Cited by 830Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The Facilitated Processing of Threatening Faces: An ERP Analysis.

Open access
Schupp, Harald T., Öhman, Arne, Junghöfer, Markus, Weike, Almut I., Stockburger, Jessica, Hamm, Alfons O.·2004·Emotion

Abstract

Threatening, friendly, and neutral faces were presented to test the hypothesis of the facilitated perceptual processing of threatening faces. Dense sensor event-related brain potentials were measured while subjects viewed facial stimuli. Subjects had no explicit task for emotional categorization of the faces. Assessing early perceptual stimulus processing, threatening faces elicited an early posterior negativity compared with nonthreatening neutral or friendly expressions. Moreover, at later stages of stimulus processing, facial threat also elicited augmented late positive potentials relative to the other facial expressions, indicating the more elaborate perceptual analysis of these stimuli. Taken together, these data demonstrate the facilitated perceptual processing of threatening faces. Results are discussed within the context of an evolved module of fear (A. Ohman & S. Mineka, 2001).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Sematic Differen- tial. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psy- chiatry, 25, 49-59.
  2. Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face rec- ognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
  3. Johnsen, B. H., Thayer, J. F., & Hugdahl, K. (1995). Affec- tive judgment of the Ekman faces: A dimensional ap- proach. Journal of Psychophysiology, 9, 193-202.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schupp, H. T., Öhman, A., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O.
Affiliations
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2004
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
189-200
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2112722284
Cited by
830
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 41
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
threatening faces, event-related potentials, early posterior negativity, late positive potential, facial expressions, emotional face processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cues, Discrimination, Psychological, Evoked Potentials, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Occipital Lobe, Random Allocation, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review