The DOI matches its Crossref record; 240 of the 241 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 46 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research.
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decade, the interpersonal theory of suicide has contributed to substantial advances in the scientific and clinical understanding of suicide and related conditions. The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that suicidal desire emerges when individuals experience intractable feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness and near-lethal or lethal suicidal behavior occurs in the presence of suicidal desire and capability for suicide. A growing number of studies have tested these posited pathways in various samples; however, these findings have yet to be evaluated meta-analytically. This paper aimed to (a) conduct a systematic review of the unpublished and published, peer-reviewed literature examining the relationship between interpersonal theory constructs and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, (b) conduct meta-analyses testing the interpersonal theory hypotheses, and (c) evaluate the influence of various moderators on these relationships. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched through the end of March, 2016: PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Hypothesis-driven meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted using 122 distinct unpublished and published samples. Findings supported the interpersonal theory: the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation; and the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
148 Own result · 28 Own method · 28 Own interpretation · 22 No basis given · 11 Sources not found · 11 No full text of the sources · 9 Not checked yet · 1 Supported so far
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide was significantly related to a greater number of prior suicide attempts”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternative configurations of theory variables were similarly useful for predicting suicide risk as theory-consistent pathways.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, effect sizes for these interactions were modest.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability for suicide was not related to suicide risk (r = 0.09, p = 0.083; k = 17; N = 6,760)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
plainn = 6,760- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and suicide risk (r = 0.42, p < 0.001; k = 23; N = 9,002)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
plaincorrelationaln = 9,002 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“40% of studies examining capability for suicide and suicide attempts reported significant results;”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability for suicide was significantly and weakly related to suicidal ideation (r = 0.10, p = 0.020; k = 29; N = 9,782)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
plaincorrelationaln = 9,782 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Post hoc, we noted that the magnitude of the relationship between perceived burdensomeness and suicide-related variables was greater than that between thwarted belongingness and suicide-related variables.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A review of the reported findings of the cross-sectional studies revealed the following: 54.3% of studies examining thwarted belongingness and suicidal thoughts and behaviors reported significant results;”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 66
- It may state two separate claims as one. 61
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Implicit measurement of suicide-related constructs (e.g., through reaction time-based tasks) may be an effective strategy to circumvent these concerns”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Nock & Banaji, 2007 source
- Supportedcites Nock et al., 2010 source
The Abstract says people considering suicide are often unwilling to report their intentions and that implicit-cognition measures may help detect behaviors unlikely to be reported. It also describes the implicit association test used in the study. This supports the hedged claim that implicit measurement may help circumvent disclosure concerns. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With articles using redundant datasets treated as one sample, 122 samples (114 articles) were analyzed.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
plainn = 122- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies were conducted in undergraduate students (44.0%) and community-dwelling adults (33.6%); 22.4% of studies examined clinical populations.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies primarily targeted young adults, with the average age of participants ranging from 18–25 years (48.3%), and adults over 25 years of age (48.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 143 samples, the majority was cross-sectional (92.3%), published between 2011 and 2015 (91.6%), and conducted in the U.S. and Canada (83.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plainn = 143- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military samples were used in 16.8% of the studies.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies primarily targeted young adults, with the average age of participants ranging from 18–25 years (48.3%), and adults over 25 years of age (48.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, post hoc two-tailed tests of differences between dependent correlations indicated that suicidal ideation (z = 26.26, p < 0.001), suicide risk (z = 10.19, p < 0.001), and suicide attempt history (z = 16.21, p < 0.001) all exhibited significantly stronger relationships with perceived burdensomeness than with thwarted belongingness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Approximately half were conducted using web-based methodologies (46.2%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On average, the percentage of males in the sample was less than half (mean = 44.6%) and the percentage of White/Caucasian participants was over half (mean = 63.4%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies were conducted in undergraduate students (44.0%) and community-dwelling adults (33.6%); 22.4% of studies examined clinical populations.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only four studies examined youth under the age of 18 years (2.8%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The INQ was not used in five samples and the ACSS was not used in three samples—these studies used proxies drawn from multiple measures (e.g., Christensen et al., 2013), the Perceived Burdensomeness Scale (Peak et al., 2016), and the Acquired Capability With Rehearsal for Suicide Scale (George et al., 2016).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
What the sources say
plainn = 5- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, given that this manuscript’s senior author was a coauthor on 26 of the published articles (i.e., 21.3% of samples), we examined whether his authorship moderated our meta-analytic results (described in detail above) as another metric of potential bias.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Publication bias
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies were conducted in undergraduate students (44.0%) and community-dwelling adults (33.6%); 22.4% of studies examined clinical populations.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 143 samples, the majority was cross-sectional (92.3%), published between 2011 and 2015 (91.6%), and conducted in the U.S. and Canada (83.9%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plainn = 143- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On average, the percentage of males in the sample was less than half (mean = 44.6%) and the percentage of White/Caucasian participants was over half (mean = 63.4%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 54 models tested, 9 were conducted with fewer than 6 samples, and 8 were conducted with 6 to 8 samples.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Meta-analytic Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, sample sizes ranged from 30 to 6,133, with the majority ranging from 100–399 (59.4%).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven samples completed a non-English-language version of the INQ and/or the ACSS; languages included Chinese, German, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
plainn = 7- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This yielded a total of 143 samples (from 130 articles) with a total N of 59,698 (see Tables 3 to 12 for the n [sample size] and k [number of samples] in each model).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
plainn = 143- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“of the 143 samples in this meta-analysis, published effect sizes were obtained from 10.5% of the samples (n = 15) and unpublished effect sizes were obtained from 89.5% of the samples (n = 128).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plainn = 143- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the I2 values remained significant (I2 > 96.7%), indicating that these moderators did not account for a substantial portion of variance.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“greater perceived burdensomeness and more severe suicidal ideation (r = 0.48), greater suicide risk (r = 0.42), and (continuous) suicide attempt history (r = 0.25)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trim and fill statistics and funnel plots could not be generated for two models (i.e., Table 8).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Funnel plot asymmetry was found in 44.4% of the models that tested the main hypotheses of the interpersonal theory (8 of 18 models), with a moderate number of missing studies (mean = 3.25, SD = 2.43, range = 1 to 8, mode = 2; Tables 6 and 7).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the interaction between the three theory constructs was significantly associated with a greater number of suicide attempts (measured continuously, and when continuous and dichotomous attempts were collapsed) and suicide risk, beyond main and two-way interaction effects; however, effect sizes were, again, small (rs = 0.06–0.11)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Impact factors were discernable for 120 of the included studies; the mean impact factor was 2.26 (SD = 1.13; range = 0.56–7.43).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Journal Impact Factors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all three models, published effect sizes were larger than the unpublished effect sizes and meta-analyses based on the unpublished effect sizes yielded non-significant results”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Greater capability for suicide was significantly related to suicide attempts and ideation, albeit the effects were weak2 (rs = 0.09–0.10) and capability was not a significant correlate of suicide risk alone.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of note, in the main interpersonal theory models, the I2 values remained significant, suggesting that these moderators did not account for a substantial amount of variance in suicidal thoughts and behaviors.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Univariate analyses revealed significant weak-to-moderate positive relationships between (1) greater thwarted belongingness and more severe suicidal ideation (r = 0.37), greater suicide risk (r = 0.33), and (continuous) suicide attempt history (r = 0.11)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the Q-test was not significant (0.03) and the I2 value (< 0.001) indicated that variability may be due to chance rather than heterogeneity.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing Alternative Pathways Between the Interpersonal Theory Variables
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, for all these moderators, I2 values remained significant, suggesting that these moderators did not account for a large portion of variance.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No publication bias was indicated for the models testing the specific predictions of the interpersonal theory, including: (1) the effect of the interaction of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness on suicidal ideation, the full model (ET = 3.36 [95% CI = 1.36,5.36], p = 0.101) and the interaction (ET = 0.22 [95% CI = −1.19,1.62], p = 0.757); (2) the effect of the three-way”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for the meta-analysis testing the association between the interaction of thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness and capability for suicide and continuous attempt history (interaction only model; Table 7), the funnel plot was moderately asymmetrical, with trim and fill analysis indicating that 6 effect sizes below the mean were missing.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Publication status emerged as a significant moderator in three of the tested meta-analytic models—(1) the relationship between capability for suicide and (continuous) attempt history (b = 0.14, SE = 0.07; z = 2.07, r = 0.97, p = 0.038; I2 = 93.3%); (2) the effect of the interaction between capability for suicide and perceived burdensomeness on continuous and dichotomous suicide attempt history (b”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“only two versions of the ACSS have been validated and published (Ribeiro et al., 2014; Van Orden, Witte, Gordon, Bender, & Joiner, 2008); however, at least five versions of the ACSS were used to measure capability for suicide (4-, 5-, 7-, 13-, and 20-item versions).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ribeiro et al., 2014 source
- Not matchedcites Van Orden, Witte, Gordon, Bender, & Joiner, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“whether the senior author of this paper was involved in a project generally did not moderate findings; this variable only emerged as a significant moderator in three (< 9%) of 34 tested models.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“most of our models evidenced no effect of publication bias adjustments on general conclusions, supporting our findings’ robustness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Across included studies, thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness exhibited a weaker relationship with suicide ideation and risk in studies in military samples and samples with a greater percentage of males, as well as in studies that did not use web-based methodologies.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that the propositions of the interpersonal theory of suicide largely stand up to empirical scrutiny, these suicide risk correlates demonstrated only modest-at-best clinical significance”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Franklin et al., 2017 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“results suggested that publication bias likely occurred in those testing the (1) relationship between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, (2) interaction effect of capability for suicide and perceived burdensomeness on (continuous) attempt history; (3) interaction effect between capability for suicide and thwarted belongingness on suicide risk; and (4) three-way interaction effect”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the I2 value remained significant for each of the models in which the moderator was significant, suggesting that the moderation effect did not account for a significant amount of variance in our outcome variable, and any significant effect observed may have been due to Type I error.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The theory was designed to explain the occurrence of lethal or near-lethal suicidal behaviors, but the extant literature has overwhelmingly neglected to test this hypothesis.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant moderators emerged in some of the tested models; however, overall, I2 values remained significant, suggesting that these factors do not account for a substantial amount of variance in suicidal outcomes.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the literature has primarily focused on the experience of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness broadly, rather than their perceived intractability.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our review revealed few prospective studies (6.9%), with most studies (93.1%) employing a cross-sectional study design.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“theory-consistent effects outpaced those of alternative pathways in some instances, though the differences were small.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the two-way interaction between perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness was an even stronger predictor of continuous suicide attempts (r = 0.20) and of both dichotomous and continuous attempts when collapsed (r = 0.09).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In two of the three cases, effects were stronger in studies including this author, and in the last case, the meta-analytic effect was weaker with the author’s inclusion.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelationaln = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“five versions of the INQ (10-, 12-, 15-, 18-, and 25-item versions) were utilized to measure thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our review revealed several gaps in the literature that require further empirical investigation.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Conclusions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, keywords were entered into four electronic databases: PubMed, Medline (Proquest), PsycINFO, and Web of Science.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Search for Studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We excluded studies that assessed the interpersonal theory constructs using single-item proxies.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Excluded Studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies that used translated versions of the INQ/ACSS and/or newly developed measures assessing the interpersonal theory constructs with evidence for the construct validity of these measures (e.g., at least a moderate correlation with the INQ, r > 0.40) were all included.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Inclusion Criteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each article was independently coded by two different authors.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For each of the remaining 153 references, two authors independently read each full-text manuscript to assess whether it met criteria for inclusion.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three authors (CC, IAH, MAH) independently conducted an initial screening of the titles and abstracts for all identified studies to determine their relevance to this study”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Disagreements were resolved through discussion and consultation with a separate author (RPT).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we attempted to contact 75 authors of 123 studies (many were authors of multiple studies) that did not report effect sizes between the interpersonal theory and suicide-related constructs”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, 24 individuals with documented suicide research experience and who have previously published data regarding theoretical models of suicidal behavior were contacted to determine if any studies were missed by our searches.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Search for Studies
plainn = 24- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Agreement between the three raters regarding study inclusion was good (κ = 0.77).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We also manually searched the reference lists of relevant manuscripts, including the recent systematic review of the interpersonal theory (Ma et al., 2016).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Search for Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ma et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inter-rater reliability for the entering of study descriptive statistics and effect sizes across these articles was good to excellent (κ = 0.83–0.99).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“however, the ACSS has been primarily administered in English.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a random effects model, a study is weighted based on its own population, not sample size, providing a more balanced assignment of weights (Borenstein, Hedges & Rothstein, 2007).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Borenstein, Hedges & Rothstein, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We examined the significance of the chi-square Q statistic to determine whether there was substantial heterogeneity of effect sizes; a significant Q-value rejects the null that studies are homogeneous and indicates the presence of substantial heterogeneity.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, caution is warranted when interpreting findings based on relatively few samples.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Meta-analytic Models
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In all included samples, Pearson’s correlations (r) and/or regression R-squared (R2) values were reported in the manuscript or we requested the raw data from the authors and calculated the necessary effect sizes directly.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Meta-Analytic Approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Suicide risk (c.f. suicide proneness) was evaluated using measures that assess both suicidal ideation and behavior and do not distinguish between these outcomes, a limitation that we discuss in the Discussion.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior Outcomes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These latter two pathways reverse the interpersonal theory’s two main predictions, in that the interaction between perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness is expected by the theory to predict ideation more so than attempts, whereas the interaction between perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and capability is posited to predict attempts more so than ideation.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Meta-Analytic Approach
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the INQ remains the mostly commonly utilized measure of these constructs and has demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including convergent validity (Van Orden et al., 2008).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Van Orden et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the full dataset was unavailable, we used the effect sizes from the study with the largest sample size to diminish redundancy.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Data Extraction and Management
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The INQ was created and validated as an English-language measure; however, several groups have translated the INQ into other languages, including Spanish (Garza & Pettit, 2010), German (Forkmann & Glaesmer, 2013; Hallensleben et al., 2016), Chinese (Zhang et al., 2013), French (Baertschi et al., 2017; Siefert-Boukaidi, Jover, Staccini, Pringuey, & Benoit, 2013), Portuguese (Campos & Holden, 2015),”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the interpersonal theory includes a prediction about the perceived intractability of feelings of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, the INQ does not directly assess hopelessness about these feelings.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Hopelessness
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, both published and unpublished data were included.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Inclusion Criteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not all samples included all the interpersonal theory variables and/or multiple suicide-related variables (i.e., ideation, risk, attempts); thus, sample sizes varied for each meta-analytic model.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To our knowledge, only one study has created a new measure of interpersonal needs; however, this measure only assesses perceived burdensomeness (Perceived Burdensomeness Scale; Peak et al., 2016).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Peak et al., 2016 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, according to the theory, capability is only relevant to (lethal) behavior in the context of suicidal desire variables.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An important point is that the theory is silent regarding these alternative pathways (H5, H6, H8, H9), though it is reasonable to expect that the pathways specifically predicted by the theory may be more supported than the alternative pathways, at least somewhat.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Meta-Analytic Approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Capability for suicide was assessed primarily using the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Predictors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although the Q-value provides evidence that the true (between) effects vary, it does not evaluate the degree of between-study dispersion (Borenstein et al., 2007); thus, we also evaluated the I-squared (I2) index.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Borenstein et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That the three-way interaction did not correlate with dichotomous suicide attempt history may reflect diminished outcome variance and power to detect significant effects.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although moderate effect sizes were generally observed for the full models, the interaction effect sizes (exclusive of lower-order variables) were relatively weak, ranging from small to moderate.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these findings are largely consistent with the theory, revealing expected significant associations between interpersonal theory constructs and suicide-related outcomes.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This dearth of studies is understandable—suicide is a low base-rate event and amassing datasets of the psychological states of suicide decedents represents a considerable challenge.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings signal that, on average, studies were published in journals for which articles published in the past two years were cited an average of 2.26 times, demonstrating a degree of impact on subsequent research.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Journal Impact Factors
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these results do not necessarily imply that the theory is incorrect or incapable of predicting suicide deaths.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In two separate meta-analyses, the odds ratios for most risk and protective factors ranged from 1.0 to 2.5 (i.e., rs ~ 0.26–0.57; Franklin et al., 2017) and few exceeded 3.0 (r ~ 0.64; Large et al., 2011).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we were unable to reach all authors (i.e., 66 of 73 contacted authors responded with relevant data) and we did not obtain unpublished data from other sources. As such, publication bias is possible.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we were unable to reach the authors of 8.13% of the studies requiring additional data, which may have influenced the accuracy of our findings.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is unclear which version of the INQ offers the greatest utility, particularly among high-risk samples.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reduction of thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide may reduce likelihood for death by suicide, but the use of these constructs as the sole clinical predictors of suicide is not currently supported by empirical data.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“individuals may still be reluctant to disclose this sensitive information due to stigma concerns”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anestis & Green, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Corrigan & Watson, 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Hom, Stanley, Podlogar, & Joiner, 2017b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the inclusion of theory constructs in these predictive algorithms may enhance their accuracy, but cannot yet be solely relied upon.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“only studies published in English were included in our review, and perhaps, as a result, the vast majority of included studies were conducted in the U.S. Thus, included studies demonstrated a strong North American bias, reducing generalizability to other regions and cultures.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“utilized a conservative data analytic approach (Borenstein et al., 2007)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Borenstein et al., 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the relative dearth of studies establishing these measures’ factor structures across populations is concerning and prevents discernment of what may account for observed study findings.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we vigorously pursued study authors to obtain data not reported within their manuscripts”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“each bivariate correlation included in our meta-analysis was double-entered prior to analysis to reduce data entry errors.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the majority of the included effect sizes were unpublished, which mitigates these concerns, we were nonetheless unable to determine the extent to which publication bias influenced the accuracy of our results.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings suggest that individually, perceived burdensomeness may be a more important contributor to suicidal behavior; however, in the context of capability for suicide, thwarted belongingness may play a greater role.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the weaker association between thwarted belongingness and suicide risk in military samples may also reflect an underreporting of suicidal symptoms”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Anestis & Green, 2015 source
- Not matchedcites Ribeiro et al., 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we employed a rigorous and thorough search strategy to identify relevant peer-reviewed papers”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though the interpersonal theory may illuminate which individuals are likely to die by suicide, the theory is less specific regarding when such self-harm may occur.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this review adjusted for the use of different measures of suicide ideation and attempts and incorporated studies using a non-specific suicide measure (i.e., assessing suicide risk).”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the lack of significant moderation effects may have been due to the restricted range of effect sizes and insufficient power given the heterogeneity of study settings”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ma et al., [2016]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the relatively small effect sizes yielded by this meta-analysis may be due to imprecise testing of the theory’s propositions.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our results may not represent other populations of interest, particularly individuals at elevated risk for suicide death.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“individuals may be more willing to report their feelings of social isolation or perception of being a burden than suicidal ideation”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Podlogar et al., 2015 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“capability for suicide likely has a genetic component”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Smith et al., 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“due to heterogeneity of studies included in the meta-analysis may have produced underinflated effects.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Strengths and Limitations of the Current Review and Meta-Analysis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The constructs of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are unidimensional and multifaceted.
“Each of these constructs is conceptualized as unidimensional and multifaceted.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The INQ does not measure hopelessness about perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness.
“which does not measure hopelessness about perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness”
The paper relies on this without support.
Suicide attempt history is often not normally distributed, especially in community samples.
“Suicide attempt history is often not normally distributed, especially in community samples.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are multifaceted, and the INQ captures only one facet of each.
“thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are multifaceted and the INQ only captures one facet of each.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Online protocols provide participants with greater privacy.
“online protocols may provide participants with greater privacy”
The paper relies on this without support.
Suicide risk measures such as the SBQ-R do not distinguish between suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors.
“suicide risk measures (e.g., SBQ-R) do not delineate between suicidal ideation and behaviors”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Conversely, feeling a burden [51], having little or no social support [52] and depleted resilience [53] will each increase the likelihood that entrapment will be translated into suicidal ideation/intent”
From The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This theory is supported by several empirical studies linking thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness to greater suicide risk (for a systematic review and meta-analysis, see Chu et al., 2017). Notably, however, these studies yielded small-to-moderate effects (Chu et al., 2017; Joiner et al., 2009).”
From Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks (2023) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses of two important theoretical models, the Interpersonal Theory of Suicidal Behavior (19) and the Integrative Motivational-Volitional Model of Suicidal Behavior (20, 21), show results that are consistent with the theories. The effects are, however, comparatively small (22, 23) and do not exceed the predictive power found in the other meta-analyses described above.”
From Suicide risk assessment: clinical implications of the unpredictability of suicidal behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“the IMV model proposes that the components of the acquired capability for suicide (fearlessness about death and increased physical pain tolerance [12,51]) are VMs”
From The integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as [51]
In the citing paper
“A recent metaanalysis yielded clear support for the perceived burdensomeness -suicidal thoughts relationship whereas the evidence for thwarted belongingness was less strong (Chu et al., 2017).”
From Exploring the psychology of suicidal ideation: a theory driven network analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“in many studies, moderation e ff ects are often much smaller then pairwise e ff ects (Chu et al., 2017; Haslbeck, Borsboom, & Waldorp, 2018).”
From Exploring the psychology of suicidal ideation: a theory driven network analysis. (2019) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Although measures of acquired capability were only weakly associated with suicide attempt history in a recent meta-analysis (Chu et al., 2017)”
From From ideation to action: Differentiating between those who think about suicide and those who attempt suicide in a national study of young adults (2018) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“a construct that the interpersonal theory of suicide theorizes develops in part through exposure to painful and provocative experiences and is necessary but not sufficient for suicidal behaviors (Chu et al., 2017; Van Orden et al., 2010)”
From Occupational stress and suicidality among firefighters: Examining the buffering role of distress tolerance (2018) · cites this paper as Chu et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Among leading suicide theories, the ITS has received the most empirical attention (and, by extension, support; see Chu et al. 2017)”
From Life stress and suicide in adolescents (2019) · cites this paper as Chu et al. 2017
In the citing paper
“The most frequently measured predictor variables included contextual factors (incl. location, activity, social company), affect, and constructs from the Interpersonal Psychological Theory of Suicide [IPTS: hopelessness, burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness (91)]. Protective factors, such as coping and social support, were less frequently assessed.”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [91]
In the citing paper
“While this seems surprising, it is consistent with other studies [9,10].”
From The association of trait impulsivity and suicidal ideation and its fluctuation in the context of the interpersonal theory of suicide (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Existing research indicates that worry is one of the core repetitive negative thinking (RNT) patterns in psychiatric disorders connected to suicide [ 84 ], which links to suicidal ideation and attempts (i.e., feeling hopeless, burdensome) [ 85 ].”
From Anxiety and Depression Symptoms among Youth Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Network Analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [85]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentz = 26.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 26.26, p < .001”
- Consistentz = 10.19reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 10.19, p < .001”
- Consistentz = 16.21reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 16.21, p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
“That we did not find any significant moderators for the models testing the theory’s main hypotheses suggests that the theory is robust to variations in study population and characteristics.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
“The full model testing the relationship between the interaction of thwarted belongingness with perceived burdensomeness and suicidal ideation was significantly stronger in samples with a smaller percentage of males (b = −0.002, SE = 0.0009; z = −2.65, r = −0.99, p = 0.008; I2 = 89.8%).”
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
“full model (ET = 3.36 [95% CI = 1.36,5.36], p = 0.101)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Investigating Possible Publication Bias
“No publication bias was indicated for the models testing the specific predictions of the interpersonal theory”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
“A flowchart describing the study inclusion selection process is presented in Figure 1.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
“Figure 2 depicts the study selection process.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“b = 0.05, SE = 0.002; z = 2.03, r = 0.97, p = 0.042, I2 = 84.4%”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Reported 2.03 · recomputed 25
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
“Of the 143 samples, the majority was cross-sectional (92.3%)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Limitations and Directions for Future Research from the Lens of the Interpersonal Theory
“Our review revealed few prospective studies (6.9%), with most studies (93.1%) employing a cross-sectional study design.”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
“However, our meta-analytic findings suggest this approach did not yield significant effects—albeit here too, we were underpowered.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide
“The interaction between perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, and hopelessness accounted for a significant amount of the variance in suicidal ideation (r = 0.15, p = 0.014; k = 3; N = 740)”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“an additional 17 were excluded after the entire article was coded and we were unable to obtain missing data. This yielded a total of 143 samples (from 130 articles)”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
Reported 130 · recomputed 136
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Support, Albeit Mixed, for the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Hypotheses
“Rather, all studies included in this review utilized the INQ, which does not measure hopelessness about perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Sample Characteristics
“The INQ was not used in five samples and the ACSS was not used in three samples”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Study Selection
“This process resulted in 382 potentially relevant reports.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Study Selection
“A total of 382 titles and abstracts were examined; 229 were excluded after reviewing the title and abstract”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Discussion > Moderator Effects
“That we did not find any significant moderators for the models testing the theory’s main hypotheses suggests that the theory is robust to variations in study population and characteristics.”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
“Beyond lower-order factors, the interaction effect was stronger among samples with a lower proportion of White/Caucasian participants (b = −0.001, SE = 0.0005; z = −2.39, r = −0.98, p = 0.017; I2 = 72.3%) and studies using non-English-language measures of the interpersonal theory variables (b = 0.10, SE = 0.05; z = 2.21, r = 0.98, p = 0.027, I2 = 73.0%).”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“b = 0.05, SE = 0.002; z = 2.03, r = 0.97, p = 0.042”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Characteristics Moderating the Relationship Between the Interpersonal Theory and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Reported 2.03 · recomputed 25
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Method > Analytic plan
“I2 = (Q − df/Q) * 100”
§ The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research > Results > Testing the Direct Relationship between the Interpersonal Theory Variables and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
“the Q-test was significant (3515.1), and the I2 value (97.3%) indicated that a large degree of variability was due to heterogeneity rather than chance.”
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245 · cited 1×
“Humans have a fundamental need to belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) that, when unmet, leads to a range of negative health outcomes (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased…”
BackgroundLovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523 · cited 1×
“…Mendelson, Mock, & Erbaugh, 1961), Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001), or Depression subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995).”
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t00742-000 · Cited by 7,535
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 · Cited by 6,793
Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality: A Meta-Analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614568352 · Cited by 6,043
The interpersonal theory of suicide.
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018697 · Cited by 5,292 · cited 5×
“Components of these dimensions include self-reported loneliness, fewer friends, living alone, nonintact family, social withdrawal, and family conflict (Van Orden et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationLoneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8 · Cited by 4,782 · cited 1×
“…a fundamental need to belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) that, when unmet, leads to a range of negative health outcomes (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased rates of…”
Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 · Cited by 4,621 · cited 1×
“To account for the dependency between these two correlations, z values were corrected by incorporating the association between perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness, according to procedures recommended by Steiger (1980).”
MethodRisk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research
Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Huang, X., Musacchio, K. M., Jaroszewski, A. C., Chang, B. P., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000084 · Cited by 3,784
The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses
Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1 · Cited by 3,445
Publication bias in clinical research
Easterbrook, P. J., Gopalan, R., Berlin, J. A., & Matthews, D. R. (1991) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y · Cited by 3,109
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977 · cited 1×
“Random effects models were utilized since we anticipated that effect sizes would vary across studies and this model approach allows for a greater degree of generalizability (Hedges & Vevea, 1998).”
MethodA Nonparametric “Trim and Fill” Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905 · Cited by 2,955
Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjghv2f · Cited by 2,891
Self-citationQuine, W. V. O. (1976) · Sententiae · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1863-0_2 · Cited by 2,709
Suicide and suicidal behaviour
Turecki, G., & Brent, D. A. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00234-2 · Cited by 2,338 · cited 1×
“…& Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased rates of suicide ideation, attempts, and fatalities across the life span (Fässberg et al., 2012; Trout, 1980; Turecki & Brent, 2016).”
Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea
Royston, P., Altman, D. G., & Sauerbrei, W. (2006) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.2331 · Cited by 2,312
Osman, A., Bagge, C. L., Gutierrez, P. M., Konick, L. C., Kopper, B. A., & Barrios, F. X. (2001) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319110100800409 · Cited by 2,276 · cited 1×
“Measures of suicide risk included the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire–Revised (SBQ-R; Osman et al., 2001) and Life Attitudes Schedule–Short Form (LAS-SF; Rohde, Seeley, Langhinrichsen-Rohling, & Rohling, 2003).”
MethodUnderstanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness.
(2002) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,786
Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation
Klonsky, E. D., May, A. M., & Saffer, B. Y. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204 · Cited by 1,675 · cited 1×
“In this regard, the interpersonal theory is the first theory of suicide positioned within what would later be termed the ideation-to-action framework (Klonsky & May, 2014; Klonsky et al., 2016; Nock et al., 2014).”
BackgroundOrden, K. A. V., Cukrowicz, K. C., Witte, T. K., & Joiner, T. E. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0025358 · Cited by 1,502 · cited 2×
“T hi s ar tic le is in te nd ed so le ly fo r th e pe rs on al us e of th e in di vi du al us er an d is no t to be di ss em in at ed br oa dl y. thwarted belongingness, 6 of which are reverse scored; Van Orden et al., 2012).”
MethodSelf-citationRebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness
Kazdin, A. E., & Blase, S. L. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610393527 · Cited by 1,254
From ideas to efficacy: The ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases
Czajkowski, S. M., Powell, L. H., Adler, N., Naar-King, S., Reynolds, K. D., Hunter, C. M., Laraia, B., Olster, D. H., Perna, F. M., Peterson, J. C., et al. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000161 · Cited by 1,161
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.1.72 · Cited by 1,126
Self-citationSocial relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation
Cacioppo, J. T., & Cacioppo, S. (2014) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12087 · Cited by 1,057 · cited 1×
“Humans have a fundamental need to belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) that, when unmet, leads to a range of negative health outcomes (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased…”
BackgroundSilverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'Carroll, P. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.264 · Cited by 991
Self-citationQin, P., Agerbo, E., & Mortensen, P. B. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.765 · Cited by 954
(2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 915
Cognitive therapy: Nature and relation to behavior therapy
Beck, A. T. (1970) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(70)80030-2 · Cited by 863
Suicide Attempt as a Risk Factor for Completed Suicide: Even More Lethal Than We Knew
Bostwick, J. M., Pabbati, C., Geske, J. R., & McKean, A. J. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15070854 · Cited by 759
Klonsky, E. D., & May, A. M. (2014) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12068 · Cited by 740 · cited 1×
“In this regard, the interpersonal theory is the first theory of suicide positioned within what would later be termed the ideation-to-action framework (Klonsky & May, 2014; Klonsky et al., 2016; Nock et al., 2014).”
Background(2009) · Cited by 670
Edinger, J. D., Wohlgemuth, W. K., Radtke, R. A., Marsh, G. R., & Quillian, R. E. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.14.1856 · Cited by 625
Measuring the Suicidal Mind: Implicit Cognition Predicts Suicidal Behavior
Nock, M. K., Park, J. M., Finn, C. T., Deliberto, T. L., Dour, H. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610364762 · Cited by 624 · cited 1×
“, through reaction time (RT)-based tasks) may be an effective strategy to circumvent these concerns (Nock & Banaji, 2007; Nock et al., 2010); though, more research is needed on this front, particularly with regard to their utility in military samples (Chiurliza et al.”
Family genetic studies, suicide, and suicidal behavior
Brent, D. A., & Mann, J. J. (2005) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30042 · Cited by 618
Moran, P., Coffey, C., Romaniuk, H., Olsson, C., Borschmann, R., Carlin, J. B., & Patton, G. C. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61141-0 · Cited by 607 · cited 1×
“To shed light on the trajectory to suicide, there is also a need for studies using adolescent samples since there are high rates of suicidal behaviors in this group and many of these symptoms onset during childhood and persist into adulthood (Moran et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSilverman, M. M., Berman, A. L., Sanddal, N. D., O'Carroll, P. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2007.37.3.248 · Cited by 593
Self-citationEffects of suicide bereavement on mental health and suicide risk
Pitman, A., Osborn, D., King, M., & Erlangsen, A. (2014) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(14)70224-x · Cited by 492
Linehan, M. M., Comtois, K. A., Brown, M. Z., Heard, H. L., & Wagner, A. (2006) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.303 · Cited by 486
Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.006 · Cited by 462
Self-citationThe interpersonal theory of suicide: Guidance for working with suicidal clients.
Joiner, T. E., Orden, K. A. V., Witte, T. K., & Rudd, M. D. (2009) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11869-000 · Cited by 458 · cited 1×
“An 18-item INQ was published in a book on the interpersonal theory (Joiner et al., 2009) and a 10-item INQ was validated for use in military populations (Bryan, 2011).”
MethodSelf-citationBaams, L., Grossman, A. H., & Russell, S. T. (2015) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038994 · Cited by 451
Ribeiro, J. D., Witte, T. K., Orden, K. A. V., Selby, E. A., Gordon, K. H., Bender, T. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0034858 · Cited by 408
Self-citationThe Hopelessness Depression Symptom Questionnaire
Metalsky, G. I., & Joiner, T. E. (1997) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021882717784 · Cited by 403 · cited 1×
“…symptom measures such as the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS; Beck & Steer, 1991), Depressive Symptom Inventory-Suicidality Subscale (DSISS; Metalsky & Joiner, 1997), Geriatric Suicidal Ideation Scale (GSSI; Heisel & Flett, 2006), and Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation (MSSI; Miller,…”
MethodSelf-citationMa, J., Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., & Han, J. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.008 · Cited by 384 · cited 5×
“1 Of note, emerging research suggests that perceived burdensomeness may have a stronger, more reliably significant association with suicidal ideation (Chu, Rogers, & Joiner, 2016d; Ma et al., 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSingle-item measurement of suicidal behaviors: Validity and consequences of misclassification
Millner, A. J., Lee, M. D., & Nock, M. K. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141606 · Cited by 361
A systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood
Fässberg, M. M., Orden, K. A. V., Duberstein, P., Erlangsen, A., Lapierre, S., Bodner, E., Canetto, S. S., Leo, D. D., Szanto, K., & Waern, M. (2012) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph9030722 · Cited by 342 · cited 1×
“…& Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased rates of suicide ideation, attempts, and fatalities across the life span (Fässberg et al., 2012; Trout, 1980; Turecki & Brent, 2016).”
Impulsivity and suicidality: The mediating role of painful and provocative experiences
Bender, T. W., Gordon, K. H., Bresin, K., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.023 · Cited by 340
Self-citationNock, M. K., Stein, M. B., Heeringa, S. G., Ursano, R. J., Colpe, L. J., Fullerton, C. S., Hwang, I., Naifeh, J. A., Sampson, N. A., Schoenbaum, M., et al. (2014) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.30 · Cited by 329 · cited 1×
“In this regard, the interpersonal theory is the first theory of suicide positioned within what would later be termed the ideation-to-action framework (Klonsky & May, 2014; Klonsky et al., 2016; Nock et al., 2014).”
BackgroundRamesh, A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019464 · Cited by 324
The Impact of Suicide on the Family
Cerel, J., Jordan, J. R., & Duberstein, P. R. (2008) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910.29.1.38 · Cited by 315
A meaningful life is worth living: Meaning in life as a suicide resiliency factor
Kleiman, E. M., & Beaver, J. K. (2013) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.08.002 · Cited by 305
The Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation: Reliability and validity.
Miller, I. W., Norman, W. H., Bishop, S. B., & Dow, M. G. T. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.54.5.724 · Cited by 301
Eyre-Walker, A., & Stoletzki, N. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675 · Cited by 297
Treatment for chronic depression using Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP)
McCullough, J. P. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.10176 · Cited by 288
Routinized Assessment of Suicide Risk in Clinical Practice: An Empirically Informed Update
Chu, C., Klein, K. M., Buchman‐Schmitt, J. M., Hom, M. A., Hagan, C. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22210 · Cited by 284
Self-citationAnestis, M. D., Bagge, C. L., Tull, M. T., & Joiner, T. E. (2011) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.013 · Cited by 271
Self-citationThe Role of Social Isolation in Suicide
Trout, D. L. (1980) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.1980.tb00693.x · Cited by 270 · cited 2×
“Humans have a fundamental need to belong (Baumeister & Leary, 1995) that, when unmet, leads to a range of negative health outcomes (Cacioppo & Cacioppo, 2014; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2010; HoltLunstad, Smith, Baker, Harris, & Stephenson, 2015; Holt-Lunstad, Smith, & Layton, 2010), including increased rates of suicide idea…”
BackgroundPerceived burdensomeness and suicide ideation in older adults
Cukrowicz, K. C., Cheavens, J. S., Van Orden, K. A., Ragain, R. M., & Cook, R. L. (2011) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0021836 · Cited by 267
Batterham, P. J., Ftanou, M., Pirkis, J., Brewer, J. L., Mackinnon, A. J., Beautrais, A., Fairweather-Schmidt, A. K., & Christensen, H. (2015) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000053 · Cited by 264
Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations.
Raghunathan, T. E., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.178 · Cited by 262
Suokas, J. T., Suominen, K. H., Isometsä, E. T., Ostamo, A. I., & Lönnqvist, J. K. (2001) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00243.x · Cited by 251
Excessive reassurance seeking, depression, and interpersonal rejection: A meta-analytic review.
Starr, L. R., & Davila, J. (2008) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013866 · Cited by 251 · cited 1×
“…senior author (T.E.J.), an originator of the interpersonal theory of suicide, was an author of the published study (similar to the approach of Starr & Davila, 2008); (2) whether the effect sizes were published or unpublished; and (3) the impact factor of the journal in which the article…”
Perceived Burdensomeness as an Indicator of Suicidal Symptoms
Van Orden, K. A., Lynam, M. E., Hollar, D., & Joiner, T. E. (2006) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-006-9057-2 · Cited by 244
Self-citationBryan, C. J., Morrow, C. E., Anestis, M. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2009) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.023 · Cited by 243
Self-citationHill, R. M., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Sharp, C., Green, K. L., & Pettit, J. W. (2014) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12129 · Cited by 243 · cited 2×
“Though studies have sought to establish the psychometric properties and factor structures of each of these INQ versions (e.g., Bryan, 2011; Hill et al., 2015; Marty, Segal, Coolidge, & Klebe, 2012), it is unclear which version of the INQ offers the greatest utility, particularly among high-risk samples.”
BackgroundLarge, M., Sharma, S., Cannon, E., Ryan, C., & Nielssen, O. (2011) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/00048674.2011.590465 · Cited by 234
DBT® skills training manual, 2nd ed.
Linehan, M. M. (2015) · Cited by 218
Franklin, J. C., Fox, K. R., Franklin, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Ribeiro, J. D., Jaroszewski, A. C., Hooley, J. M., & Nock, M. K. (2016) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000093 · Cited by 217
The Development and Initial Validation of the Geriatric Suicide Ideation Scale
Heisel, M. J., & Flett, G. L. (2006) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.jgp.0000218699.27899.f9 · Cited by 214 · cited 1×
“…as the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS; Beck & Steer, 1991), Depressive Symptom Inventory-Suicidality Subscale (DSISS; Metalsky & Joiner, 1997), Geriatric Suicidal Ideation Scale (GSSI; Heisel & Flett, 2006), and Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation (MSSI; Miller, Norman, Bishop, & Dow, 1986).”
MethodAnestis, M. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.006 · Cited by 204
Self-citationHom, M. A., Joiner, T. E., & Bernert, R. A. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000241 · Cited by 203
Self-citationSmith, P. N., Cukrowicz, K. C., Poindexter, E. K., Hobson, V., & Cohen, L. M. (2010) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20701 · Cited by 202
Suicidal Ideation in College Students Varies Across Semesters: The Mediating Role of Belongingness
Orden, K. A. V., Witte, T. K., James, L. M., Castro, Y., Gordon, K. H., Braithwaite, R. S., Hollar, D. L., & Joiner, T. E. (2008) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2008.38.4.427 · Cited by 200
Self-citationSmith, P. N., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2010) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2010.40.3.266 · Cited by 200 · cited 1×
“Recent empirical evidence substantiates retaining the acquired component of capability for suicide; yet, concurrently, work has suggested that capability for suicide may have a substantial genetic component (Smith & Cukrowicz, 2010; Smith et al., 2012).”
BackgroundPrinstein, M. J. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.1.1 · Cited by 195 · cited 2×
“To advance the scientific understanding of factors that lead to suicide ideation and attempts—and, in some cases, death by suicide—and elucidate intervention points, it is crucial for suicide research to utilize theoretical frameworks (Klonsky, May, & Saffer, 2016; Prinstein, 2008; Selby, Joiner, & Ribeiro, 2014; Stan…”
BackgroundClarifying the role of pain tolerance in suicidal capability
Franklin, J. C., Hessel, E. T., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.08.001 · Cited by 187
Combat experience and the acquired capability for suicide
Bryan, C. J., Cukrowicz, K. C., West, C. L., & Morrow, C. E. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20703 · Cited by 186
Orden, K. A. V., & Conwell, Y. (2011) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-011-0193-3 · Cited by 176
Suicide as a derangement of the self-sacrificial aspect of eusociality.
Joiner, T. E., Hom, M. A., Hagan, C. R., & Silva, C. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000020 · Cited by 169 · cited 2×
“Further tests of this eusocial framework for understanding suicide risk are certainly needed (see Joiner et al., 2016 for specific recommendations); however, preliminarily, it appears that it may serve to complement and enhance the interpersonal theory.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAssessment of self-Injurious thoughts using a behavioral test
Nock, M. K., & Banaji, M. R. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.5.820 · Cited by 158
A test of the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in a large community-based cohort
Christensen, H. M., Batterham, P. J., Soubelet, A., & Mackinnon, A. J. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.002 · Cited by 156 · cited 1×
“The INQ was not used in five samples and the ACSS was not used in three samples—these studies used proxies drawn from multiple measures (e.g., Christensen et al., 2013), the Perceived Burdensomeness Scale (Peak et al., 2016), or the Acquired Capability With Rehearsal for Suicide Scale (George et…”
MethodSmith, A. R., Ribeiro, J. D., Mikolajewski, A. J., Taylor, J. E., Joiner, T. E., & Iacono, W. G. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.010 · Cited by 153 · cited 2×
“Lastly, since capability for suicide likely has a genetic component (Smith et al., 2012), studies utilizing biological indices of theory variables and translational approaches are needed.”
BackgroundSelf-citationInterpersonal suicide risk and ideation: the influence of depression and social anxiety
Davidson, C. L., Wingate, L. R., Grant, D. M., Judah, M. R., & Mills, A. C. (2011) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2011.30.8.842 · Cited by 146
Hill, R. M., & Pettit, J. W. (2012) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2012.00113.x · Cited by 139
Jahn, D. R., Cukrowicz, K. C., Linton, K., & Prabhu, F. (2011) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2010.501064 · Cited by 137
Smith, A. R., Fink, E. L., Anestis, M. D., Ribeiro, J. D., Gordon, K. H., Davis, H. A., Keel, P. K., Bardone‐Cone, A. M., Peterson, C. B., Klein, M. H., et al. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.004 · Cited by 134
Self-citationExamining the Interpersonal–Psychological Theory of Suicide in an Inpatient Veteran Sample
Monteith, L. L., Menefee, D. S., Pettit, J. W., Leopoulos, W. L., & Vincent, J. P. (2013) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12027 · Cited by 134 · cited 2×
“Research testing the interpersonal theory has been conducted spanning diverse samples, such as psychiatric inpatients and outpatients (Monteith et al., 2013), prison inmates (Mandracchia & Smith, 2015), undergraduates (Hagan, Podlogar, Chu, & Joiner, 2015), sexual minorities (Silva et al.”
BackgroundHom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., Podlogar, M. C., & Joiner, T. E. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22440 · Cited by 131
Self-citationForging an agenda for suicide prevention in the United States.
Caine, E. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.301078 · Cited by 129 · cited 1×
“Understanding the causes of Suicide, as well as best practices for the assessment, prevention, and treatment of suicidal behaviors, has been identified as a critical public health priority and global imperative (Caine, 2013; WHO, 2014).”
BackgroundCombat Exposure and Suicide Risk in Two Samples of Military Personnel
Bryan, C. J., Hernandez, A. M., Allison, S., & Clemans, T. A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21932 · Cited by 129
Asian American college students' suicide ideation: A mixed-methods study.
Wong, Y. J., Koo, K. H., Tran, K. K., Chiu, Y.-C., & Mok, Y. (2011) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023040 · Cited by 129
Bryan, C. J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20726 · Cited by 129 · cited 1×
“An 18-item INQ was published in a book on the interpersonal theory (Joiner et al., 2009) and a 10-item INQ was validated for use in military populations (Bryan, 2011).”
MethodBuitron, V., Hill, R. M., Pettit, J. W., Green, K. L., Hatkevich, C. E., & Sharp, C. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.077 · Cited by 127
Christensen, H. M., Batterham, P. J., Mackinnon, A. J., Donker, T., & Soubelet, A. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.029 · Cited by 125
Hawkins, K. A., Hames, J. L., Ribeiro, J. D., Silva, C., Joiner, T. E., & Cougle, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.12.005 · Cited by 122
Self-citationPerceived burdensomeness, fearlessness of death, and suicidality among deployed military personnel
Bryan, C. J., Clemans, T. A., & Hernandez, A. M. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.045 · Cited by 122
Hope as a predictor of interpersonal suicide risk.
Davidson, C. L., Wingate, L. R., Rasmussen, K., & Slish, M. L. (2009) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour · doi:10.1521/suli.2009.39.5.499 · Cited by 121
Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Rogers, M. L., Hagan, C. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1012045 · Cited by 118
Self-citationThe Great Black Hope: Hope and Its Relation to Suicide Risk among African Americans
Davidson, C. L., Wingate, L. R., Slish, M. L., & Rasmussen, K. A. (2010) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2010.40.2.170 · Cited by 115
Stoicism and Sensation Seeking: Male Vulnerabilities for the Acquired Capability for Suicide
Witte, T., Gordon, K. H., Smith, P. N., & Orden, K. V. V. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.004 · Cited by 114
Anestis, M. D., & Green, B. A. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22198 · Cited by 113
Cukrowicz, K. C., Jahn, D. R., Graham, R. D., Poindexter, E. K., & Williams, R. B. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034953 · Cited by 112 · cited 4×
“…(Hagan, Podlogar, Chu, & Joiner, 2015), sexual minorities (Silva et al., 2015), military service members Bryan, Morrow, Anestis, and Joiner (2010), physicians (Fink-Miller, 2015), firefighters (Chu, Buchman-Schmitt, Hom, Stanley, & Joiner, 2016), and older adults (Cukrowicz et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialUnderstanding and preventing military suicide.
Bryan, C. J., Jennings, K. W., Jobes, D. A., & Bradley, J. C. (2012) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2012.667321 · Cited by 109
Bryan, C. J., Ray-Sannerud, B. N., Morrow, C. E., & Etienne, N. (2012) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.044 · Cited by 106
Joiner, T. E., & Van Orden, K. A. (2008) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1680/ijct.2008.1.1.80 · Cited by 106
Self-citationAssociations Between Types of Combat Violence and the Acquired Capability for Suicide
Bryan, C. J., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2011) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2011.00023.x · Cited by 103
Cero, I., Zuromski, K. L., Witte, T. K., Ribeiro, J. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.055 · Cited by 103
Self-citationNadorff, M. R., Anestis, M. D., Nazem, S., Harris, H. C., & Winer, E. S. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.011 · Cited by 102
Construct validity of a proposed new diagnostic entity: Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance (ASAD)
Tucker, R. P., Michaels, M. S., Rogers, M. L., Wingate, L. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.049 · Cited by 100
Self-citationFreedenthal, S. L., Lamis, D. A., Osman, A., Kahlo, D. M., & Gutierrez, P. M. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20782 · Cited by 98
Testing the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: The Moderating Role of Hopelessness
Hagan, C. R., Podlogar, M. C., Chu, C., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2015.8.2.99 · Cited by 94
Self-citationMitchell, S. M., Seegan, P. L., Roush, J. F., Brown, S. L., Sustaíta, M. A., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2016) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260516628291 · Cited by 94
Transforming odds ratios into correlations for meta-analytic research.
Bonett, D. G. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.3.254 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“For logistic regression analyses, the odds ratios (OR) were extracted; ORs were converted into Cohen’s d and subsequently to Pearson’s r, consistent with the approach employed by Bonett (2007).”
MethodClinical applications of the interpersonal‐psychological theory of attempted and completed suicide
Stellrecht, N. E., Gordon, K. H., Orden, K. A. V., Witte, T. K., Wingate, L. R., Cukrowicz, K. C., Butler, M. A., Schmidt, N. B., Fitzpatrick, K. K., & Joiner, T. E. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20224 · Cited by 91 · cited 2×
“Components of the interpersonal theory have additionally led to advancements in the assessment of suicide risk (Chu et al., 2015; Ribeiro, Bodell, Hames, Hagan, & Joiner, 2013) and treatment recommendations (Joiner & Van Orden, 2008; Joiner, Van Orden, Witte, & Rudd, 2009; Stellrecht et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAnestis, M. D., Khazem, L. R., Mohn, R. S., & Green, B. A. (2015) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.03.006 · Cited by 89
The Role of Organized Activities in Facilitating Social Adaptation Across the Transition to College
Bohnert, A. M., Aikins, J. W., & Edidin, J. (2007) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/0743558406297940 · Cited by 89
O’Keefe, V. M., Wingate, L. R., Tucker, R. P., Rhoades-Kerswill, S., Slish, M. L., & Davidson, C. L. (2013) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033540 · Cited by 88
Self-citationLamis, D. A., & Malone, P. S. (2011) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2011.00052.x · Cited by 88
Cheavens, J. S., Cukrowicz, K. C., Hansen, R. W., & Mitchell, S. M. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22230 · Cited by 87
Chronic pain and the interpersonal theory of suicide.
Wilson, K. G., Kowal, J., Henderson, P. R., McWilliams, L. A., & Péloquin, K. (2013) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031390 · Cited by 86
Joiner, T. E., & Orden, K. A. V. (2008) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1521/ijct.2008.1.1.80 · Cited by 85
Self-citationThe Role of Hope and Optimism in Suicide Risk for American Indians/Alaska Natives
O’Keefe, V. M., & Wingate, L. R. (2013) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12044 · Cited by 80
Role of Intense Affects in Predicting Short-term Risk for Suicidal Behavior
Hendin, H., Jurdi, R. K. A., Houck, P. R., Hughes, S., & Turner, J. B. (2010) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181d13d14 · Cited by 79
Forrest, L., Bodell, L. P., Witte, T., Goodwin, N. P., Bartlett, M., Siegfried, N., Eddy, K., Thomas, J., Franko, D., & Smith, A. R. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.017 · Cited by 79
Wang, K. T., Wong, Y. J., & Fu, C.-C. (2013) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032551 · Cited by 78
Hill, R. M., & Pettit, J. W. (2013) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2013.777001 · Cited by 78
Bryan, C. J., & Anestis, M. D. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20808 · Cited by 76
Van Orden, K. A., Stone, D. M., Rowe, J., McIntosh, W. L., Podgorski, C., & Conwell, Y. (2013) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2013.03.003 · Cited by 75
Chu, C., Hom, M. A., Rogers, M. L., Stanley, I. H., Ringer, F. B., Podlogar, M. C., Hirsch, J. K., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.065 · Cited by 75
Self-citationExperience with euthanasia is associated with fearlessness about death in veterinary students.
Witte, T., Correia, C., & Angarano, D. (2013) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behaviour · doi:10.1111/sltb.12000 · Cited by 73
Social Cognition in Bulimia Nervosa: A Systematic Review
DeJong, H., den Eynde, F. V., Broadbent, H. J., Kenyon, M., Lavender, A., Startup, H. M., & Schmidt, U. H. (2011) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.07.002 · Cited by 73
George, S. E., Page, A. C., Hooke, G. R., & Stritzke, W. G. K. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000276 · Cited by 73 · cited 5×
“The study included (a) any version of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS; e.g., Ribeiro, Witte, et al., 2014) or any other validated measure developed to assess capability for suicide, and (b) at least one measure of suicidal behavior.”
MethodInfluentialAn exploratory factor analysis of the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale in male prison inmates.
Smith, P. N., Wolford‐Clevenger, C., Mandracchia, J. T., & Jahn, D. R. (2012) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/a0030817 · Cited by 71
Rogers, M. L., Chiurliza, B., Hagan, C. R., Tzoneva, M., Hames, J. L., Michaels, M. S., Hitschfeld, M. J., Palmer, B. A., Lineberry, T. W., Jobes, D. A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.057 · Cited by 71 · cited 1×
“This future direction dovetails with emerging evidence that highlights the import of acute suicide risk factors (Hendin, Al Jurdi, Houck, Hughes, & Turner, 2010; Rogers et al., 2017; Stanley, Rufino, Rogers, Ellis, & Joiner, 2016; Tucker, Michaels, Rogers, Wingate, & Joiner, 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationExamination of the relationship between obesity and suicidal ideation
Dutton, G. R., Bodell, L. P., Smith, A. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2013) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.224 · Cited by 69
Self-citationKleiman, E. M., Law, K. C., & Anestis, M. D. (2013) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.10.015 · Cited by 67
Nonsuicidal self-injury in sexual minority college students: a test of theoretical integration
Muehlenkamp, J. J., Hilt, L. M., Ehlinger, P. P., & McMillan, T. (2015) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-015-0050-y · Cited by 67
Zhang, J., Lester, D., Zhao, S., & Zhou, C. (2013) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2013.805643 · Cited by 66
Kleiman, E. M., Liu, R. T., & Riskind, J. H. (2013) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2013.10.007 · Cited by 66
Tucker, R. P., Wingate, L. R., O’Keefe, V. M., Slish, M. L., Judah, M. R., & Rhoades-Kerswill, S. (2012) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.023 · Cited by 66
Self-citationWhy null results rarely see the light of day
Mervis, J. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.345.6200.992 · Cited by 65
Hallensleben, N., Spangenberg, L., Kapusta, N. D., Forkmann, T., & Glaesmer, H. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.045 · Cited by 64
DeShong, H. L., Tucker, R. P., O’Keefe, V. M., Mullins‐Sweatt, S. N., & Wingate, L. R. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.002 · Cited by 63
Self-citationSilva, C., Chu, C., Monahan, K. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2014) · Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity · doi:10.1037/sgd0000086 · Cited by 63 · cited 1×
“…(Monteith et al., 2013), prison inmates (Mandracchia & Smith, 2015), undergraduates (Hagan, Podlogar, Chu, & Joiner, 2015), sexual minorities (Silva et al., 2015), military service members Bryan, Morrow, Anestis, and Joiner (2010), physicians (Fink-Miller, 2015), firefighters (Chu,…”
Self-citationA test of the interpersonal theory of suicide in a large sample of current firefighters
Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.041 · Cited by 62 · cited 3×
“Moreover, research on the theory has been conducted across samples derived from locations outside of the United States (U.S.), such as South Korea (Chu et al., 2016b) and Australia (Christiansen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChu, C., Rogers, M. L., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.061 · Cited by 61 · cited 3×
“Moreover, research on the theory has been conducted across samples derived from locations outside of the United States (U.S.), such as South Korea (Chu et al., 2016b) and Australia (Christiansen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRinger, F. B., Soberay, K. A., Rogers, M. L., Hagan, C. R., Chu, C., Schneider, M., Podlogar, M. C., Witte, T. K., Holm‐Denoma, J. M., Plant, E. A., et al. (2017) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000519 · Cited by 61
Self-citationThe role of optimism in the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior
Rasmussen, K. A., & Wingate, L. R. (2011) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2011.00022.x · Cited by 60
Unpacking Sleep and Suicide in Older Adults in a Combined Online Sample
Golding, S., Nadorff, M. R., Winer, E. S., & Ward, K. C. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.5270 · Cited by 60
Nsamenang, S. A., Webb, J. R., Cukrowicz, K. C., & Hirsch, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.042 · Cited by 60
The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide Applied to Male Prisoners
Mandracchia, J. T., & Smith, P. N. (2014) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12132 · Cited by 60 · cited 1×
“…theory has been conducted spanning diverse samples, such as psychiatric inpatients and outpatients (Monteith et al., 2013), prison inmates (Mandracchia & Smith, 2015), undergraduates (Hagan, Podlogar, Chu, & Joiner, 2015), sexual minorities (Silva et al., 2015), military service members…”
BackgroundChu, C., Hom, M. A., Rogers, M. L., Ringer, F. B., Hames, J. L., Suh, S. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · doi:10.5664/jcsm.5784 · Cited by 60 · cited 3×
“Moreover, research on the theory has been conducted across samples derived from locations outside of the United States (U.S.), such as South Korea (Chu et al., 2016b) and Australia (Christiansen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationVenta, A., Mellick, W., Schatte, D., & Sharp, C. (2014) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2014.33.5.428 · Cited by 59
Wong, Y. J., Kim, B. S. K., Nguyen, C., Cheng, J. K. Y., & Saw, A. (2013) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034681 · Cited by 59
Marty, M. A., Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L., & Klebe, K. J. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.21877 · Cited by 58
An empirically based approach to the assessment and management of suicidal behavior.
Ribeiro, J. D., Bodell, L. P., Hames, J. L., Hagan, C. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2013) · Journal of Psychotherapy Integration · doi:10.1037/a0031416 · Cited by 58
Self-citationStanley, I. H., Rufino, K. A., Rogers, M. L., Ellis, T. E., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.06.012 · Cited by 58
Self-citationRibeiro, J. D., Bender, T. W., Buchman, J. M., Nock, M. K., Rudd, M. D., Bryan, C. J., Lim, I. C., Baker, M. T., Knight, C., Gutierrez, P. M., et al. (2015) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22240 · Cited by 57
Self-citationCampos, R. C., & Holden, R. R. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22196 · Cited by 57 · cited 3×
“The INQ was created and validated as an English-language measure; however, several groups have translated the INQ into other languages, including Spanish (Garza & Pettit, 2010), German (Forkmann & Glaesmer, 2013; Glaesmer, Spangenberg, Scherer, & Forkmann, 2014; Hallensleben et al., 2016), Chinese (Zhang et al., 2013)…”
Garza, M. J., & Pettit, J. W. (2010) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2010.40.6.561 · Cited by 57 · cited 3×
“The INQ was created and validated as an English-language measure; however, several groups have translated the INQ into other languages, including Spanish (Garza & Pettit, 2010), German (Forkmann & Glaesmer, 2013; Glaesmer, Spangenberg, Scherer, & Forkmann, 2014; Hallensleben et al., 2016), Chinese (Zhang et al., 2013)…”
BackgroundThe Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: Guidance for Working With Suicidal Clients
Chessick, C. A. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09050679 · Cited by 56
Chu, C., Walker, K. L., Stanley, I. H., Hirsch, J. K., Greenberg, J. H., Rudd, M. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000152 · Cited by 56
Self-citationChu, C., Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., Gai, A. R., Nock, M. K., Gutierrez, P. M., & Joiner, T. E. (2017) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000262 · Cited by 55
Self-citationPersonality disorder traits, risk factors, and suicide ideation among older adults
Jahn, D. R., Poindexter, E. K., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2015) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610215000174 · Cited by 54
Woodward, E. N., Wingate, L. R., Gray, T. W., & Pantalone, D. W. (2014) · Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity · doi:10.1037/sgd0000046 · Cited by 54
Hom, M. A., Chu, C., Schneider, M. E., Lim, I. C., Hirsch, J. K., Gutierrez, P. M., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.032 · Cited by 53 · cited 1×
“Although there has been a recent increase in studies testing the explanatory roles of the interpersonal theory variables (Chu et al., 2017, in press; Chu, Rogers, & Joiner, 2016; Chu, Rogers, Gai, & Joiner, 2017; Hom et al., 2017; Kwan, Gordon, Carter, Minnich, & Grossman, 2017), further research examining a wider ran…”
BackgroundSelf-citationJahn, D. R., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2011) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2011.00060.x · Cited by 52
Physical Disability and the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide
Khazem, L. R., Jahn, D. R., Cukrowicz, K. C., & Anestis, M. D. (2015) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2015.1047061 · Cited by 52
Ribeiro, J. D., Silva, C., & Joiner, T. E. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.036 · Cited by 51
Self-citationGutierrez, P. M., Pease, J. L., Matarazzo, B. B., Monteith, L. L., Hernández, T. D., & Osman, A. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000310 · Cited by 51
Anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns predict suicide risk
Oglesby, M. E., Capron, D. W., Raines, A. M., & Schmidt, N. B. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.057 · Cited by 50
Donker, T., Batterham, P. J., Orden, K. A. V., & Christensen, H. M. (2014) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/2050-7283-2-20 · Cited by 50
Ribeiro, J. D., Yen, S., Joiner, T., & Siegler, I. C. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.037 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“, 2012), the weaker association between thwarted belongingness and suicide risk in military samples may also reflect an underreporting of suicidal symptoms (cf. Anestis & Green, 2015; Ribeiro et al., 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationValidation and psychometric properties of the German Capability for Suicide Questionnaire
Wachtel, S., Vocks, S., Edel, M., Nyhuis, P. W., Willutzki, U., & Teismann, T. (2014) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.03.008 · Cited by 47
Early life stressors and suicidal ideation: Mediation by interpersonal risk factors
Puzia, M., Kraines, M. A., Liu, R. T., & Kleiman, E. M. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.027 · Cited by 47
Tucker, R. P., & Wingate, L. R. (2014) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2013.824839 · Cited by 46
Self-citationBaertschi, M., Costanza, A., Richard-Lepouriel, H., Pompili, M., Sarasin, F., Weber, K., & Canuto, A. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.049 · Cited by 45 · cited 3×
“The INQ was created and validated as an English-language measure; however, several groups have translated the INQ into other languages, including Spanish (Garza & Pettit, 2010), German (Forkmann & Glaesmer, 2013; Glaesmer, Spangenberg, Scherer, & Forkmann, 2014; Hallensleben et al., 2016), Chinese (Zhang et al., 2013)…”
Who are we missing? Nondisclosure in online suicide risk screening questionnaires.
Podlogar, M. C., Rogers, M. L., Chiurliza, B., Hom, M. A., Tzoneva, M., & Joiner, T. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000242 · Cited by 44
Self-citationGuidry, E. T., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2015) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1040721 · Cited by 43
Khazem, L. R., Law, K. C., Green, B. A., & Anestis, M. D. (2014) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.009 · Cited by 42
Witte, T. K., Zuromski, K. L., Gauthier, J. M., Smith, A. R., Bartlett, M. L., Siegfried, N., Bodell, L. P., & Goodwin, N. P. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.043 · Cited by 42
Lockman, J. D., & Servaty‐Seib, H. L. (2015) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2015.1105325 · Cited by 42
Campos, R. C., Holden, R. R., Laranjeira, P., Troister, T., Oliveira, A. R., Costa, F., Abreu, M., & Fresca, N. (2016) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2016.1150920 · Cited by 41
Brackman, E. H., Morris, B. W., & Andover, M. S. (2016) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2016.1162247 · Cited by 41
Poindexter, E. K., Mitchell, S. M., Jahn, D. R., Smith, P. N., Hirsch, J. K., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.043 · Cited by 40
Rohde, P., Seeley, J. R., Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, J., & Rohling, M. L. (2003) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.33.3.249.23216 · Cited by 39
Can Perceived Burdensomeness Explain the Relationship Between Suicide and Perfectionism?
Rasmussen, K. A., Slish, M. L., Wingate, L. R., Davidson, C. L., & Grant, D. M. (2012) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.2011.00074.x · Cited by 39
Dating Violence Victimization, Interpersonal Needs, and Suicidal Ideation Among College Students
Wolford‐Clevenger, C., Elmquist, J., Brem, M. J., Zapor, H., & Stuart, G. L. (2015) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000353 · Cited by 38
Chu, C., Buchman‐Schmitt, J. M., Ringer, F. B., & Joiner, T. E. (2015) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-015-9715-3 · Cited by 38 · cited 3×
“Moreover, research on the theory has been conducted across samples derived from locations outside of the United States (U.S.), such as South Korea (Chu et al., 2016b) and Australia (Christiansen et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRogers, M. L., & Joiner, T. E. (2016) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2016.1158681 · Cited by 38
Self-citationTesting the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in Chronic Pain
Wilson, K. G., Heenan, A., Kowal, J., Henderson, P. R., McWilliams, L. A., & Castillo, D. (2016) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000451 · Cited by 38
Joiner, T. E., & Stanley, I. H. (2016) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.2016.1142800 · Cited by 37 · cited 1×
“This component of the theory, in particular, has been generative with regard to its contribution to an emerging biobehavioral account of suicidal behavior—the eusocial theory of suicide (Joiner, Hom, Hagan, & Silva, 2016; cf. Joiner & Stanley, 2016).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKwan, M. Y., Gordon, K. H., Carter, D. L., Minnich, A. M., & Grossman, S. D. (2016) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12304 · Cited by 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Twenge, J. M., Joiner, T. E., Rogers, M. L., & Martin, G. N. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617723376 · Cited by 1,705
Self-citationThe integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behaviour
O'Connor, R. C., & Kirtley, O. J. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0268 · Cited by 1,781
Suicidal thoughts and behaviors and social isolation: A narrative review of the literature
Calati, R., Ferrari, C., Brittner, M., Oasi, O., Olié, E., Carvalho, A. F., & Courtet, P. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.022 · Cited by 584
The associations between non-suicidal self-injury and first onset suicidal thoughts and behaviors
Kiekens, G., Hasking, P. A., Boyes, M. E., Claes, L., Mortier, P., Auerbach, R. P., Cuijpers, P. J., Demyttenaere, K., Green, J. G., Kessler, R. C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.033 · Cited by 467
Diamond, L. M., & Alley, J. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104720 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Tucker, R. P., Hagan, C. R., Rogers, M. L., Podlogar, M. C., Chiurliza, B., Ringer, F. B., Michaels, M. S., Patros, C. H. G., & Joiner, T. E.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1313-1345
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- PMC
- PMC5730496
- OpenAlex
- W2766751125
- Cited by
- 1,231
- References
- 241
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 230 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 6
- FWCI
- 11.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (acceptedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH093311-04)
- Military Suicide Research Consortium (W81XWH-10-2-0181, W81XWH-16-2-0003)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- interpersonal theory of suicide, suicidal ideation, perceived burdensomeness, thwarted belongingness, previous suicide attempts, suicide risk, suicidal behavior
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Suicide, Internationality, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
