Cited by 321Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisInfant Development and Preterm Care

Pattern of perceived stress and anxiety in pregnancy predicts preterm birth

Open access
Glynn, Laura M., Schetter, Christine Dunkel, Hobel, Calvin J., Sandman, Curt A.·2008·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the pattern of prenatal stress, as compared to prenatal stress assessed at a single gestational time point, predicts preterm delivery (PTD). DESIGN: Perceived stress and anxiety were assessed in 415 pregnant women at 18-20 and 30-32 weeks' gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestational length was determined by last menstrual period and confirmed by early pregnancy ultrasound. Births were categorized as preterm (< 37 weeks) or term. RESULTS: At neither assessment did levels of anxiety or perceived stress predict PTD. However, patterns of anxiety and stress were associated with gestational length. Although the majority of women who delivered at term exhibited declines in stress and anxiety, those who delivered preterm exhibited increases. The elevated risk for PTD associated with an increase in stress or anxiety persisted when adjusting statistically for obstetric risk, pregnancy-related anxiety, ethnicity, parity, and prenatal life events. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the pattern of prenatal stress is an important predictor of PTD. More generally, the findings support the possibility that a decline in stress responses during pregnancy may help to protect mother and fetus from adverse influences associated with PTD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.43

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glynn, L. M., Schetter, C. D., Hobel, C. J., & Sandman, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2008-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
43-51
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W1988959073
Cited by
321
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 HD-40967, R0l HD-28413)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
perceived stress, pregnancy-related anxiety, preterm birth, gestation length, prenatal stress, term birth, prenatal risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Los Angeles, Risk Assessment, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review