Cited by 1,428Team Dynamics and PerformanceInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 219 of the 219 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.

Hinsz, Verlin B., Tindale, R. Scott, Vollrath, David A.·1997·Psychological Bulletin

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A selective review of research highlights the emerging view of groups as information processors. In this review, the authors include research on processing objectives, attention, encoding, storage, retrieval, processing, response, feedback, and learning in small interacting task groups. The groups as information processors perspective underscores several characteristic dimensions of variability in group performance of cognitive tasks, namely, commonality-uniqueness of information, convergence-diversity of ideas, accentuation-attenuation of cognitive processes, and belongingness-distinctiveness of members. A combination of contributions framework provides an additional conceptualization of information processing in groups. The authors also address implications, caveats, and questions for future research and theory regarding groups as information processors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43

Cites

219 of 219 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,530
Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Hammer, T. H., Anderson, J. F., Gurdon, M. A., Jick, T. D., Petit, A., Stern, R. N., Schwartz, H., Vardi, Y., & Dunnette, M. D. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2391755 · Cited by 11,947
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS
Bannister, D., & Fransella, F. (2010) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203405321_chapter_1 · Cited by 8,589
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
The Social Psychology of Groups
Kenkel, W. F., Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3709294 · Cited by 5,899
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658

Show all 219 references

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 997

Förderung des computerbasierten Wissenserwerbs durch kooperatives Lernen und eine Feedbackmaßnahme
Krause, U.-M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2004) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652.18.2.125 · Cited by 15
Methods for Diagnosing Interaction Strategies
Becker-Beck, U. (2001) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/104649640103200301 · Cited by 15
Teams in Small Organizations: Conceptual, Methodological, and Practical Considerations
Reiter‐Palmon, R., Kennel, V. L., & Allen, J. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530291 · Cited by 23
Team Readiness to Change: Reflexivity, Tenure, and Vision in Play
Groulx, P. M., Johnson, K., & Harvey, J. (2023) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/00218863231216724 · Cited by 14
“…“ the capacity of teams to gather information from the performance environment and use it to make functional adjustments to team strategies, behaviors, role structures, and resource allocations ” (Randall et al., 2011, p. 526; see also Burke et al., 2006; Hinsz et al., 1997; Maynard et al., 2015).”
Collectively Intelligent Teams: Integrating Team Cognition, Collective Intelligence, and AI for Future Teaming
Canonico, L. B., Flathmann, C., & McNeese, N. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181319631278 · Cited by 14
“Furthermore, prior research has shown that asking team members to defend their position induces a cognitive strategy relying on generative confirmatory evidence, whereas asking not expecting them to leads for greater freedom to explore arguments counter to initial positions (Hinsz et al., 1997).”
BackgroundInfluential
A meta-analysis of top management team compositional characteristics and corporate innovation in China
Wei, X., Yang, H.-J., & Han, S. (2020) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2021.1846952 · Cited by 14
The Effect of Stereotype Threat on Group Versus Individual Performance
Aramovich, N. P. (2014) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414523508 · Cited by 14
The effects of expected group longevity and expected task difficulty on learning and recall: Implications for the development of transactive memory.
Baumann, M. R., & Bonner, B. L. (2011) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0023615 · Cited by 14
Listing and Structuring of Discussion Content
Voigtländer, D., Pfeiffer, F., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2009) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.79 · Cited by 14
Enabling team learning in healthcare
Boak, G. (2016) · Action Learning Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/14767333.2016.1150807 · Cited by 14
“…research that is closely related to the study of team learning is the examination of how teams share information (Hoch 2014), process information (Hinsz, Tindale, and Vollrath 1997), share knowledge (Lee, Lee, and Park 2014), create knowledge (Reihlen and Nikolova 2010), integrate knowledge…”
Background
Intergenerational sharing of knowledge as means of deepening the organisational learning culture in schools
Klein, J., & Shapira‐Lishchinsky, O. (2016) · School Leadership and Management · doi:10.1080/13632434.2016.1196172 · Cited by 14
“Thus the skills and experience sharpened in one type of learning do not guarantee success in the other (Hinsz, Tindale, and Vollrath 1997; Triest 1999).”
Background
Managing Conflict in Groups and Teams: Conflict about Conflict
Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2012) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2012)0000015009 · Cited by 15
1 The History of Group Research
Forsyth, D. R., & Burnette, J. L. (2005) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412990165.d3 · Cited by 14
Emotions and Decision-Making Processes in Management Teams: A Collective Level Analysis
Tran, V., Páez, D., & Sánchez, F. (2012) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.5093/tr2012a2 · Cited by 19
On the same page: The value of paid and volunteer leaders sharing mental models in churches
Solansky, S. T., Duchon, D., Plowman, D. A., & Martínez, P. G. (2008) · Nonprofit Management and Leadership · doi:10.1002/nml.215 · Cited by 14
Social Capital as a Communicative Paradigm
Ginman, M. (2003) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458203009001005 · Cited by 14
The Use of Distributed Information in Decision Making Groups: The Role of Shared Task Representations
van Ginkel, W. (2007) · Cited by 14
Assessing Knowledge Construction in On-Line Learning Communities.
Derry, S. J., & DuRussel, L. A. (2000) · Cited by 14
Group Processes in Organizations
Braun, S. H., Frey, D., Brodbeck, F. C., & Hentschel, T. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.73071-6 · Cited by 14
How do teams learn? shared mental models and transactive memory systems as determinants of team learning and effectiveness
Nandkeolyar, A. K. (2008) · doi:10.17077/etd.upgvsg29 · Cited by 13
Individual and group performance on insight problems: The effects of experimentally induced fixation
Smith, C. M., Bushouse, E., & Lord, J. (2009) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430209340276 · Cited by 12
“The increased capacity to encode, store, and retrieve information possessed by groups is assumed to be associated with enhanced problem solving, which, in part, accounts for the extremely robust finding that groups outperform individuals on problemsolving tasks (Davis, 1969; Hinsz et al., 1997).”
Background
The creating force of minority dissent: A motivated information processing perspective
Dreu, C. K. W. D., Nijstad, B. A., Baas, M., & Bechtoldt, M. N. (2008) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510802341157 · Cited by 13
“The MIP-G model (De Dreu et al., 2008) builds on the view of groups as information processors developed by Hinsz, Tindale, and Vollrath (1997).”
Method
Let’s decide together: Differences between individual and joint delay discounting
Schwenke, D., Dshemuchadse, M., Vesper, C., Bleichner, M. G., & Scherbaum, S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176003 · Cited by 13
Leading Artificial Intelligence at Work: A Matter of Facilitating Human‐Algorithm Cocreation
Cremer, D. D. (2019) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.21637 · Cited by 13
“Me” versus “We” in moral dilemmas: Group composition and social influence effects on group utilitarianism
Curșeu, P. L., Fodor, O. C., Pavelea, A., & Meslec, N. (2020) · Business Ethics A European Review · doi:10.1111/beer.12292 · Cited by 14
How can we master the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic? The role of planning at social levels
Thürmer, J. L., Wieber, F., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2021) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2020.1852699 · Cited by 14
“Building on the literature on group cognition (Hinsz et al., 1997; Levine & Smith, 2013; E. R. Smith & Semin, 2004), we assume that actions are distributed across members.”
Background
Teams as technology: applying theory and research to model macrocognition processes in teams
Wallace, D. M., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639221003729201 · Cited by 13
“Fortunately, research generally shows that teams outperform individuals on many cognitive tasks, although this is not uniformly so (McGrath 1984, Hinsz et al .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citation
Strategic demonstration of problem solutions by groups: The effects of member preferences, confidence, and learning goals
Aramovich, N. P., & Larson, J. R. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.04.001 · Cited by 14
Self-Reference Effect and the Group-Reference Effect in the Recall of Shared and Unshared Information in Nominal Groups and Interacting Groups
Stewart, D. D., Stewart, C. B., & Walden, J. C. (2007) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207078693 · Cited by 13
“Hinsz et al. (1997) found that groups tend to accentuate individual level information processing bias if it is present.”
Background
Toward a Truly Social Epistemology: Babbage, the Division of Mental Labor, and the Possibility of Socially Distributed Warrant
Shieber, J. H. (2011) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00524.x · Cited by 13
Do High Working Memory Groups Perform Better?
Mojzisch, A., Krumm, S., & Schultze, T. (2014) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000111 · Cited by 15
“This is surprising given the fact that group interaction is a cognitively demanding task (Hinsz et al., 1997; Larson, 2010): Thus, group members have to continuously monitor the ongoing conversation, hold their own ideas in memory, integrate”
Background
Impacts of human communication network topology on group optimism bias in Capital Project Planning: a human-subject experiment
Du, J., Zhao, D. F., & Zhang, O. (2018) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2018.1508848 · Cited by 14
“Group interaction can accentuate common misconceptions (Hinsz et al. 1997).”
Collective orientation and its implications for coordination and team performance in interdependent work contexts
Hagemann, V., Ontrup, G., & Kluge, A. (2020) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-03-2020-0020 · Cited by 20
The Gap Between Perceived and Actual Learning From Group Reflection
Bolinger, A. R., & Stanton, J. V. (2014) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496414538322 · Cited by 16
When and why prior task experience fosters team creativity
Francesca Gino, B., Todorova, G., Miron‐Spektor, E., & Argote, L. (2009) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2009)0000012007 · Cited by 13
Are N+1 heads better than one? The timing and selectivity of Australian-managed investment funds
Prather, L. J., Middleton, K. L., & Cusack, A. J. (2001) · Pacific-Basin Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/s0927-538x(01)00021-x · Cited by 13
Team Performance in Dynamic Task Environments
Hinsz, V. B., Wallace, D. M., & Ladbury, J. L. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470745267.ch6 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Collaborative Working Environments
Pankiewicz, M. (2011) · bonndoc (University of Bonn) · Cited by 13
Engaged Decision Making
Rouwette, E. A. J. A., & Franco, L. A. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003404200 · Cited by 14
Development of an Evidence-based Extended Programme of Maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) for People with Dementia
Aguirre, E., Spector, A. E., Hoe, J., Streater, A., Russell, I. T., Woods, B. T., & Orrell, M. W. (2011) · City Research Online (City University London) · Cited by 12
Scenario reliability assessment to support decision makers in situations of severe uncertainty
Comes, T., Wijngaards, N. J. E., Maule, J., Allen, D., & Schultmann, F. (2012) · IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support · doi:10.1109/cogsima.2012.6188402 · Cited by 12
Critical Team Composition Issues for Long-Distance and Long-Duration Space Exploration A Literature Review, an Operational Assessment, and Recommendations for Practice and Research
Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G. U., Outland, N. B., & Abben, D. R. (2015) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 12
Does board turnover enhance firm performance? A contingency approach
Qiang, W., Wong, S., Koh, K., & Tong, Y. H. (2022) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12455 · Cited by 12
Beyond the Surface: Exploring the Relationship between Value Diversity and Team Creativity
Kirrane, M., Kramer, M., & Lassleben, H. (2019) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2019.1697920 · Cited by 11
The temporal phase structure of team interaction under asymmetric information distribution: The solution fixation trap
Sohrab, G., Uitdewilligen, S., & Waller, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2592 · Cited by 15
The video feedback viewing in novice weightlifters: Total control strategy improves snatch technique during learning
Souissi, M. A., Trabelsi, O., Souissi, H., Elghoul, Y., Ammar, A., Chamari, K., & Souissi, N. (2021) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541211062596 · Cited by 13
“The learners have already detected the errors and corrected them by encoding and retrieving the correct information.(45) This consolidation of information thus strengthens the construction of higher-level schema for the TC group.”
Method
The paradoxical effects of professional stereotypes on the quality of care by interprofessional teams: The contingent effects of team faultlines, team stereotypes, and championship behaviors
Sheffer‐Hilel, G., Drach‐Zahavy, A., & Endevelt, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135071 · Cited by 12
Gender Diversity in Führungsteams und Unternehmensperformanz: Eine Metaanalyse
Reinwald, M., Hüttermann, H., Kröll, J., & Boerner, S. (2015) · Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1007/bf03372925 · Cited by 12
Distributed Mental Models: Mental Models in Distributed Cognitive Systems
Banks, A. P., & Millward, L. J. (2009) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) · Cited by 12
How Does Context Influence Individual Behavior? Multilevel Assessment of the Implementation of Social Innovations.
Choi, J. N. (2003) · Prevention & Treatment · doi:10.1037/1522-3736.6.1.623c · Cited by 12
The environment matters: Comparing individuals and dyads in their adaptive use of decision strategies
Kämmer, J. E., Gaissmaier, W., & Czienskowski, U. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005994 · Cited by 12
“…learning and motivation (Nadler, 1979), studies in psychology (e.g., Davis, 1969; Laughlin & Shippy, 1983; Tindale, 1989; see Hill, 1982, and Hinsz et al., 1997, for reviews) and behavioral economics (Kocher & Sutter, 2005; Maciejovsky , Sutter, Budescu, & Bernau, 2010) have shown that…”
Is Internal Communication Important for Sport Commitment
Mishra, N., Sharma, N. P., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2015) · Communication & Sport · doi:10.1177/2167479515572810 · Cited by 12
A Conceptual Framework of Knowledge Transfer in Malaysia E- Government IT Outsourcing: An Integration with Transactive Memory System (TMS)
Hamid, N. A. A., & Salim, J. (2011) · International Journal of Computer Science Issues · Cited by 12
Cross-level impact of team goal orientation and individual goal orientation on individual creativity
Zhang, J., Ji, M., Anwar, C. M., Li, Q., & Fu, G. (2018) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.6 · Cited by 14
“In addition, Hinsz et al. (1997) found isomorphism in the information processing on the team and individual-level.”
Background
How the Distribution of Member Expectations Influences Cooperation and Competition in Groups: A Social Relations Model Analysis of Social Dilemmas
Ladbury, J. L., & Hinsz, V. B. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218771322 · Cited by 12
“The theory of combinations of contributions (Hinsz & Ladbury, 2013; Hinsz et al., 1997) and the Input-Process-Outcome (IPO) framework (McGrath, 1964) posit that expectations are part of the inputs that members bring with them to the group interaction and task performance.”
BackgroundSelf-citation
A systematic investigation of absorptive capacity and external information search in groups
Curșeu, P. L., & Pluut, H. (2018) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-09-2017-0047 · Cited by 12
The Effects of Perceived Decision-Making Styles on Evaluations of Openness and Competence That Elicit Collaboration
Tsai, M., Melia, N. V., & Hinsz, V. B. (2019) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167219843934 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Deconstructing Information Elaboration: The Critical Role of Framing and Initial Dialogue
Sanner, B., & Evans, K. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419853019 · Cited by 12
When Will We Meet Again? Regularities of Social Connectivity and Their Reflections in Memory and Decision Making
Pachur, T., Schooler, L. J., & Stevens, J. R. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0007 · Cited by 12
Simple Heuristics in a Social Game
Hertwig, R., Fischbacher, U., & Bruhin, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0002 · Cited by 12
Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis
Mesmer‐Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. A. (2012) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2012.6172774 · Cited by 12
Embodied Collaboration in Small Groups
Williamson, K., & Sutton, J. D. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230369580_7 · Cited by 12
The Is and Ought of Sharing: The Equality Heuristic Across the Lifespan
Keller, M., Gummerum, M., Canz, T., Gigerenzer, G., & Takezawa, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0006 · Cited by 12
On the Virtues of Assuming Minimal Differences in Information Processing in Individuals and Groups
Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (2000) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430200003002006 · Cited by 12
“Some of their colleagues (Hinsz et al., 1997) have recently used the term ‘combination of contributions framework’.”
Background
Measuring Shifts in Mental Models in the Prevention of Childhood Obesity in Rural Australia
Felmingham, T., Bolton, K. A., Fraser, P., Allender, S. E., & Brown, A. D. (2023) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/10901981231165339 · Cited by 11
“While others may have consolidated their thinking, reducing the number of responses (Hinsz et al., 1997; Hovmand, 2014; McCardleKeurentjes et al., 2018).”
Background
How entrepreneurial team informational and social category faultlines affect new venture performance: A conservation of resources perspective
Wei, F., Mo, Y., Zhang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-024-09952-6 · Cited by 11
“As information processing theory posits, there is variability in cognitive representations among team members (Hinsz et al., 1997).”
Does feedback type matter? The superiority of process feedback over performance feedback in interdependent teamwork
Hagemann, V., & Decius, J. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101949 · Cited by 11
Cognição Social: Fundamentos, formulaçõees actuais e perspectivas futuras
Garrido, M. V., Azevedo, C., & Palma, T. A. (1969) · Psicologia · doi:10.17575/rpsicol.v25i1.282 · Cited by 18
Team Cognition and External Representations: A Framework and Propositions for Supporting Collaborative Problem Solving
Rosen, M. A., Eduardo Salas, A., Fiore, S. M., Pavlas, D., & Lum, H. C. (2009) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120905301828 · Cited by 11
Evaluation of Satisfaction Using Online Learning with Interactivity
Baharin, A. T., Lateh, H., Nawawi, H. M., & Nathan, S. S. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.208 · Cited by 14
A quasi‐experimental examination of knowledge‐sharing interventions enhancing service performance: The roles of time, occupational identity, and image
Li, N., Zheng, X., Yu, Y., & Yu, J. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2609 · Cited by 14
Building effective inside-outside sales rep dyads: A collaboration perspective
Shi, H., Sridhar, S., & Grewal, R. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-023-00960-4 · Cited by 11
“Variations in members’ knowledge might increase the range of information in use and stimulate efforts to generate new and useful insights (Hinsz et al., 1997; Jehn et al., 1999).”
Conflict and performance in US and Mexican learning teams
Cooper, D., & Watson, W. E. (2011) · Cross Cultural Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13527601111179500 · Cited by 11
“Teams can be understood as information processors that bring together information to address a task ( Hinsz et al. , 1997”
Background
Social Loafing During Preparation for Performance Situations
Ohlert, J., & Kleinert, J. (2012) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000107 · Cited by 11
Motivated to change? TMT regulatory focus and strategic change
Roundy, P. T., Dai, Y., Bayer, M. A., & Byun, G. (2016) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-10-2014-0235 · Cited by 11
The Social Psychology of Cybersecurity
McAlaney, J., Taylor, J., & Faily, S. (2015) · Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1275.6961 · Cited by 11
The Detrimental Effects of Ethical Incongruence in Teams: An Interactionist Perspective of Ethical Fit on Relationship Conflict and Information Sharing
Shin, N. J., Ziegert, J. C., & Muethel, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04684-1 · Cited by 11
Information Similarity as a Moderator of the Effect of Gender on Participation in Small Groups
Bonito, J. A., & Lambert, B. L. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496404266164 · Cited by 11
Honey Bee Swarm Cognition
Passino, K. M. (2010) · International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research · doi:10.4018/jsir.2010040105 · Cited by 11
“…have been used for both animals and humans to discuss fully integrated group functioning, especially group decision-making (Hölldobler & Wilson, 2008, 1990; Levine et al., 1993; Franks, 1989; Seeley, 1989, 1995; Hinsz et al., 1997; Wilson, 2000; Camazine et al., 2001; Surowiecki, 2004).”
Chapter 1 When are Teams an Asset in Negotiations and when are they a Liability?
Cohen, T. R., & Thompson, L. (2011) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2011)0000014004 · Cited by 12
The Viability of Alternative Call Centre Production Models
Batt, R., & Moynihan, L. M. (2004) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230288805_2 · Cited by 12
Group Composition and Decision Making
George, E., & Chattopadhyay, P. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199290468.003.0019 · Cited by 10
THE BENEFITS OF VERIFYING DIVERSE IDENTITIES FOR GROUP PERFORMANCE
Polzer, J. T., Swann, W. B., & Milton, L. P. (2004) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1016/s1534-0856(02)05004-1 · Cited by 12
The Mind as an Intuitive Pollster: Frugal Search in Social Spaces
Pachur, T., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0009 · Cited by 11
Simple mechanisms for gathering social information
García‐Retamero, R., Takezawa, M., & Galešić, M. (2009) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.05.002 · Cited by 12
Does Stress Lead to a Loss of Team Perspective?
Driskell, J. E., Eduardo Salas, A., & Jolinston, J. (2000) · Human performance in extreme environments · doi:10.7771/2327-2937.1008 · Cited by 11
“If we adopt Hinsz et al.'s (1997) model of groups as information processors, it is likely that, in addition to affecting attentional processes, stress may disrupt other aspects of group functioning, such as memory, retrieval, processing, and response.”
MethodInfluential
Group Decision and Deliberation: A Distributed Detection Process
Sorkin, R. D., Luan, S., & Itzkowitz, J. (2004) · doi:10.1002/9780470752937.ch23 · Cited by 11
Collaborative problem solving: The role of team knowledge building processes and external representations
Rosen, M. A. (2010) · ProQuest Demo Repository · Cited by 11
Decision Making in Groups and Organizations
Tindale, R. S., & Kluwe, K. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118468333.ch30 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
The effects of gender diversity and cognitive diversity on team performance in Japanese R&D teams including the effect of shared leadership as a moderator
Ishikawa, J. (2024) · Asia Pacific Business Review · doi:10.1080/13602381.2024.2353773 · Cited by 11
“As they pointed out, information elaboration involves several processes of collective cognition (Hinsz and Vollrath 1997).”
Modeling the Feedback Process in Teams: A Field Study of Teamwork
Potosky, D., Godé, C., & Lebraty, J. (2021) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011211018017 · Cited by 11
Developing computational thinking collaboratively: the nexus of computational practices within small groups
Huang, J., & Parker, M. C. (2022) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2022.2039488 · Cited by 11
The Impact of Team Mental Models on Is Project Teams' Information Processing and Project Performance
Hsu, J. S., Parolia, N., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. L. (2007) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 10
Examining Functional Communication as Egocentric or Group-Centric: Application of a Latent Group Model
Bonito, J. A., & Meyers, R. A. (2011) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2011.618138 · Cited by 10
“As Hinsz, Tindale, and Vollrath (1997) suggested, ‘‘[a]t the individual level of analysis, dispersion and heterogeneity become relatively salient.”
Background
Team Reflection
Otte, K., Knipfer, K., & Schippers, M. C. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795872.013.44 · Cited by 10
An analysis of design process and performance in distributed data science teams
Maier, T., DeFranco, J. F., & McComb, C. (2019) · Team Performance Management · doi:10.1108/tpm-03-2019-0024 · Cited by 10
Top Management Team Influence on Firms’ Internationalization Complexity
Vallone, T., Elia, S., Greve, P. M., Longoni, L., & Marinelli, D. (2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1745-886220190000014012 · Cited by 10
The Effect of Perceived Competence and Competitive Environment on Team Decision-Making in the Hidden-Profile Paradigm
Dayeh, V., & Morrison, B. W. (2020) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-020-09701-2 · Cited by 10
Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for
Thürmer, J. L., Wieber, F., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388 · Cited by 11
“To perform successfully, groups require the contributions of their members (Steiner, 1972; Hinsz et al., 1997; Hinsz and Ladbury, 2012), but group members can often enjoy the benefits of their group’s performance even if they do not contribute adequately (Kerr, 1983, 2013; Parks, 2020).”
Background
Exploring the Non-significant Difference on Students’ Cognitive Load Imposed by Robotics Tasks in Pair Learning
Zhong, B., & Wang, J. (2021) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-021-00764-y · Cited by 10

Authors: Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A.
Affiliations: North Dakota State University (US)
ORCID: Hinsz, Verlin B.
Tindale, R. Scott
Venue: Psychological Bulletin
Publisher: American Psychological Association (APA)
Published: 1997
Volume: 121
Issue: 1
Pages: 43-64
ISSN: 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
1939-1455
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43
OpenAlex: W2029057170
Cited by: 1,428
References: 219
Citations by year: 2026: 27 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 109
FWCI: 37.57
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords: group cognition, small group interaction, attention, encoding and retrieval, group learning, feedback
MeSH terms: Attention, Cognition, Group Processes, Humans, Mental Processes, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Social Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks