Cited by 33Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Mindfulness and Young Adult Dating Relationship Stability: a Longitudinal Path Analysis

Khaddouma, Alexander, Gordon, Kristina Coop·2018·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-0901-8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Khaddouma, A., & Gordon, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Khaddouma, Alexander
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2018-02-20
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1529-1542
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2790663537
Cited by
33
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
relationship stability, romantic relationship dissolution, relationship satisfaction, trait mindfulness, mindfulness facets, acting with awareness, dyadic interdependence, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review