The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Abstract
Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving information in a degraded font (Experiments 1 and 4), in difficult-to-read lettering (Experiment 2), or while furrowing one's brow (Experiment 3)--reduced the impact of heuristics and defaults in judgment (Experiments 1 and 3), reduced reliance on peripheral cues in persuasion (Experiment 2), and improved syllogistic reasoning (Experiment 4). Metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency appear to serve as an alarm that activates analytic forms of reasoning that assess and sometimes correct the output of more intuitive forms of reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alter et al. (2007) demonstrated that metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency activate more analytical reasoning processes.”
From Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance (2025) · cites this paper as Alter et al. (2007)
In the citing paper
“Manipulating the activation of these heuristics (e.g., via priming) can be used to improve metacognitive control: increasing subjective processing difficulty (e.g., by using a degraded font) stimulates more metacognitive control and thereby improves participants' performance on reasoning tasks that benefit from a more analytic processing style [7].”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–848 of 848
An essay about the effect of vague accounting standards on the decision making process of auditors
Nishi, H. (2010) · Americanae (AECID Library)
The replication crisis is good for science
Loken, E. (2019) · doi:10.64628/aai.un3gkmyem
Irrelevant Task Difficulty Modulates the Emergence of Task Conflict
Hershman, R., Keha, E., Beckmann, L., Henik, A., & Sapir, A. (2026) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.475
Beege, M., Mengelkamp, C., & Nebel, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1731080
Defining Biases in Visual Data Analysis
Wall, E. (2026) · Synthesis lectures on visualization · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09307-3_3
Differences in streaming quality impact viewer expectations, attitudes and reactions to video
Sanchez, C. A., Raghunath, N., & Ahart, C. (2026) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2026.103350
Yau, K. W., Dong, T., Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H. M. L., King, I., Wong, S. W. H., & Yeung, Y. A. M. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale66047.2025.11346635
Easy to Understand, Easy to See: Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency Drives News Headline Selection
Riggs, E. E. (2026) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x261424551
Tuğtekin, E. B., Tuğtekin, U., & İLİÇ, U. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-13915-3
How Cartoon-Style Illustrations Influence Travel Intentions
Ning, D., Yao, Y., Liu, X., Lu Monroe, M., & Liu, Y. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/10963480261432626
Top down, side up: how food architecture modulates the portion-size effect for indulgent desserts
Davis, S. W., Belei, N., Ramanathan, S., & Horváth, C. (2026) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2026.2644425
Jargon, fluency, and judgment: how legal jargon shapes juror decision-making
Bullock, O. M. (2026) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2026.2639525
Wei, S., & Wei, W. (2026) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8824-4_1
Guérin, S. M. R. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ebe126c0ze4f5z41abza158z4ef9bd6d72f8
Criticism in a foreign accent does not hurt less
Bazzi, L., Brouwer, S. M., & Foucart, A. (2026) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069261435070
Seo, J., Kwon, O., & Kim, H. (2026) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2026.2651051
Setor, T. K., Shaikh, F. A., & Joseph, D. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116241
Сергеевна, Ц. Э., Likhanov, M. V., Горбунова, Е., & Kovas, Y. V. (2026) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2026.2665232
Combining Deep Learning Mechanisms to Predict Interests from Gaze
Izumi, A., Harada, F., & Shimakawa, H. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26102975
Sindhuja, S., & Majumdar, A. (2026) · Communication Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/22041451.2026.2672872
Controlling Heuristic Reasoning
(2026) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781837072538-00115
Wei, S., & Wei, W. (2026) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep16060182
Gao, J., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Wang, X. (2026) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-026-09569-7
外国語使用および教材表現がエフェクチュエーション型意思決定に与える影響 ~状況判断課題を用いた判断過程・理解・選好・行動選択の段階的検討~
鈴木, 一. (2026) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)
(2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-64113-051-620251029
The beauty of chaos: Positive impact of disorderly product assortments on consumer choice
Kim, A. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-02-2026-0456
Choi, J., Park, H., Yin, B. M., & Singh, S. N. (2026) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-03-2024-0187
Mora-Ruano, D., & Mora-Ruano, R. (2026) · Ensayos: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete · doi:10.18239/ensayos.v41i2.3949
Liu, D., Cornil, Y., & Xu, X. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.70034
Foreign language effect and neuromyth discernibility: Framing and information richness as moderators
Zhang, Z., Xu, B., Tamim, M., & Shao, H. (2026) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728926101503
Almansoori, M., Ghosh, C., Singh, S., Chatterjee, R., & Mondal, M. (2026) · Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies · doi:10.56553/popets-2026-0132
Hiskes, B., Hicks, M., & Breithaupt, F. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7216700
Synthetic Rationality: The Behavioral Macroeconomics of Cognitive Offloading to Generative AIPreprint
Gorlick, R. A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7399060
Lu, D., & Zeng, Y. (2026) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2026.2728129
Mechanisms underlying disfluency effects: a systematic review
Сергеевна, Ц. Э. (2026) · Психологические исследования · doi:10.54359/ps.v19i108.2207
Fluency in semantic coherence detection: Insights from response times, confidence, and eye movements
Sweklej, J., Balas, R., Marcowski, P., & Żuk, D. (2026) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2026.104122
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity
Halupa, C. M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9089-5.ch003
Tiwari, S. K., & Pandey, A. R. (2026) · European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry · doi:10.1922/ejprd.v34i12s.2130
The disfluency effect revisited: processing demands moderate memory performance
Muhmenthaler, M. C., & Meier, B. (2026) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2026.2742962
Luu, A., Nguyen, A., Duong, N.-A.-T., Dang, B., & Ng, D. T. K. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt68022.2026.00082
Acoustic predictors of metacognitive monitoring in vocal emotion recognition
Sinvani, R.-T. (2026) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2026.103493
How multisensory marketing can affect consciousness
Petit, O., & Velasco, C. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198909088.003.0005
Feng, Q., & Deng, T. (2026) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/13670069261500719
Metadata
- Authors
- Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-576
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2138921773
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (051811; SES0241544)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- metacognition, analytical thinking, intuitive thinking, heuristics, syllogistic reasoning, persuasion, peripheral cues, cognitive effort, dual-process theory
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Pilot Projects, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
