The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning.
Abstract
Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency--receiving information in a degraded font (Experiments 1 and 4), in difficult-to-read lettering (Experiment 2), or while furrowing one's brow (Experiment 3)--reduced the impact of heuristics and defaults in judgment (Experiments 1 and 3), reduced reliance on peripheral cues in persuasion (Experiment 2), and improved syllogistic reasoning (Experiment 4). Metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency appear to serve as an alarm that activates analytic forms of reasoning that assess and sometimes correct the output of more intuitive forms of reasoning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alter et al. (2007) demonstrated that metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency activate more analytical reasoning processes.”
From Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance (2025) · cites this paper as Alter et al. (2007)
In the citing paper
“Manipulating the activation of these heuristics (e.g., via priming) can be used to improve metacognitive control: increasing subjective processing difficulty (e.g., by using a degraded font) stimulates more metacognitive control and thereby improves participants' performance on reasoning tasks that benefit from a more analytic processing style [7].”
From The Metacognitive Demands and Opportunities of Generative AI (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.
Sloman, S. A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3 · Cited by 3,942
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,583
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 848
Eye-tracking evidence shows that non-fit messaging impacts attention, attitudes and choice
Fridman, I., Ubel, P. A., & Higgins, E. T. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205993 · Cited by 12
Jia, X., Li, P., & Li, W. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13030027 · Cited by 13
Swaryandini, G., Graham, J., Griffith, S., Grilo, V., Ruzzante, F., Zhang, X., Yeung, S. K., Mangiarulo, M., Basarkod, G., Ng, C., et al. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02253-y · Cited by 11
Ninomiya, Y., Iwata, T., Terai, H., & Miwa, K. (2023) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-023-01448-w · Cited by 15
A hard to read font reduces the causality bias
Díaz‐Lago, M., & Matute, H. (2019) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004848 · Cited by 11
Prioritizing unread e-mails: people send urgent responses before important or short ones
Cox, A. L., Bird, J., Brumby, D. P., Cecchinato, M. E., & Gould, S. J. J. (2020) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2020.1835481 · Cited by 11
Hendijani, R., Ghafourian, F., & Attari, I. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01459-3 · Cited by 11
Question Design Affects Students' Sense‐Making on Mathematics Word Problems
Kirkland, P. K., & McNeil, N. M. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12960 · Cited by 18
Calvillo, D. P., Bratton, J., Velazquez, V., Smelter, T. J., & Crum, D. (2022) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2022.2075035 · Cited by 11
Linsenmeyer, M., & Long, G. (2023) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-023-01752-9 · Cited by 11
Visual inspection problem-solving strategies at different experience levels
Swann, L., Popović, V., & Wiredja, D. (2024) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104273 · Cited by 11
A Dual Process Evaluability Framework for decision anomalies
Schneider, M., & Coulter, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2015.09.005 · Cited by 12
Metacognition and Decision Making: between First and Third Person Perspective
Strle, T. (2012) · Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems · doi:10.7906/indecs.10.3.6 · Cited by 13
Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys Model.
Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E., Newell, B. R., Zeelenberg, R., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000067 · Cited by 11
Wulandari, N. H., Widayati, K. A., & Suryobroto, B. (2016) · HAYATI Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.hjb.2016.09.001 · Cited by 11
The effect of price fluency and duration framing in price advertisements
Park, K., & Ryu, G. (2019) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1593734 · Cited by 11
Dual Processing in Syllogistic Reasoning
Teovanović, P. (2019) · Psihologijske teme · doi:10.31820/pt.28.1.7 · Cited by 11
Urbig, D., Muehlfeld, K. S., Procher, V., & van Witteloostuijn, A. C. (2020) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-020-00412-z · Cited by 11
Petersen, M. B., & Arceneaux, K. (2020) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12668 · Cited by 11
Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.
Pramanik, S., & Johnson, V. E. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000482 · Cited by 11
Heads of Worry, Hearts of Joy: Daily Diary Investigations of Self-Location and Well-Being
Irvin, R. L., Wu, D., Fetterman, A. K., & Robinson, M. D. (2023) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-023-00196-z · Cited by 10
Atanasiu, V., & Marthot-Santaniello, I. (2021) · International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR) · doi:10.1007/s10032-021-00386-0 · Cited by 10
Doris, J. M. (2021) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198719601.001.0001 · Cited by 10
A Guide to Graphic Design For Functional versus Experiential Ads
Zhu, Y., Tessitore, T., Harrigan, P., & Coussement, K. (2023) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2023-002 · Cited by 12
Lay Personality Theories in Interactive Decisions: Strongly Held, Weakly Supported
Cooper, D. A., Connolly, T., & Kugler, T. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1842 · Cited by 10
Thompson, V. A., Ackerman, R., Sidi, Y., Ball, L. J., Pennycook, G., & Turner, J. A. P. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.003 · Cited by 10
Lugo, R. G., Sütterlin, S., Knox, B. J., Jøsok, Ø., Helkala, K. M., & Lande, N. M. (2016) · Journal of Military Studies · doi:10.1515/jms-2016-0005 · Cited by 10
Boukamcha, F. (2017) · Journal of Indian Business Research · doi:10.1108/jibr-02-2016-0010 · Cited by 10
Nadarevic, L., & Kroneisen, M. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104156 · Cited by 11
Choice protection for feeling-focused decisions.
Maglio, S. J., & Reich, T. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000735 · Cited by 10
The bat-and-ball problem: a word-problem debiasing approach
Hoover, J. D., & Healy, A. F. (2021) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2021.1878473 · Cited by 10
What I do or how I do it - the effect of accountability focus on individual exploration
Verwaeren, B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2021.1967322 · Cited by 10
Adding possibilities can reduce the Gambler's Fallacy: A naïve-probability paradox
Navarrete, G., & Santamaría, C. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.625357 · Cited by 10
Business Intuition: The Mortar among the Bricks of Analysis
Williams, K. C. (2012) · Cited by 10
Avramova, Y. R., Pelsmacker, P. D., & Dens, N. (2018) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-018-0103-7 · Cited by 16
Judgements by representativeness
Teigen, K. H. (2012) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203720615-16 · Cited by 10
How to Provide Feedback? The Role of Robot’s Language and Feedback Framework
Huang, H., & Rau, P. P. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2223946 · Cited by 10
Smith, L. W., & Abell, A. (2025) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaf020 · Cited by 9
How verbal-nonverbal consistency shapes the truth
ten Brinke, L., & Max Weisbuch, A. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103978 · Cited by 9
Is there a mere categorization effect in investment decisions?
Lewis, D., & Gill, T. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.01.001 · Cited by 9
Effect of individual thinking styles on item selection during study time allocation
Jia, X., Li, W., Cao, L., Li, P., Shi, M., Wang, J., Wei, C., & Li, X. (2016) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12267 · Cited by 9
Kersten, G. E., Roszkowska, E., & Wachowicz, T. (2018) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_4 · Cited by 9
Scientific Misinformation and Fake News: A Blurred Boundary
Galeotti, A. E., & Meini, C. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2070788 · Cited by 9
From meaning well to doing well: ethical expertise in the GIS domain
Huff, C. (2014) · Journal of Geography in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03098265.2014.936314 · Cited by 9
Berger, C. R., & Lee, K. J. (2010) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210377986 · Cited by 9
Rahinel, R., Amaral, N. B., Clarkson, J. J., & Kay, A. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.001 · Cited by 9
Choi, S., An, S. C., Lee, U. S., Yun, J., Jang, J. H., & Kang, D. (2018) · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience · doi:10.9758/cpn.2018.16.1.391 · Cited by 10
Is less readable liked better? The case of font readability in poetry appreciation
Gao, X., Dera, J. J. M., Nijhof, A. D., & Willems, R. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225757 · Cited by 9
Analytical thinking, Little's Law understanding, and stock‐flow performance: two empirical studies
Hendijani, R. (2021) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.1685 · Cited by 8
When the Spatial and Ideological Collide
Kleiman, T., Stern, C., & Trope, Y. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615624029 · Cited by 9
People Underestimate the Value of Persistence for Creative Performance
Lucas, B., & Nordgren, L. F. (2014) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e573552014-073 · Cited by 9
Zhang, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102397 · Cited by 9
Fasolo, B., Misuraca, R., & Reutskaja, E. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000481 · Cited by 9
Lascău, L., Brumby, D. P., Gould, S. J. J., & Cox, A. L. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3635145 · Cited by 8
Sansom‐Daly, U. M., & Forgas, J. P. (2010) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.5.630 · Cited by 8
Critical Thinking and the Rejection of Unsubstantiated Claims
Bensley, D. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108684354.005 · Cited by 9
Recycling in Babel: The Impact of Foreign Languages in Rule Learning
Antón, E., Soleto, N. B., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113784 · Cited by 8
Goodman, J. K., & Reczek, R. W. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2199 · Cited by 8
They’re vs They Are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments
Chan, E. Y., & Meng, Y. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113463 · Cited by 8
The intuitive decision preference and EEG features based on commonality heuristic
Jia, W., Li, S., Qian, S., Wang, M., Bao, W., Zhao, J., Cheong, K. H., & Xie, N. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106845 · Cited by 8
Mindreading with ease? Fluency and belief reasoning in 4- to 5-year-olds
Fiebich, A. (2013) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0301-5 · Cited by 8
Familiarity, Challenge, and Processing of Persuasion Messages
Garcia‐Marques, T., Fonseca, R., & Blascovich, J. (2015) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.6.585 · Cited by 9
The first–second language influence on framing effects and loss aversion of balanced bilinguals
Huang, H., & Rau, P. P. (2018) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006918813646 · Cited by 8
Judgments of Meaning in Life, Religious Beliefs, and the Experience of Cognitive (Dis)Fluency
Davis, W. E., & Hicks, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12159 · Cited by 8
The Precision Effect: How Numerical Precision Influences Everyday JudgmentsPreprint
Thomas, M., & Park, J. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2229833 · Cited by 8
Supporting students' knowledge integration with technology-enhanced inquiry curricula
Chiu, J. L. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 8
The role of request precision and perceived efficacy in increasing charitable donations
Hershberger, E. K., & Hair, M. (2022) · Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.1746 · Cited by 7
Dutemple, E., Brokl, C., & Poulin‐Dubois, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Developmental Psychology · doi:10.3389/fdpys.2024.1332358 · Cited by 7
A Novel Lens on Metacognition in Visualization
Chen, M., Yang, A., Min, S., Hamilton, K. A., & Wall, E. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714400 · Cited by 7
Lecturer fluency can impact students' judgments of learning and actual learning performance
Wilford, M. M., Kurpad, N., Platt, M., & Weinstein, Y. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3724 · Cited by 7
The foreign language effect in bilingualism: Examining prosocial sentiment after offense taking
Miller, D., Solís-Barroso, C., & Delgado, R. (2021) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716420000806 · Cited by 9
Considering Preventative Care in a Native vs. Non-native Language: A Foreign Language Effect
Hayakawa, S. L., Pan, Y., & Marian, V. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11101309 · Cited by 7
Amaral, N. B., & Jiao, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04995-x · Cited by 8
Beege, M., Krieglstein, F., Schneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.678798 · Cited by 8
Linguistic Discrimination in Science: Can English Disfluency Help Debias Scientific Research?
Peters, U. (2023) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2023.2251676 · Cited by 7
The relationship between blocking and inference in causal learning.
Livesey, E. J., Lee, J., & Shone, L. T. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 7
The Science of Learning and Its Applications
McDaniel, M. A., & Wooldridge, C. L. (2012) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452244006.n6 · Cited by 7
Cognition and its relationship with endogenous and exogenous factors in engineering students
Silva, W. F., Sierra, C. A. S., Morales, J. J., Ligardo, Y. A. M., & Espinosa‐Fuentes, E. (2017) · DSPACE System - Metalibrary (University of the Coast) · Cited by 7
Situational Factors Influencing Receptivity to Bullshit
Brown, M., Keefer, L. A., & McGrew, S. J. (2019) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.v14i3.37393 · Cited by 8
Successful Problem Solving in Genetics Varies Based on Question Content
Avena, J. S., McIntosh, B. B., Whitney, O. N., Wiens, A., & Knight, J. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-01-0016 · Cited by 7
Testing the Foreign Language Effect on Cognitive Reflection in Older Adults
Vega‐Mendoza, M., Hansson, P., Sörman, D. E., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11111527 · Cited by 7
Deliberation does not make the attraction effect disappear: The role of induced cognitive reflection
Padamwar, P. K., Kalakbandi, V. K., & Dawra, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113335 · Cited by 7
SHARP wit: Why receiving sarcasm improves perspective-taking
Huang, L. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2023) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101709 · Cited by 7
The impact of open and closed mindsets on evaluative priming
Alexopoulos, T., Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2012) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2011.630991 · Cited by 7
Reflections on collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning
Lin, T., & Anderson, R. C. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.002 · Cited by 7
A process-dissociation analysis of semantic illusions
Mata, A., Ferreira, M. B., & Reis, J. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.08.001 · Cited by 7
Disfluent Font Can Hinder Sight-Word Acquisition in Students With Intellectual Disability
Taylor, K. L. H., Skinner, C. H., Cazzell, S., Gibbons, S. D., Ryan, K., Ruddy, J., Ciancio, D., Beeson, T. S., & Cihak, D. F. (2018) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932518771749 · Cited by 7
Fouché, J. (2013) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 7
On the cognitive bases of illusionism
Camı́, J., Gómez-Marín, À., & Martı́nez, L. M. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.9712 · Cited by 7
Sundar, A., Wu, R., & Kardes, F. R. (2019) · Interdisciplinary Journal of Signage and Wayfinding · doi:10.15763/issn.2470-9670.2019.v1.i2.a37 · Cited by 7
Intuitive and Reflective Responses in PhilosophyPreprint
Byrd, N. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2787284 · Cited by 7
Carriedo, N., Corral, A., Montoro, P. R., & Herrero, L. (2019) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12400 · Cited by 6
Panigyraki, A., Polyportis, A., & Kyriakopoulos, N. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2350 · Cited by 6
Clouded judgments? The role of virtual weather in word valence evaluations
Rocabado, F., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2024) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2024.2354488 · Cited by 6
Masón, L., Carretti, B., Ronconi, A., Pizzigallo, E., Haverkamp, Y. E., & Bråten, I. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105172 · Cited by 6
Yang, X., Meng, W., & Chen, S. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3992 · Cited by 6
Huang, J. Y., Song, H., & Bargh, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.002 · Cited by 6
Development of Substitution Bias Sensitivity: Are Adolescents Happy Fools?
Rossi, S., Cassotti, M., Agogué, M., & Neys, W. D. (2013) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 6
The effects of mood and retrieval cues on semantic memory and metacognition
Hall, A. C. G., Evans, D. G., Higginbotham, L., & Thompson, K. S. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/sjop.12632 · Cited by 6
Do Our Choices Tell Us Who We Are? It Depends on How Easy or Difficult They Were to Make
Steffel, M., & Williams, E. F. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1218 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 569-576
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2138921773
- Cited by
- 844
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (051811; SES0241544)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- metacognition, analytical thinking, intuitive thinking, heuristics, syllogistic reasoning, persuasion, peripheral cues, cognitive effort, dual-process theory
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Judgment, Pilot Projects, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review