Cited by 223Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStress Responses and CortisolHealth and Well-being Studies

The assessment and measurement of adult life stress: Basic premises, operational principles, and design requirements.

Harkness, Kate L., Monroe, Scott M.·2016·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Life stress is a central factor in the onset and course of a wide range of medical and psychiatric conditions. Determining the precise etiological and pathological consequences of stress, though, has been hindered by weaknesses in prevailing definitional and measurement practices. The purpose of the current paper is to evaluate the primary strategies for defining and measuring major and minor acute life events, chronic stressors, and daily hassles as informed by 3 basic scientific premises. The first premise concerns the manner in which stress is conceptualized and operationally defined, and specifically we assert that stress measures must not conflate the stress exposure with the stress response. The second premise concerns how stress exposures are measured, and we provide guidelines for optimizing standardized and sensitive indicators of life stress. The third premise addresses the consequences of variations in the procedures for life event measurement with regard to the validity of the research designs employed. We show that life stress measures are susceptible to several sources of bias, and if these potential sources of bias are not controlled in the design of the research, spurious findings may result. Our goal is to provide a useful guide for researchers who consider life stress to be an important factor in their theoretical models of disease, wish to incorporate measures of life stress in their research, and seek to avoid the common pitfalls of past measurement practices. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000178

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Adolescent STRAIN gives no guidance on interpreting items, so variability may increase because participants understand stressors differently.

    “Third, notwithstanding its considerable strengths (e.g., scalability, behaviorally-anchored probe questions, branching logic), the Adolescent STRAIN does not guide participants on how to interpret items, which could increase variability attributable to their idiosyncratic understanding of what constitutes a stressor (see Harkness and Monroe 2016).”

    From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Harkness and Monroe 2016

  • The Adolescent STRAIN uses predefined criteria to separate acute events from chronic difficulties, a strength relative to most other life stress measures.

    “An advantage of the Adolescent STRAIN compared to most other life stress assessment instruments is that it differentiates acute life events and chronic difficulties based on a priori criteria (see Harkness and Monroe 2016).”

    From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Harkness and Monroe 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harkness, K. L., & Monroe, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2016-07
Volume
125
Issue
5
Pages
727-745
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2418072186
Cited by
223
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4
FWCI
22.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2012-1536)
  • John Simon Guggenheim Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
life events, stress measurement, daily hassles, chronic stressors, measurement bias, stress symptoms, psychosocial stress
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Psychometrics, Research Design, Stress, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review