The DOI matches its Crossref record; 219 of the 219 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Abstract
A selective review of research highlights the emerging view of groups as information processors. In this review, the authors include research on processing objectives, attention, encoding, storage, retrieval, processing, response, feedback, and learning in small interacting task groups. The groups as information processors perspective underscores several characteristic dimensions of variability in group performance of cognitive tasks, namely, commonality-uniqueness of information, convergence-diversity of ideas, accentuation-attenuation of cognitive processes, and belongingness-distinctiveness of members. A combination of contributions framework provides an additional conceptualization of information processing in groups. The authors also address implications, caveats, and questions for future research and theory regarding groups as information processors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With regard to diagnosing information elaboration, research has shown that teams that elaborate on information focus attention on the task at hand rather than on the self (Hinsz et al., 1997).”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Hinsz et al., 1997
In the citing paper
“Collaborative learners can be considered as a single information processing system (Hinsz et al. 1997;Tindale and Kameda 2000;Ickes and Gonzalez 1994), consisting of multiple, limited working memories which can create a larger, more effective, collective working space.”
From An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks (2012) · cites this paper as Hinsz et al. 1997
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,530
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS
Bannister, D., & Fransella, F. (2010) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203405321_chapter_1 · Cited by 8,589
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
The Social Psychology of Groups
Kenkel, W. F., Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709294 · Cited by 5,899
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–997 of 997
Timm, I. J., Reuter, L., Berndt, J. O., Ulfert, A., Ellwart, T., & Antoni, C. H. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.659 · Cited by 6
“In psychological group-research, teams can be defined as collective information-processing systems [26].”
BackgroundNguyen, H.-T., Lin, H., & Chang, S. (2021) · Asian Business & Management · doi:10.1057/s41291-020-00146-8 · Cited by 6
Hackathon Approach: Its Contributions on Collaboration and Teamwork Skills
Lyonnet, B. (2021) · International Conference on Educational Technology Management (ICETM) · doi:10.1145/3510309.3510324 · Cited by 6
“Some degree of information sharing must occur in order for the team to operate successfully [18].”
BackgroundMuller-Schoof, I. J. M., Verbiest, M. E. A., Snoeren, M. M. W. C., & Luijkx, K. G. (2023) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.57529 · Cited by 6
“A shared understanding is important as it encourages the exchange of relevant information (De Dreu et al., 2008; Hinsz et al., 1997).”
BackgroundRadical Collective Intelligence and the Reimagining of Cognitive Science
Rabb, N., & Sloman, S. A. (2024) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12727 · Cited by 6
Hamid, N. A. A., & Salim, J. (2010) · International Conference on Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management (CAMP) · doi:10.1109/infrkm.2010.5466896 · Cited by 6
“…such as personnel motion, training, jobs rotation [10], interactions with suppliers and customers [11], community of practices and post-project reviews [12], (2) by technology based coordination mechanism such as collaboration software, distributed learning and business intelligence system.”
BackgroundStrong shared representations promote schema-consistent memory errors in groups
Betts, K. R., & Hinsz, V. B. (2013) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430213486206 · Cited by 6
Self-citationCoyle, S., Conboy, K., & Acton, T. (2015) · International Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 6
Role-Related Participation in Product Design Teams
Bonito, J. A., Keyton, J., & Ervin, J. N. (2016) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215618759 · Cited by 6
Adair, W. L., & Liu, L. A. (2011) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2011)0000014006 · Cited by 6
Effektive Führung heterogener Teams
Boerner, S., Hüttermann, H., & Reinwald, M. (2017) · Gruppe Interaktion Organisation Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) · doi:10.1007/s11612-017-0357-7 · Cited by 6
“Gemäß der Theorie von Teams als Informationsverarbeitungssystemen (Hinsz et al. 1997) sollte die Neuund Re-Kombination dieser informationellen Ressourcen ein synergistisches Potential freisetzen, das zu ausgewogeneren Entscheidungen, kreativeren Lösungen und letztlich einer höheren Performanz als…”
BackgroundTowards Simulation-Based Role Optimization in Organizations
Reuter, L., Berndt, J. O., & Timm, I. J. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67190-1_32 · Cited by 6
The Effects of Differing Knowledge Transfer Strategies on Group Decision Making and Performance
Walker, S. D. S., & Bonner, B. L. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2053 · Cited by 6
Modeling group and individual learning: lessons for integrating disciplines and agile research
Anderson, E. G., & Lewis, K. (2019) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.1636 · Cited by 6
The Impact of Group Size on the Discovery of Hidden Profiles in Online Discussion Groups
Tausczik, Y., & Huang, X. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3359758 · Cited by 6
“In decision-making, groups exchange information, selectively attend to some information over others, use that information to reason about alternatives, and negotiate individual opinions to form collective judgments [18, 26].”
BackgroundUhlaner, L. M., Massis, A. D., Jorissen, A., & Du, Y. (2020) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · doi:10.25384/sage.c.5053080.v1 · Cited by 6
Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries
Kauppila, O. (2012) · Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal · doi:10.1108/dlo.2012.08126baa.008 · Cited by 6
“However, these concerns are especially pronounced in the virtual context, where the challenges can not be risen to in face-to-face interactions (Hinsz et al., 1997; Wenger and Snyder, 2000; von Korgh et al., 2000; Kirkmalet al. 2002).”
BackgroundCooperate with Equals: A Simple Heuristic for Social Exchange
Johnson, T., & Smirnov, O. A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0005 · Cited by 6
Working memory affine technological support functions improve decision performance
Brich, I. R., Bause, I. M., Hesse, F. W., & Wesslein, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.014 · Cited by 6
Wecker, C., & Stegmann, K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55754-9_19 · Cited by 6
Communication and Group Cognitive Complexity
Coman, A. D., Curșeu, P. L., Fodor, O. C., Oţoiu, C., Ratiu, L. C. I., Fleştea, A. M., & Bria, M. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419853624 · Cited by 6
Parrello, S., Iorio, I., Rosa, B. D., & Sommantico, M. (2019) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2019.1651260 · Cited by 6
Christensen, B. T. (2010) · Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060410000041 · Cited by 6
“It has been argued and shown that providing past exemplars in creativity may have both beneficial and detrimental effects on the creative outcome (Smith et al., 1993; Hinsz et al., 1997; Perttula & Sipilä, 2007; for a review, see Christensen & Schunn, 2009a).”
BackgroundProject Management Simulation-Based Learning For Systems Engineering Students
Davidovitch, L., Shtub, A., & Parush, A. (2007) · doi:10.1109/icsem.2007.373329 · Cited by 6
Fiore, S. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2001) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120104500446 · Cited by 6
Impact of Group Collaboration on the Improvement of Individual Creative Thinking Ability
Tateishi, I. (2011) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 6
O’Leary, M. B., Mortensen, M., & Woolley, A. W. (2009) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 6
Nam, C. W. (2008) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 6
Organizational structure as a determinant of performance
Csaszar, F. A. (2009) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 5
Ying, B., Duan, Y., Zheng, S., & Zheng, X. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.70031 · Cited by 12
Graf, B., Beinig, R., Schwickert, S., & Schischke, D. (2026) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2026.103045 · Cited by 7
Conceptualising the Role of Expertise in EU Policy-Making
Blom, T. (2020) · European administrative governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54367-9_2 · Cited by 5
When Majority Men Respect Minority Women, Groups Communicate Better: A Neurological Exploration
Amey, R. C., Emich, K. J., & Forbes, C. E. (2023) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964231175640 · Cited by 5
“Sharing unique information does not necessarily mean that information will be acknowledged and drawn into a final group decision (Hinsz et al., 1997).”
BackgroundBenyekhlef, K., Bailey, J., Burkell, J., & Gélinas, F. (2016) · University of Ottawa Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780776624303 · Cited by 5
Park, S., González, C., & Puranam, P. (2024) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.01507 · Cited by 6
Janssens, M., van der Bruggen, S. C. P., Meslec, N., Beerepoot, L. V., & Leenders, R. (2024) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011241303982 · Cited by 5
“However, the occurrence of work fl ow interruptions makes it more dif fi cult to build on what was said previously, because it disrupts the team members ’ information processing system (Hinsz et al., 1997).”
Tabernero, C., Arenas, A., & Briones, E. (2005) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1174/0213474052871033 · Cited by 5
Team Composition and Project-Based Organizations: New Perspectives for Human Resource Management
Vicentini, F., & Boccardelli, P. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137355720_2 · Cited by 5
Triguero‐Sánchez, R., Peña‐Vinces, J. C., & Guillen, J. B. (2016) · International Journal of Organizational Leadership · doi:10.33844/ijol.2016.60337 · Cited by 5
Perreault, M., Milton, D., Alunni‐Menichini, K., Archambault, L., Perreault, N., & Bertrand, K. (2019) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.12942 · Cited by 5
The optimal knowledge creation strategy of organizations in groupthink situations
Cha, N., Hwang, J., & Kim, E. (2020) · Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory · doi:10.1007/s10588-020-09313-w · Cited by 5
Shen, N., & Zhuo, Z. (2022) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-10-2020-0462 · Cited by 5
Team Building and Appreciative Inquiry in Research and Development Teams
Mandal, M. (2022) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/09722629211063528 · Cited by 10
“This has been proved by many empirical studies laying importance to the concept of Shared Mental Model in enhancing group effectiveness (Hinsz et al., 1997; Marks et al., 2002).”
Park, G., Oh, H. S., Lim, B., & Khoo, B. L. Z. (2022) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2126949 · Cited by 5
“In a similar vein, as a growing number of employees are required to perform intellectual and cognitive tasks in team settings (Cooke et al. 2003; Hinsz, Tindale, and Vollrath 1997), how members share and interact to process information collectively is a crucial indicator of successful performance.”
BackgroundAssessing Automated Administration
Coglianese, C., & Lai, A. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.30 · Cited by 5
Chen, W., Chen, C., & Xiong, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1102192 · Cited by 5
“Team attention is focused on the selected problem, and the more that members are likely to share and support an idea, the more that idea’s value is demonstrated (Hinsz et al., 1997).”
BackgroundSlippage in the System: The Effects of Errors in Transactive Memory Behavior on Team Performance
Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P. J., & Bell, B. S. (2008) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 5
Smart, P. R., Richardson, D., Sycara, K. P., & Tang, Y. (2014) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 5
Kognitive Ansätze zur Vorhersage der Gruppenleistung
Reimer, T. O. (2001) · Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1024//0044-3514.32.2.107 · Cited by 5
Collective Intelligence in Teams – Practical Approaches to Develop Transactive Memory
Busch, M. W., & von der Oelsnitz, D. (2010) · Advances in intelligent and soft computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14481-3_9 · Cited by 5
“What we do not know is how much knowledge must be overlapping, and how much specialization is too much” [ 39 ].”
BackgroundIs Science an Evolutionary Process? Evidence from Miscitations of the Scientific Literature
Vicente, K. J. (2000) · Perspectives on Science · doi:10.1162/106361400568019 · Cited by 5
Le dialogisme de la rationalité dans l'ordre de l'interaction
Trognon, A., Batt, M., & Marchetti, É. (2011) · Bulletin de psychologie · doi:10.3917/bupsy.515.0439 · Cited by 5
Using cognitive architectures to study issues in team cognition in a complex task environment
Smart, P. R., Sycara, K. P., & Tang, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.2053287 · Cited by 5
“As it becomes increasingly possible to harness the cognitive processing capabilities of multiple individuals within a distributed, networked environment, so attention has focused on the factors that enable groups to function as the processors of information.(1) This burgeoning research interest is particularly apparen…”
BackgroundDecision framing and critical success factors of new product development
Emami, A., & Talebi, K. H. S. (2011) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT · doi:10.5897/ajbm11.252 · Cited by 5
Effect of Word-List Consistency on the Correlation between Group Memory and Group Polarization
Arima, Y. (2013) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/01.07.17.pr0.112.2.375-389 · Cited by 5
A neighbor like me: the effect of fractionalization on subjective well-being
Kwakwa, M., & Peña-Vasquez, A. C. (2019) · Politics Groups and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2018.1564054 · Cited by 5
Voinov, P. V., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.016 · Cited by 5
Li, M., & Liu, K. (2019) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2019.87 · Cited by 5
Role Assignment Adaptation: An Intentional Forgetting Approach
Timm, I. J., Reuter, L., & Berndt, J. O. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.588 · Cited by 5
Schippers, M. C., & Jaarsveld, G. M. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3599939 · Cited by 5
Budak, G., & Kara, İ. (2022) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-06-2021-0047 · Cited by 5
Athletes’ imagery use from a team-level perspective and team cohesion
Curtin, K. D., Munroe‐Chandler, K. J., & Loughead, T. M. (2015) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2015.1036096 · Cited by 5
“Related to this suggestion, Hinsz, Tindale, and Vollrath (1997) noted that teams process information through mental models, which are beliefs, thoughts and opinions about how the sport works, teammates, anticipation of certain game events, environmental cues, personal goals and individual roles on…”
BackgroundDynamics between Member Replacement and Team Performance: The Role of Members’ Relative Attributes
Li, J., & Gevers, J. (2017) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12116 · Cited by 5
Measuring shared knowledge with group false memory
Arima, Y., Yukihiro, R., & Hattori, Y. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28347-4 · Cited by 5
Freeburg, D. (2018) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-189007 · Cited by 7
“Although a broad course topic is proposed, mutual definition of the domain occurs as students are asked to contribute their own unique experiences and knowledge – what only one person knows [30] – to reshape what this topic actually looks like.”
Perceived analogical communication in design teams: Development and validation of a scale
Graff, D., Meslec, N., & Clark, M. A. (2020) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.004 · Cited by 5
Designing an accounting analytics course using experiential learning approach
Pan, G., Shankararaman, V., Seow, P. S., & Tan, G. H. (2016) · Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) · Cited by 5
The Psychology of Entrepreneurs: A Self-regulation Perspective
Johnson, A. R., & Delmar, F. (2010) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781849806947.00024 · Cited by 6
Towards an interactionist theory of group‐level feedback
Dewett, T. C. (2003) · Management Research News · doi:10.1108/01409170310784041 · Cited by 5
Fiore, S. M., Jentsch, F. G., Bowers, C. A., & Eduardo Salas, A. (2003) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120304700340 · Cited by 5
Group judgment and advice-taking: The social context underlying CEO compensation decisions.
Bonner, B. L., & Cadman, B. D. (2014) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/gdn0000011 · Cited by 7
“, group polarization; Moscovici & Zavalloni, 1969), or improves upon the contributions of individuals by correcting individuals’ misperceptions or errors (Hinsz et al., 1997; Shaw, 1932).”
BackgroundProse, F., Engellandt, C., & Bendrien, J. (2000) · Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12151-1_2 · Cited by 5
Partner Influence, Team Brainstorming, and Fraud Risk Assessment: Some Implications of SAS No. 99
Carpenter, T. D. (2004) · Cited by 5
Wang, S. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2789908 · Cited by 5
Vanderheyden, K., Lommelen, B., & Cools, E. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 5
Workforce age diversity and the intensity of inventive activities in universities
Chapman, G., Nasirov, S., Hughes, M., & Hughes, P. (2025) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-025-10250-6 · Cited by 9
“…workforce age variety benefits the invention process in universities by facilitating collaboration among academics from differ - ent age groups as well as enhancing the sharing of diverse knowledge, skills, and networks (Hinsz et al., 1997; Mothe & Nguyen-Thi, 2021; Van Knippenberg et al., 2004).”
Antecedents and consequences of group cognitive complexity: a conceptual review
Coman, A. D., & Fodor, O. C. (2022) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-09-2021-0069 · Cited by 4
Customer‐Oriented Boundary Spanning, Functional Diversity, and Customer Adoption
Wagner, A., van Knippenberg, D., & D’Innocenzo, L. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2884 · Cited by 3
Choi, J. Y., Oh, I.-S., Park, G., Colbert, A., Kim, K., & Kang, S. (2025) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011251356136 · Cited by 6
Li, W. (2018) · Science Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.11648/j.sjbm.20180601.14 · Cited by 4
How diversity promotes team creativity: Two bumpy roads to collective inspiration
Hoever, I. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819993-0.00005-9 · Cited by 4
Hagemann, V., Rieth, M., & Klasmeier, K. N. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0297565 · Cited by 7
“As team-level performance feedback is thought to promote reflection processes [42] and, hypothesized theoretically, can lead to CO [43] and that team-level process feedback directs attention processes towards teamwork processes [23], our study can provide new empirical insights on those assumptions.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGroup Dynamics Meets Organizational Learning: Reflections on Research
Argote, L. (2024) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964241263117 · Cited by 7
“Our article was consistent with conception of groups prevalent in the 1990s of groups as information-processing and problem-solving systems (Hinsz et al., 1997; Klimoski & Mohammed, 1994; Levine & Moreland, 1991) and is reflected in models of group performance (Kozlowski & Ilgen, 2006).”
The differential impacts of team diversity as variability versus atypicality on team effectiveness
Modi, N., Lungeanu, A., DeChurch, L. A., & Contractor, N. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-86483-0 · Cited by 4
The “Less-Is-More” Effect in Group Decision Making
Luan, S., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Reimer, T. O. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0010 · Cited by 4
Putri, P., & Dewi, A. C. (2012) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 4
Integrating the group within models of information processes
Toms, E. G., Toze, S. L., & Kelley, E. (2008) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.2008.1450450275 · Cited by 4
Enhancing team performance through transactive memory
Chatterjee, S. (2016) · Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal · doi:10.1108/dlo-06-2015-0055 · Cited by 4
Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2008) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(08)11008-8 · Cited by 5
Supporting Virtual Collaborative Learning using Collaboration Scripts and Content Schemes
Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-0011-9.ch303 · Cited by 4
Bonner, B. L., Soderberg, A. T., & Romney, A. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000099 · Cited by 4
Creative success in collaboration: A sociocultural perspective
Glăveanu, V. P., Ness, I. J., & Rasmussen, L. J. T. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819993-0.00002-3 · Cited by 4
Sinha, R., & Stothard, C. (2020) · The Learning Organization · doi:10.1108/tlo-06-2020-0115 · Cited by 5
Group diversity and salience: A natural experiment from a television game show
Bucci, G. A., & Tenorio, R. (2009) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.10.006 · Cited by 4
Team Decision-Making in Crisis: How Affect Asymmetry and Team Process Norms Affect Decision-Making
Collins, B. J., Munyon, T. P., Ashkanasy, N. M., Gallagher, E. E., Lawrence, S. A., O'Connor, J., & Kessler, S. R. (2023) · Research on emotion in organizations · doi:10.1108/s1746-979120220000018014 · Cited by 4
The experience and emergence of attitudinal consensus in conversations
Koudenburg, N., Kutlaca, M., & Kuppens, T. (2023) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2992 · Cited by 4
The Perception of Fairness of Performance Appraisals
Prather, T. M. (2010) · EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University) · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A.
- Affiliations
- North Dakota State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-64
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2029057170
- Cited by
- 1,428
- References
- 219
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 109
- FWCI
- 37.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- group cognition, small group interaction, attention, encoding and retrieval, group learning, feedback
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Cognition, Group Processes, Humans, Mental Processes, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Social Identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review