The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.
Abstract
The present study took a critical look at a central construct in couples research: relationship satisfaction. Eight well-validated self-report measures of relationship satisfaction, including the Marital Adjustment Test (MAT; H. J. Locke & K. M. Wallace, 1959), the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS; G. B. Spanier, 1976), and an additional 75 potential satisfaction items, were given to 5,315 online participants. Using item response theory, the authors demonstrated that the MAT and DAS provided relatively poor levels of precision in assessing satisfaction, particularly given the length of those scales. Principal-components analysis and item response theory applied to the larger item pool were used to develop the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI) scales. Compared with the MAS and the DAS, the CSI scales were shown to have higher precision of measurement (less noise) and correspondingly greater power for detecting differences in levels of satisfaction. The CSI scales demonstrated strong convergent validity with other measures of satisfaction and excellent construct validity with anchor scales from the nomological net surrounding satisfaction, suggesting that they assess the same theoretical construct as do prior scales. Implications for research are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The CSI-32 was found to have excellent construct validity and convergent validity with other measures of relationship satisfaction (Funk and Rogge, 2007).”
From Partner symptom accommodation in generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary examination of correlates with symptoms and cognitive behavioural therapy outcome (2024) · cites this paper as Funk and Rogge, 2007
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments.
Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286 · Cited by 3,970
Christensen, A., Atkins, D. C., Berns, S., Wheeler, J., Baucom, D. H., & Simpson, L. E. (2004) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.72.2.176 · Cited by 380
A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier dyadic adjustment scale
Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G. (1982) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351594 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,004
Pruitt, M. M., Rhoden, M., & Ekas, N. V. (2016) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361316669621 · Cited by 50
“Mothers completed the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI), which is a valid and reliable measure that assesses how they perceived aspects of their relationship and how satisfied they were with their relationship (Funk and Rogge, 2007).”
MethodPsychometric Properties of Revised Form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale in a Sample from North Cyprus
Bayraktaroglu, H. T., & Çakıcı, E. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Sciences · doi:10.1080/09751122.2017.1393954 · Cited by 39
“Taking the first criteria into consideration, it is found that the MAT, DAS, CSI and MSS all measure how couples agree about specific subjects, their attitudes towards trust and control besides marital satisfaction; however, the QMI and KMS only measure marital satisfaction.”
MethodParent–Child Aggression Risk in Expectant Mothers and Fathers: A Multimethod Theoretical Approach
Rodriguez, C. M., Smith, T., & Silvia, P. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-016-0481-y · Cited by 39
“The Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI; Funk and Rogge 2007) is an inventory assessing partner relationship satisfaction.”
Factors that contribute to the maintenance or decline of relationship satisfaction
Righetti, F., Faure, R., Zoppolat, G., Meltzer, A. L., & McNulty, J. K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00026-2 · Cited by 48
Turliuc, M. N., & Candel, O. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635148 · Cited by 57
Dennis, C., Brown, H. K., & Brennenstuhl, S. (2017) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2017.07.018 · Cited by 44
When She Brings Home the Job Status: Wives’ Job Status, Status Leakage, and Marital Instability
Byrne, A., & Barling, J. I. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1120 · Cited by 51
“Relationship satisfaction was assessed with the 16-item couples’ satisfaction index (Funk and Rogge 2007).”
MethodRodriguez, C. M., Silvia, P., & Gaskin, R. (2017) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/vio0000115 · Cited by 38
“The Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI; Funk & Rogge, 2007) is an inventory that assesses satisfaction with one’s partner along several dimensions.”
Comparing Parents of Children With Down Syndrome at Different Life Span Stages
Goff, B., Monk, J. K., Malone, J., Staats, N., Tanner, A. J., & Springer, N. (2016) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12312 · Cited by 38
“I’m so excited for you!” How an enthusiastic responding intervention enhances close relationships
Woods, S. B., Lambert, N., Brown, P. C., Fincham, F., & May, R. W. (2015) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407514523545 · Cited by 38
“Relationship satisfaction and perception of study partners’ relationship satisfaction were assessed at Time 1 and Time 2 with an adapted version of the 4-item Couple Satisfaction Index (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodShould it stay or should it go now? Smartphones and relational health.
Lapierre, M. A., & Lewis, M. N. (2016) · Psychology of Popular Media Culture · doi:10.1037/ppm0000119 · Cited by 42
“The 16-item version of the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-16; Funk & Rogge, 2007) was used to assess relationship satisfaction.”
MethodReciprocal influences among family processes and toddlers’ sleep problems.
Peltz, J. S., Rogge, R. D., Sturge‐Apple, M. L., O’Connor, T. G., & Pigeon, W. R. (2016) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000202 · Cited by 45
Self-citationVento, P. W. P.-D., & Cobb, R. (2011) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2011.30.9.905 · Cited by 37
Moors, A. C., Schechinger, H. A., Balzarini, R. N., & Flicker, S. M. (2021) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01885-7 · Cited by 42
“Relationship satisfaction was assessed with the Couples Satisfaction Index Short form (CSI; Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodLiebman, R. E., Whitfield, K. M., Sijercic, I., Ennis, N., & Monson, C. M. (2020) · Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40501-020-00211-1 · Cited by 51
Marital Quality Assessment: Reviewing the Concept, Instruments, and Methods
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2020) · Marriage & Family Review · doi:10.1080/01494929.2020.1712300 · Cited by 36
“In general, those results indicate that short measures with global items are more precise and provide as much information as lengthier scales (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodResultGuschlbauer, A., Smith, N., DeStefano, J., & Soltis, D. (2019) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407517746787 · Cited by 36
Chamberlain, A., Cordier, R., Vaz, S. M. A., & Falkmer, T. (2018) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2018.11.011 · Cited by 50
What do dads want? Treatment preferences for paternal postpartum depression
Cameron, E. E., Hunter, D., Sedov, I. D., & Tomfohr‐Madsen, L. M. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.031 · Cited by 42
Halford, W. K., Pepping, C., Hilpert, P., Bodenmann, G., Wilson, K., Busby, D., Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (2015) · The Behavior Therapist · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2015.02.001 · Cited by 36
“Consistent with this latter possibility, Funk and Rogge (2007) found low measurement sensitivity at the upper end of the satisfaction range in a number of widely used couple relationship satisfaction scales.”
BackgroundHaydon, K. C., & Salvatore, J. E. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211013499 · Cited by 41
“The seven-item Relationship Assessment Scale (Hendrick, 1988) was administered at T1 to assess current relationship satisfaction; the 32-item Couple Satisfaction Index (Funk & Rogge, 2007) was administered to assess current relationship satisfaction at T2.”
MethodNew Parents Experienced Lower Parenting Self-Efficacy during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown
Xue, A., Oros, V., Marca-Ghaemmaghami, P. L., Scholkmann, F., Righini-Grunder, F., Natalucci, G., Karen, T., Bassler, D., & Restin, T. (2021) · Children · doi:10.3390/children8020079 · Cited by 35
“The CSI consists of four questions which evaluate relationship satisfaction in couples [20].”
BackgroundMeasuring COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Parents: Psychometric Comparison of Four Different Inventories
Kubb, C., & Foran, H. M. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/24507 · Cited by 43
“The Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI), developed by Funk and Rogge [89], is a widely used measurement in research and practice for relationship satisfaction.”
Rosen, N., Williams, L., Vannier, S. A., & Mackinnon, S. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01667-1 · Cited by 35
Fredman, S. J., Macdonald, A., Monson, C., Dondanville, K., Blount, T. H., Hall-Clark, B. N., Fina, B. A., Mintz, J., Litz, B., Young-McCaughan, S., et al. (2019) · The Behavior Therapist · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2019.10.003 · Cited by 35
Merwin, K. E., O’Sullivan, L. F., & Rosen, N. O. (2017) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2017.1283378 · Cited by 46
“Relationship Satisfaction Relationship satisfaction was assessed using the 16-item short form of the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI-16; Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodMeasuring Constructs in Family Science: How Can Item Response Theory Improve Precision and Validity?
Gordon, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/jomf.12157 · Cited by 35
Gordon, A. M., Tuskeviciute, R., & Chen, S. (2013) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12005 · Cited by 28
“The four-item version of the Couple’s Satisfaction Index (CSI; Funk & Rogge 2007) was used to assess relationship satisfaction.”
MethodStephenson, K. R., & Meston, C. M. (2012) · Sexual & Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/14681994.2012.738905 · Cited by 34
“Participants (n¼ 75) were recruited from the community through advertisements posted in numerous locations throughout the local mid-sized metropolitan area, and through online advertisements on www.craigslist.org.”
MethodJózefacka, N., Szpakiewicz, E., Lech, D., Guzowski, K., & Kania, G. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20054103 · Cited by 34
“The Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-32) developed by Funk and Rogge [50] (Polish adaptation by Stawska [51]) is a self-reporting questionnaire consisting of 32 items that measure relationship satisfaction.”
MethodRaposo, S., Rosen, N. O., & Muise, A. (2019) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407519875217 · Cited by 42
“Relationship satisfaction was assessed with the 16-item Couples Satisfaction Index (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodWhy do couples seek relationship help online? Description and comparison to in-person interventions.
Roddy, M. K., Rothman, K., Cicila, L. N., & Doss, B. (2019) · Journal of Marital & Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12329 · Cited by 34
Xue, W. L., He, H.-G., Ying, J.-C., Wang, W., & Shorey, S. (2018) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.002 · Cited by 34
Yeung, N. C. Y., Zhang, Y., Ji, L., Lu, G., & Lü, Q. (2018) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.12872 · Cited by 37
A systematic review of disease related stigmatization in patients living with prostate cancer
Larkin, D., Birtle, A. J., Bradley, L., Dey, P., Martin, C. R., Pilkington, M., & Romero-Rivas, C. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261557 · Cited by 37
“CSI Couples Satisfaction Index Funk and Rogge [87]”
Shrout, M., Renna, M., Madison, A., Alfano, C. M., Povoski, S., Lipari, A. M., Agnese, D., Farrar, W. B., Carson, W. E., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. (2020) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5615 · Cited by 33
“Women who were married/domestic partners completed the 4‐item Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI‐4) to assess their marital satisfaction.(29) The short version of the CSI distinguishes between satisfied and dissatisfied partners with greater precision than most commonly used marital satisfaction scales, and has a cut‐sco…”
MethodGuidry, A. R., Floyd, C. G., Volk, F. A., & Moen, C. E. (2019) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2019.1654579 · Cited by 52
“The potential benefits identified include increased sexual frequency and knowledge, diminished sexual boredom, and an increased desire to be sexually adventurous and experiment within the relationship (Grov et al., 2011; Kohut et al., 2017; Lofgren-Martensen & Mansson, 2010; Weinberg et al., 2010).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRelative Cost Effectiveness of In-Person and Internet Interventions for Relationship Distress.
Salivar, E. G., Rothman, K., Roddy, M. K., & Doss, B. (2018) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12414 · Cited by 33
Do differences matter? A typology of emerging adult romantic relationship
Roberson, P. N. E., Norona, J. C., Fish, J. N., Olmstead, S. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2016) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407516661589 · Cited by 40
“Relationship satisfaction was measured at T2 using the Couple Satisfaction Index (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodA randomized clinical trial of online-biblio relationship education for expectant couples.
Kalinka, C. J., Fincham, F., & Hirsch, A. (2012) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026398 · Cited by 33
“…completed the Ineffective Arguing Inventory (IAI: Kurdek, 1994), which is a measure of conflict resolution; the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI: Funk & Rogge, 2007), which is a measure of relationship satisfaction; and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD; Radloff,…”
MethodCorrelates and Predictors of Sexual Satisfaction for Older Adults in Same-Sex Relationships
Fleishman, J., Crane, B., & Koch, P. B. (2019) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2019.1618647 · Cited by 44
Leavitt, C. E., Whiting, J. B., & Hawkins, A. J. (2020) · Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy · doi:10.1080/15332691.2020.1757547 · Cited by 41
Emotion Regulation in Couples Affected by Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder
Dubé, J. P., Corsini‐Munt, S., Muise, A., & Rosen, N. O. (2019) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-019-01465-4 · Cited by 43
PTSD and relationship satisfaction in female survivors of sexual assault.
Dimauro, J., & Renshaw, K. D. (2019) · Psychological Trauma · doi:10.1037/tra0000391 · Cited by 32
Halford, W. K., Leung, P., Chan, H.-C., Lau, C.-W., Hiew, D. N., & van de Vijver, F. (2018) · Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cfp0000104 · Cited by 32
Qiao, S., Li, X.-M., Zhou, Y.-J., Shen, Z.-Y., & Tang, Z.-Z. (2016) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2016.1146397 · Cited by 32
“Quality of relationship with partner To assess the quality of relationship with partner, five items from an existing scale (Funk & Rogge, 2007) were used to ask the participants about the extents to which the descriptions truly reflected their relationship with their current partner (“My partner…”
MethodPrime, H., Wade, M., May, S. S., Jenkins, J. M., & Browne, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669106 · Cited by 31
Shrout, M. R., Renna, M. E., Madison, A. A., Alfano, C. M., Povoski, S. P., Lipari, A. M., Agnese, D. M., Yee, L. D., Carson, W. E., & Kiecolt‐Glaser, J. K. (2020) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104708 · Cited by 38
“Developed using item response theory, the short version of the CSI distinguishes between satisfied and dissatisfied partners with greater precision than most commonly used relationship satisfaction scales (Funk and Rogge, 2007).”
MethodThe Intergenerational Effects of Parental Divorce on Young Adult Relationships
Roper, S. W., Fife, S. T., & Seedall, R. (2019) · Journal of Divorce and Remarriage · doi:10.1080/10502556.2019.1699372 · Cited by 31
“The Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI) utilizes a 7 point Likert scale and is designed to measure the level of satisfaction an individual has in their relationship.”
MethodVannier, S. A., Adare, K. E., & Rosen, N. (2018) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407517743086 · Cited by 31
“Relationship satisfaction was assessed using the 4-item Couples Satisfaction Index—Short form (CSI-SF; Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodPaulin, M. M., Lachance‐Grzela, M., & McGee, S. (2017) · Journal of Family and Economic Issues · doi:10.1007/s10834-017-9524-9 · Cited by 38
“The CSI-4 has been described by Funk and Rogge (2007) as rivaling information contributed by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier 1976) despite having far fewer items (correlation of 0.87 between the two scales).”
MethodInfluentialHalford, W. K., Rahimullah, R. H., Wilson, K. L., Occhipinti, S., Busby, D. M., & Larson, J. H. (2017) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000181 · Cited by 37
Braithwaite, S. R., Doxey, R. A., Dowdle, K. K., & Fincham, F. (2016) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-016-9237-6 · Cited by 31
“Starting with 180 relationship satisfaction items, Funk and Rogge (2007) conducted an item response theory analysis to develop a four-item measure of relationship satisfaction with optimized psychometric properties, creating the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI).”
MethodFredman, S. J., Beck, J. G., Shnaider, P., Le, Y., Pukay‐Martin, N. D., Pentel, K. Z., Monson, C. M., Simon, N. M., & Marques, L. M. (2016) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.05.001 · Cited by 34
Bar‐Kalifa, E., Hen-Weissberg, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2015) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2015.34.7.587 · Cited by 32
Boals, A. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2996 · Cited by 31
Lambert, N., Fincham, F., Dewall, N., Pond, R. S., & Beach, S. (2013) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01411.x · Cited by 31
Measuring a New Stress Domain: Validation of the Couple-Level Minority Stress Scale
Neilands, T. B., LeBlanc, A. J., Frost, D. M., Bowen, K., Sullivan, P. S., Hoff, C. C., & Chang, J. Y. (2019) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-019-01487-y · Cited by 56
“Relationship satisfaction was measured with the four-item Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-4, Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodBarry, R., Barden, E. P., & Dubac, C. (2019) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000507 · Cited by 30
Effects of self‐disclosure and responsiveness between couples on passionate love within couples
Welker, K., Baker, L., Padilla, A., Holmes, H. J., Aron, A., & Slatcher, R. (2014) · Personal Relationships · doi:10.1111/pere.12058 · Cited by 30
“Participants also completed the 16-item Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-16; Funk & Rogge, 2007) as an index of relationship satisfaction.”
MethodResultHatch, S. G., Knopp, K., Le, Y., Allen, M. O. T., Rothman, K., Rhoades, G. K., & Doss, B. D. (2022) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12710 · Cited by 28
Hammett, J., Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. N. (2020) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000629 · Cited by 29
“—Husband and wife relationship satisfaction, conceptualized as spouses’ global sentiment towards the relationship, was an adapted measure using ten items from the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI-16; Funk & Rogge, 2007), with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction.”
MethodHeyman, R., Slep, A. M. S., Lorber, M. F., Mitnick, D. M., Xu, S., Baucom, K. J. W., Halford, W., & Niolon, P. (2018) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0961-y · Cited by 29
The Reliability Paradox of the Parent–Child Conflict Tactics Corporal Punishment Subscale
Lorber, M. F., & Slep, A. M. S. (2017) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000307 · Cited by 29
Braithwaite, S. R., Mitchell, C. M., Selby, E., & Fincham, F. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.045 · Cited by 29
“Startingwith 180 itemspreviously used to assess relationship satisfaction, Funk and Rogge (2007) conducted an Item Response Theory analysis to develop a 4-item measure of relationship satisfaction with optimized psychometric properties.”
MethodResultI just want to be left alone: Daily overload and marital behavior.
Sears, M., Repetti, R., Robles, T., & Reynolds, B. M. (2016) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000197 · Cited by 29
Cultural Differences in Support Provision
Chen, J. M., Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Hashimoto, T. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215602224 · Cited by 41
Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R., Walker, A., Wilcox, A., Lewis, V. L., & Robbins, D. C. (2014) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12105 · Cited by 26
Doss, B., Mitchell, A., Georgia, E. J., Biesen, J., & Rowe, L. S. (2015) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038541 · Cited by 29
“Participants’ relationship satisfaction scores on the Quality of Marriage Index (Norton, 1983) covered a wide range (6–45), with 76% of women and 61% of men scoring in the distressed range ( 30.5; Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialImplicit Theories of Relationships and Close Relationship Violence
Cobb, R. A., DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212473159 · Cited by 26
“Relationship satisfaction was assessed using Funk and Rogge’s (2007) four-item measure of relationship satisfaction.”
MethodOhye, B. Y., Brendel, R., Fredman, S. J., Bui, E., Rauch, P., Allard, M. D., Pentel, K. Z., & Simon, N. (2015) · Professional Psychology Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0037735 · Cited by 29
Queensland Family Cohort: a study protocol
Borg, D. J., Rae, K. M., Fiveash, C. E., Schagen, J., James‐McAlpine, J., Friedlander, F., Thurston, C., Oliveri, M., Harmey, T., Cavanagh, E., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044463 · Cited by 32
Kohut, T., Dobson, K., Balzarini, R. N., Rogge, R. D., Shaw, A. M. M., McNulty, J. K., Russell, V. M., Fisher, W. A., & Campbell, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661347 · Cited by 39
“Study 1: relationship satisfaction Relationship satisfaction was measured with the four item shortform of the Couples Satisfaction Index (Funk and Rogge, 2007).”
MethodSelf-citationIncorporating physiology into the study of psychotherapy process.
Deits‐Lebehn, C., Baucom, K. J. W., Crenshaw, A. O., Smith, T. W., & Baucom, B. (2020) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000391 · Cited by 36
“Figure 1 presents spouses’ CSI-4 scores over time; the solid horizontal line represents the cut-off value for clinically significant distress of 13.5.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZygar, C., & Schönbrodt, F. (2019) · Collabra: Psychology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mvynu · Cited by 28
Blais, R. (2019) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12449 · Cited by 28
“Higher scores indicate greater relationship satisfaction, and scores 13.5 are indicative of distressed relationships (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKeneski, E., Neff, L. A., & Loving, T. J. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617731499 · Cited by 28
“To adjust for general relationship quality, spouses also completed a slightly adapted version of the 16-item Couples Satisfaction Index (Funk & Rogge, 2007) as part of the background questionnaire.”
MethodBrisini, K. S. C., Solomon, D. H., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2017) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407517699283 · Cited by 36
“The scale is a widely used measure of relational satisfaction and has demonstrated high interitem reliability in previous research (a ¼ .96, Fincham, Paleari, & Regalia, 2002; a ¼ .96, Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodPersonal and couple level risk factors: Maternal and paternal parent-child aggression risk.
Tucker, M. C., Rodriguez, C. M., & Baker, L. R. (2017) · International Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.030 · Cited by 28
“CSI scores are associated with related measures of dyadic adjustment, global relationship satisfaction, and marital adjustment (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
BackgroundMethodDevelopment of the Experiences of Humility Scale
Davis, D. E., McElroy, S., Choe, E., Westbrook, C. J., DeBlaere, C., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J., Sandage, S. J., & Placeres, V. (2017) · Journal of Psychology and Theology · doi:10.1177/009164711704500101 · Cited by 25
“Partial correlations among items on each subscale were examined after controlling for the total score on that subscale (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodCouple resilience and life wellbeing in firefighters
Sanford, K., Kruse, M. I., Proctor, A., Torres, V. A., Pennington, M. L., Synett, S. J., & Gulliver, S. B. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1291852 · Cited by 25
“Participants completed the 4-item version of the Couples Satisfaction Index (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
MethodBois, S. N. D., Sher, T. G., Grotkowski, K., Aizenman, T., Slesinger, N. C., & Cohen, M. (2015) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480715616580 · Cited by 43
“Part four borrows a format from the CSI (Funk & Rogge, 2007) by asking respondents to rate how much they feel six emotions when they think about their romantic relationship with their partner.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUnger, D., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Kuonath, A. (2015) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726715571188 · Cited by 35
“We used the four-item Couples Satisfaction Index (e.g. ‘How satisfied are you with your relationship?’”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPsychometric characteristics of the Hungarian version of the Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS-H)
Martos, T., Sallay, V., Szabó, T., Lakatos, C., & Tóth-Vajna, R. (2014) · Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika · doi:10.1556/mental.15.2014.3.6 · Cited by 28
“…és az IRT (item Martos Tamás és munkatársai 249 response theory) segítségével kidolgozott, több kérdésbõl álló Pár Elégedettségi Index (Couple Satisfaction Index, CSI) — a CSI az elemzések szerint a RAS-nál pontosabban detektálja az elégedettség különbözõ szintjeit (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
Cortisol slopes and conflict: A spouse’s perceived stress matters
Shrout, M. R., Renna, M. E., Madison, A. A., Jaremka, L. M., Fagundes, C. P., Malarkey, W. B., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2020) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104839 · Cited by 27
“Marital satisfaction was assessed with the Couples Satisfaction Index, a measure that can discriminate between satisfied and dissatisfied couples with greater precision that other commonly used marital scales (Funk and Rogge, 2007).”
MethodHandlin, L., Novembre, G., Lindholm, H., Kämpe, R., Paul, E. R., & Morrison, I. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81197 · Cited by 33
Hughes, C. H., Devine, R. T., Mesman, J., Blair, C., & the NewFAMS Team (2019) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579419000804 · Cited by 42
“In the Couple Satisfaction Index, parents rated their level of agreement to items measuring their overall happiness with their relationship, the extent to which their relationship is rewarding, and the emotions evoked by their relationship.”
MethodRodriguez, C. M., Wittig, S. M. O., & Silvia, P. (2020) · International Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104563 · Cited by 27
Niekerk, L. V. V., Schubert, E., & Matthewson, M. (2020) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/0167482x.2020.1774547 · Cited by 27
A Closer Look at Sexual Passion in Relationships
Busby, D. M., Leonhardt, N. D., & James, S. L. (2019) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-019-01682-4 · Cited by 28
Wagner, A. C., Mithoefer, M. C., Mithoefer, A. T., & Monson, C. M. (2019) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2019.1589028 · Cited by 92
“Participants completed assessments at baseline, post-treatment, three-month follow-up, and six-month follow-up, and completed the PTSD Checklist (PCL-5, patient or partner version; Weathers et al. 2013b) and a one-item rating of relationship satisfaction (Couples Satisfaction Index, CSI; Funk and Rogge 2007) at every…”
MethodThe Effect of Stress on Empathic Accuracy in Romantic Couples
Crenshaw, A. O., Leo, K., & Baucom, B. R. (2019) · Journal of family psychology · doi:10.1037/fam0000508 · Cited by 27
Mindfulness and Young Adult Dating Relationship Stability: a Longitudinal Path Analysis
Khaddouma, A., & Gordon, K. C. (2018) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-018-0901-8 · Cited by 33
“Internal reliability in the current sample was adequate at both time points of measurement (baseline = .72, 30 days post-baseline = .74) with mean scores comparable to similar non-clinical young adult samples on relationship satisfaction (e.g., corresponding mean of 16.00; Funk and Rogge 2007).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDyadic Coping in an Eastern European Context
Rusu, P., Hilpert, P., Turliuc, M., & Bodenmann, G. (2016) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175616664009 · Cited by 27
“Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI 32; Funk & Rogge, 2007) is a 32-item questionnaire designed to measure how satisfied an individual is within his/her current relationship (Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
BackgroundPathways to romantic relationship success among Chinese young adult couples
Johnson, M. D., Nguyen, L., Anderson, J. R., Liu, W.-L., & Vennum, A. (2015) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407514522899 · Cited by 27
“The 4-item version of the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-4; Funk & Rogge, 2007) was used to assess relationship satisfaction.”
MethodCorsini‐Munt, S., Bergeron, S., Rosen, N. O., Steben, M., Mayrand, M., Delisle, I., McDuff, P., Aerts, L., & Santerre-Baillargeon, M. (2014) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-506 · Cited by 33
“which demonstrates strong convergent validity, and high precision and power for detecting distinctions in levels of satisfaction [47].”
Lucier‐Greer, M., Adler‐Baeder, F. M., Harcourt, K. T., & Gregson, K. D. (2014) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12069 · Cited by 21
Do Combat Exposure and Post-Deployment Mental Health Influence Intent to Divorce?
Foran, H. M., Wright, K. M., & Wood, M. D. (2013) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2013.32.9.917 · Cited by 23
Norton, A. M., Baptist, J. A., & Hogan, B. (2018) · Journal of Marital & Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/jmft.12246 · Cited by 27
Measuring “we‐ness” in couple relationships: A social identity approach
Cruwys, T., South, E. I., Halford, W. K., Murray, J. A., & Fladerer, M. P. (2022) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12811 · Cited by 27
“The Couple Satisfaction Index was used to measure relationship satisfaction (CSI; Funk & Rogge, 2007).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- ORCID
- Rogge, Ronald D.
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 572-583
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W2116307289
- Cited by
- 1,806
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 108 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 19.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Rochester
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- relationship satisfaction, measurement precision, scale development, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, item response theory, convergent validity, construct validity, nomological network, couples
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychological Tests, Psychological Theory, Internet, Principal Component Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review