Cited by 197Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attentionBehavioral Health and Interventions

The benefits of simply observing: Mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior

Open access
Papies, Esther K., Pronk, Tila M., Keesman, Mike, Barsalou, Lawrence W.·2015·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Mindful attention, a central component of mindfulness meditation, can be conceived as becoming aware of one's thoughts and experiences and being able to observe them as transient mental events. Here, we present a series of studies demonstrating the effects of applying this metacognitive perspective to one's spontaneous reward responses when encountering attractive stimuli. Taking a grounded cognition perspective, we argue that reward simulations in response to attractive stimuli contribute to appetitive behavior and that motivational states and traits enhance these simulations. Directing mindful attention at these thoughts and seeing them as mere mental events should break this link, such that motivational states and traits no longer affect reward simulations and appetitive behavior. To test this account, we trained participants to observe their thoughts in reaction to appetitive stimuli as mental events, using a brief procedure designed for nonmeditators. Across 3 experiments, we found that adopting the mindful attention perspective reduced the effects of motivational states and traits on appetitive behavior in 2 domains, in both the laboratory and the field. Specifically, after applying mindful attention, participants' sexual motivation no longer made opposite-sex others seem more attractive and thus desirable as partners. Similarly, participants' levels of hunger no longer boosted the attractiveness of unhealthy foods, resulting in healthier eating choices. We discuss these results in the context of mechanisms and applications of mindful attention and explore how mindfulness and mindful attention can be conceptualized in psychological research more generally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0038032

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both the mindful and sham decentering groups, the metaphor of a waterfall was used, and there was a similar structure, wording, length, and calmness.

    “In both the mindful and sham decentering groups, the metaphor of a waterfall was used, and there was a similar structure, wording, length, and calmness (e.g., see Keesman et al., 2020; Papies et al., 2015).”
  • The data suggest that the waterfall metaphor, as used previously in other research contexts, is effective for anxiety relief.

    “Also, the data suggests that the waterfall metaphor, as used previously in other research contexts (e.g., see Keesman et al., 2020; Papies et al., 2015), is effective for anxiety relief.”
  • Mindful decentering, as induced by the waterfall metaphor, was successful in allowing participants to relate to their sensations as transient events that are detached from oneself and that do not reflect reality.

    “This indicates that mindful decentering, as induced by the waterfall metaphor, was successful in allowing participants to relate to their sensations as transient events that are detached from oneself and that do not reflect reality (e.g., see Keesman et al., 2020; Papies et al., 2015).”
  • Mindfulness attenuates behavioral responses to external cues.

    “This is consistent with the findings that mindfulness attenuates behavioral responses to external cues33.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papies, E. K., Pronk, T. M., Keesman, M., & Barsalou, L. W.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2015
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
148-170
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2120575903
Cited by
197
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VENI-451-10-027)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
mindful attention, mindfulness meditation, appetitive behavior, grounded cognition, sexual motivation, food attractiveness, hunger, metacognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Male, Motivation, Reward, Sexual Behavior, Thinking, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review