Cited by 1,639Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks

Open access

Abstract

Single-neuron activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is tuned to mixtures of multiple task-related aspects. Such mixed selectivity is highly heterogeneous, seemingly disordered and therefore difficult to interpret. We analysed the neural activity recorded in monkeys during an object sequence memory task to identify a role of mixed selectivity in subserving the cognitive functions ascribed to the PFC. We show that mixed selectivity neurons encode distributed information about all task-relevant aspects. Each aspect can be decoded from the population of neurons even when single-cell selectivity to that aspect is eliminated. Moreover, mixed selectivity offers a significant computational advantage over specialized responses in terms of the repertoire of input-output functions implementable by readout neurons. This advantage originates from the highly diverse nonlinear selectivity to mixtures of task-relevant variables, a signature of high-dimensional neural representations. Crucially, this dimensionality is predictive of animal behaviour as it collapses in error trials. Our findings recommend a shift of focus for future studies from neurons that have easily interpretable response tuning to the widely observed, but rarely analysed, mixed selectivity neurons.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12160

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rigotti, M., Barak, O., Warden, M. R., Wang, X.-J., Daw, N. D., Miller, E. K., & Fusi, S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Fusi, Stefano
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-05
Volume
497
Issue
7451
Pages
585-590
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2033708181
Cited by
1,639
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 146 · 2025: 171 · 2024: 220 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 139 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 104 · 2018: 106 · 2017: 102 · 2016: 101 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 14
FWCI
44.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PMC
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (133357)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091174, R37MH087027, 5-R37-MH087027-04)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
mixed selectivity, prefrontal cortex, single-unit activity, population coding, error trials
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Behavior, Animal, Cognition, Memory, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Prefrontal Cortex, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review