The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the century, feedback interventions (FIs) produced negative—but largely ignored—effects on performance. A meta-analysis (607 effect sizes; 23,663 observations) suggests that FIs improved performance on average (d =.41) but that over '/3 of the FIs decreased perfor-mance. This finding cannot be explained by sampling error, feedback sign, or existing theories. The authors proposed a preliminary FI theory (FIT) and tested it with moderator analyses. The central assumption of FIT is that FIs change the locus of attention among 3 general and hierarchically organized levels of control: task learning, task motivation, and meta-tasks (including self-related) processes. The results suggest that FI effectiveness decreases as attention moves up the hierarchy closer to the self and away from the task. These findings are further moderated by task characteristics that are still poorly understood. To relate feedback directly to behavior is very confusing. Results are contradictory and seldom straight-forward. (Ilgen, Fisher, & Taylor, 1979, p. 368) The effects of manipulation of KR [knowledge of results] on motor learning...reveal... some violent contradictions to earlier beliefs about KR, and some glaring absences in our knowledge. (Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter, 1984, p. 378). Feedback does not uniformly improve performance. (Balcazar,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comprehensive review of research studies of feedback showed that feedback improved performance in 60% of them.In the cases where it was not helpful, the feedback turned out to be merely a judgment or grading with no indication of how to improve (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The need to motivate pupils is evident, but it is often assumed that this is best done by offering such extrinsic rewards as merits, grades, gold stars and prizes.There is ample evidence that challenges this assumption.”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The inclusion criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent findings about the power of feedback is the remarkable variability of effects.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The existing research has identified several relevant moderators like timing and specificity of the goals and task complexity (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996)”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“However, the efficacy of peer assessment, like traditional feedback, is likely to be contingent on a range of factors including characteristics of the learning environment, the student, and the assessment itself (Kluger and DeNisi 1996; Ossenberg et al. 2018).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi 1996
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi (1996), in their presentation of feedback intervention theory, used grading as an example of an external intervention likely to render metatask processes concerning self-goals, such as performance goals, salient at the expense of task-related goals.”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“but when A&F comes from a regulatory body, the recipient may be more likely to activate affective processes (e.g., distress) which distract attention from the specific task requiring change.”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [10] suggests that feedback that captures the recipient’s attention and directs it toward a specific behaviour is more likely to be successful”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This crucial aspect of formative assessment that has been often discussed but too rarely studied is students' responses to feedback, or the internal mechanisms involved in the reception of feedback and their influences on learning and achievement (Butler and Winne, 1995;Kluger and DeNisi, 1996;Shute, 2008;Draper, 2009;Bennett, 2011;Dann, 2014;Panadero and Lipnevich, 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“For example, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported a mean effect size of 0.41 for formative feedback on performance, but 38% of these effects were negative.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi (1996)
In the citing paper
“For example, norm-referenced feedback promotes maladaptive attributional thinking (e.g., attributing failure to lack of ability) that demotivates efforts on subsequent tasks (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that assessment enhances performance when self-efficacy is high and impedes performance when self-efficacy is low (Beckmann, Beckmann, & Elliott, 2009;Birney, Beckmann, Beckmann, & Double, 2017;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Variations in the effect of feedback have been related to content, form and timing of the feedback, and studies have indeed found variations based on these factors”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, feedback does not always result in student improvement, and may in some cases inhibit learning rather than promote it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“General information unrelated to the performance, comments about a good or poor performance or compliments are less effective than specific comments [27, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi’s feedback intervention theory, derived from their meta-analysis of over 130 studies of feedback interventions in various settings, also posits that feedback becomes less effective as attention shifts away from the task and toward the individual; in short, feedback that is threatening to self-esteem is unlikely to be effective [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“feedback is most effective when directed at the task level and may assist in ‘deep processing and mastery of tasks’ when it is about processing of tasks or self-regulation.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Grades are a clear and non-nuanced form of feedback which can trigger both promotion and prevention responses in trainees [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“positive feedback is more effective in motivating performance improvement for learners in promotion focus, while negative feedback is more useful in motivating performance improvement for learners in prevention focus [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [28] posits that feedback which threatens self-esteem is much less likely to be effective.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to Kluger and de Nisi’s meta-analysis, some feedback recipients feel content to be ‘good enough’ or become helpless when told they are not making the grade, to the detriment of their performance [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that feedback becomes less effective as its focus moves away from the task and toward the self [13, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There are studies which have found learner preferences for group feedback [90] and for individual feedback [1] and it is clear that the context matters [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The results showed greater effectiveness with increasing frequency of the feedback,”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
In the citing paper
“Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger 1996), which suggests that feedback that directs attention towards acceptable and familiar tasks (as opposed to those that generate emotional responses or cause deep self‐reflection) seem most likely to lead to improvement.”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
“From their major review, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) concluded that feedback is effective to the degree to which it directs information to enhanced self-efficacy and to more effective self-regulation, such that attention is directed back to the task and causes students to invest more effort or…”
BackgroundInfluentialAssessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
“170 Perhaps the most surprising finding that emerged from the Kluger and DeNisi (1996) meta-analysis is that in more than one third of the 607 cases (effect sizes), FIs reduced performance.”
BackgroundSelf-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis.
Stajković, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240 · Cited by 4,130
Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework
(2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00052_5.x · Cited by 3,465
Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model
Garris, R. D., Ahlers, R. H., & Driskell, J. E. (2002) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878102238607 · Cited by 3,480
The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior
Luthans, F. (2002) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.165 · Cited by 3,373
WHEN JOB DISSATISFACTION LEADS TO CREATIVITY: ENCOURAGING THE EXPRESSION OF VOICE.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069410 · Cited by 2,862
Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020) · Applied Developmental Science · doi:10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791 · Cited by 2,733
“In a meta-analysis of 131 studies, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported an average effect size on learning due to feedback of .40; however, they also found large variation across studies.”
BackgroundVanLEHN, K. (2011) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.611369 · Cited by 2,323
Day, D. V. (2000) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8 · Cited by 2,180
Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106291059 · Cited by 2,133
Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x · Cited by 1,865
Formative assessment: a critical review
Bennett, R. E. (2011) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2010.513678 · Cited by 1,498
7 Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416520903047327 · Cited by 1,555
The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., & Knafo, A. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202289008 · Cited by 1,506
Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century
Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105 · Cited by 1,490
Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172170408600105 · Cited by 1,323
Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review.
Covington, M. V. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171 · Cited by 1,316
Fisher, C. D. (2009) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x · Cited by 1,502
What is assessment for learning
Wiliam, D. (2011) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001 · Cited by 1,282
Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.
Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234 · Cited by 1,252
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087 · Cited by 1,199
“…criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002 · Cited by 1,162
Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses.
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000098 · Cited by 1,347
Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education
Evans, C. (2013) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654312474350 · Cited by 1,143
The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612436661 · Cited by 1,104
Rousseau, D. M., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211651 · Cited by 1,083
Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139 · Cited by 1,051
Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., Yerushalmy, M., Trouche, L., Chazan, D. I., English, L. D., & Kirshner, D. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203448946 · Cited by 1,018
Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31
Norcini, J., & Burch, V. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701775453 · Cited by 984
Performance management and employee engagement
Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2010) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.09.004 · Cited by 1,085
Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2972 · Cited by 964
BONNER, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00052-6 · Cited by 1,018
The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5 · Cited by 1,016
Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations
Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & Walle, D. V. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(03)00079-5 · Cited by 947
A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.
van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.652239 · Cited by 892
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884
The Behavior of Tutoring Systems
VanLehn, K. A. (2006) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.3233/irg-2006-16(3)02 · Cited by 836
Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029 · Cited by 802
The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice
Burris, E. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0562 · Cited by 800
State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback
Archer, J. C. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x · Cited by 783
The Role of Goal Orientation Following Performance Feedback
VandeWalle, D., Cron, W. L., & Slocum, J. W. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629 · Cited by 781
Mertens, S., Herberz, M., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2107346118 · Cited by 864
The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.005 · Cited by 770
Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.762 · Cited by 762
A meta‐analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance
Subramony, M. V. (2009) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20315 · Cited by 745
Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the Workplace
Swap, W. C., Leonard, D. A., Shields, M., & Abrams, L. (2001) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045668 · Cited by 725
The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427 · Cited by 903
Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors : student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning
Woolf, B. P. (2009) · HAL · Cited by 716
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314564881 · Cited by 714
Successful Organizational Change: Integrating the Management Practice and Scholarly Literatures
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & Cremer, D. D. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0095 · Cited by 807
What is feedback in clinical education?
Van De Ridder, J. M. M., Stokking, K. M., McGaghie, W. C., & Ten Cate, O. T. J. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x · Cited by 686
The Future of Leadership in Learning Organizations
Bass, B. M. (2000) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190000700302 · Cited by 685
Changing Behavior With Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling
Schultz, P. W. (1999) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2101_3 · Cited by 684
Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000085 · Cited by 677
Self-citationThe effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis.
Corpus, J. H., & Lepper, M. R. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.774 · Cited by 748
A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment
Andrade, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00087 · Cited by 810
Zhou, J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261 · Cited by 676
Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2012) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720812448394 · Cited by 647
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_180253 · Cited by 642
Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis.
Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D. L., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000241 · Cited by 744
Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs
Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317910x502359 · Cited by 678
Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors
Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9049-0 · Cited by 632
Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W., & Smith, D. B. (2004) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-004-1275-5 · Cited by 629
Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda
Fletcher, C. (2001) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317901167488 · Cited by 626
The influence of technology on the future of human resource management
Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Johnson, R. (2015) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002 · Cited by 618
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615
Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Guillaume, Y. R. F. (2016) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12119 · Cited by 614
DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., & Wiechmann, D. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1035 · Cited by 639
The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602
SMITHER, J. W., LONDON, M., & REILLY, R. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x · Cited by 601
Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L. A., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R. A., & Warm, J. S. (2002) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315 · Cited by 627
Teachers' reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation
Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2009) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034 · Cited by 578
Lord, R. G., Diefendorff, J. M., Schmidt, A. M., & Hall, R. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100314 · Cited by 576
The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.
Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000560 · Cited by 572
Understanding the emotional labor process: a control theory perspective
Diefendorff, J. M., & Gosserand, R. H. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.230 · Cited by 589
DeRue, D. S., & Wellman, N. M. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015317 · Cited by 586
Kuvaas, B. (2006) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190500521581 · Cited by 596
Colquitt, J. A., & Simmering, M. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.654 · Cited by 549
Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions
Bendoly, E., Donohue, K. L., & Schultz, K. L. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.10.001 · Cited by 545
Zohar, D. M., & Luria, G. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.322 · Cited by 561
Performance Concepts and Performance Theory
Sonnentag, S., & Fresé, M. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0470013419.ch1 · Cited by 590
The Feedback Environment Scale: Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation
Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164403258440 · Cited by 534
Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25years
Lawrence, M. J., Goodwin, P., O’Connor, M. J., & Önkal, D. (2006) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.007 · Cited by 534
Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM
Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., et al. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038 · Cited by 793
Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(01)00043-2 · Cited by 516
Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2918 · Cited by 514
Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 · Cited by 509
Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis.
Keith, N., & Fresé, M. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59 · Cited by 545
Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers
Brookhart, S. M. (2011) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x · Cited by 555
Research in the Psychological Laboratory
Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00002 · Cited by 500
Resilience Building in Students: The Role of Academic Self-Efficacy
Cassidy, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01781 · Cited by 495
Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions
Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696 · Cited by 494
Personnel Psychology: Performance Evaluation and Pay for Performance
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B. A., & Parks, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254 · Cited by 493
Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare.
Hughes, A. M., Gregory, M. E., Joseph, D. L., Sonesh, S. C., Marlow, S. L., Lacerenza, C. N., Benishek, L. E., King, H. B., & Salas, E. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000120 · Cited by 495
Carrico, A. R., & Riemer, M. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.004 · Cited by 489
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01782.x · Cited by 511
Practice Feedback Interventions: 15 Suggestions for Optimizing Effectiveness
Brehaut, J., Colquhoun, H. L., Eva, K. W., Carroll, K. A., Sales, A. E., Michie, S., Ivers, N. M., & Grimshaw, J. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-2248 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Kluger, Avraham N.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-284
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2030441548
- Semantic Scholar
- 97cce81ca813ed757e1e76c0023865c7dbdc7308
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 369 · 2020: 432 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 302 · 2017: 334 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 354 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- feedback interventions, performance improvement, feedback effectiveness, feedback intervention theory, task learning, task motivation, knowledge of results, motor learning, task characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
