The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Abstract
Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving information in a degraded font (Experiments 1 and 4), in difficult-to-read lettering (Experiment 2), or while furrowing one's brow (Experiment 3)--reduced the impact of heuristics and defaults in judgment (Experiments 1 and 3), reduced reliance on peripheral cues in persuasion (Experiment 2), and improved syllogistic reasoning (Experiment 4). Metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency appear to serve as an alarm that activates analytic forms of reasoning that assess and sometimes correct the output of more intuitive forms of reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alter et al. (2007) demonstrated that metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency activate more analytical reasoning processes.”
From Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance (2025) · cites this paper as Alter et al. (2007)
In the citing paper
“Manipulating the activation of these heuristics (e.g., via priming) can be used to improve metacognitive control: increasing subjective processing difficulty (e.g., by using a degraded font) stimulates more metacognitive control and thereby improves participants' performance on reasoning tasks that benefit from a more analytic processing style [7].”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 848
Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Zeng, Y., & Niu, X. (2026) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104786 · Cited by 2
Cui, W., & Wang, D. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58481-2_24 · Cited by 2
I know the rule, but I'll just go with my gut:is there a rational use of intuition?
Loureiro, F., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2018) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1448300 · Cited by 2
Zhihua, G. A. O., & Zhongyi, L. U. (2019) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2019.00177 · Cited by 2
Bad after bad is good: previous trial disfluency reduces interference promoted by incongruence
Oliveira, G. A., Remondes, M., & Garcia‐Marques, T. (2022) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-021-01626-y · Cited by 2
Reasoning and emotion in the body
(2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315888538-15 · Cited by 2
A review of the theoretical models of processing fluency
Yagi, Y., Kasagi, Y., & Inoue, K. (2023) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.94.22401 · Cited by 3
Fort, K. S., & Shulman, H. C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417910 · Cited by 2
Consequences of distinguishing anthropomorphism from animism in experimental manipulations
Karpińska-Krakowiak, M. (2024) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-024-09761-3 · Cited by 2
Off the top of my head: Malleability and stability in natural categories
Palma, T. A., Santos, A. S., & Garcia‐Marques, L. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.002 · Cited by 2
Unraveling the Affordances of 'Silas Marner' in a Japanese University EFL Context
Canning, N. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2018) · L2 Journal · doi:10.5070/l210235419 · Cited by 2
Currie, G. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315112640-14 · Cited by 2
Donovan, S., Salmon, P. M., Horberry, T., & Lenné, M. G. (2020) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20876 · Cited by 2
Liu, Q., Gui, J., Peng, B., Fang, P., Zhang, Y., & Miao, D. (2022) · Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal · doi:10.2224/sbp.10952 · Cited by 2
Wischnewski, M., & Wermter, A. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47896-3_13 · Cited by 2
Weißgerber, S. C., Terhorst, D. I. P., & Rummer, R. (2023) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-023-09366-7 · Cited by 2
The presence of images does not moderate the disfluency effect
Березнер, Т., & Горбунова, Е. (2024) · Психологические исследования · doi:10.54359/ps.v16i92.1489 · Cited by 2
The erosion of rationality in high vulnerability conditions: A cognitive‐disruption perspective
Freling, T. H., Saini, R., & Yang, Z. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.1767 · Cited by 2
The Beneficent and Maleficent Effects of Simplification on Retirement Savings
Shah, A. M., Osborne, M., Lefkowitz, J., Fertig, A., Fishbane, A., & Soman, D. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucae067 · Cited by 2
The impact of frowning and doubt on deductive reasoning
Cortial, C., Prado, J., & Caparos, S. (2026) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-026-10212-x · Cited by 2
When face engulfs the field: differential effects of visual quality levels in print ads
Kergoat, M., & Meyer, T. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-01-2015-1284 · Cited by 2
Teaching Mathematical Reasoning in Science, Engineering, and Technology
Dey, P. P., Uhlig, R. P., Amin, M. N., Datta, A. K., Romney, G. W., Gatton, T. M., Wyne, M. F., & Cruz, A. P. (2009) · Cited by 2
Khaled, S., El, A., & Zahran, K. (2012) · Cited by 2
van Rooij, M. M. J. W., & Favela, L. H. (2016) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University) · Cited by 2
On Web Brutalism and Contemporary Web Design
Ganci, A., & Ribeiro, B. (2017) · Dialectic · doi:10.3998/dialectic.14932326.0001.107 · Cited by 2
How to Present Calorie Information on the Electronic Menu to Help People Order More Healthily
Zhang, S., Zhou, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_15 · Cited by 2
Brideau, K. (2021) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12532.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Response generation, not response execution, influences feelings of rightness in reasoning
Stewart, K., Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231156712 · Cited by 2
Fluency and Psychological Distance
Oppenheimer, D. M., Shah, A., & Alter, A. L. (2008) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Self-citationEffects of Time for Deliberation and Disfluency on Omission Neglect
Wu, R., Han, X., Liu, M., & Kardes, F. R. (2020) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding · doi:10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2020.v4.i2.a66 · Cited by 2
Xie, G., Du, W., Yuan, H., & Jiang, Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020441 · Cited by 2
Intuition speed as a predictor of choice and confidence in point spread predictions
Walker, A. C., Turpin, M. H., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003387 · Cited by 2
Ninomiya, Y., Terai, H., & Miwa, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934029 · Cited by 2
A New View on Foreign Language Learning - 3: Two Vicious Circles that Choke the LearnerPreprint
Palacios, A. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2578082 · Cited by 2
McNeel, A. E. (2017) · CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) · Cited by 2
Embodied Intuitive Interaction in Children
Desai, S. H. (2017) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.112766 · Cited by 2
A fluency-affect intuition model
Topolinski, S. (2009) · Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) · Cited by 2
Palacios, A. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2578074 · Cited by 2
The fluency effect as the underlying variable for judging beauty and usability
Nazareth, D. S. (2014) · Cited by 2
Temler, M., Paterson, H. M., & MacCann, C. (2024) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-024-00252-0 · Cited by 1
Bullock, O. M., Shulman, H. C., & Dixon, G. (2025) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2025.2480371 · Cited by 1
Gasiorek, J., & Dragojević, M. (2025) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2025.2516003 · Cited by 1
Reichert-Schlax, J., & Zlatkin‐Troitschanskaia, O. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2026.103007 · Cited by 1
The adaptive function of analytic thinking styles: Balancing effort and accuracy in meta-reasoning
Orona, G. A. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106618 · Cited by 1
Claypool, H. M., Garcia‐Marques, T., Silva, R. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197763414.013.11 · Cited by 1
Wang, Z., Liang, J., Shi, S., Zhai, P., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2025.1604751 · Cited by 1
Lee, H., Si, S., Lee, K., & Youn, N. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102854 · Cited by 1
Bourdages, R. (2026) · Language and Education · doi:10.1080/09500782.2026.2716141 · Cited by 1
Does AI undermine democratic deliberation? How engagement algorithms hijack epistemic agency
Dorsch, J., Coeckelbergh, M., & Vierkant, T. (2026) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05820-6 · Cited by 1
Razão e desrazão nas tomadas de decisão
Dias, Á. M. (2010) · Psicologia USP · doi:10.1590/s0103-65642010000200009 · Cited by 1
McGrath, L. (2015) · International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies · doi:10.1145/2809563.2809572 · Cited by 1
Full-Scale Controlled Comparison of Alternative Information Formats for Stated Choice Exercises
Mitrani, A. (2016) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2565-09 · Cited by 1
Reflective Intentions: Philosophical Concepts of Intentionality
Tobia, K. P. (2014) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
When Products Feel Special: Low Fluency Leads to Enhanced Desirability
Pocheptsova, A., Labroo, A. A., & Dhar, R. (2009) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 1
Treviranus, G. R. S. (2017) · Universal Journal of Psychology · doi:10.13189/ujp.2017.050203 · Cited by 1
Kuklytė, J., & Vveinhardt, J. (2017) · Management of Organizations Systematic Research · doi:10.1515/mosr-2017-0004 · Cited by 1
Barone, M. J., Li, X., Winterich, K. P., & Lyle, K. B. (2018) · Customer Needs and Solutions · doi:10.1007/s40547-018-0090-6 · Cited by 1
Difficult training improves team performance: an empirical case study of US college basketball
Kappes, H. B., Alter, A. L., Edwards, G. S., & Berri, D. J. (2019) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.22 · Cited by 1
Self-citationFluency – Friend or foe for learners?
Devlin-Glass, B. (2009) · ANU Undergraduate Research Journal · doi:10.22459/aurj.01.2009.03 · Cited by 1
How Does The Audit Report's Structure Affect Nonprofessional Investors' Attention To Its Content?
Goodson, B. M. (2015) · Cited by 1
Burghardt, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63893-4_16 · Cited by 1
Judgments by representativeness
Bornstein, R. F., & Craver-Lemley, C. (2016) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315696935-18 · Cited by 1
Деева, Т., & Козлов, Д. В. (2022) · Психологические исследования · doi:10.54359/ps.v15i82.1089 · Cited by 1
Leisti, T., Vaahteranoksa, M., Olives, J.-L., Peltoketo, V.-T., & Häkkinen, J. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867874 · Cited by 2
Rational thinking and Little’s Law understanding: an empirical study
Hendijani, R. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04004-y · Cited by 1
Letter Spacing Does not Affect Memory and Metamemory
Luna, K., Bueno, D., Conde, E., Bermúdez, D., Gutiérrez, M. F., Aldana, G., Botía, I., Rodríguez, V., & Cadavid, S. E. (2023) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941231178466 · Cited by 1
Decoding Stumpers: Large Language Models vs. Human Problem-Solvers
Goldstein, A., Havin, M., Reichart, R., & Goldstein, A. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.779 · Cited by 4
Boukamcha, F. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijphm-11-2022-0094 · Cited by 1
Some Worries About the Probability Account of the Feelings of (Un)Certainty
Spatan, S. (2024) · Erkenntnis · doi:10.1007/s10670-024-00861-0 · Cited by 1
Alban, M. W. (2024) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941241287411 · Cited by 1
We like people who are easy to read : the influence of processing fluency in impression formation
Merola, N. A. (2013) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Majocha, K. L., & Mullennix, J. W. (2015) · Qualitative Research Reports in Communication · doi:10.1080/17459435.2015.1086418 · Cited by 1
Domino effects in causal contradictions.
Khemlani, S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2015) · Cognitive Science · Cited by 1
Metacognitive Prompting Aids Dynamic Decision-Making
Evans, J., Güss, C. D., & Boot, W. R. (2011) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Information choice within disclosures, mobile devices, and investor estimates of fundamental value
Grant, S. M. (2016) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) · Cited by 1
Taswin, M. Z. S., & Yudiana, W. (2018) · Journal of Psychological Science and Profession · doi:10.24198/jpsp.v2i3.19374 · Cited by 2
A Metacognitive Triggering Mechanism for Anticipatory Thinking
Hough, A. R., Larue, O., & Juvina, I. (2019) · Journal of Bioresource Management · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.19337.80483 · Cited by 1
Méndez-Carbajo, D., & Mixon, F. G. (2021) · International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics · doi:10.4018/ijabe.2021100101 · Cited by 1
Static Influencing Mechanism of Weibo Users’ Information Sharing of Brand Crisis Cases
Yang, C. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6667-4_5 · Cited by 1
Song, H. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 1
Raj, J. D. (2026) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · doi:10.82444/warw.33599143 · Cited by 1
Activity-Based Target Acquisition Methods for Use in Urban Environments
Myles, K. (2009) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 1
Is rationality the enemy of religion?
Ball, P. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10539 · Cited by 1
Gatobu, S. (2014) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 1
Promoting Teaming Metacognition
Rynearson, L. (2016) · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · Cited by 1
Schnaubert, L. (2019) · DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen) · doi:10.17185/duepublico/70041 · Cited by 1
The order of questions on a test affects how well students believe they performed
Franco, G. (2015) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17012516 · Cited by 1
Ganderton, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0238 · Cited by 1
Almanzar, A. D. R., Edinger‐Schons, L. M., & Grüning, D. J. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jbxeq · Cited by 1
Su, J., Li, Z., & He, Q. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5179178 · Cited by 1
Exit and voice: papers from a revisionist public choice perspective
Taylor, B. R. (2014) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · doi:10.25911/5d73928bdbc2f · Cited by 1
The role of emotion in practical rationality
Simpson, R. J. (2014) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 1
Meel, J. V. (2012) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
What Role Do Cognitive Processes Play in Assessing Quality or Quality-of-Life?
Barofsky, I. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9819-4_3
Four essays in consumer decision-making
Paolacci, G. (2012) · ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)
McCormick, M. (2013) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Of Mental Models, Assumptions and Heuristics: The Case of Acids and Acid Strength
McClary, L. (2010) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
The influence of language on decision-making
de Weger, J. (2015)
Does Plain Language Enhance Reading Comprehension and Content Recall
Hansson, T. (2013)
Dissociação de modos de processamento em persuasão
Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, P., & Loureiro, F. (2013) · Laboratório de Psicologia · doi:10.14417/lp.671
Metadata
- Authors
- Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-576
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2138921773
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (051811; SES0241544)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- metacognition, analytical thinking, intuitive thinking, heuristics, syllogistic reasoning, persuasion, peripheral cues, cognitive effort, dual-process theory
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Pilot Projects, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review