Self- and Interpersonal Growth
London, M., Sessa, V. I., & Shelley, L. A. (2022) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-044531 · Cited by 221
Assessment and Classroom Learning: a deductive approach
Hattie, J., & Jaeger, R. M. (1998) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050107 · Cited by 185
Having the will and finding the way: A review and meta-analysis of hope at work
Reichard, R. J., Avey, J. B., Lopez, S. J., & Dollwet, M. (2013) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.800903 · Cited by 185
Bickman, L. (2020) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01065-8 · Cited by 184
Student perceptions of classroom feedback
Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2012.749212 · Cited by 184
Ohly, S., & Schmitt, A. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9328-3 · Cited by 182
Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045 · Cited by 182
Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x · Cited by 181
Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback
Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.604951 · Cited by 181
Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S. M., Gibbons, E. J., Wright, J. M., Valderas, J. M., Meads, D. M., & Black, N. A. (2017) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819617740925 · Cited by 181
Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills
Kogan, J. R., Conforti, L. N., Bernabeo, E. C., Durning, S. J., Hauer, K. E., & Holmboe, E. S. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04137.x · Cited by 180
Evidence-Based I–O Psychology: Not There Yet
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01287.x · Cited by 180
Kim, Y. J., & Kim, J. (2019) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.1196 · Cited by 180
Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., & Haynie, J. M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00313.x · Cited by 179
Delivering effective performance feedback: The strengths-based approach
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2011) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004 · Cited by 197
Feedback on household electricity consumption: learning and social influence processes
Grønhøj, A., & Thøgersen, J. B. (2011) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00967.x · Cited by 177
Procedural Instructions, Principles, and Examples
Eiríksdóttir, E., & Catrambone, R. (2011) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811419154 · Cited by 193
Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031026 · Cited by 192
A surprising effect of feedback on learning
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.001 · Cited by 176
Giving feedback – An integral part of education
Schartel, S. A. (2012) · Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003 · Cited by 195
Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy
Evans, N., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168810375367 · Cited by 176
Field Experiments in Organizations
Eden, D. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062400 · Cited by 188
Yu, S., Jiang, L. G., & Zhou, N. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451 · Cited by 187
Understanding feedback in online learning – A critical review and metaphor analysis
Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. J. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271 · Cited by 177
A Within-Person Examination of Correlates of Performance and Emotions While Working
Fisher, C. D., & Noble, C. S. (2004) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1702_2 · Cited by 194
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., & Ferrier, S. (2005) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x · Cited by 174
Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback
Watling, C., Driessen, E., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Vanstone, M., & Lingard, L. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12150 · Cited by 174
Assessment: The Bridge between Teaching and Learning
Wiliam, D. (2013) · Voices from the Middle · doi:10.58680/vm201324461 · Cited by 174
der Kleij, F. M. V. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010 · Cited by 175
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318755303 · Cited by 173
Assessing eco-feedback interface usage and design to drive energy efficiency in buildings
Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., & Peschiera, G. (2012) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.033 · Cited by 172
Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002 · Cited by 176
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2 · Cited by 186
Personal Informatics, Self-Insight, and Behavior Change: A Critical Review of Current Literature
Kersten-van Dijk, E. T., Westerink, J. H. D. M., Beute, F., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2017) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2016.1276456 · Cited by 171
Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: A Critical Scoping Review and Call for Research
Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x · Cited by 189
Donovan, J. J., & Williams, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.379 · Cited by 170
Huang, N., Burtch, G., Gu, B., Hong, Y., Liang, C., Wang, K., Fu, D., & Yang, B. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2944 · Cited by 170
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients
Proctor, E. K., Powell, B. J., Baumann, A. A., Hamilton, A. M., & Santens, R. L. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96 · Cited by 169
Developmental coaching for high school teachers: Executive coaching goes to school.
Grant, A. M., Green, L. S., & Rynsaardt, J. (2010) · Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research · doi:10.1037/a0019212 · Cited by 167
Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection
Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011 · Cited by 167
Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning
Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Wittek, A. L. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002 · Cited by 190
Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L. L., & Zhao, Q. (2020) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395 · Cited by 185
Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction
Chien, Y., Chang, Y.-H., & Chang, C. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.10.003 · Cited by 185
Types and frequencies of feedback interventions in classroom interaction in secondary education
Voerman, L., Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Simons, R. J. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.06.006 · Cited by 166
The Effectiveness and Features of Formative Assessment in US K-12 Education: A Systematic Review
Lee, H., Chung, H. Q., Zhang, Y., Abedi, J., & Warschauer, M. (2020) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2020.1732383 · Cited by 197
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165
Liang, F., & Cao, L. (2021) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s318632 · Cited by 188
When things go wrong: The effect of daily work hassles on effort, exertion and negative mood
Zohar, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317999166671 · Cited by 171
The Formative Purpose: Assessment Must First Promote Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004) · Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x · Cited by 170
The Psychology of Tailoring‐Ingredients in Computer‐Tailored Persuasion
Dijkstra, A. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00081.x · Cited by 164
Reflexivity in Teams: A Review and New Perspectives
Konradt, U., Otte, K., Schippers, M. C., & Steenfatt, C. (2015) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977 · Cited by 183
Unpacking the Role of Instructional Leadership in Teacher Professional Development
Kilag, O. K. T., & Sasan, J. M. (2023) · Advanced Qualitative Research · doi:10.31098/aqr.v1i1.1380 · Cited by 164
Kim, H., & Lee, S. Y. (2009) · Social Work in Health Care · doi:10.1080/00981380802598499 · Cited by 178
Classroom Assessment: Tensions and Intersections in Theory and Practice
Brookhart, S. M. (2004) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00346.x · Cited by 163
Effectiveness of Consultation on Student Ratings Feedback: A Meta-Analysis
Penny, A. R., & Coe, R. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074002215 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Kluger, Avraham N.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-284
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2030441548
- Semantic Scholar
- 97cce81ca813ed757e1e76c0023865c7dbdc7308
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 369 · 2020: 432 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 302 · 2017: 334 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 354 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- feedback interventions, performance improvement, feedback effectiveness, feedback intervention theory, task learning, task motivation, knowledge of results, motor learning, task characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
