Cited by 248Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Single-cell topological RNA-seq analysis reveals insights into cellular differentiation and development

Open access
Rizvi, Abbas H, Camara, Pablo G, Kandror, Elena K, Roberts, Thomas J, Schieren, Ira, Maniatis, Tom, Rabadan, Raul·2017·Nature Biotechnology

Abstract

Transcriptional programs control cellular lineage commitment and differentiation during development. Understanding of cell fate has been advanced by studying single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) but is limited by the assumptions of current analytic methods regarding the structure of data. We present single-cell topological data analysis (scTDA), an algorithm for topology-based computational analyses to study temporal, unbiased transcriptional regulation. Unlike other methods, scTDA is a nonlinear, model-independent, unsupervised statistical framework that can characterize transient cellular states. We applied scTDA to the analysis of murine embryonic stem cell (mESC) differentiation in vitro in response to inducers of motor neuron differentiation. scTDA resolved asynchrony and continuity in cellular identity over time and identified four transient states (pluripotent, precursor, progenitor, and fully differentiated cells) based on changes in stage-dependent combinations of transcription factors, RNA-binding proteins, and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). scTDA can be applied to study asynchronous cellular responses to either developmental cues or environmental perturbations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nbt.3854

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-cell RNA sequencing data are suitable for graph representation learning to model cellular differential processes and disease states.

    “Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data lend themselves to graph representation learning to model cellular differential processes [136, 155] and disease states [140].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizvi, A. H., Camara, P. G., Kandror, E. K., Roberts, T. J., Schieren, I., Maniatis, T., & Rabadan, R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Maniatis, Tom
Venue
Nature Biotechnology
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
551-560
ISSN
  • 0733-222X (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0156
  • 1546-1696
OpenAlex
W2610774430
Cited by
248
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 17
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA193313)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM117591, T32GM008224)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS088992, DP1NS082099)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, cell differentiation, motor neuron differentiation, mouse embryonic stem cells, transcriptional regulation, lineage commitment, long non-coding RNA, RNA-binding proteins, transcription factors
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Gene Expression Regulation, Motor Neurons, RNA, Transcription, Genetic, Transcriptional Activation, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review