Cited by 87Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Decentering in the process of cultivating mindfulness: An experience-sampling study in time and context.

Shoham, Adi, Goldstein, Pavel, Oren, Ravit, Spivak, David, Bernstein, Amit·2017·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Through intensive experience sampling, we studied the practice and development of mindfulness as a dynamic process in time and context. We focused on role(s) and salutary function(s) of mindfulness and decentering for emotional experience over the course of mindfulness practice and development. METHOD: (SD) = 25.05 (3.26) years, participated in a 1-month, 6-session, Mahasi-based mindfulness-training intervention (Mahasi, 1978). We collected 52 digital experience samples of mindfulness, decentering, and emotional experience, in the context of daily living and meditative states, over the course of the program. RESULTS: Data were analyzed via time-varying effects models (TVEMs) and mixed-linear models (MLMs) within a single-subject, multiple-baseline experimental design. First, over the course of the intervention, participants grew more mindful and decentered in daily living and meditative states. Second, the association between mindfulness and decentering was significant in daily living, although the magnitude of this association was stronger in meditative states. Third, we observed the same contextualized pattern of relations between mindfulness and emotional valence (happy > sad) as well as arousal (calm > nervous). Finally, whereas decentering mediated the effect of mindfulness on reduced emotional arousal in meditative states, it did not similarly mediate the effect of mindfulness on positive emotional valence. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings illustrate the insights that may be gained about mindfulness mechanisms broadly and decentering specifically through the study of mindfulness as a dynamic, contextualized developmental process over time. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000154

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shoham, A., Goldstein, P., Oren, R., Spivak, D., & Bernstein, A.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2017-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
123-134
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2582653275
Cited by
87
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israeli Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness, decentering, emotional experience, emotional valence, emotional arousal, meditative states, everyday life, mindfulness training, time-dependent effects, mediation
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Sampling Studies, Time, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review