Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,429Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPersonality Traits and PsychologyAesthetic Perception and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 299 of the 299 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review

Langlois, Judith H., Kalakanis, Lisa, Rubenstein, Adam J., Larson, Andrea, Hallam, Monica, Smoot, Monica·2000·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390

Cites

299 of 299 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 297 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Brunswick, 1945, Social perception of traits from photographs., Psychological Bulletin, 45, 535
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387 · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330 · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0021-843X.100.2.181 · DOI
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · Paper page
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 · Paper page
  8. Daly, 1990, Evolutionary theory and parental motives., 25
  9. 10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2307/1129726 · doi:10.2307/1129726 · Paper page
  11. Farkas, 1987, Linear proportions in above- and below-average women's faces., 119
  12. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125 · Paper page
  13. 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304 · Paper page
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947 · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.464 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.464 · Paper page
  16. 10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79 · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.363 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.363 · Paper page
  18. Mohr, 1932, Beauty as related to intelligence and scholarship., Psychological Bulletin, 29, 564
  19. Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
  20. 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.456 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.456
  21. Thornhill, 1998, Darwinian aesthetics., 543
  22. Waldrop, 1971, Minor physical anomalies and hyperactive behavior in young children., Vol. 2, 343
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.85 · DOI

Cited by

Items 501–600 of 1,004

Metadata

Authors
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2000
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
390-423
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2088165831
Cited by
2,429
References
297
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 118 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 121 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 138
FWCI
20.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021332)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
physical attractiveness, beauty, attractiveness judgments, evolutionary psychology, socialization theory
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Beauty, Child, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.