The DOI matches its Crossref record; 240 of the 241 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 46 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research.
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decade, the interpersonal theory of suicide has contributed to substantial advances in the scientific and clinical understanding of suicide and related conditions. The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that suicidal desire emerges when individuals experience intractable feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness and near-lethal or lethal suicidal behavior occurs in the presence of suicidal desire and capability for suicide. A growing number of studies have tested these posited pathways in various samples; however, these findings have yet to be evaluated meta-analytically. This paper aimed to (a) conduct a systematic review of the unpublished and published, peer-reviewed literature examining the relationship between interpersonal theory constructs and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, (b) conduct meta-analyses testing the interpersonal theory hypotheses, and (c) evaluate the influence of various moderators on these relationships. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched through the end of March, 2016: PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Hypothesis-driven meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted using 122 distinct unpublished and published samples. Findings supported the interpersonal theory: the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation; and the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 of 46 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide was significantly related to a greater number of prior suicide attempts”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternative configurations of theory variables were similarly useful for predicting suicide risk as theory-consistent pathways.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, effect sizes for these interactions were modest.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability for suicide was not related to suicide risk (r = 0.09, p = 0.083; k = 17; N = 6,760)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and suicide risk (r = 0.42, p < 0.001; k = 23; N = 9,002)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“40% of studies examining capability for suicide and suicide attempts reported significant results;”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability for suicide was significantly and weakly related to suicidal ideation (r = 0.10, p = 0.020; k = 29; N = 9,782)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post hoc, we noted that the magnitude of the relationship between perceived burdensomeness and suicide-related variables was greater than that between thwarted belongingness and suicide-related variables.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A review of the reported findings of the cross-sectional studies revealed the following: 54.3% of studies examining thwarted belongingness and suicidal thoughts and behaviors reported significant results;”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 66
- It may state two separate claims as one. 61
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Implicit measurement of suicide-related constructs (e.g., through reaction time-based tasks) may be an effective strategy to circumvent these concerns”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nock & Banaji, 2007 source
- Supportedcites Nock et al., 2010 source
The Abstract says people considering suicide are often unwilling to report their intentions and that implicit-cognition measures may help detect behaviors unlikely to be reported. It also describes the implicit association test used in the study. This supports the hedged claim that implicit measurement may help circumvent disclosure concerns. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With articles using redundant datasets treated as one sample, 122 samples (114 articles) were analyzed.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 122Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies were conducted in undergraduate students (44.0%) and community-dwelling adults (33.6%); 22.4% of studies examined clinical populations.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies primarily targeted young adults, with the average age of participants ranging from 18–25 years (48.3%), and adults over 25 years of age (48.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 143 samples, the majority was cross-sectional (92.3%), published between 2011 and 2015 (91.6%), and conducted in the U.S. and Canada (83.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 143Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military samples were used in 16.8% of the studies.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies primarily targeted young adults, with the average age of participants ranging from 18–25 years (48.3%), and adults over 25 years of age (48.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, post hoc two-tailed tests of differences between dependent correlations indicated that suicidal ideation (z = 26.26, p < 0.001), suicide risk (z = 10.19, p < 0.001), and suicide attempt history (z = 16.21, p < 0.001) all exhibited significantly stronger relationships with perceived burdensomeness than with thwarted belongingness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Approximately half were conducted using web-based methodologies (46.2%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On average, the percentage of males in the sample was less than half (mean = 44.6%) and the percentage of White/Caucasian participants was over half (mean = 63.4%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies were conducted in undergraduate students (44.0%) and community-dwelling adults (33.6%); 22.4% of studies examined clinical populations.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only four studies examined youth under the age of 18 years (2.8%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The INQ was not used in five samples and the ACSS was not used in three samples—these studies used proxies drawn from multiple measures (e.g., Christensen et al., 2013), the Perceived Burdensomeness Scale (Peak et al., 2016), and the Acquired Capability With Rehearsal for Suicide Scale (George et al., 2016).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 5Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, given that this manuscript’s senior author was a coauthor on 26 of the published articles (i.e., 21.3% of samples), we examined whether his authorship moderated our meta-analytic results (described in detail above) as another metric of potential bias.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Publication bias
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies were conducted in undergraduate students (44.0%) and community-dwelling adults (33.6%); 22.4% of studies examined clinical populations.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 143 samples, the majority was cross-sectional (92.3%), published between 2011 and 2015 (91.6%), and conducted in the U.S. and Canada (83.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 143Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On average, the percentage of males in the sample was less than half (mean = 44.6%) and the percentage of White/Caucasian participants was over half (mean = 63.4%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 54 models tested, 9 were conducted with fewer than 6 samples, and 8 were conducted with 6 to 8 samples.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Meta-analytic Models
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, sample sizes ranged from 30 to 6,133, with the majority ranging from 100–399 (59.4%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven samples completed a non-English-language version of the INQ and/or the ACSS; languages included Chinese, German, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 7Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This yielded a total of 143 samples (from 130 articles) with a total N of 59,698 (see Tables 3 to 12 for the n [sample size] and k [number of samples] in each model).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 143Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“of the 143 samples in this meta-analysis, published effect sizes were obtained from 10.5% of the samples (n = 15) and unpublished effect sizes were obtained from 89.5% of the samples (n = 128).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the I2 values remained significant (I2 > 96.7%), indicating that these moderators did not account for a substantial portion of variance.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“greater perceived burdensomeness and more severe suicidal ideation (r = 0.48), greater suicide risk (r = 0.42), and (continuous) suicide attempt history (r = 0.25)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trim and fill statistics and funnel plots could not be generated for two models (i.e., Table 8).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Funnel plot asymmetry was found in 44.4% of the models that tested the main hypotheses of the interpersonal theory (8 of 18 models), with a moderate number of missing studies (mean = 3.25, SD = 2.43, range = 1 to 8, mode = 2; Tables 6 and 7).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the interaction between the three theory constructs was significantly associated with a greater number of suicide attempts (measured continuously, and when continuous and dichotomous attempts were collapsed) and suicide risk, beyond main and two-way interaction effects; however, effect sizes were, again, small (rs = 0.06–0.11)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Impact factors were discernable for 120 of the included studies; the mean impact factor was 2.26 (SD = 1.13; range = 0.56–7.43).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Journal Impact Factors
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all three models, published effect sizes were larger than the unpublished effect sizes and meta-analyses based on the unpublished effect sizes yielded non-significant results”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater capability for suicide was significantly related to suicide attempts and ideation, albeit the effects were weak2 (rs = 0.09–0.10) and capability was not a significant correlate of suicide risk alone.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of note, in the main interpersonal theory models, the I2 values remained significant, suggesting that these moderators did not account for a substantial amount of variance in suicidal thoughts and behaviors.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Univariate analyses revealed significant weak-to-moderate positive relationships between (1) greater thwarted belongingness and more severe suicidal ideation (r = 0.37), greater suicide risk (r = 0.33), and (continuous) suicide attempt history (r = 0.11)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the Q-test was not significant (0.03) and the I2 value (< 0.001) indicated that variability may be due to chance rather than heterogeneity.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing Alternative Pathways Between the Interpersonal Theory Variables
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, for all these moderators, I2 values remained significant, suggesting that these moderators did not account for a large portion of variance.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No publication bias was indicated for the models testing the specific predictions of the interpersonal theory, including: (1) the effect of the interaction of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness on suicidal ideation, the full model (ET = 3.36 [95% CI = 1.36,5.36], p = 0.101) and the interaction (ET = 0.22 [95% CI = −1.19,1.62], p = 0.757); (2) the effect of the three-way”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for the meta-analysis testing the association between the interaction of thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness and capability for suicide and continuous attempt history (interaction only model; Table 7), the funnel plot was moderately asymmetrical, with trim and fill analysis indicating that 6 effect sizes below the mean were missing.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Publication status emerged as a significant moderator in three of the tested meta-analytic models—(1) the relationship between capability for suicide and (continuous) attempt history (b = 0.14, SE = 0.07; z = 2.07, r = 0.97, p = 0.038; I2 = 93.3%); (2) the effect of the interaction between capability for suicide and perceived burdensomeness on continuous and dichotomous suicide attempt history (b”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“only two versions of the ACSS have been validated and published (Ribeiro et al., 2014; Van Orden, Witte, Gordon, Bender, & Joiner, 2008); however, at least five versions of the ACSS were used to measure capability for suicide (4-, 5-, 7-, 13-, and 20-item versions).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ribeiro et al., 2014 source
- Not matchedcites Van Orden, Witte, Gordon, Bender, & Joiner, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whether the senior author of this paper was involved in a project generally did not moderate findings; this variable only emerged as a significant moderator in three (< 9%) of 34 tested models.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most of our models evidenced no effect of publication bias adjustments on general conclusions, supporting our findings’ robustness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Across included studies, thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness exhibited a weaker relationship with suicide ideation and risk in studies in military samples and samples with a greater percentage of males, as well as in studies that did not use web-based methodologies.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that the propositions of the interpersonal theory of suicide largely stand up to empirical scrutiny, these suicide risk correlates demonstrated only modest-at-best clinical significance”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Franklin et al., 2017 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“results suggested that publication bias likely occurred in those testing the (1) relationship between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, (2) interaction effect of capability for suicide and perceived burdensomeness on (continuous) attempt history; (3) interaction effect between capability for suicide and thwarted belongingness on suicide risk; and (4) three-way interaction effect”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the I2 value remained significant for each of the models in which the moderator was significant, suggesting that the moderation effect did not account for a significant amount of variance in our outcome variable, and any significant effect observed may have been due to Type I error.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The theory was designed to explain the occurrence of lethal or near-lethal suicidal behaviors, but the extant literature has overwhelmingly neglected to test this hypothesis.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant moderators emerged in some of the tested models; however, overall, I2 values remained significant, suggesting that these factors do not account for a substantial amount of variance in suicidal outcomes.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the literature has primarily focused on the experience of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness broadly, rather than their perceived intractability.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our review revealed few prospective studies (6.9%), with most studies (93.1%) employing a cross-sectional study design.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“theory-consistent effects outpaced those of alternative pathways in some instances, though the differences were small.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the two-way interaction between perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness was an even stronger predictor of continuous suicide attempts (r = 0.20) and of both dichotomous and continuous attempts when collapsed (r = 0.09).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In two of the three cases, effects were stronger in studies including this author, and in the last case, the meta-analytic effect was weaker with the author’s inclusion.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“five versions of the INQ (10-, 12-, 15-, 18-, and 25-item versions) were utilized to measure thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our review revealed several gaps in the literature that require further empirical investigation.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Conclusions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, keywords were entered into four electronic databases: PubMed, Medline (Proquest), PsycINFO, and Web of Science.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Search for Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded studies that assessed the interpersonal theory constructs using single-item proxies.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Excluded Studies
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies that used translated versions of the INQ/ACSS and/or newly developed measures assessing the interpersonal theory constructs with evidence for the construct validity of these measures (e.g., at least a moderate correlation with the INQ, r > 0.40) were all included.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Inclusion Criteria
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each article was independently coded by two different authors.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For each of the remaining 153 references, two authors independently read each full-text manuscript to assess whether it met criteria for inclusion.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three authors (CC, IAH, MAH) independently conducted an initial screening of the titles and abstracts for all identified studies to determine their relevance to this study”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disagreements were resolved through discussion and consultation with a separate author (RPT).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we attempted to contact 75 authors of 123 studies (many were authors of multiple studies) that did not report effect sizes between the interpersonal theory and suicide-related constructs”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, 24 individuals with documented suicide research experience and who have previously published data regarding theoretical models of suicidal behavior were contacted to determine if any studies were missed by our searches.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Search for Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 24Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Agreement between the three raters regarding study inclusion was good (κ = 0.77).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We also manually searched the reference lists of relevant manuscripts, including the recent systematic review of the interpersonal theory (Ma et al., 2016).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Search for Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ma et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inter-rater reliability for the entering of study descriptive statistics and effect sizes across these articles was good to excellent (κ = 0.83–0.99).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“however, the ACSS has been primarily administered in English.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a random effects model, a study is weighted based on its own population, not sample size, providing a more balanced assignment of weights (Borenstein, Hedges & Rothstein, 2007).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Borenstein, Hedges & Rothstein, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We examined the significance of the chi-square Q statistic to determine whether there was substantial heterogeneity of effect sizes; a significant Q-value rejects the null that studies are homogeneous and indicates the presence of substantial heterogeneity.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, caution is warranted when interpreting findings based on relatively few samples.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Meta-analytic Models
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all included samples, Pearson’s correlations (r) and/or regression R-squared (R2) values were reported in the manuscript or we requested the raw data from the authors and calculated the necessary effect sizes directly.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Meta-Analytic Approach
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Suicide risk (c.f. suicide proneness) was evaluated using measures that assess both suicidal ideation and behavior and do not distinguish between these outcomes, a limitation that we discuss in the Discussion.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter two pathways reverse the interpersonal theory’s two main predictions, in that the interaction between perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness is expected by the theory to predict ideation more so than attempts, whereas the interaction between perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and capability is posited to predict attempts more so than ideation.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Meta-Analytic Approach
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the INQ remains the mostly commonly utilized measure of these constructs and has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including convergent validity (Van Orden et al., 2008).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Van Orden et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the full dataset was unavailable, we used the effect sizes from the study with the largest sample size to diminish redundancy.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The INQ was created and validated as an English-language measure; however, several groups have translated the INQ into other languages, including Spanish (Garza & Pettit, 2010), German (Forkmann & Glaesmer, 2013; Hallensleben et al., 2016), Chinese (Zhang et al., 2013), French (Baertschi et al., 2017; Siefert-Boukaidi, Jover, Staccini, Pringuey, & Benoit, 2013), Portuguese (Campos & Holden, 2015),”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the interpersonal theory includes a prediction about the perceived intractability of feelings of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, the INQ does not directly assess hopelessness about these feelings.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Hopelessness
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, both published and unpublished data were included.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Inclusion Criteria
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not all samples included all the interpersonal theory variables and/or multiple suicide-related variables (i.e., ideation, risk, attempts); thus, sample sizes varied for each meta-analytic model.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To our knowledge, only one study has created a new measure of interpersonal needs; however, this measure only assesses perceived burdensomeness (Perceived Burdensomeness Scale; Peak et al., 2016).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peak et al., 2016 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, according to the theory, capability is only relevant to (lethal) behavior in the context of suicidal desire variables.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An important point is that the theory is silent regarding these alternative pathways (H5, H6, H8, H9), though it is reasonable to expect that the pathways specifically predicted by the theory may be more supported than the alternative pathways, at least somewhat.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Meta-Analytic Approach
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability for suicide was assessed primarily using the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although the Q-value provides evidence that the true (between) effects vary, it does not evaluate the degree of between-study dispersion (Borenstein et al., 2007); thus, we also evaluated the I-squared (I2) index.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Borenstein et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That the three-way interaction did not correlate with dichotomous suicide attempt history may reflect diminished outcome variance and power to detect significant effects.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although moderate effect sizes were generally observed for the full models, the interaction effect sizes (exclusive of lower-order variables) were relatively weak, ranging from small to moderate.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these findings are largely consistent with the theory, revealing expected significant associations between interpersonal theory constructs and suicide-related outcomes.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This dearth of studies is understandable—suicide is a low base-rate event and amassing datasets of the psychological states of suicide decedents represents a considerable challenge.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings signal that, on average, studies were published in journals for which articles published in the past two years were cited an average of 2.26 times, demonstrating a degree of impact on subsequent research.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Journal Impact Factors
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these results do not necessarily imply that the theory is incorrect or incapable of predicting suicide deaths.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In two separate meta-analyses, the odds ratios for most risk and protective factors ranged from 1.0 to 2.5 (i.e., rs ~ 0.26–0.57; Franklin et al., 2017) and few exceeded 3.0 (r ~ 0.64; Large et al., 2011).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we were unable to reach all authors (i.e., 66 of 73 contacted authors responded with relevant data) and we did not obtain unpublished data from other sources. As such, publication bias is possible.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we were unable to reach the authors of 8.13% of the studies requiring additional data, which may have influenced the accuracy of our findings.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is unclear which version of the INQ offers the greatest utility, particularly among high-risk samples.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reduction of thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide may reduce likelihood for death by suicide, but the use of these constructs as the sole clinical predictors of suicide is not currently supported by empirical data.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“individuals may still be reluctant to disclose this sensitive information due to stigma concerns”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anestis & Green, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Corrigan & Watson, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hom, Stanley, Podlogar, & Joiner, 2017b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the inclusion of theory constructs in these predictive algorithms may enhance their accuracy, but cannot yet be solely relied upon.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“only studies published in English were included in our review, and perhaps, as a result, the vast majority of included studies were conducted in the U.S. Thus, included studies demonstrated a strong North American bias, reducing generalizability to other regions and cultures.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“utilized a conservative data analytic approach (Borenstein et al., 2007)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Borenstein et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the relative dearth of studies establishing these measures’ factor structures across populations is concerning and prevents discernment of what may account for observed study findings.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we vigorously pursued study authors to obtain data not reported within their manuscripts”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“each bivariate correlation included in our meta-analysis was double-entered prior to analysis to reduce data entry errors.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the majority of the included effect sizes were unpublished, which mitigates these concerns, we were nonetheless unable to determine the extent to which publication bias influenced the accuracy of our results.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings suggest that individually, perceived burdensomeness may be a more important contributor to suicidal behavior; however, in the context of capability for suicide, thwarted belongingness may play a greater role.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the weaker association between thwarted belongingness and suicide risk in military samples may also reflect an underreporting of suicidal symptoms”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anestis & Green, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Ribeiro et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we employed a rigorous and thorough search strategy to identify relevant peer-reviewed papers”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though the interpersonal theory may illuminate which individuals are likely to die by suicide, the theory is less specific regarding when such self-harm may occur.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this review adjusted for the use of different measures of suicide ideation and attempts and incorporated studies using a non-specific suicide measure (i.e., assessing suicide risk).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the lack of significant moderation effects may have been due to the restricted range of effect sizes and insufficient power given the heterogeneity of study settings”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ma et al., [2016]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the relatively small effect sizes yielded by this meta-analysis may be due to imprecise testing of the theory’s propositions.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our results may not represent other populations of interest, particularly individuals at elevated risk for suicide death.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“individuals may be more willing to report their feelings of social isolation or perception of being a burden than suicidal ideation”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Podlogar et al., 2015 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“capability for suicide likely has a genetic component”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Smith et al., 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“due to heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis may have produced underinflated effects.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The constructs of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are unidimensional and multifaceted.
“Each of these constructs is conceptualized as unidimensional and multifaceted.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The INQ does not measure hopelessness about perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness.
“which does not measure hopelessness about perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness”
The paper relies on this without support.
Suicide attempt history is often not normally distributed, especially in community samples.
“Suicide attempt history is often not normally distributed, especially in community samples.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are multifaceted, and the INQ captures only one facet of each.
“thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are multifaceted and the INQ only captures one facet of each.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Online protocols provide participants with greater privacy.
“online protocols may provide participants with greater privacy”
The paper relies on this without support.
Suicide risk measures such as the SBQ-R do not distinguish between suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors.
“suicide risk measures (e.g., SBQ-R) do not delineate between suicidal ideation and behaviors”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Conversely, feeling a burden [51], having little or no social support [52] and depleted resilience [53] will each increase the likelihood that entrapment will be translated into suicidal ideation/intent”
From The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This theory is supported by several empirical studies linking thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness to greater suicide risk (for a systematic review and meta-analysis, see Chu et al., 2017). Notably, however, these studies yielded small-to-moderate effects (Chu et al., 2017; Joiner et al., 2009).”
From Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks (2023) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses of two important theoretical models, the Interpersonal Theory of Suicidal Behavior (19) and the Integrative Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behavior (20, 21), show results that are consistent with the theories. The effects are, however, comparatively small (22, 23) and do not exceed the predictive power found in the other meta-analyses described above.”
From Suicide risk assessment: clinical implications of the unpredictability of suicidal behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the IMV model proposes that the components of the acquired capability for suicide (fearlessness about death and increased physical pain tolerance [12,51]) are VMs”
From The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“A recent metaanalysis yielded clear support for the perceived burdensomeness -suicidal thoughts relationship whereas the evidence for thwarted belongingness was less strong (Chu et al., 2017).”
From Exploring the psychology of suicidal ideation: a theory driven network analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“in many studies, moderation e ff ects are often much smaller then pairwise e ff ects (Chu et al., 2017; Haslbeck, Borsboom, & Waldorp, 2018).”
From Exploring the psychology of suicidal ideation: a theory driven network analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Although measures of acquired capability were only weakly associated with suicide attempt history in a recent meta-analysis (Chu et al., 2017)”
From From ideation to action: Differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults (2018) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“a construct that the interpersonal theory of suicide theorizes develops in part through exposure to painful and provocative experiences and is necessary but not sufficient for suicidal behaviors (Chu et al., 2017; Van Orden et al., 2010)”
From Occupational stress and suicidality among firefighters: Examining the buffering role of distress tolerance (2018) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Among leading suicide theories, the ITS has received the most empirical attention (and, by extension, support; see Chu et al. 2017)”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Chu et al. 2017
In the citing paper
“The most frequently measured predictor variables included contextual factors (incl. location, activity, social company), affect, and constructs from the Interpersonal Psychological Theory of Suicide [IPTS: hopelessness, burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness (91)]. Protective factors, such as coping and social support, were less frequently assessed.”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“While this seems surprising, it is consistent with other studies [9,10].”
From The association of trait impulsivity and suicidal ideation and its fluctuation in the context of the interpersonal theory of suicide (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Existing research indicates that worry is one of the core repetitive negative thinking (RNT) patterns in psychiatric disorders connected to suicide [ 84 ], which links to suicidal ideation and attempts (i.e., feeling hopeless, burdensome) [ 85 ].”
From Anxiety and Depression Symptoms among Youth Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Network Analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentz = 26.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 26.26, p < .001”
- Consistentz = 10.19reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 10.19, p < .001”
- Consistentz = 16.21reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 16.21, p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Claim of no moderators conflicts with reported moderator result
MajorThe Discussion says no significant moderators were found for models testing the main hypotheses. Results nevertheless report a significant sex-composition moderator for the model relating the two-way interaction to suicidal ideation.
“That we did not find any significant moderators for the models testing the theory’s main hypotheses suggests that the theory is robust to variations in study population and characteristics.”
“The full model testing the relationship between the interaction of thwarted belongingness with perceived burdensomeness and suicidal ideation was significantly stronger in samples with a smaller percentage of males (b = −0.002, SE = 0.0009; z = −2.65, r = −0.99, p = 0.008; I2 = 89.8%).”
An Egger-test confidence interval conflicts with its nonsignificant p-value
MajorThe reported 95% confidence interval for this test excludes zero, but its reported two-sided p-value is 0.101. The text uses that p-value to classify the theory-hypothesis model as showing no publication bias.
“full model (ET = 3.36 [95% CI = 1.36,5.36], p = 0.101)”
“No publication bias was indicated for the models testing the specific predictions of the interpersonal theory”
Study-selection flowchart is assigned two figure numbers
MinorThe study-selection flowchart is identified as Figure 1 in Results but as Figure 2 in Methods.
“A flowchart describing the study inclusion selection process is presented in Figure 1.”
“Figure 2 depicts the study selection process.”
Impact-factor moderator coefficient and standard error do not yield its z-value
MinorDividing the reported coefficient by its standard error gives 25, not the stated z-value of 2.03. Rounding at the printed precision cannot account for that gap.
Reported 2.03 · recomputed 25
“b = 0.05, SE = 0.002; z = 2.03, r = 0.97, p = 0.042, I2 = 84.4%”
Cross-sectional study share changes between sections
MinorThe Results report that 92.3% of samples were cross-sectional, while the Discussion gives 93.1% for the same study design.
“Of the 143 samples, the majority was cross-sectional (92.3%)”
“Our review revealed few prospective studies (6.9%), with most studies (93.1%) employing a cross-sectional study design.”
Discussion overlooks a significant hopelessness interaction
MinorThe Discussion says the proxy-hopelessness approach produced no significant effects, but Results report a significant association with suicidal ideation for that interaction.
“However, our meta-analytic findings suggest this approach did not yield significant effects—albeit here too, we were underpowered.”
“The interaction between perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and hopelessness accounted for a significant amount of the variance in suicidal ideation (r = 0.15, p = 0.014; k = 3; N = 740)”
Final article count does not follow the reported exclusions
MinorThe selection account identifies 153 remaining references and 17 subsequent exclusions. That leaves 136 references, not the reported 130 articles; no further six exclusions are stated.
Reported 130 · recomputed 136
“an additional 17 were excluded after the entire article was coded and we were unable to obtain missing data. This yielded a total of 143 samples (from 130 articles)”
The review says both that every study used the INQ and that some did not
MinorThe discussion says all included studies used the INQ, but the results identify five samples that did not.
“Rather, all studies included in this review utilized the INQ, which does not measure hopelessness about perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness.”
“The INQ was not used in five samples and the ACSS was not used in three samples”
The study-selection account assigns different roles to the same 382 reports
MinorThe methods say 382 reports remained after the initial title-and-abstract screening. The results instead say 382 were screened and 229 were excluded at that stage.
“This process resulted in 382 potentially relevant reports.”
“A total of 382 titles and abstracts were examined; 229 were excluded after reviewing the title and abstract”
The discussion overlooks reported moderators of main-hypothesis models
MinorThe results identify significant moderators for the two-way ideation model and the three-way attempt model. The discussion nevertheless says no significant moderators were found for models testing the main hypotheses.
“That we did not find any significant moderators for the models testing the theory’s main hypotheses suggests that the theory is robust to variations in study population and characteristics.”
“Beyond lower-order factors, the interaction effect was stronger among samples with a lower proportion of White/Caucasian participants (b = −0.001, SE = 0.0005; z = −2.39, r = −0.98, p = 0.017; I2 = 72.3%) and studies using non-English-language measures of the interpersonal theory variables (b = 0.10, SE = 0.05; z = 2.21, r = 0.98, p = 0.027, I2 = 73.0%).”
A reported moderator z-score does not match its coefficient and standard error
MinorDividing the reported coefficient by its standard error gives 25, not 2.03. Rounding at the displayed precision cannot explain the difference.
Reported 2.03 · recomputed 25
“b = 0.05, SE = 0.002; z = 2.03, r = 0.97, p = 0.042”
The printed heterogeneity formula disagrees with the reported result
MinorApplied as printed, the I2 formula cannot produce the reported 97.3% from Q = 3515.1 and 97 studies. That result requires subtracting the degrees of freedom from Q before dividing by Q.
“I2 = (Q − df/Q) * 100”
“the Q-test was significant (3515.1), and the I2 value (97.3%) indicated that a large degree of variability was due to heterogeneity rather than chance.”
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245 · cited 1×
“Humans have a fundamental need to belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) that, when unmet, leads to a range of negative health outcomes (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased…”
BackgroundLovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523 · cited 1×
“…Mendelson, Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961), Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001), or Depression subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995).”
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t00742-000 · Cited by 7,535
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 241 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,221
Shim, E., Lee, S. H., Kim, N. J., Kim, E. S., Bang, J. H., Sohn, B. K., Park, H. Y., Son, K., Hwang, H., Lee, K.-M., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-018-9749-5 · Cited by 14
Perceived burdensomeness, bullying, and suicidal ideation in suicidal military personnel
Crowell‐Williamson, G. A., Fruhbauerova, M., DeCou, C. R., & Comtois, K. A. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22836 · Cited by 17
Janackovski, A., Deane, F. P., & Hains, A. R. (2020) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2536 · Cited by 18
Preadolescent Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: An Intensive Longitudinal Study of Risk Factors
Thompson, R. J., Whalen, D. J., Gilbert, K., Tillman, R., Hennefield, L., Donohue, M. R., Hoyniak, C. P., Barch, D. M., & Luby, J. L. (2024) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2024.03.018 · Cited by 14
“Meta-analytic evidence indicates that both constructs are signi fi cantly associated with adult suicidal ideation, 16 and individual studies demonstrate similar associations in adolescents 29 ; however, their relevance in preadolescents is unexplored.”
Cross-sectional Study of Factors Associated With Suicide Ideation in Ontario Adolescents
Rakoff, J., Chavarria, J., Hamilton, H. A., & Elton‐Marshall, T. (2022) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437221111364 · Cited by 16
“The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide(4) attempts to explain suicide etiology and has garnered empirical support.(5) The theory hypothesizes that perceived burdensomeness (i.”
BackgroundKarnick, A. T., Fergerson, A. K., Caulfield, N. M., Buerke, M. L., Albanese, B. J., Schmidt, N. B., & Capron, D. W. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.050 · Cited by 14
Mournet, A. M., Kellerman, J. K., Yeager, A. L., Rosen, R. L., Kim, J. S., & Kleiman, E. M. (2022) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12911 · Cited by 14
“The relevance of perceived burdensomeness in the current results is consistent with prior research that has shown perceived burdensomeness to be a more robust predictor of suicidal ideation compared with thwarted belongingness (Chu et al., 2017; Hallensleben et al., 2019).”
ResultSeijo, D., Vázquez, M. J., Pérez, M. N., & Rivera, F. F. (2023) · Educación XX1 · doi:10.5944/educxx1.31818 · Cited by 16
Sims, M. A., Menzies, R. E., & Menzies, R. G. (2023) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2023.2179686 · Cited by 15
“In another systematic and meta-analytic review, the capability for suicide was found to be significantly related (albeit weakly) to suicidal ideation and suicide attempts (Chu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-hate, dissociation, and suicidal behavior in bulimia nervosa
Lieberman, A. J., Robison, M., Wonderlich, S. A., Crosby, R. D., Mitchell, J. E., Crow, S. J., Peterson, C. B., Grange, D. L., Bardone‐Cone, A. M., Kolden, G. G., et al. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.015 · Cited by 14
Self-citationMoseley, R. L., Gregory, N. J., Smith, P. L., Allison, C. L., Cassidy, S., & Baron‐Cohen, S. (2023) · Autism in Adulthood · doi:10.1089/aut.2022.0042 · Cited by 22
“To date, the dominant paradigm in suicidology is the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (ITS), 23–25 which holds that suicide ideation and suicide attempts are distinct phenomena dependent on specific proximal risk factors.”
Silver, J. K., Fleming, T. K., Ellinas, E. H., et al. (2024) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.13152 · Cited by 14
“18 The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that thwarted belongingness and the perception that one is a burden to others contributes to ideation, attempts, and mortality.”
Ward, M. D., Briggs, R., & Kenny, R. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1436218 · Cited by 18
“These findings provide support for the interpersonal theory of suicide, first proposed by Joiner (21, 22) and further developed by Van Orden et al. (6), which states that the WTD is a response to thwarted belongingness (unmet need for social connectedness) and perceived burdensomeness (on others).”
ResultSchulte-Frankenfeld, P. M., Breedvelt, J., Brouwer, M. E., van der Spek, N., Bosmans, G., & Bockting, C. (2024) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.13717 · Cited by 18
“Increasing attention has recently been paid to the role that early childhood interper sonal and relational factors might play in the development and trajectory of mental health problems and suicidal thoughts and behaviors (Chu et al., 2017; Franzoi et al., 2024; Van Orden et al., 2010).”
Moyano, N., Vélez, K., Arias, A., & Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D. M. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00757-6 · Cited by 17
Mental health distress in homebound older adults: Importance of the aging network
Fullen, M. C., Shannonhouse, L., Mize, M. C., & Miskis, C. (2020) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2020.1758920 · Cited by 15
“Chu et al. (2017) described ten studies in which the IPTS and related variables were applied to older adult samples.”
BackgroundInfluentialMartin, C. E., Pukay‐Martin, N. D., Blain, R. C., Dutton, C. E., & Chard, K. M. (2020) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22540 · Cited by 16
Brochu, P., Veillette, L. A. S., Serrano, J., & Seidl, M. L. (2020) · Stigma and Health · doi:10.1037/sah0000264 · Cited by 13
Suicide among LGBTQIA+ youth: A review of the treatment literature
Russon, J., Washington, R., Machado, A., Smithee, L. C., & Dellinger, J. (2021) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2021.101578 · Cited by 21
Levi‐Belz, Y. (2021) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2021.1958791 · Cited by 14
“The ITS posits that these two interpersonal dimensions comprise the fundamental causal interactive risk vs. resilience factors for distress (Chu et al., 2017; Van Orden et al., 2010).”
BackgroundChung, M., Forstner, A. J., Mücke, M., Geiser, F., Schumacher, J., & Conrad, R. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.11.017 · Cited by 14
Williams, D. Y., Hall, W. J., Dawes, H. C., Rizo, C. F., & Goldbach, J. T. (2022) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc12060170 · Cited by 15
Elledge, D. K., Zullo, L., Kennard, B. D., Diederich, A., Emslie, G. J., & Stewart, S. M. (2019) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2019.1661896 · Cited by 16
Repeated Police Mental Health Act Detentions in England and Wales: Trauma and Recurrent Suicidality
Warrington, C. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16234786 · Cited by 14
Ordóñez-Carrasco, J. L., Sánchez‐Castelló, M., Calandre, E. P., Cuadrado, I., & Tejada, A. J. R. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18010209 · Cited by 15
“This result is in line with the growing empirical evidence that perceived burdensomeness is more related to suicidal ideation than thwarted belongingness [70,71].”
Resultde Rozario, M. R., van Velzen, L. S., Davies, P., Rice, S., Davey, C. G., Robinson, J., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Allott, K., McKechnie, B., Felmingham, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100114 · Cited by 15
The temporal dynamics of the wish to live and the wish to die among suicidal individuals
Bryan, C. J. (2020) · Alternatives to Suicide · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814297-4.00004-2 · Cited by 13
Suicide and self-harm in older adults
Connors, M. H., Draper, B., Wand, A. P. F., Leo, D. D., & Reppermund, S. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00454-w · Cited by 17
“Risk factors relating to both constructs also increase in old age, which could account for the corresponding increases in suicide rates 155 .”
Shim, Y., Choe, K., Kim, K., Kim, J., & Ha, J. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12757 · Cited by 17
Patients with first versus multiple episodes of self-harm: how do their profiles differ?
Golay, P., Ostertag, L., Costanza, A., der Vaeren, B. V., Dorogi, Y., Saillant, S., & Michaud, L. (2021) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-021-00351-5 · Cited by 13
“Furthermore, low social support is related to loneliness, which can increase interpersonal difficulties—both with relatives and with health care providers—in a vicious circle, and perceived burdensomeness—a risk factor for suicidal behavior [35, 36]—prevents repeaters from reporting their feelings and seeking help fro…”
BackgroundDeveloping a competency framework for managers to address suicide risk in the workplace
O’Brien, S., Galavan, E., & O’Shea, D. E. (2021) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.21437 · Cited by 18
“A meta-analysis confirmed the interaction between perceived burdensomeness and thwarted connectedness simultaneously in developing suicidal desire, as well as the three-way interaction including capability (Chu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundOrtiz, S. N., Aggarwal, P., Jain, A. T., Singh, N. P., George, T. S., Smith, A. R., & Raval, V. V. (2022) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2022.2110026 · Cited by 18
“These findings align with Chu and colleagues ’ (Chu et al., 2017) meta-analysis of IPTS research over the past decade.”
ResultWitnessing cyberbullying and suicidal ideation among middle school students
Doumas, D. M., & Midgett, A. (2022) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22823 · Cited by 16
Silva, C., Smith, P. N., Rogers, M. L., Joiner, T. E., Foote, B., & Orden, K. A. V. (2023) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000898 · Cited by 13
Self-citationHu, C., Jiang, W., Huang, J., Lin, J., Huang, J., Wang, M., Xie, J. M., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1228260 · Cited by 12
Vélez-Grau, C., Mcternan, M., Mufson, L., & Lindsey, M. A. (2023) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour · doi:10.1111/sltb.13003 · Cited by 18
King, C. A., Brent, D. A., Grupp‐Phelan, J., Page, K., Czyz, E. K., McGuire, T. C., Mahabee‐Gittens, E. M., Block, L., & Casper, T. C. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2024.2330068 · Cited by 13
“…suggests that perceived burdensomeness (PB) may be more important than thwarted belongingness (TB) to our understanding of suicide risk (e.g., Chu et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2016), although findings have been mixed (e.g., Czyz et al., 2015) and few prospective studies have examined these…”
InfluentialSuicide ideation and male-female differences in major depressive disorder
Olgiati, P., Pecorino, B., & Serretti, A. (2024) · International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1080/13651501.2024.2335950 · Cited by 14
“…means of a clinical scale for depression and not using specific scales; other suicidal variables (e.g., thwarted belongingness; burdensomeness etc) (chu et al., 2017) were not investigated. another caveat involved the assessment of mixed features: in fact, the asRM scale used in this study did not…”
MethodErtem, H. Y. (2024) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-024-02195-6 · Cited by 14
Suicide Risk Evaluations and Suicide in the Veterans Health Administration
Saulnier, K. G., Bagge, C. L., Ganoczy, D. A., Bahraini, N. H., Jagusch, J., Hosanagar, A., Ilgen, M. A., & Pfeiffer, P. N. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61559 · Cited by 14
Quality of life, depression, and psychosocial mechanisms of suicide risk in prostate cancer
Tripp, D. A., Mihajlovic, V., Fretz, K. M., Fervaha, G., Izard, J., Corby, R., & Siemens, D. R. (2019) · Canadian Urological Association Journal · doi:10.5489/cuaj.6310 · Cited by 16
Schafer, K. M., Kennedy, G. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2020) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2020.1859031 · Cited by 14
“A recent meta-analysis (Chu et al., 2017) indicated that IPTS constructs, including interactions, were significant but moderate predictors of suicidal ideation.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationKolnogorova, K., Allan, N. P., Moradi, S., & Stecker, T. A. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.079 · Cited by 12
Madjar, N., Daka, D., Zalsman, G., & Shoval, G. (2021) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034321998741 · Cited by 24
“Thoughts about suicide in the last two weeks were evaluated using three items of Paykel Suicide Scale (Meneese et al., 1992; Paykel et al., 1974) (e.g., “In the last two weeks, have you felt life not worth living”).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSuicide ideation among Southern U.S. Sexual minority college students
Wolford‐Clevenger, C., Frantell, K. A., Brem, M. J., Garner, A. R., Florimbio, A. R., Grigorian, H. L., Shorey, R. C., & Stuart, G. L. (2018) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2018.1531088 · Cited by 15
“…building evidence that perceived burdensomeness may be a more salient correlate of suicide ideation than thwarted belongingness (Baams et al., 2015; Cero, Zuromski, Witte, Ribeiro, & Joiner, 2015; Chu et al., 2017; Hill & Pettit, 2012; Kim & Yang, 2015; Silva et al., 2015; Woodward et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSuicide and Types of Agriculture: A Time‐Series Analysis in Japan
Kanamori, M., & Kondo, N. (2019) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12559 · Cited by 17
“…theory of suicide by Joiner, repeated exposure to physically painful and/or fear-inducing might appear in habituation and a sense of fearlessness to the death and produce capability for suicide, possibly causing suicidal behavior (Chu et al., 2017; Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-Contempt as a Predictor of Suicidality
Rüsch, N., Oexle, N., Thornicroft, G., Keller, J., Waller, C., Germann, I., Regelmann, C. A., Noll‐Hussong, M., & Zahn, R. (2019) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001079 · Cited by 13
“Conceptually and consistent with the interpersonal theory of suicide, negative emotions about oneself lead to perceived burdensomeness and a reduced sense of belongingness, which in turn increase hopelessness and suicidality (Chu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundResultBlais, R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22939 · Cited by 10
“Unfortunately, poor interpersonal functioning is considered a key risk factor for suicide (e.g., see review, Chu et al., 2017; Joiner, 2005; Till, Tran, & Niederkrotenthaler, 2017).”
BackgroundArrest History and Psychopathology Among Veterans at Risk for Suicide
Edwards, E. R., Gromatsky, M. A., Sissoko, D. R. G., Hazlett, E., Sullivan, S. R., Geraci, J. C., & Goodman, M. (2020) · Psychological services · doi:10.1037/ser0000454 · Cited by 9
Chalker, S. A., Parrish, E. M., Cano, M., Kelsven, S., Moore, R. C., Granholm, E. L., Pinkham, A. E., Harvey, P. D., & Depp, C. A. (2021) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000001462 · Cited by 13
“The IPTS is a commonly cited psychological theory that posits that perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, acquired capability for suicide, and hopelessness converge to foster a lethal SA (Chu et al., 2017; Van Orden et al., 2010).”
BackgroundJin, Y., Kieslich, K., Hall, A., & Pitman, A. (2025) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2025.2489159 · Cited by 14
“There is evidence to support these pathways in young adult samples, but not all were representative (Chu et al., 2017; Joiner et al., 2009).”
Etherson, M. E., Lee, S., Loney, K. J., Steward, I. P., Ward, J., McClelland, H., Kandola, A. A., Mendes, J. A. D. A., Hollis, C. P., Townsend, E., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0326381 · Cited by 15
Aggarwal, P., Ortiz, S. N., Jain, A. T., Velkoff, E. A., George, T. S., Smith, A. R., & Raval, V. V. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12809 · Cited by 13
Wyk, J. A. V. (2021) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211055080 · Cited by 12
“Capability for suicide combines reduced fear of death and physical pain tolerance, often collectively referred to as acquired capability (Chu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundOlgiati, P., & Serretti, A. (2023) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/yic.0000000000000479 · Cited by 12
“, 2018), thwarted belongingness and burdensomeness (Chu et al., 2017).”
Ren, Y., Cui, S., Cui, T., Tang, C., Song, J., Jackson, T., & He, J. (2024) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2024.2310140 · Cited by 16
“Empirically, a cross-national meta-analysis of IPTS studies (Chu et al., 2017) found that thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness had small-to-medium-sized associations with suicidal ideation and attempts.”
Smith, A. R., Forrest, L. N., Kinkel‐Ram, S. S., Grunewald, W., Tubman, S. D., Esche, A., & Levinson, C. A. (2024) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291724000734 · Cited by 12
“Perceived burdensomeness has emerged as a robust predictor of suicidal ideation, and our results support past meta-analytic findings (Chu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundResultQuashigah, S., & Amuzu, J. (2024) · Management Research Quarterly · doi:10.63029/8x367t04 · Cited by 12
Short, N. A., Boffa, J. W., Raudales, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.041 · Cited by 12
Fong, T. C. T., Cheng, Q., & YIP, P. S. F. (2021) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-021-02203-9 · Cited by 12
“According to the ideation-to-action framework [11], such a transition to the High-risk class could contribute to subsequent progression toward suicidal behaviors [13] when combined with an individual’s capability for suicide [10].”
BackgroundForrest, L. N., Velkoff, E. A., Johnson, C. J., Luebbe, A. M., & Smith, A. R. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.074 · Cited by 11
Stecz, P., Slezáčková, A., Millová, K., & Nowakowska‐Domagała, K. (2019) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00163-1 · Cited by 12
Lapidos, A., Abraham, K. M., Jagusch, J., Garlick, J., Walters, H., Kim, H. M., Vega, E., Damschroder, L. J., Forman, J. H., Ahmedani, B. K., et al. (2019) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2019.105850 · Cited by 14
“While studies have not consistently replicated the theorized interactions between domains, the independent effects of the ITS domains have been found to be associated with suicide outcomes, thereby supporting the use of these constructs as intervention targets [15].”
ResultGallyer, A. J., Chu, C., Klein, K. M., Quintana, J., Carlton, C. N., Dougherty, S. P., & Joiner, T. E. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22994 · Cited by 13
Self-citationOrdóñez-Carrasco, J. L., Cuadrado, I., & Tejada, A. J. R. (2020) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2020.1783031 · Cited by 12
“meta-analysis (Chu et al., 2017) generally found sup-”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAmini‐Tehrani, M., Sadeghi, R., Nasiri, M., Jalali, T., & Zamanian, H. (2020) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2507 · Cited by 12
Lai, C. C. W., & Boag, S. (2021) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.436 · Cited by 14
Suicidality in childhood abuse survivors – the contribution of identification with the aggressor
Lahav, Y. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.138 · Cited by 12
Mapping the complexity of suicide by combining participatory modeling and network science
Giabbanelli, P. J., Galgoczy, M. C., Nguyen, D. M., et al. (2021) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3487351.3488271 · Cited by 12
“Ideation-to-action theories of suicide [4, 5] and the social ecological model [6] have enabled important advances to suicidal behaviors (e.”
BackgroundLamontagne, S. J., Zabala, P. K., Zarate, C. A., & Ballard, E. D. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105361 · Cited by 12
Pet Attachment and the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide
Douglas, V. J., Kwan, M. Y., & Gordon, K. H. (2021) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000822 · Cited by 11
Stanley, I. H., Marx, B. P., Nichter, B., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2022) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12860 · Cited by 11
Self-citationZullo, L., Mbroh, H., Moorehead, A., Lee, S. J. C., Kennard, B. D., & Stewart, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-022-02310-4 · Cited by 11
“There are nearly two decades worth of empirical support for the IPTS and its separate constructs (Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2010; Chu et al., 2017) and this study builds on this line of research to extend this model into the realm of theory-based intervention development.”
BackgroundEfficacy of BrighterSide, a Self-Guided App for Suicidal Ideation: Randomized Controlled Trial
Josifovski, N., Torok, M. H., Batterham, P. J., Wong, Q. J. J., Beames, J. R., Theobald, A., Holland, S., Huckvale, K., Riley, J., Cockayne, N. L., et al. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/55528 · Cited by 11
“In a similar vein, it could be argued that, given the identified relationship between thwarted belonging-ness and suicidal ideation [22,23], placing the onus on the participant to choose their method of interaction without the possibility of social connection (ie, no contact with another person)…”
BackgroundWilling, M. M. P., Nevers, J. I., Nofziger, D., Rogers, T., & Riggs, D. S. (2024) · Mental Health & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2024.200330 · Cited by 14
Interpersonal relationships and suicidal ideation among Chinese youths: A network analysis
Ge, Y., & Zhang, M. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.062 · Cited by 14
Suicide and suicidality in Australian Defence Force veterans: A systematic scoping review
Oltvolgyi, C. G., Meurk, C., & Heffernan, E. (2024) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00048674241246443 · Cited by 12
“These factors have been the basis for many studies in the US military setting (for example, Chu et al., 2017; Hom et al., 2019).”
BackgroundBloch‐Elkouby, S., Rogers, M. L., Goncearenco, I., Yanez, N., Nemeroff, C. B., Chennapragada, L., Cohen, L. J., & GALYNKER, I. I. (2024) · Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pmip.2024.100131 · Cited by 13
Self-citationLuo, Z., Wang, J., Chen, X., Cheng, D., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444820 · Cited by 14
DiBlasi, E., Kaufman, E. A., Webster, S., Hagn, E. E., Shabalin, A. A., Chen, D., Han, S., Jawish, R., Monson, E. T., Staley, M., et al. (2024) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03794-1 · Cited by 12
“This is important, as perceived burdensomeness is a major risk factor for suicide in and of itself [34] and interpersonal relationships and social responses to pain affect how an individual perceives their pain and even their responsiveness to treatment [5].”
Wong, Q. J. J., Torok, M. H., van Spijker, B. A. J., Werner‐Seidler, A., Calear, A. L., Batterham, P. J., Han, J., & Christensen, H. M. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113406 · Cited by 11
Schomberg, J., Teismann, T., Bussmann, S., Vaganian, L., Gerlach, A. L., & Cwik, J. C. (2020) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/ecc.13330 · Cited by 12
Suicide capacity within the ideation-to-action framework: a scoping review protocol
Bayliss, L. T., Lamont‐Mills, A., du Plessis, C., & Morgan, T. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043649 · Cited by 11
Ordóñez-Carrasco, J. L., Cuadrado, I., & Tejada, A. J. R. (2021) · Terapia psicológica · doi:10.4067/s0718-48082021000100017 · Cited by 15
Oakey‐Frost, N., Harris, J. A., May, A. M., Bryan, A. O., Tucker, R. P., & Bryan, C. J. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12815 · Cited by 10
Self-citationZohn, J. H., & Hovis, S. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16651 · Cited by 11
Pérez, S., Layrón, J. E., Barrigón, M. L., Baca‐García, E., & Marco, J. H. (2023) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2023.2235569 · Cited by 13
“Some authors have found that the literature on the IPTS mainly uses cross-sectional methodologies (93%-95% of the studies) (Chu et al., 2017).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBaer, M. M., LaCroix, J. M., Browne, J. C., Hassen, H. O., Perera, K. U., Weaver, J. J., Soumoff, A. A., & Ghahramanlou‐Holloway, M. (2018) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12530 · Cited by 14
Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Gallyer, A. J., Gray, J. S., & Joiner, T. E. (2019) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461519847812 · Cited by 13
“…suicide among AI/AN firefighters, specifically, the interpersonal theory of suicide may be illuminative (Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2010; see Chu et al., 2017, for review) The interpersonal theory of suicide proposes that individuals will not engage in lethal or nearlethal behavior unless…”
BackgroundSelf-citationWang, S., Li, C., Jia, X., Lyu, J., Wang, Y., & Sun, H. (2020) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.334 · Cited by 12
Calandre, E. P., Ordóñez-Carrasco, J. L., & Rico‐Villademoros, F. (2021) · Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology · doi:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/pufzd6 · Cited by 11
McIntyre, J. C., Elahi, A., Latham, C., Mullholland, H., Haines‐Delmont, A., Saini, P., & Taylor, P. J. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.103 · Cited by 10
Dodd, D. R., Harris, K., Allen, K., Velkoff, E. A., & Smith, A. R. (2021) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12794 · Cited by 11
Understanding Patterns of Adolescent Suicide Ideation: Implications for Risk Assessment
Miranda, R., Ortin‐Peralta, A., Rosario‐Williams, B., Kelly, T. F., Macrynikola, N., & Sullivan, S. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82465-5_9 · Cited by 13
Olgiati, P., Fanelli, G., & Serretti, A. (2023) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/yic.0000000000000461 · Cited by 13
“, 2018), thwarted belongingness and burdensomeness (Chu et al., 2017).”
Baldini, V., Varallo, G., Pisanò, G., Gnazzo, M., Ronchi, D. D., Tubbs, A. S., Brand, S., Plazzi, G., & Fiorillo, A. (2026) · Psychiatric Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11126-026-10256-9 · Cited by 11
Sparks, S., Mitchell, S. M., & LeDuc, M. K. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23493 · Cited by 13
Campbell‐Sills, L., Sun, X., Papini, S., Choi, K. W., He, F., Kessler, R. C., Ursano, R. J., Jain, S., & Stein, M. B. (2023) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01596-2 · Cited by 9
“Selection of the environmental and behavioral variables was based on the aforementioned empirical results [18, 19] and on theories of suicidal behavior that highlight individual differences in personality, stress exposure (particularly early life adversity), social cohesion, and cognitive style [4, 6, 20].”
BackgroundLevi‐Belz, Y. (2023) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12973 · Cited by 13
Self-burdensomeness, other-burdensomeness, and suicidal ideation
Teismann, T., Brailovskaia, J., Robison, M., & Joiner, T. E. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104388 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Tucker, R. P., Hagan, C. R., Rogers, M. L., Podlogar, M. C., Chiurliza, B., Ringer, F. B., Michaels, M. S., Patros, C. H. G., & Joiner, T. E.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1313-1345
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- PMC
- PMC5730496
- OpenAlex
- W2766751125
- Cited by
- 1,231
- References
- 241
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 230 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (acceptedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH093311-04)
- Military Suicide Research Consortium (W81XWH-10-2-0181, W81XWH-16-2-0003)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- interpersonal theory of suicide, suicidal ideation, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, previous suicide attempts, suicide risk, suicidal behavior
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Suicide, Internationality, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review