Cited by 23Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attention

The decentering component of mindfulness reduces reactions to mental imagery.

Open access
Keesman, Mike, Aarts, Henk, Häfner, Michael, Papies, Esther K.·2020·Motivation Science

Abstract

Four experiments examined whether reactions to mental imagery can be reduced by the mindfulness component of decentering, i.e. the insight that experiences are impermanent mental states.In Experiment 1, participants vividly imagined an unpleasant autobiographical event (1a, 1b) or a rewarding food (1c).When instructed to adopt a decentering perspective in comparison to an immersed perspective during imagery, participants experienced less negative affect and fewer cravings to eat.In Experiment 2, participants were exposed to an attractive or a neutral food, and we assessed salivation and eating-related imagery.While imagery did not differ between groups, the attractive food elicited less salivation in decentering relative to control participants.We suggest that decentering can make one's imagery of consuming a food and of reliving of negative experiences less compelling, and thus reduce affective responses to both unpleasant and rewarding imagery, even if the imagery itself is kept active in mind.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/mot0000137

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both the mindful and sham decentering groups, the metaphor of a waterfall was used, and there was a similar structure, wording, length, and calmness.

    “In both the mindful and sham decentering groups, the metaphor of a waterfall was used, and there was a similar structure, wording, length, and calmness (e.g., see Keesman et al., 2020; Papies et al., 2015).”

    From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Keesman et al., 2020

    The Materials section (p. 7) says the decentering and control instructions had similar length and structure, and describes a waterfall metaphor for decentering. It describes the control instruction using a different illustration—a remembered funny event—rather than a waterfall. The paper does not establish that the two instructions had similar wording or calmness. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness practice promotes a decentered perspective wherein individuals observe their thoughts and feelings as transient mental events rather than reflections of the self or reality.

    “Mindfulness practice promotes a decentered perspective wherein individuals observe their thoughts and feelings as transient mental events rather than reflections of the self or reality [79, 80].”
  • Mindful decentering, as induced by the waterfall metaphor, was successful in allowing participants to relate to their sensations as transient events that are detached from oneself and that do not reflect reality.

    “This indicates that mindful decentering, as induced by the waterfall metaphor, was successful in allowing participants to relate to their sensations as transient events that are detached from oneself and that do not reflect reality (e.g., see Keesman et al., 2020; Papies et al., 2015).”
  • The data suggest that the waterfall metaphor, as used previously in other research contexts, is effective for anxiety relief.

    “Also, the data suggests that the waterfall metaphor, as used previously in other research contexts (e.g., see Keesman et al., 2020; Papies et al., 2015), is effective for anxiety relief.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayes, Steven C., Kirk D. Strosahl, and Kelly G. Wilson. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Second Edition: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change. Guilford Press, 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keesman, M., Aarts, H., Häfner, M., & Papies, E. K.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Berlin University of the Arts (DE)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Keesman, Mike
Venue
Motivation Science
Published
2020-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
34-42
ISSN
  • 2333-8113 (ISSN-L)
  • 2333-8121
OpenAlex
W2939989772
Cited by
23
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Motivation Science (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
decentering, mindfulness, mental imagery, negative affect, food cravings, salivary secretion, autobiographical memory, transience, dietary habits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review