The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Abstract
Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving information in a degraded font (Experiments 1 and 4), in difficult-to-read lettering (Experiment 2), or while furrowing one's brow (Experiment 3)--reduced the impact of heuristics and defaults in judgment (Experiments 1 and 3), reduced reliance on peripheral cues in persuasion (Experiment 2), and improved syllogistic reasoning (Experiment 4). Metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency appear to serve as an alarm that activates analytic forms of reasoning that assess and sometimes correct the output of more intuitive forms of reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alter et al. (2007) demonstrated that metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency activate more analytical reasoning processes.”
From Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance (2025) · cites this paper as Alter et al. (2007)
In the citing paper
“Manipulating the activation of these heuristics (e.g., via priming) can be used to improve metacognitive control: increasing subjective processing difficulty (e.g., by using a degraded font) stimulates more metacognitive control and thereby improves participants' performance on reasoning tasks that benefit from a more analytic processing style [7].”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 848
Atypical food packaging affects the persuasive impact of product claims
van Ooijen, I., Fransen, M. L., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Smit, E. G. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.08.002 · Cited by 39
En Route to Depression: Self‐Esteem Discrepancies and Habitual Rumination
Phillips, W. J., & Hine, D. W. (2014) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12141 · Cited by 43
Price, J., McElroy, K., & Martin, N. J. (2015) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2015.1102194 · Cited by 39
The formation and revision of intuitions
Meyer, A., & Frederick, S. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105380 · Cited by 38
Brosnan, M., Johnson, H., Grawemeyer, B., Chapman, E., Antoniadou, K., & Hollinworth, M. (2015) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361315589477 · Cited by 42
Think or blink — is the recognition heuristic an “intuitive” strategy?
Hilbig, B. E., Scholl, S., & POHL, R. F. (2010) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003533 · Cited by 38
Come on and Take a Free Ride: Contributing to Public Goods in Native and Foreign Language Settings
Urbig, D., Terjesen, S. A., Procher, V., Muehlfeld, K. S., & van Witteloostuijn, A. C. (2015) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2014.0338 · Cited by 38
Ball, B. H., Klein, K. N., & Brewer, G. A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000023 · Cited by 43
Prominent Attributes Under Limited Attention
Zhu, Y., & Dukes, A. (2017) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2017.1037 · Cited by 38
Cognitive Interruption as an Object of Metacognitive Monitoring: Feeling of Difficulty and Surprise
Touroutoglou, A., & Efklides, A. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_9 · Cited by 38
A processing fluency-account of funniness: Running gags and spoiling punchlines
Topolinski, S. (2014) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.863180 · Cited by 37
Kim, H. J., & Jang, J. M. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10124777 · Cited by 38
Liu, S.-F., Lee, H., & Lien, N. (2020) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2020.09.001 · Cited by 37
Reforming intuition pumps: when are the old ways the best?
Talbot, B. R. (2012) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9949-9 · Cited by 36
The effect of signaling in dependence on the extraneous cognitive load in learning environments
Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2020) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-020-01002-5 · Cited by 36
Analytical reasoning reduces internet fraud susceptibility
Kelley, N. J., Hurley-Wallace, A. L., Warner, K. L., & Hanoch, Y. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107648 · Cited by 42
Claypool, H. M., Mackie, D. M., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12179 · Cited by 36
Rhyme as reason in commercial and social advertising
Filkuková, P., & Klempe, S. H. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12069 · Cited by 36
Consequences of Cultural Fluency
Mourey, J. A., Lam, B. C. P., & Oyserman, D. (2015) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.4.308 · Cited by 36
New developments in behavioral pricing research
Koschate‐Fischer, N., & Wüllner, K. (2016) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-016-0839-z · Cited by 43
Michaelian, K. (2012) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2012.01445.x · Cited by 35
Developmental Changes in Cross‐Situational Word Learning: The Inverse Effect of Initial Accuracy
Fitneva, S. A., & Christiansen, M. H. (2015) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12322 · Cited by 35
Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language
Mækelæ, M. J., & Pfuhl, G. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211428 · Cited by 36
A focus on partisanship: How it impacts voting behaviors and political attitudes
Krishna, A., & Sokolova, T. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.005 · Cited by 35
The impact of font choice on web pages: Relationship with willingness to pay and tourism motivation
Huang, Y., Wu, J., & Shi, W. (2017) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.010 · Cited by 35
Buettner, R. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 34
Yoo, J., Jaśko, K., & Winkielman, P. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0326 · Cited by 41
Concept Inventories: Predicting the Wrong Answer May Boost Performance
Talanquer, V. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00427 · Cited by 34
Misinformation and disinformation
Armitage, R., & Vaccari, C. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003004431-5 · Cited by 34
Basu, S., & Dixit, S. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111318 · Cited by 34
Price or quality? The influence of fluency on the dual role of price
Chang, C. (2013) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-013-9223-8 · Cited by 34
Barberia, I., Tubau, E., Matute, H., & Rodríguez‐Ferreiro, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191907 · Cited by 34
Homo economicusand social marketing: questioning traditional models of behavior
Carvalho, H. C., & Mazzon, J. A. (2013) · Journal of Social Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsocm-11-2011-0080 · Cited by 36
Thomä, D., & Baum, A. (2018) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000502 · Cited by 33
Past the Privacy Paradox: The Importance of Privacy Changes as a Function of Control and Complexity
Mourey, J. A., & Waldman, A. E. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/708034 · Cited by 35
Taylor, A., Sanson, M., Burnell, R., Wade, K. A., & Garry, M. (2020) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2020.1758726 · Cited by 33
The Search for Moderators in Disfluency Research
Oppenheimer, D. M., & Alter, A. L. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3023 · Cited by 32
Self-citationCarpenter, S. K., Mickes, L., Rahman, S., & Fernandez, C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000077 · Cited by 32
Geller, J., Still, M. L., Dark, V. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2018) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0824-6 · Cited by 32
Intel Inside: The Linguistic Properties of Effective Slogans
Hodges, B. T., Estes, Z., & Warren, C. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad034 · Cited by 31
Cui, X. (2016) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs4010001 · Cited by 31
Rule abstraction, model-based choice, and cognitive reflection
Don, H. J., Goldwater, M. B., Otto, A. R., & Livesey, E. J. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1012-y · Cited by 32
Instructor accents in online education and their effect on learning and attitudes
Sanchez, C. A., & Khan, S. H. (2016) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12149 · Cited by 31
Stupple, E. J. N., Gale, M., & Richmond, C. J. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 31
The Heart and the Head: On Choosing Experiences Intuitively and Possessions Deliberatively
Gallo, Í., Sood, S., Mann, T. C., & Gilovich, T. D. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1997 · Cited by 31
Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1 · Cited by 35
Cretenet, J., & Dru, V. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0015379 · Cited by 31
Koriat, A., Adiv, S., & Schwarz, N. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868315585269 · Cited by 31
Can dual processing theory explain physics students’ performance on the Force Concept Inventory?
Wood, A. K., Galloway, R., & Hardy, J. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.023101 · Cited by 31
Weissgerber, S. C., Reinhard, M.-A., & Schindler, S. (2018) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1387644 · Cited by 30
Fraundorf, S. H., Caddick, Z. A., Nokes‐Malach, T. J., & Rottman, B. M. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00511-z · Cited by 35
Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2017) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1402060 · Cited by 30
Chan, C.-S. R., Park, H. D., Huang, J. Y., & Parhankangas, A. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00176 · Cited by 30
Relations Between Memory and Reasoning
Heit, E., Rotello, C. M., & Hayes, B. K. (2012) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394293-7.00002-9 · Cited by 30
Min, B. (2022) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-08-2021-0603 · Cited by 29
The Mere Exposure Instruction Effect
Dessel, P. V., Mertens, G., Smith, C. T., & Houwer, J. D. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000376 · Cited by 29
Customer reviews are not always informative: The impact of effortful versus heuristic processing
Book, L. A., Tanford, S., & Chang, W. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.001 · Cited by 29
Subjective Normativity and Action Guidance1
Sepielli, A. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662951.003.0003 · Cited by 28
Analytical reasoning task reveals limits of social learning in networks
Rahwan, I., Krasnoshtan, D., Shariff, A., & Bonnefon, J. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.1211 · Cited by 29
Scherer, L. D., Yates, J. F., Baker, S., & Valentine, K. D. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217700607 · Cited by 28
An Open Letter to Our Students: Doing Interdisciplinary Moral Psychology
Machery, É., & Doris, J. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61849-4_7 · Cited by 30
Besuglov, E., & Crasselt, N. (2020) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-020-00980-4 · Cited by 28
Preemptive Authority: The Challenge From Outrageous Expert Judgments
Grundmann, T. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.30 · Cited by 28
Franzoni, C., & Tenca, F. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221102107 · Cited by 29
Altmeier, A., & Fisch, C. O. (2023) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12783 · Cited by 28
Increasing cognitive inhibition with a difficult prior task: implications for mathematical thinking
Attridge, N., & Inglis, M. (2014) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0656-1 · Cited by 28
Heyman, T., & Schaeken, W. (2015) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.bc · Cited by 28
Refining the dual‐system theory of choice
Martin, J. W., & Sloman, S. A. (2013) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.006 · Cited by 28
İLİÇ, U., & Akbulut, Y. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.001 · Cited by 27
Walter, N., Bilandzic, H., Schwarz, N., & Brooks, J. J. (2020) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2020.1789477 · Cited by 23
Cognitive and regulatory characteristics and mathematical performance in high school students
Morosanova, V. I., Fomina, T. G., Kovas, Y. V., & Bogdanova, O. Y. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.034 · Cited by 27
Intuitions' Linguistic Sources: Stereotypes, Intuitions and Illusions
Fischer, E., & Engelhardt, P. E. (2016) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12095 · Cited by 29
The 1/N Rule revisited: Heterogeneity in the naïve diversification bias
Fernandes, D. V. D. H. (2013) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.04.001 · Cited by 26
Investors' Processing of Financial Communications: A Persuasion Perspective
Hamilton, E. L., & Winchel, J. (2018) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-52211 · Cited by 27
On the link between cognitive control and heuristic processes
Cokely, E. T., Parpart, P., & Schooler, L. J. (2009) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 26
Corporate social responsibility: the effect of need-for-status and fluency on consumers’ attitudes
Zhang, L., Yang, W., & Zheng, X. (2018) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-01-2017-0048 · Cited by 27
Tanko, M. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101339 · Cited by 25
Challenge and threat motivation: effects on superficial and elaborative information processing
Fonseca, R., Blascovich, J. J., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01170 · Cited by 25
Giannouli, V. (2013) · Cited by 25
The Malleable Efficacy of Willpower Theories
Clarkson, J. J., Otto, A. S., Hirt, E. R., & Egan, P. M. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216664059 · Cited by 25
Best in Class or Simply the Best? The Impact of Absolute versus Relative Ecolabeling Approaches
Hille, S. L., Geiger, C., Loock, M., & Peloza, J. (2016) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.15.030 · Cited by 25
Cahan, S., Greenbaum, C. W., Artman, L., Deluya, N., & Gappel-Gilon, Y. (2008) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.01.004 · Cited by 25
On the relevance of folk intuitions: A commentary on Talbot
Sytsma, J. M., & Machery, É. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.003 · Cited by 25
Philosophical intuitions, heuristics, and metaphors
Fischer, E. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0292-2 · Cited by 24
Ball, L. J., Threadgold, E., Marsh, J. E., & Christensen, B. T. (2018) · Metaphor and Symbol · doi:10.1080/10926488.2018.1481255 · Cited by 24
Pieschl, S., Budd, J., Thomm, E., & Archer, J. (2021) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725721996223 · Cited by 24
Entrepreneurial metacognition: a study on nascent entrepreneurs
Bastian, B., & Zucchella, A. (2022) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-022-00799-1 · Cited by 25
How Diagrams Can Support Syllogistic Reasoning: An Experimental Study
Sato, Y., & Mineshima, K. (2015) · Journal of Logic Language and Information · doi:10.1007/s10849-015-9225-4 · Cited by 24
Pumilia, C. A., Lessans, S., & Harris, D. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.10372 · Cited by 24
Peng-yi, S., Nie, X., & Tong, C. (2024) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-01-2024-0052 · Cited by 24
Effortless online shopping? How online shopping contexts prime heuristic processing
Braga, J. N., & Jacinto, S. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2032 · Cited by 23
Strategies for dealing with policy ambiguities
Fowler, L. (2022) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12887 · Cited by 23
Carnevale, M., Hadi, R., Luna, D., & Pogacar, R. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113578 · Cited by 23
“Choozing” the Best Spelling: Consumer Response to Unconventionally Spelled Brand Names
Costello, J. P., Walker, J., & Reczek, R. W. (2023) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429231162367 · Cited by 23
Većkalov, B., Gligorić, V., & Petrović, M. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104549 · Cited by 14
Confidence in one’s social beliefs: Implications for belief justification
Koriat, A., & Adiv, S. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.008 · Cited by 23
Using metacognitive cues to infer others’ thinking
Mata, A., & Almeida, T. (2014) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500006215 · Cited by 23
The Facilitative Effects of Ambiguous Figures on Creative Solution
Wu, X., Gu, X., & Zhang, H. (2016) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.161 · Cited by 26
The dual‐process theory and understanding of stocks and flows
Lakeh, A. B., & Ghaffarzadegan, N. (2016) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.1566 · Cited by 23
Children’s Judgments and Feelings about Their Own Drawings
Bonoti, F., & Metallidou, P. (2010) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2010.15042 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-576
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2138921773
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (051811; SES0241544)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- metacognition, analytical thinking, intuitive thinking, heuristics, syllogistic reasoning, persuasion, peripheral cues, cognitive effort, dual-process theory
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Pilot Projects, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review