The DOI matches its Crossref record; 299 of the 299 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review
Abstract
Common maxims about beauty suggest that attractiveness is not important in life. In contrast, both fitness-related evolutionary theory and socialization theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction. In 11 meta-analyses, the authors evaluate these contradictory claims, demonstrating that (a) raters agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across cultures; (b) attractive children and adults are judged more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; (c) attractive children and adults are treated more positively than unattractive children and adults, even by those who know them; and (d) attractive children and adults exhibit more positive behaviors and traits than unattractive children and adults. Results are used to evaluate social and fitness-related evolutionary theories and the veracity of maxims about beauty.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Physical attractiveness is one of the most powerful demographic variables known to science (Langlois et al., 2000), and it is substantially genetic (Gangestad & Scheyd, 2005).”
From A process-based approach to psychological diagnosis and treatment:The conceptual and treatment utility of an extended evolutionary meta model (2020) · cites this paper as Langlois et al., 2000
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488618 · Cited by 99,167
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1990) · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,269
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
(1907) · The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Tokyo · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,892
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
(2017) · Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 9,510
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Andersson, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691207278 · Cited by 7,401
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: The Darwinian Pivot
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,252
The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992) · Cited by 5,221
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Brunswick, 1945, Social perception of traits from photographs., Psychological Bulletin, 45, 535
- 10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-843X.100.2.181 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261 · Paper page
- Daly, 1990, Evolutionary theory and parental motives., 25
- 10.1037/0003-066X.50.3.145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1129726 · doi:10.2307/1129726 · Paper page
- Farkas, 1987, Linear proportions in above- and below-average women's faces., 119
- 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.125 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.464 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.3.464 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.79 · Paper page
- 10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.363 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.23.3.363 · Paper page
- Mohr, 1932, Beauty as related to intelligence and scholarship., Psychological Bulletin, 29, 564
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.456 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.456
- Thornhill, 1998, Darwinian aesthetics., 543
- Waldrop, 1971, Minor physical anomalies and hyperactive behavior in young children., Vol. 2, 343
- 10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.85 · DOI
Cited by
Items 201–300 of 1,004
Reflections of the extended self: Visual self-representation in avatar-mediated environments
Messinger, P. R., Ge, X., Smirnov, K., Stroulia, E., & Lyons, K. A. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.020 · Cited by 118
Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists
Jarreau, P., Cancellare, I. A., Carmichael, B. J., Porter, L., Toker, D., & Yammine, S. Z. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216625 · Cited by 117
“Perceived attractiveness has been associated with assessments of moral goodness, aka the “Beauty-Is-Good” stereotype [67], trustworthiness [68], and intelligence [69].”
BackgroundFink, B., & Neave, N. (2005) · International Journal of Cosmetic Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2494.2005.00286.x · Cited by 112
“[3] demonstrated that within and between cultures, raters strongly agree about who is and who is not attractive.”
BackgroundIntelligence and physical attractiveness☆
Satoshi Kanazawa, A. (2010) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.003 · Cited by 108
“Consistent with such views, meta-analyses (Jackson, Hunter &Hodge, 1995; Langlois et al., 2000) show that there is a small but significantly positive correlation between intelligence andphysical attractiveness.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe art of designing robot faces
Blow, M., Dautenhahn, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C. L., & Lee, D. M. (2006) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1121241.1121301 · Cited by 111
Strauss, R. P., Ramsey, B., Edwards, T., Topolski, T. D., Kapp‐Simon, K. A., Thomas, C., Fenson, C., & Patrick, D. (2007) · Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00383.x · Cited by 114
She’s Got the Look: Inferences from Female Chief Executive Officers’ Faces Predict their Success
Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9658-9 · Cited by 122
“Nonverbal behavior”
BackgroundBody Image Disturbance and The Social Norms Approach: An Integrative Review of the Literature
Bergstrom, R. L., & Neighbors, C. (2006) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2006.25.9.975 · Cited by 116
“Meta–analyses of this literature indicate that there is at least some truth in these perceptions, particularly with regard to social competence (Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991; Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundLove & Loans: The Effect of Beauty and Personal Characteristics in Credit MarketsPreprint
Ravina, E. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1101647 · Cited by 123
Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9974-y · Cited by 110
“The overarching assumption in human mating research is that individuals who possess certain traits or qualities (e.g., good looks) will be more or less successful at mating (e.g., Buss & Barnes, 1986; Buss & Schmitt, 1993; Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialBale, C., & Archer, J. E. (2013) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491301100107 · Cited by 120
“Given that greater physical attractiveness is also associated with more positive friendship, professional and even familial relationships (Langlois et al., 2000), these results are still consistent with a sociometer perspective.”
ResultSex Differences in Judgments of Physical Attractiveness: A Social Relations Analysis
Marcus, D. K., & Miller, R. S. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202250193 · Cited by 110
“In fact, in their meta-analysis, Langlois et al. (2000) had to collapse video and in situ studies into a single category because there were so few in situ studies on record.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialChoosing to conform: The discursive complexities of choice in relation to feminine beauty practices
Stuart, A., & Donaghue, N. (2011) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353511424362 · Cited by 121
When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials
Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M. P. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.013 · Cited by 111
The body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives
Furnham, A. F., & Swami, V. (2007) · WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) · Cited by 104
Luo, L., Li, H., & Lee, K. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.002 · Cited by 105
“In addition, adults tend to prefer attractive faces and be more inclined to help strangers with more attractive faces than those who are less attractive (for reviews, see Langlois et al., 2000; Rhodes, 2006).”
BackgroundPerception of Robot Smiles and Dimensions for Human-Robot Interaction Design
Blow, M., Dautenhahn, K., Appleby, A., Nehaniv, C. L., & Lee, D. M. (2006) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2006.314372 · Cited by 105
“claims to the contrary, see [19]), and that attractiveness has a social effect on the way we judge and treat others [11].”
BackgroundBissell, K. L., & Chung, J. Y. (2009) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292980902827144 · Cited by 112
“Defining what is beautiful for women and attempting to produce a ‘norm’ for attractiveness is unlikely, due to the numerous cultural interpretations of female beauty (Langois, Kalakanis, Rubenstein, Larson, Hallam, & Smoot, 2000 ).”
BackgroundThe Beauty Premium: Physical Attractiveness and Gender in Dictator Games
Rosenblat, T. (2008) · Negotiation Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2008.00198.x · Cited by 109
“…have theorized that appearance can enhance the acquisition of social skills throughout life because good-looking 466 Rosenblat The Beauty Premium people often receive more positive attention from parents, caregivers, teachers, and coworkers (Hatfield and Sprecher 1986; Langlois et al. 2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialOlenik‐Shemesh, D., & Heiman, T. (2016) · The Journal of Genetic Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221325.2016.1195331 · Cited by 116
“Socialization theories suggest appearance and body esteem significantly influence development and social functioning (Langlois & Kalakanis, 2000).”
BackgroundSmile aesthetics as perceived by dental students: a cross-sectional study
Armalaitė, J., Jarutiene, M., Vasiliauskas, A., Šidlauskas, A., Švalkauskienė, V., Šidlauskas, M., & Skarbalius, G. (2018) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-018-0673-5 · Cited by 102
Human Sex Differences in Sexual Psychology and Behavior
Okami, P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2001) · Annual Review of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/10532528.2001.10559798 · Cited by 103
“If social power is defined as the ability to effect one’s will in society, then more attractive women have more power than less attractive women because people of all ages, including infants, prefer attractive people t o unattractive people (Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundVariation in Perceived Attractiveness: Differences Between Dynamic and Static Faces
Rubenstein, A. J. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01610.x · Cited by 104
“Langlois et al. (2000) calculated the reliability of attractiveness ratings for 67 studies using adults from the same culture.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Charity Beauty Premium: Satisfying Donors’ “Want” versus “Should” Desires
Cryder, C. E., Botti, S., & Simonyan, Y. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0658 · Cited by 101
“Attractive children and adults are considered to be healthier and fitter, to have greater social appeal, to have higher academic competence, and to be more confident and better adjusted than their less attractive counterparts (Landy and Sigall 1974; Langlois et al. 2000; Mobius and Rosenblat 2006).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialColombo, M. G., Fisch, C. O., Momtaz, P. P., & Silvio Vismara, A. (2020) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1417 · Cited by 120
Little, A. C. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1316 · Cited by 111
Origins of a stereotype: categorization of facial attractiveness by 6‐month‐old infants
Ramsey, J. L., Langlois, J. H., Hoss, R. A., Rubenstein, A. J., & Griffin, A. M. (2004) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00339.x · Cited by 110
“Stereotyping based on physical attractiveness is known in the social psychology literature as the 'beauty is good' stereotype and continues throughout adulthood (Dion, Berscheid & Walster, 1972; Eagly et al. , 1991; Langlois et al. , 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAre human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability?
Simmons, L. W., Rhodes, G., Peters, M., & Koehler, N. (2004) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arh099 · Cited by 100
“…meta-analysis suggests a weak effect size of general facial attractiveness on mental (0.16, 95% CI ¼ 0.09/0.23 from 19 studies) and physical health (0.38, 0.24/0.53 from five studies; Langlois et al., 2000), and facial asymmetry is perceived as healthy (Jones et al., 2001; Rhodes et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialAttractiveness of Own-Race, Other-Race, and Mixed-Race Faces
Rhodes, G., Lee, K., Palermo, R., Weiss, M., Yoshikawa, S., Clissa, P. J., Williams, T., Peters, M., Winkler, C., & Jeffery, L. (2005) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5191 · Cited by 100
“Two meta-analyses have found a relationship, albeit weak, between attractiveness and health (Feingold 1992; Langlois et al 2000).”
BackgroundThe Relative State Model: Integrating Need-Based and Ability-Based Pathways to Risk-Taking
Mishra, S., Barclay, P., & Sparks, A. M. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316644094 · Cited by 112
“Similarly, people who are competitively disadvantaged because of embodied traits are rarely only disadvantaged in a single domain: Various facets of embodied capital—attractiveness, intelligence, physical ability, and strength—tend to be at least somewhat associated with each other, and with such key outcomes as incom…”
BackgroundThe right look: Conservative politicians look better and voters reward it
Berggren, N., Jordahl, H., & Poutvaara, P. (2016) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.12.008 · Cited by 109
“…explanation could be that goodlooking people are more likely to perceive the world as a just place, since they are treated better than others (Langlois et al. 2000), achieve higher status (Anderson et al. 2001) and are happier (Hamermesh and Abrevaya, 2013) – and a frequent reason for people…”
Sesardić, N. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487378 · Cited by 147
Exploring Body Comparison Tendencies: Women Are Self-Critical Whereas Men Are Self-Hopeful
Franzoi, S. L., Vasquez, K., Sparapani, E., Frost, K. A., Martin, J. L., & Aebly, M. (2011) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684311427028 · Cited by 126
Update on hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck
Eivazi, B., Ardelean, M., Bäumler, W., Berlien, H., Cremer, H., Elluru, R. G., Koltai, P. J., Olofsson, J. S., Richter, G. T., Schick, B., et al. (2008) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-008-0875-6 · Cited by 99
“Further information can be found in the appended reference list [15–20].”
BackgroundBehne, K.-E., & Wöllner, C. (2011) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/1029864911410955 · Cited by 99
Gao, Y., Niddam, J., Noel, W., Hersant, B., & Meningaud, J. (2016) · Asian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.007 · Cited by 101
Analysts’ Beauty and Performance
Cao, Y., Feng, G., Li, Z., & Yang, Y. G. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3336 · Cited by 93
Social benefits of brand logos in presentation of self in cross and same gender influence contexts
Lee, J., Ko, E., & Megehee, C. M. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.12.004 · Cited by 105
Back, M. D., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., Sachse, K. A., Borkenau, P., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.806 · Cited by 104
A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad.
Koch, A. S., Alves, H., Krüger, T., & Unkelbach, C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000243 · Cited by 104
Tews, M. J., Stafford, K., & Zhu, J. (2009) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00454.x · Cited by 103
Benzeval, M., Green, M. J., & MacIntyre, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063975 · Cited by 99
“This is because cultural norms, stereotypes and expectations about attractiveness are likely to influence both the judgement and the treatment of attractive versus unattractive individuals [4].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThere’s More Than Meets the Eye: Facial Appearance and Evaluations of Transsexual People
Gerhardstein, K. R., & Anderson, V. N. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9746-x · Cited by 107
What Makes You Click? Mate Preferences and Matching Outcomes in Online DatingPreprint
Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.895442 · Cited by 96
“Consistent with findings in a large literature in cognitive psychology, attractiveness ratings by independent observers appear to be positively correlated (for surveys of this literature, see Langlois et al. 2000, Etcoff 1999, and Buss 2003).”
ResultBeauty, weight, and skin color in charitable giving
Jenq, C., Pan, J., & Theseira, W. E. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.004 · Cited by 94
Neural activation in the “reward circuit” shows a nonlinear response to facial attractiveness
Liang, X., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Zhang, Y. (2010) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470911003619916 · Cited by 99
“Psychological research demonstrates an “attractiveness halo” whereby people with more attractive faces are judged more positively on a range of dimensions (Berscheid & Walster, 1974 ; Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991 ; Feingold, 1992 ) as well as given preferential treatment in many life domains (Langlois et a…”
BackgroundTrujillo, L. T., Jankowitsch, J. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2013) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0230-2 · Cited by 103
Self-citationMating strategies of young women: Role of physical attractiveness
Singh, D. N. (2004) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224490409552212 · Cited by 95
“Indeed, the review of the literature on the stereotype reveals that attractive people are more popular with the opposite sex, less lonely, less socially anxious, and more socially skilled than less-attractive people (for a meta-analytic review, see Feingold, 1992; Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundBeauty and Status: The Illusion of Exchange in Partner Selection?
McClintock, E. A. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122414536391 · Cited by 106
“Perhaps partially because physically attractive individuals are treated preferentially, they enjoy improved school performance, greater occupational success, and higher earnings (Clifford and Walster 1973; Hamermesh and Biddle 1994; Haskins and Ransford 1999; Jackson, Hunter, and Hodge 1995; Langlois et al. 2000; Rose…”
BackgroundInfluentialAttractive Agents Are More Persuasive
Khan, R., & Sutcliffe, A. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.839904 · Cited by 105
“This study and the aforementioned results all demonstrate that the attractiveness stereotype, which has been established in the real world (Langlois et al., 2000), also functions in the virtual world with stimuli that portray attractive individuals as having more positive qualities than…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSocial Hierarchy, Social Status, and Status Consumption
Dubois, D., & Ordabayeva, N. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107706552.013 · Cited by 102
Is Beautiful Always Good? Implicit Benefits of Facial Attractiveness
van Leeuwen, M. L., & Macrae, C. N. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.6.637.54819 · Cited by 100
“Daily experience (and an extensive literature) attests that good-looking people are more popular with their peers and are treated more favorably by others than their unattractive counterparts (Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow Beauty Determines Gaze! Facial Attractiveness and Gaze Duration in Images of Real World Scenes
Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669516664355 · Cited by 87
“Even though people are often not aware of its impact, attractiveness affects our social perception and interactions in various ways (Brand, Bonatsos, D’Orazio, & DeShong, 2012; Dion, Walster, & Berscheid, 1972; Langlois et al., 2000; Tsukiura & Cabeza, 2011).”
BackgroundSubtyping Ageism: Policy Issues in Succession and Consumption
North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2013) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01042.x · Cited by 102
“More generally, negative halo effects explain ageism as arising because older people are perceived as generally unattractive, and are therefore seen as having negative traits and abilities (Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMorris, P., White, J., Morrison, E. R., & Fisher, K. (2012) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.006 · Cited by 101
Gender and Nasal Shape: Measures for Rhinoplasty
Springer, I. N. G., Zernial, O., Nölke, F., Warnke, P. H., Wiltfang, J., Russo, P., Terheyden, H., & Wolfart, S. (2008) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000298095.18943.72 · Cited by 93
Electrophysiological precursors of social conformity
Шестакова, А. Н., Rieskamp, J., Tugin, S., Ossadtchi, A. E., Krutitskaya, J., & Klucharev, V. A. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nss064 · Cited by 97
“Importantly, attractiveness is a socially important facial feature (Langlois et al., 2000); judgments of facial attractiveness are fast, effortless and consistent across people (Willis and Todorov, 2006).”
BackgroundAMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Dixon, S. (2009) · Cited by 92
FACIAL PROFILING: RACE, PHYSICAL APPEARANCE, AND PUNISHMENT*
Johnson, B. D., & King, R. D. (2017) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12143 · Cited by 99
Kühn, S. W., & Petzer, D. J. (2018) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2018.1463799 · Cited by 101
“Moreover, positive associations exist between the perceived attractiveness of a person and the favorable traits, such as honesty and trustworthiness, others judge that person to have (Langlois et al. 2000).”
BackgroundBeyond initial attraction: Physical attractiveness in newlywed marriage.
McNulty, J. K., Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2008) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.1.135 · Cited by 93
“Consistent with findings that people within and across cultures show very high levels of agreement about who is attractive (Langlois et al., 2000) , the reliability of our coders was quite high (coefficient ␣ ϭ .90 for ratings of husbands, and coefficient ␣ ϭ .93 for wives).”
BackgroundInfluentialAre Average and Symmetric Faces Attractive to Infants? Discrimination and Looking Preferences
Rhodes, G., Geddes, K., Jeffery, L., Dziurawiec, S., & Clark, A. (2002) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p3129 · Cited by 89
Saad, G. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.002 · Cited by 97
Beholding Inequality: Race, Gender, and Returns to Physical Attractiveness in the United States
Monk, E. P., Esposito, M. H., & Lee, H. (2021) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/715141 · Cited by 97
“Nor is it to gainsay research that has identified physical characteristics such as facial symmetry and facial averageness, which seem to have cross-cultural relevance asmarkers of perceived attractiveness among adults (see Langlois et al. 2000; Todorov et al. 2015).”
BackgroundEvolution, Appearance, and Occupational Success
Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2012) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491201000503 · Cited by 90
“While there appears limited accuracy in terms of positive personality attribution, there are studies that suggest attractive individuals are more sociable than their nonattractive peers (see Langlois et al., 2000, for a meta-analytic review).”
BackgroundSomething to smile about: the interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression
Golle, J., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2014) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.817383 · Cited by 88
“Taking these findings together, it could be argued that subjects pay more attention to attractive than to less attractive people (Langlois et al., 2000; COGNITION AND EMOTION, 2014, 28 (2) 307 Maner et al., 2003) and thus are more sensitive towards them.”
BackgroundMeyer, B., Enström, M. K., Harstveit, M., Bowles, D., & Beevers, C. G. (2007) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760601076635 · Cited by 88
“Even though a great deal of evidence shows that attractive people, compared to less attractive ones, are generally treated more favorably and are better adjusted (Langlois et al., 2000), these benefits of attractiveness did not extend to our groups of professional fashion models.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBarelds, D. P. H., & Dijkstra, P. (2007) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407507079235 · Cited by 100
“Likewise, individuals tend to think that physically attractive members of the opposite sex are more intelligent, more kind, more sociable and make better partners than physically less attractive ones (e.g., Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundTestosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners' dilemma
Sánchez‐Pagés, S., & Turiégano, E. (2009) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.11.013 · Cited by 90
The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm
Havlíček, J., Cobey, K. D., Barrett, L., Klapilová, K., & Roberts, S. C. (2015) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arv064 · Cited by 92
“People readily agree on who is attractive and who is not (Langlois et al. 2000), and judgments are often consistent across people from different cultures and ethnicities (Jones et al.”
BackgroundBalen, H. V. (2006) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2005.086942 · Cited by 87
The Modular Neuroarchitecture of Social Judgments on Faces
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Hoffstaedter, F., Turetsky, B. I., Zilles, K., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2011) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr166 · Cited by 87
“Cerebral Cortex April 2012;22:951--961 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr166 Advance Access publication July 1, 2011”
BackgroundInfluentialTrustworthy-Looking Face Meets Brown Eyes
Kleisner, K., Priplatova, L., Frost, P., & Flegr, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053285 · Cited by 85
“It has repeatedly been shown that facial appearance strongly affects various social interactions [1,2].”
BackgroundCan a New Smile Make You Look More Intelligent and Successful?
Beall, A. E. (2007) · Dental Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cden.2007.02.002 · Cited by 87
“So how true are these stereotypes? Research has demonstrated that attractive people are somewhat more relaxed and outgoing and have more social finesse than less attractive individuals [2,5].”
BackgroundIs beauty a premium? A study of the physical attractiveness effect in service encounters
Li, Y., Zhang, C., & Laroche, M. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.016 · Cited by 90
Little, A. C., Saxton, T. K., Roberts, S. C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Vukovic, J., Perrett, D. I., Feinberg, D. R., & Chenore, T. (2010) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006 · Cited by 83
“…known to affect many types of psychological processes (Buchanan et al., 1992), although broad similarities between judgments of facial attractiveness by children and by adults are generally found (Cross and Cross, 1971; Cavior and Lombardi, 1973; Dion, 1973; for review see Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundResultBeauty perception: A historical and contemporary review
Dimitrov, D., & Kroumpouzos, G. (2023) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.02.006 · Cited by 121
Kenealy, P. M., Kingdon, A., Richmond, S., & Shaw, W. C. (2007) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910706x96896 · Cited by 90
“Langlois et al., (2000) argue that such common maxims may be myths, and that both socialization theory and fitness-related evolutionary theory suggest that attractiveness influences development and interaction; their findings from 11 meta-analyses support this view.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialYoung, S. G., Sacco, D. F., & Hugenberg, K. (2011) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.800 · Cited by 82
The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping
Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M., & Lee, H. K. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.306 · Cited by 108
“The tendency for faces higher in attractiveness to be rated as more likeable and competent as well as less dangerous and reserved is consistent with the well-documented attractiveness halo effecf(e.g., Eagly et al., 1991; Feingold, 1992; Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundResultBeauty in Mind: The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on Psychological Well-Being and Distress
Gupta, N. D., Etcoff, N. L., & Jæger, M. M. (2015) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9644-6 · Cited by 91
“Social psychologists have identified a ‘‘halo’’ effect of physical attractiveness leading to inferences that the attractive are more competent, confident, and socially skilled than the unattractive (Eagly et al. 1991; Hatfield and Sprecher 1986; Langlois et al. 2000; Feingold 1992).”
BackgroundSamper, A., Yang, L. W., & Daniels, M. E. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx116 · Cited by 97
“In this manner, we integrate literature on personality trait inferences based on physical appearance (Dion et al. 1972; Langlois et al. 2000) with research on moral trait inferences based on specific behaviors (Reeder and Brewer 1979; Skowronski and Carlston 1979) to understand how physical…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNaini, F. B., Donaldson, N., McDonald, F., & Cobourne, M. T. (2011) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.055 · Cited by 81
Hawley, P. H., Johnson, S. E., Mize, J. A., & McNamara, K. A. (2007) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.04.001 · Cited by 85
“Accordingly physical attractiveness is perceived to be associated with intelligence (Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991; Feingold, 1992), self-sufficiency (Dion & Berscheid, 1974), social competence (Eagly et al., 1991; Langlois et al., 2000), prosociality (Dion, 1973; Langlois & Styczynski, 1979), and friendlin…”
BackgroundAdeyemo, W., James, O., & Butali, A. (2016) · Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.4103/2231-0746.200336 · Cited by 88
“”[9] Orofacial cleft, due to its particular location in the orofacial region, can be particularly distressing; and parents of the affected children are usually ashamed/uncomfortable with bringing out their children in public.”
BackgroundWilkins, C. L., Chan, J. F., & Kaiser, C. R. (2011) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024733 · Cited by 80
“Compared with less attractive individuals, attractive people receive more attention, cooperation, and help from their peers (Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialPhysical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: physiological and socio‐cultural influences
Sarwer, D. B., Magee, L., & Clark, V. (2003) · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1473-2130.2003.00003.x · Cited by 85
Little, A., Jones, B., DeBruine, L., & Caldwell, C. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0192 · Cited by 74
Hong, S., Shang, H., He, L., Ding, M., Su, Z.-P., & Shi, Y. (2018) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.026 · Cited by 80
Macrae, C. N., & Susanne Quadflieg, A. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001012 · Cited by 83
How does money influence health?
Benzeval, M., Bond, L. M., Campbell, M., Egan, M., Lorenc, T., Petticrew, M. P., & Popham, F. (2015) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) · doi:10.17037/pubs.02167225 · Cited by 78
Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria
Sussman, A. B., Petkova, K. G., & Todorov, A. T. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.003 · Cited by 84
“For example, although attractiveness should not influence a politician's ability, ratings of attractiveness have frequently been tied to election outcomes (e.g., Berggren, Jordahl, & Poutvaara, 2010; King & Leigh, 2009; Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodMore than skin deep: Judgments of individuals with facial disfigurement.
Jamrozik, A., Ali, M. O., Sarwer, D. B., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2017) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000147 · Cited by 87
“Attractive people are regarded as more socially competent, dominant, better adjusted, more capable in school and work, and receive greater rewards and lesser punishments (for meta-analyses, see Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991; Langlois et al., 2000).”
BackgroundAgthe, M., Spörrle, M., & Maner, J. K. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.007 · Cited by 84
Female Facial Appearance and Health
Gray, A. W., & Boothroyd, L. G. (2012) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491201000108 · Cited by 77
“The universal nature of human facial preferences (Langlois et al., 2000) suggests”
BackgroundColour homogeneity and visual perception of age, health and attractiveness of male facial skin
Fink, B., Matts, P. J., D’Emiliano, D., Bunse, L., Weege, B., & Röder, S. (2011) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04316.x · Cited by 79
Cognitive Mechanisms for Explaining Dynamics of Aesthetic Appreciation
Carbon, C. (2011) · i-Perception · doi:10.1068/i0463aap · Cited by 77
Gray, P. B., & Frederick, D. A. (2012) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491201000319 · Cited by 80
“The existing work indicates that a person’s physical attractiveness influences a wide variety of personal experiences, including mating opportunities and job opportunities (e.g., Buss, 1989; Langlois et al. 2000).”
BackgroundSexual dimorphism in chin shape: Implications for adaptive hypotheses
Thayer, Z. M., & Dobson, S. D. (2010) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.21330 · Cited by 76
Zebrowitz, L. A., & Franklin, R. G. (2014) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2014.897151 · Cited by 82
“Two well-documented phenomena in person perception are the attractiveness halo effect, whereby more positive traits are ascribed to more attractive individuals of many ages and races (Eagly, Ashmore, Makhijani, & Longo, 1991; Langlois et al., 2000; Dion, 2002), and the babyface overgeneralization effect, whereby more…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 390-423
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2088165831
- Cited by
- 2,429
- References
- 297
- Citations by year
- 2026: 84 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 131 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 118 · 2016: 126 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 121 · 2013: 129 · 2012: 138
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD021332)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- physical attractiveness, beauty, attractiveness judgments, evolutionary psychology, socialization theory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Beauty, Child, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.