Cited by 213Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Functions and Memory

Posterior parietal cortex is implicated in continuous switching between verbal fluency tasks: an fMRI study with clinical implications

Gurd, Jennifer M., Amunts, Katrin, Weiss, Peter H., Zafiris, Oliver, Zilles, Karl, Marshall, John C., Fink, Gereon R.·2002·Brain

Abstract

We investigated whether posterior parietal cortex controls attentional switching when the tasks involve neither spatial nor visual cognition. Normal volunteers were scanned using functional MRI (fMRI). In all conditions, subjects were required to covertly produce words in verbal fluency tasks. They did so at a rate of one every 2 s (with eyes closed) in response to an auditory beep. In the non-switching (NS) trials, subjects responded with a series of items from a prespecified semantic category (SC) (e.g. fruits or cars) and from overlearned sequences (OSs) (days of the week, months of the year or letters of the alphabet). Instructions as to which category items should be drawn from on a given run of trials were presented over fMRI-compatible earphones prior to each run. In the switching (S) trials, subjects produced a series of word triads from three SCs: for example, fruits, cars and furniture (e.g. pear, Mercedes, table.); and from three OSs: days of the week, months of the year and letters of the alphabet (e.g. Monday, January, A.). This design is factorial, with the factors verbal class (SC or OSs) and switching conditions (S or NS). Increases in neural activity (P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons) were observed only in superior posterior parietal cortex bilaterally as a main effect of the S conditions compared with the NS conditions. When SC fluency was compared with OS fluency, significant activations were found in anterior cingulate cortex bilaterally, the left inferior frontal gyrus, the middle frontal gyrus bilaterally, frontal operculum bilaterally and in the cerebellar vermis. These results support the hypothesis that superior posterior parietal cortex is a supramodal area implicated in task switching, even when no visual or spatial component is implicated in the tasks. Task switching, frequently used to examine 'frontal' executive functions, may also be clinically relevant to the assessment of patients with superior posterior parietal lesions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awf093

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Burgess PW, Shallice T. Fractionnement du syndrome frontal. Rev Neuropsychol 1994; 4: 345±70.
  2. Mountcastle V, Plum F, Geige SV, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Sect. 1, Vol. 5, Pt 1. Bethesda (MD): American Psychological Society; 1987. p. 373±417.
  3. Milner B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Arch Neurol 1963; 9: 90±100.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurd, J. M., Amunts, K., Weiss, P. H., Zafiris, O., Zilles, K., Marshall, J. C., & Fink, G. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Gurd, Jennifer M.
Venue
Brain
Published
2002-05
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
1024-1038
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2105686225
Cited by
213
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Guarantors of Brain
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
posterior parietal cortex, task switching, verbal fluency, attentional shift, executive function, anterior cingulate cortex, cerebellar vermis, frontal operculum, frontal cortex, neuropsychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Parietal Lobe, Patient Compliance, Speech, Stereotaxic Techniques, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review