The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the century, feedback interventions (FIs) produced negative—but largely ignored—effects on performance. A meta-analysis (607 effect sizes; 23,663 observations) suggests that FIs improved performance on average (d =.41) but that over '/3 of the FIs decreased perfor-mance. This finding cannot be explained by sampling error, feedback sign, or existing theories. The authors proposed a preliminary FI theory (FIT) and tested it with moderator analyses. The central assumption of FIT is that FIs change the locus of attention among 3 general and hierarchically organized levels of control: task learning, task motivation, and meta-tasks (including self-related) processes. The results suggest that FI effectiveness decreases as attention moves up the hierarchy closer to the self and away from the task. These findings are further moderated by task characteristics that are still poorly understood. To relate feedback directly to behavior is very confusing. Results are contradictory and seldom straight-forward. (Ilgen, Fisher, & Taylor, 1979, p. 368) The effects of manipulation of KR [knowledge of results] on motor learning...reveal... some violent contradictions to earlier beliefs about KR, and some glaring absences in our knowledge. (Salmoni, Schmidt, & Walter, 1984, p. 378). Feedback does not uniformly improve performance. (Balcazar,
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A comprehensive review of research studies of feedback showed that feedback improved performance in 60% of them.In the cases where it was not helpful, the feedback turned out to be merely a judgment or grading with no indication of how to improve (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The need to motivate pupils is evident, but it is often assumed that this is best done by offering such extrinsic rewards as merits, grades, gold stars and prizes.There is ample evidence that challenges this assumption.”
From Working inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom (2004) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The inclusion criteria are comparable to the criteria that were used to include meta-analyses in the Visible Learning research syntheses but allow to exclude studies from meta-analyses that encompass both an educational and a non-educational context (Wiersma, 1992; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Standley, 1996).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“One of the most consistent findings about the power of feedback is the remarkable variability of effects.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“The existing research has identified several relevant moderators like timing and specificity of the goals and task complexity (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996)”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“However, the efficacy of peer assessment, like traditional feedback, is likely to be contingent on a range of factors including characteristics of the learning environment, the student, and the assessment itself (Kluger and DeNisi 1996; Ossenberg et al. 2018).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi 1996
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi (1996), in their presentation of feedback intervention theory, used grading as an example of an external intervention likely to render metatask processes concerning self-goals, such as performance goals, salient at the expense of task-related goals.”
From Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. (2011) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“but when A&F comes from a regulatory body, the recipient may be more likely to activate affective processes (e.g., distress) which distract attention from the specific task requiring change.”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [10] suggests that feedback that captures the recipient’s attention and directs it toward a specific behaviour is more likely to be successful”
From No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This crucial aspect of formative assessment that has been often discussed but too rarely studied is students' responses to feedback, or the internal mechanisms involved in the reception of feedback and their influences on learning and achievement (Butler and Winne, 1995;Kluger and DeNisi, 1996;Shute, 2008;Draper, 2009;Bennett, 2011;Dann, 2014;Panadero and Lipnevich, 2021).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“For example, Kluger and DeNisi (1996) reported a mean effect size of 0.41 for formative feedback on performance, but 38% of these effects were negative.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi (1996)
In the citing paper
“For example, norm-referenced feedback promotes maladaptive attributional thinking (e.g., attributing failure to lack of ability) that demotivates efforts on subsequent tasks (Kluger and DeNisi, 1996).”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Kluger and DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“there is evidence that assessment enhances performance when self-efficacy is high and impedes performance when self-efficacy is low (Beckmann, Beckmann, & Elliott, 2009;Birney, Beckmann, Beckmann, & Double, 2017;Kluger & DeNisi, 1996).”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Variations in the effect of feedback have been related to content, form and timing of the feedback, and studies have indeed found variations based on these factors”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, feedback does not always result in student improvement, and may in some cases inhibit learning rather than promote it.”
From Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback (2021) · cites this paper as Kluger & DeNisi, 1996
In the citing paper
“General information unrelated to the performance, comments about a good or poor performance or compliments are less effective than specific comments [27, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Kluger and DeNisi’s feedback intervention theory, derived from their meta-analysis of over 130 studies of feedback interventions in various settings, also posits that feedback becomes less effective as attention shifts away from the task and toward the individual; in short, feedback that is threatening to self-esteem is unlikely to be effective [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“feedback is most effective when directed at the task level and may assist in ‘deep processing and mastery of tasks’ when it is about processing of tasks or self-regulation.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Grades are a clear and non-nuanced form of feedback which can trigger both promotion and prevention responses in trainees [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“positive feedback is more effective in motivating performance improvement for learners in promotion focus, while negative feedback is more useful in motivating performance improvement for learners in prevention focus [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“but it is no less important to learning, and is influenced by feedback [28, 34, 45].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Feedback intervention theory [28] posits that feedback which threatens self-esteem is much less likely to be effective.”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“According to Kluger and de Nisi’s meta-analysis, some feedback recipients feel content to be ‘good enough’ or become helpless when told they are not making the grade, to the detriment of their performance [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that feedback becomes less effective as its focus moves away from the task and toward the self [13, 28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“There are studies which have found learner preferences for group feedback [90] and for individual feedback [1] and it is clear that the context matters [28].”
From Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education. (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The results showed greater effectiveness with increasing frequency of the feedback,”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
In the citing paper
“Feedback Intervention Theory (Kluger 1996), which suggests that feedback that directs attention towards acceptable and familiar tasks (as opposed to those that generate emotional responses or cause deep self‐reflection) seem most likely to lead to improvement.”
From Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (2012) · cites this paper as Kluger 1996
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Tosi, H. L. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278976 · Cited by 4,147
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,033
Heimbeck, D., Fresé, M., Sonnentag, S., & Keith, N. (2003) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00153.x · Cited by 301
The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: a longitudinal field study
Carter, W. R., Nesbit, P., Badham, R. J., Parker, S. K., & Sung, L. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096 · Cited by 348
Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances.
Lambert, M. J. (2013) · Psychotherapy · doi:10.1037/a0030682 · Cited by 286
The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS)
Linderbaum, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310373145 · Cited by 286
Effects of Process Feedback on Motivation, Satisfaction, and Performance in Virtual Teams
Geister, S., Konradt, U., & Hertel, G. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406292337 · Cited by 316
Hannan, R. L., Krishnan, R., & Newman, A. H. (2008) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2008.83.4.893 · Cited by 293
Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance
de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017289 · Cited by 284
Bozer, G., & Jones, R. J. (2018) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2018.1446946 · Cited by 328
Job and team design: Toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2008) · Research in personnel and human resources management · doi:10.1016/s0742-7301(08)27002-7 · Cited by 300
Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback
Anseel, F., Lievens, F., & Schollaert, E. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003 · Cited by 281
Video Feedback in Education and Training: Putting Learning in the Picture
Fukkink, R. G., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. J. C. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9144-5 · Cited by 281
A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking
Kluger, A. N., Siegfried, Z., & Ebstein, R. P. (2002) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001082 · Cited by 281
Self-citationLeader development and the dark side of personality
Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.007 · Cited by 292
Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: evidence and theory
Carlier, I. V. E., Meuldijk, D., van Vliet, I. M., van Fenema, E. M., van der Wee, N. J. A., & Zitman, F. G. (2010) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x · Cited by 288
Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/669901 · Cited by 296
Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible
Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001 · Cited by 276
Dijk, D. V., & Kluger, A. N. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.725 · Cited by 293
Self-citationStudent engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms
Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.12.003 · Cited by 303
Leadership and leadership development in health care: the evidence base
West, M. A. (2015) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 276
Fresé, M., BEIMEL, S., & SCHOENBORN, S. (2003) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00754.x · Cited by 287
Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x · Cited by 274
Feedback to clinicians: Theory, research, and practice
Sapyta, J. J., Riemer, M., & Bickman, L. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20107 · Cited by 282
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00111.x · Cited by 273
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
Lu, J., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 · Cited by 272
Performance evaluation will not die, but it should
Murphy, K. R. (2019) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12259 · Cited by 322
Antecedents of coworker trust: Leaders' blessings.
Lau, D. C.-S., & Liden, R. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1130 · Cited by 270
A Measurement Feedback System (MFS) Is Necessary to Improve Mental Health Outcomes
Hamilton, J. D., & Bickman, L. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e3181825af8 · Cited by 276
Expertise in psychotherapy: An elusive goal?
Tracey, T. J. G., Wampold, B. E., Lichtenberg, J. W., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0035099 · Cited by 301
Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective
Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004 · Cited by 257
The impact of financial and nonfinancial incentives on business-unit outcomes over time.
Peterson, S. J., & Luthans, F. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.156 · Cited by 269
Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool
Norcini, J. J., Burch, V. C., & Gibbs, T. J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 266
Electricity saving in households—A social cognitive approach
Thøgersen, J. B., & Grønhøj, A. (2010) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.025 · Cited by 265
Effects of Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL Writing Accuracy
Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong‐Krause, D., & ANDERSON, N. J. (2010) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.5054/tq.2010.213781 · Cited by 265
Is timely information always better? The effect of feedback frequency on decision making
Lurie, N. H., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.005 · Cited by 264
Chaudhry, I. S., Sarwary, S. A. M., El Refae, G. A., & Chabchoub, H. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2210461 · Cited by 262
Training Advanced Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice
Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903213600 · Cited by 262
Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies
Narciss, S., Sosnovsky, S., Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.011 · Cited by 260
Suffering in Silence: Medical Error and its Impact on Health Care Providers
Robertson, J., & Long, B. (2018) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.001 · Cited by 259
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J. (2017) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003 · Cited by 269
Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict
Behfar, K. J., Mannix, E. A., Peterson, R. S., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2010) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496410389194 · Cited by 276
A FIVE‐YEAR STUDY OF UPWARD FEEDBACK: WHAT MANAGERS DO WITH THEIR RESULTS MATTERS
Walker, A. G., & Smither, J. W. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00166.x · Cited by 257
Why Is Performance Management Broken?
Pulakos, E. D., & O'Leary, R. S. (2011) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01315.x · Cited by 256
The Impact of Culture on Feedback-Seeking Behavior: An Integrated Model and Propositions
de Luque, M. S., & Sommer, S. M. (2000) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707736 · Cited by 256
Zohar, D. M., & Polachek, T. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034096 · Cited by 268
Feedback, Self-Esteem, and Performance in Organizations
Kuhnen, C. M., & Tymula, A. A. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1379 · Cited by 267
Expatriate success may depend on a ?learning orientation?: Considerations for selection and training
Porter, G., & Tansky, J. W. (1999) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-050x(199921)38:1 · Cited by 129
de Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023 · Cited by 267
Loock, C.-M., Staake, T., & Thiesse, F. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.4.15 · Cited by 247
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021950 · Cited by 246
How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game
Burgers, C., Eden, A., van Engelenburg, M. D., & Buningh, S. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.038 · Cited by 245
Panagopoulos, C. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9114-0 · Cited by 245
Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning
der Kleij, F. M. V., Eggen, T. J. H. M., Timmers, C. F., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020 · Cited by 245
360‐degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S. J. (2003) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.10083 · Cited by 244
Hertwig, R., & Engel, C. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635594 · Cited by 273
Vogel, B., Reichard, R. J., Batistič, S., & Černe, M. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101381 · Cited by 280
Caprara, G. V., & Cervone, D. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812767.006 · Cited by 244
Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2013) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785384 · Cited by 287
Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding
Shepard, L. A. (2005) · Educational leadership · Cited by 242
The Development of a Feedback Environment and Role Clarity Model of Job Performance
Whitaker, B. G., Dahling, J. J., & Levy, P. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306297581 · Cited by 242
Hon, A. H. Y., Chan, W. W. H., & Lü, L. (2013) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.11.001 · Cited by 240
Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning
Ruiz‐Primo, M. A. (2011) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003 · Cited by 268
Assessment for Learning in the Classroom
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250808.n2 · Cited by 241
Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001 · Cited by 266
Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12189 · Cited by 269
Greenhalgh, J., Dalkin, S. M., Gooding, K., Gibbons, E. J., Wright, J. M., Meads, D. M., Black, N. A., Valderas, J. M., & Pawson, R. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05020 · Cited by 253
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001 · Cited by 236
Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence
Eriksson, T., Poulsen, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2009) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2009.08.006 · Cited by 245
Adding Instructional Features That Promote Learning in a Game-Like Environment
Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2010) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.42.3.a · Cited by 255
Leung, K., Su, S. K., & Morris, M. W. (2001) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726701549002 · Cited by 234
Understanding and encouraging feedback‐seeking behaviour: a literature review
Crommelinck, M., & Anseel, F. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12075 · Cited by 246
A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback
Colquhoun, H. L., Brehaut, J. C., Sales, A., Ivers, N., Grimshaw, J., Michie, S., Carroll, K., Chalifoux, M., & Eva, K. W. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-66 · Cited by 231
Feedback and the educational alliance: Examining credibility judgements and their consequences.
Telio, S., Regehr, G., & Ajjawi, R. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13063 · Cited by 231
The therapeutic effects of providing patient progress information to therapists and patients
Hawkins, E. J., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Slade, K. L., & Tuttle, K. C. (2004) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1093/ptr/kph027 · Cited by 230
Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2015.106 · Cited by 230
Work matters: Job design in classic and contemporary perspectives.
Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., & Juillerat, T. L. (2010) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12169-013 · Cited by 243
Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H.-S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668 · Cited by 229
Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback
Steelman, L. A., & Rutkowski, K. A. (2004) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940410520637 · Cited by 229
Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work
Sparr, J. L., & Sonnentag, S. (2008) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/13594320701743590 · Cited by 228
Brainstorming Reconsidered: A Goal-Based View
Litchfield, R. C. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.32465708 · Cited by 235
Li, N., Harris, B., Boswell, W. R., & Xie, Z. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024029 · Cited by 250
Knowledge Management in New Product Teams: Practices and Outcomes
Lynn, G. S., Reilly, R. R., & Akgün, A. E. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.846789 · Cited by 226
Gardner, B., Whittington, C., McAteer, J., Eccles, M. P., & Michie, S. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.039 · Cited by 225
Cianci, A. M., Klein, H. J., & Seijts, G. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019130 · Cited by 236
Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning
Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1571992 · Cited by 274
Wooten, J. O., & Ulrich, K. T. (2016) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12613 · Cited by 224
The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching
Bangert, A. W. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.06.003 · Cited by 223
Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Schmitt, J., Sokoloski, R., & Silva-Send, N. (2015) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.130 · Cited by 222
Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt
Baer, M., & Brown, G. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.003 · Cited by 237
Carpentier, J., & Mageau, G. A. (2013) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.003 · Cited by 217
Hassan, L., Dias, A., & Hamari, J. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.004 · Cited by 236
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080 · Cited by 218
Learning from errors: The role of context, emotion, and personality
Zhao, B. (2010) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.696 · Cited by 228
Effective regulation of affect: An action control perspective on emotion regulation
Webb, T. L., Schweiger Gallo, I., Miles, E., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2012) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.718134 · Cited by 216
UNDERSTANDING RESPONSES TO MULTI‐SOURCE FEEDBACK: THE ROLE OF CORE SELF‐EVALUATIONS
Bono, J. E., & Colbert, A. E. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00633.x · Cited by 222
A Covariance Structure Analysis of Employees' Response to Performance Feedback.
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B. (., & McKee‐Ryan, F. M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1057 · Cited by 214
Exploratory Orientation as an Educational Goal
Flum, H., & Kaplan, A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_3 · Cited by 213
Hayes, C. W., Rhee, A., Detsky, M. E., LeBlanc, V. R., & Wax, R. S. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000268059.42429.39 · Cited by 213
The Influence of Perceptions of Fairness on Performance Appraisal Reactions
Jawahar, I. M. “. (2007) · Journal of Labor Research · doi:10.1007/s12122-007-9014-1 · Cited by 228
Psychological Theory and the Gamification of Learning
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., Callan, R. C., & Armstrong, M. B. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_9 · Cited by 211
Effects of Energy Availability on Immediate and Delayed Emotional Reactions to Work Events.
Zohar, D. M., Tzischinski, O., & Epstein, R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1082 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- ORCID
- Kluger, Avraham N.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 254-284
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2030441548
- Semantic Scholar
- 97cce81ca813ed757e1e76c0023865c7dbdc7308
- Cited by
- 5,882
- References
- 257
- Citations by year
- 2026: 273 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 235 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 287 · 2021: 369 · 2020: 432 · 2019: 344 · 2018: 302 · 2017: 334 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 354 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 252 · 2012: 221
- FWCI
- 36.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- feedback interventions, performance improvement, feedback effectiveness, feedback intervention theory, task learning, task motivation, knowledge of results, motor learning, task characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
