Cited by 18Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The meditation app revolution.

Open access
Creswell, J. David, Goldberg, Simon B.·2025·American Psychologist

Abstract

Smartphone-based meditation training has jumped onto the world stage, shifting how millions of people learn and practice meditation. This review examines the rapid proliferation of meditation apps and synthesizes current scientific findings on their usage patterns, efficacy, mechanisms of action, and safety. Though research lags well behind public adoption, recent randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses reveal that app-based meditation interventions produce modest but consistent reductions in depression and anxiety. Initial mechanistic studies further suggest that improvements in worry, repetitive negative thinking, and self-reported mindfulness skills may underpin these effects, alongside early findings on blood pressure reduction and pro-inflammatory gene expression. This review describes some of the similarities and differences between meditation apps and traditional, in-person mindfulness programs. Meditation apps often differ in the relative absence of interpersonal support, briefer practice sessions, lower sustained engagement rates, and greater opportunities for personalization and large-scale data capture. We discuss opportunities based on these issues, including hybrid models that combine app-based content with human support, just-in-time interventions, and advanced trial designs that harness app analytics. With thoughtful development and rigorous evaluation, meditation apps have potential to expand the reach of evidence-based meditation training, offering a unique platform for advancing translational research on meditative practices. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/amp0001576

Cites

63 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness-based interventions can help individuals focus on the present moment and reduce the cognitive hyperarousal that often accompanies sleep onset anxiety.

    “Mindfulness-based interventions can help individuals focus on the present moment and reduce the cognitive hyperarousal that often accompanies sleep onset anxiety [73,74].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Mechanisms section reports that app-based mindfulness meditation can reduce worry and repetitive negative thinking, while the Similarities section describes attention monitoring as a foundational skill. Those findings support the general idea of redirecting attention and easing anxious thought, but the paper does not establish that these interventions reduce cognitive hyperarousal specifically during sleep-onset anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Creswell JD, & Lindsay EK (2014). How does mindfulness training affect health? A mindfulness stress buffering account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 401– 407.
  2. Gavrilova L, & Zawadzki MJ (2023). Examining How Headspace Impacts Mindfulness Mechanisms Over an 8-Week App-Based Mindfulness Intervention. Mindfulness, 14(9), 2236– 2249.
  3. Khan N, Islam B, Albert J, McConnell P, Xu O, & Creswell JD (under review). Mindfulness meditation and respiration: Accelerometer-Based Respiration Rate and Mindfulness Progress Estimation to Enhance App Engagement and Mindfulness Skills.
  4. Manigault AW, Slutsky J, Raye J, & Creswell JD (2021). Examining Practice Effects in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Daily Life Mindfulness Practice Predicts Stress Buffering Effects of Mindfulness Meditation Training. Mindfulness, 12(10), 2487– 2497.
  5. Richmond LM (2024). Rejoyn: First App Cleared by FDA for Depression; Cost, Efficacy Unclear. Psychiatric News, 59(06), appi.pn.2024.06.6.15. 10.1176/appi.pn.2024.06.6.15 · DOI
  6. Segal Z, Williams M, & Teasdale J (2012). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creswell, J. D., & Goldberg, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
2025-08-07
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W4413040824
Cited by
18
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 2
FWCI
21.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01CA236860; R01DK128114, R24AT012845; K32AT010879)
  • Hope for Depression Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
meditation apps, smartphone-based intervention, mindfulness training, depression, anxiety, worry, repetitive negative thinking, mindfulness skills, blood pressure, inflammatory gene expression, app engagement, hybrid intervention, just-in-time interventions, app analytics, translational research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review