Cited by 3,414Psychological Testing and AssessmentPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory

Costa, Paul T., McCrae, Robert R.·1992·Psychological Assessment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,011

Metadata

Authors
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
1992-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
5-13
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2045883408
Cited by
3,414
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 130 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 215 · 2022: 195 · 2021: 221 · 2020: 195 · 2019: 201 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 131 · 2012: 129
FWCI
29.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
NEO Personality Inventory, personality assessment, normal personality, clinical practice, Big Five personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review