Cited by 240Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and Influences

Plasticity of memory for new learning in very old age: A story of major loss?

Open access
Singer, Tania, Lindenberger, Ulman, Baltes, Paul B.·2003·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Longitudinal survivors of the Berlin Aging Study (N = 96, mean age = 84 years, range 75-101 years) were instructed and trained in a mnemonic skill to examine plasticity of episodic memory performance in very old age. Performance gains after mnemonic instruction were modest, and most individuals were unable to further enhance their performance during 4 sessions of mnemonic practice. Whereas the proportion of variance explained by measures from the broad fluid-ability domain (e.g., perceptual speed) increased with training, the proportion of variance explained by crystallized-ability domain (e.g., word knowledge) and sociobiographical variables decreased. Furthermore, prior 6-year longitudinal changes (loss) in perceptual speed predicted individual differences in plasticity. Results suggest that aging-induced biological factors are a prominent source of individual differences in cognitive plasticity in very old age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.306

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singer, T., Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2003-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
306-317
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2170045108
Cited by
240
References
90
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
cognitive plasticity, episodic memory, oldest old, mnemonic training, perceptual speed, fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, individual differences, aging, Berlin Aging Study
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropsychological Tests, Practice, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review