Cited by 509Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

The impact of cognitive training and mental stimulation on cognitive and everyday functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Open access
Kelly, Michelle E., Loughrey, David, Lawlor, Brian A., Robertson, Ian H., Walsh, Cathal, Brennan, Sabina·2014·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the impact of cognitive training and general mental stimulation on the cognitive and everyday functioning of older adults without known cognitive impairment. We examine transfer and maintenance of intervention effects, and the impact of training in group versus individual settings. Thirty-one randomised controlled trials were included, with 1806 participants in cognitive training groups and 386 in general mental stimulation groups. Meta-analysis results revealed that compared to active controls, cognitive training improved performance on measures of executive function (working memory, p=0.04; processing speed, p<0.0001) and composite measures of cognitive function (p=0.001). Compared to no intervention, cognitive training improved performance on measures of memory (face-name recall, p=0.02; immediate recall, p=0.02; paired associates, p=0.001) and subjective cognitive function (p=0.01). The impact of cognitive training on everyday functioning is largely under investigated. More research is required to determine if general mental stimulation can benefit cognitive and everyday functioning. Transfer and maintenance of intervention effects are most commonly reported when training is adaptive, with at least ten intervention sessions and a long-term follow-up. Memory and subjective cognitive performance might be improved by training in group versus individual settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.004

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies with children and older adults could be more sensitive to training-related changes than studies with young people.

    “Hence, studies with children and older adults could be more sensitive to training-related changes than studies with young people (Kelly et al., 2014; Spencer-Smith and Klingberg, 2015; Weicker et al., 2016).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Kelly et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, M. E., Loughrey, D., Lawlor, B. A., Robertson, I. H., Walsh, C., & Brennan, S.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Michelle E.
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
15
Pages
28-43
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136715217
Cited by
509
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORMA (acceptedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Alzheimer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive training, mental stimulation, older adults, healthy aging, executive function, working memory, processing speed, memory, transfer of training, maintenance of intervention effects, daily functioning
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition, Humans, Mental Processes, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Cognitive Reserve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review