Cited by 147Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBioenergy crop production and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment

Creutzig, Felix, Popp, Alexander, Plevin, Richard, Luderer, Gunnar, Minx, Jan, Edenhofer, Ottmar·2012·Nature Climate Change

DOI 10.1038/nclimate1416

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate1416

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T.-H. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151861 · Cited by 4,888
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J., & Allen, M. R. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08017 · Cited by 2,775
IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation
Revel, D. (2011) · OpenEdition (OpenEdition) · doi:10.58079/o8wx · Cited by 2,190
Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma
Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., Pacala, S., Reilly, J., Searchinger, T., Somerville, C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177970 · Cited by 1,596
Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture
Cassman, K. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952 · Cited by 1,500
An overview of second generation biofuel technologies
Sims, R. E. H., Mabee, W., Saddler, J. N., & Taylor, M. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046 · Cited by 1,497
Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture
Schlenker, W., & Lobell, D. B. (2010) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014010 · Cited by 1,492
Untitled work
(2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279
Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health
McMichael, A. J., Powles, J. W., Butler, C. D., & Uauy, R. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61256-2 · Cited by 1,226

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

Edwards, R., Szekeres, S., Neuwahl, F. & Mahieu, V. Biofuels in the European Context: Facts and Uncertainties (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2008).
Brander, M. et al. Methodology and Evidence Base on the Indirect Greenhouse Gas Effects of Using Wastes, Residues, and By-products for Biofuels and Bioenergy (Renewable Fuels Agency and Department for Energy and Climate Change, 2009).
Erb, K-H. et al. Eating the Planet: Feeding and Fuelling the World Sustainably, Fairly and Humanely — A Scoping Study (Institute of Social Ecology and PIK Potsdam, 2009).
Edenhofer, O. & Seyboth, K. in Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource and Environmental Economics (ed. Shogren, J. F.) (Elsevier, in the press).

Sorted by citations

Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., Kato, E., Jackson, R. B., Cowie, A., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2870 · Cited by 1,440
Self-citation
Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges
Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A. D., & Keirstead, J. E. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 · Cited by 1,174
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment
Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A., et al. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205 · Cited by 752
Self-citation
Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options
Ivanova, D., Barrett, J., Wiedenhofer, D., Macura, B., Callaghan, M., & Creutzig, F. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589 · Cited by 728
Self-citation
How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?
Smith, P., Haberl, H., Popp, A., Erb, K., Lauk, C., Harper, R. J., Tubiello, F. N., Pinto, A. D. S., Jafari, M., Sohi, S., et al. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12160 · Cited by 700
Self-citation
Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios
Luderer, G., Madeddu, S., Merfort, L., Ueckerdt, F., Pehl, M., Pietzcker, R., Rottoli, M., Schreyer, F., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z · Cited by 622
Self-citation
Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling
Pehl, M., Arvesen, A., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Hertwich, E. G., & Luderer, G. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0032-9 · Cited by 536
Self-citation
Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers
Plevin, R. J., Delucchi, M. A., & Creutzig, F. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12074 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions
Davidson, E. A., & Kanter, D. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105012 · Cited by 407
Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling
Nemet, G. F., Callaghan, M. W., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Hartmann, J., Hilaire, J., Lamb, W. F., Minx, J. C., Rogers, S., & Smith, P. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 · Cited by 343
Self-citation
Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: A review
Kemper, J. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.012 · Cited by 335
Energy Crops in Sustainable Phytoremediation
Pandey, V. C., Bajpai, O., & Singh, N. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.078 · Cited by 317
On the economics of renewable energy sources
Edenhofer, O., Hirth, L., Knopf, B., Pahle, M., Schlömer, S., Schmid, E., & Ueckerdt, F. (2013) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.015 · Cited by 308
Self-citation
When the background matters: using scenarios from integrated assessment models in prospective life cycle assessment
Mendoza Beltran, A., Cox, B., Mutel, C., van Vuuren, D. P., Font Vivanco, D., Deetman, S., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Guinée, J., & Tukker, A. (2020) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12825 · Cited by 301
Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models
Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3148 · Cited by 288
Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials
Kang, Y., Yang, Q., Bartocci, P., Wei, H., Liu, S. S., Wu, Z., Zhou, H., Yang, H., Fantozzi, F., & Chen, H. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109842 · Cited by 269
Global bioenergy resources
Slade, R., Bauen, A., & Gross, R. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2097 · Cited by 249
Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2)
Sala, S., Farioli, F., & Zamagni, A. (2012) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0509-5 · Cited by 260
The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems
Creutzig, F., Breyer, C., Hilaire, J., Minx, J., Peters, G. P., & Socolow, R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee03682a · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Untitled work
Pietzcker (2014) · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.08.059 · Cited by 222
Self-citation
Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy
Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Bauer, N., Schwanitz, V. J., Petermann, N., Bosetti, V., Marcucci, A., Otto, S., Paroussos, L., Rao, S., et al. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.021 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options
Popp, A., Rose, S. K., Calvin, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Dietrich, J. P., Wise, M., Stehfest, E., Humpenöder, F., Kyle, P. G., van Vliet, J., et al. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0926-x · Cited by 178
Self-citation
Research priorities for negative emissions
Fuss, S., JONES, C. D., Kraxner, F., Peters, G. P., Smith, P., Tavoni, M., van Vuuren, D. P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Milne, J., et al. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/11/115007 · Cited by 167
Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development
IPCC (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157940.004 · Cited by 203
Catching two European birds with one renewable stone: Mitigating climate change and Eurozone crisis by an energy transition
Creutzig, F., Goldschmidt, J. C., Lehmann, P. L., Schmid, E., von Blücher, F., Breyer, C., Fernandez, B., Jakob, M., Knopf, B., Lohrey, S., et al. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.028 · Cited by 150
Self-citation
The Emissions Gap Report 2012
van Vuuren, D. P. (2012) · Cited by 141
Environmental and energy assessment of biomass residues to biochar as fuel: A brief review with recommendations for future bioenergy systems
Lee, M., Lin, Y.-L., Chiueh, P.-T., & Den, W. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119714 · Cited by 135
Is atmospheric carbon dioxide removal a game changer for climate change mitigation?
Kriegler, E., Edenhofer, O., Reuster, L., Luderer, G., & Klein, D. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0681-4 · Cited by 130
Self-citation
Integrating Global Climate Change Mitigation Goals with Other Sustainability Objectives: A Synthesis
von Stechow, C., McCollum, D. L., Riahi, K., Minx, J. C., Kriegler, E., van Vuuren, D. P., Jewell, J., Robledo‐Abad, C., Hertwich, E. G., Tavoni, M., et al. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-021113-095626 · Cited by 144
Self-citation
Navigating environmental concerns: Unveiling the role of economic growth, trade, resources and institutional quality on greenhouse gas emissions in OECD countries
Wahab, S., Imran, M., Ahmed, B., Rahim, S., & Hassan, T. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139851 · Cited by 126
The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE
Klein, D., Luderer, G., Kriegler, E., Strefler, J., Bauer, N., Leimbach, M., Popp, A., Dietrich, J. P., Humpenöder, F., Lotze‐Campen, H., et al. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0940-z · Cited by 110
Self-citation
Deriving life cycle assessment coefficients for application in integrated assessment modelling
Arvesen, A., Luderer, G., Pehl, M., Bodirsky, B. L., & Hertwich, E. G. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.010 · Cited by 122
Self-citation
Toward a systemic monitoring of the European bioeconomy: Gaps, needs and the integration of sustainability indicators and targets for global land use
O’Brien, M., Wechsler, D., Bringezu, S., & Schaldach, R. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.047 · Cited by 112
Livelihood impacts of biofuel crop production: Implications for governance
Hunsberger, C. A., Bolwig, S., Corbera, E., & Creutzig, F. (2013) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.022 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
On the Sustainability of Renewable Energy Sources
Edenhofer, O., Seyboth, K., Creutzig, F., & Schlömer, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-051012-145344 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
The Emissions Gap Report 2015: A UNEP Synthesis Report
Olhoff, A., Christensen, J. M., Burgon, P., Bakkegaard, R. K., Larsen, C., & Schletz, M. (2015) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.21629.36322 · Cited by 86
Environmental impacts of producing bioethanol and biobased lactic acid from standalone and integrated biorefineries using a consequential and an attributional life cycle assessment approach
Parajuli, R., Knudsen, M. T., Birkved, M., Djomo, S. N., Corona, A., & Dalgaard, T. (2017) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.087 · Cited by 84
Empirical Evidence for the Potential Climate Benefits of Decarbonizing Light Vehicle Transport in the U.S. with Bioenergy from Purpose-Grown Biomass with and without BECCS
Gelfand, I., Hamilton, S. K., Kravchenko, A. N., Jackson, R. D., Thelen, K. D., & Robertson, G. P. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b07019 · Cited by 79
A comparison of commercial ethanol production systems from Brazilian sugarcane and US corn
Chum, H. L., Warner, E., Seabra, J. E. A., & Macedo, I. C. (2013) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1448 · Cited by 80
Pricing indirect emissions accelerates low—carbon transition of US light vehicle sector
Wolfram, P., Weber, S. M., Gillingham, K. T., & Hertwich, E. G. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27247-y · Cited by 78
Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions
Creutzig, F. (2016) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12235 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Assessment of the technical and economic potentials of biomass use for the production of steam, chemicals and polymers
Saygin, D., Gielen, D. J., Draeck, M., Worrell, E., & Patel, M. K. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.114 · Cited by 79
Ecosystem‐scale measurements of biomass water using cosmic ray neutrons
Franz, T. E., Zreda, M., Rosolem, R., Hornbuckle, B. K., Irvin, S., Adams, H. D., Kolb, T. E., Zweck, C., & Shuttleworth, W. J. (2013) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/grl.50791 · Cited by 72
Model collaboration for the improved assessment of biomass supply, demand, and impacts
Wicke, B., van der Hilst, F., Daioglou, V., Banse, M., Beringer, T., Gerssen-Gondelach, S. J., Heijnen, S., Karssenberg, D., Laborde, D., Lippe, M., et al. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12176 · Cited by 76
Competition for land in the global bioeconomy
Hertel, T. W., Steinbuks, J., & Baldos, U. L. C. (2013) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12057 · Cited by 73
A global yield dataset for major lignocellulosic bioenergy crops based on field measurements
Li, W., Ciais, P., Makowski, D., & Peng, S. (2018) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.169 · Cited by 64
Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?
Kalt, G., Mayer, A., Theurl, M. C., Lauk, C., Erb, K., & Haberl, H. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12626 · Cited by 67
Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response
Burns, W., & Nicholson, S. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-017-0445-6 · Cited by 70
Environmental life cycle assessment of producing willow, alfalfa and straw from spring barley as feedstocks for bioenergy or biorefinery systems
Parajuli, R., Knudsen, M. T., Djomo, S. N., Corona, A., Birkved, M., & Dalgaard, T. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.207 · Cited by 62
Reviewing the sociotechnical dynamics of carbon removal
Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C. M., & Low, S. (2023) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.11.008 · Cited by 69
Allocation of biomass resources for minimising energy system greenhouse gas emissions
Bentsen, N. S., Jack, M. W., Felby, C., & Thorsen, B. J. (2014) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.045 · Cited by 62
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) offers sustainable bioenergy production and resilience to climate change
Owen, N. A., Fahy, K. F., & Griffiths, H. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12272 · Cited by 65
The BECCS Implementation Gap–A Swedish Case Study
Fuss, S., & Johnsson, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.553400 · Cited by 73
What can and can't we say about indirect land‐use change in Brazil using an integrated economic – land‐use change model?
Verstegen, J. A., van der Hilst, F., Woltjer, G. B., Karssenberg, D., de Jong, S. M., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12270 · Cited by 59
Competing uses of biomass for energy and chemicals: implications for long‐term global CO 2 mitigation potential
Daioglou, V., Wicke, B., Faaij, A. P. C., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12228 · Cited by 67
A Reflection of the Use of the Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Agri-Food Sustainability
Gava, O., Bartolini, F., Venturi, F., Brunori, G., Zinnai, A., & Pardossi, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11010071 · Cited by 60
Exploring negative territory Carbon dioxide removal and climate policy initiatives
Meadowcroft, J. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0684-1 · Cited by 66
Integrating place-specific livelihood and equity outcomes into global assessments of bioenergy deployment
Creutzig, F., Corbera, E., Bolwig, S., & Hunsberger, C. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035047 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Triple bottom line study of a lignocellulosic biofuel industry
Malik, A., Lenzen, M., & Geschke, A. (2014) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12240 · Cited by 59
Sustainable bioenergy options for Mexico: GHG mitigation and costs
García, C. A., Riegelhaupt, E., Ghilardi, A., Skutsch, M., Islas, J., Manzini, F., & Masera, O. R. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.062 · Cited by 55
Bioenergy-induced land-use-change emissions with sectorally fragmented policies
Merfort, L., Bauer, N., Humpenöder, F., Klein, D., Strefler, J., Popp, A., Luderer, G., & Kriegler, E. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01697-2 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Improving Policy Evidence Base for Agricultural Sustainability and Food Security: A Content Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Research
Gava, O., Bartolini, F., Venturi, F., Brunori, G., & Pardossi, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12031033 · Cited by 49
Consequential Life Cycle Assessment of Policy Vulnerability to Price Effects
Rajagopal, D. (2013) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12058 · Cited by 46
Impact of the Keystone XL pipeline on global oil markets and greenhouse gas emissions
Erickson, P. A., & Lazarus, M. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2335 · Cited by 44
Interrogating Social Sustainability in the Biofuels Sector in Latin America: Tensions Between Global Standards and Local Experiences in Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia
Selfa, T. L., Bain, C., Moreno, R., Eastmond, A., Sweitz, S. R., Bailey, C., Pereira, G. S., Souza, T., & Medeiros, R. (2015) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0535-8 · Cited by 43
Assessing the Climate Effects of Biofuels Using Integrated Assessment Models, Part I: Methodological Considerations
Plevin, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12507 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Future bioenergy expansion could alter carbon sequestration potential and exacerbate water stress in the United States
Cheng, Y., Huang, M., Lawrence, D. M., Calvin, K., Lombardozzi, D., Sinha, E., Pan, M., & He, X. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm8237 · Cited by 40
Climate Policy Decisions Require Policy-Based Lifecycle Analysis
Bento, A. M., & Klotz, R. L. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405164g · Cited by 42
From global economic modelling to household level analyses of food security and sustainability: How big is the gap and can we bridge it?
van Wijk, M. T. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.10.003 · Cited by 41
Land‐use change to bioenergy: grassland to short rotation coppice willow has an improved carbon balance
Harris, Z. M., Alberti, G., Viger, M., Jenkins, J. R., Rowe, R., McNamara, N. P., & Taylor, G. (2017) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12347 · Cited by 40
A meta-analysis of the greenhouse gas abatement of bioenergy factoring in land use changes
Akkari, M. E., Réchauchère, O., Bispo, A., Gabrielle, B., & Makowski, D. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26712-x · Cited by 38
The implications of initiating immediate climate change mitigation — A potential for co-benefits?
Schwanitz, V. J., Longden, T., Knopf, B., & Capros, P. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.003 · Cited by 37
Comparison between Different Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Methodologies: A Review and Case Study of Biomass-based p-Xylene Production
Luo, Y., & Ierapetritou, M. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c04709 · Cited by 33
A model for cost- and greenhouse gas optimal material and energy allocation of biomass and hydrogen
Millinger, M., Tafarte, P., Jordan, M., Musonda, F., Chan, K., Meisel, K., & Aliabadi, D. E. (2022) · SoftwareX · doi:10.1016/j.softx.2022.101264 · Cited by 30
Cause-effect analysis for sustainable development policy
Cucurachi, S., & Suh, S. (2017) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/er-2016-0109 · Cited by 29
Can Bioenergy Assessments Deliver?
Creutzig, F., von Stechow, C., Klein, D., Hunsberger, C. A., Bauer, N., Popp, A., & Edenhofer, O. (2012) · Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy · doi:10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.5 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Human Health and Ecosystem Impacts of Deep Decarbonization of the Energy System
Astudillo, M. F., Vaillancourt, K., Pineau, P., & Amor, B. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04923 · Cited by 25
A comparison of land use change accounting methods: seeking common grounds for key modeling choices in biofuel assessments
Salinas, K. S. D. B., Hamelin, L., Hauschild, M. Z., Kim Pilegaard, L., & Ibrom, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.180 · Cited by 25
Harmonized and systematic assessment of microalgae energy potential for biodiesel production
Arcigni, F., Friso, R., Collu, M., & Venturini, M. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.024 · Cited by 26
The role of services and capital in footprint modelling
Vivanco, D. F. (2019) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-019-01687-7 · Cited by 25
Aligning agricultural production and environmental regulation: An integrated assessment of the Netherlands
González‐Martínez, A. R., Jongeneel, R. A., Kros, J., Lesschen, J. P., de Vries, M., Reijs, J. W., & Verhoog, D. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105388 · Cited by 24
Response to Comments on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation …”
Plevin, R. J., Delucchi, M. A., & Creutzig, F. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12153 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
A model‐based quantitative assessment of the carbon benefits of introducing iLUC factors in the European Renewable Energy Directive
Malins, C. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01207.x · Cited by 23
Sustainable energy crop production
Grosso, S. J. D., Smith, P., Galdos, M. V., Hastings, A., & Parton, W. J. (2014) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.007 · Cited by 30
Eddy covariance captures four‐phase crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) gas exchange signature in Agave
Owen, N. A., Choncubhair, Ó. N., Males, J., Laborde, J. I. D. R., Rubio‐Cortés, R., Griffiths, H., & Lanigan, G. J. (2015) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12610 · Cited by 22
Economy-wide rebound makes UK’s electric car subsidy fall short of expectations
Vivanco, D. F., Nechifor, V., Freire‐González, J., & Calzadilla, A. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117138 · Cited by 21
Quantifying biodiversity impacts of climate change and bioenergy: the role of integrated global scenarios
Meller, L., van Vuuren, D. P., & Cabeza, M. (2013) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0504-9 · Cited by 21
Comment on ‘Carbon Intensity of corn ethanol in the United States: state of the science’
Spawn, S., Lark, T. J., Gibbs, H., Houghton, R. A., Kucharik, C. J., Malins, C., Pelton, R. E. O., & Robertson, G. P. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2e35 · Cited by 18
Toward a More Comprehensive Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment of Biofuels: The Case of Forest-Based Fischer–Tropsch Diesel Production in Finland
Soimakallio, S. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405792j · Cited by 18
Who benefits from energy policy incentives? The case of jatropha adoption by smallholders in Mexico
Soto, I., Achten, W., Muys, B., & Mathijs, E. (2015) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.028 · Cited by 19
Representing vehicle-technological opportunities in integrated energy modeling
Wolfram, P., & Hertwich, E. G. (2019) · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.06.006 · Cited by 18
SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy – How Access to Affordable and Clean Energy Affects Forests and Forest-Based Livelihoods
Jagger, P., Bailis, R., Dermawan, A., Kittner, N., & McCord, R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108765015.009 · Cited by 19
Implications of large‐scale miscanthus cultivation in water protection areas: A Life Cycle Assessment with model coupling for improved policy support
Weik, J., Lask, J., Petig, E., Seeger, S., Vidaurre, N. A. M., Wagner, M., Weiler, M., Bahrs, E., Lewandowski, I. M., & Angenendt, E. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12994 · Cited by 15
Communicating energy system modelling to the wider public: An analysis of German media coverage
Scheer, D. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.188 · Cited by 16
Competition for Land in the Global BioeconomyPreprint
Hertel, T. W., Steinbuks, J., & Baldos, U. L. C. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2222243 · Cited by 16
Linking carbon stock change from land-use change to consumption of agricultural products: A review with Indonesian palm oil as a case study
Goh, C. S., Wicke, B., Verstegen, J. A., Faaij, A. P. C., & Junginger, M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.055 · Cited by 15
Land and the food–fuel competition: insights from modeling
Prieler, S., Fischer, G., & van Velthuizen, H. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment · doi:10.1002/wene.55 · Cited by 17
Drop-in biofuels offer strategies for meeting California’s 2030 climate mandate
Taptich, M. N., Scown, C. D., Piscopo, K., & Horvath, A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aadcb2 · Cited by 14
PopFor: A new model for estimating poplar yields
Henner, D. N., Hastings, A., Pogson, M., McNamara, N. P., Davies, C. A., & Smith, P. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105470 · Cited by 14
Impacts of Bioenergy on Climate Pattern
Haghighatjoo, F., & Rahimpour, M. R. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-93940-9.00072-4 · Cited by 14

Authors: Creutzig, F., Popp, A., Plevin, R., Luderer, G., Minx, J., & Edenhofer, O.
Affiliations: Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID: Creutzig, Felix
Popp, Alexander
Plevin, Richard
Luderer, Gunnar
Minx, Jan
Edenhofer, Ottmar
Venue: Nature Climate Change
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2012-03-04
Volume: 2
Issue: 5
Pages: 320-327
ISSN: 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
1758-6798
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1416
OpenAlex: W2056823493
Cited by: 147
References: 81
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 6
FWCI: 16.72
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations: Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics: Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords: indirect land use change, greenhouse gas emissions, integrated assessment models, renewable energy, climate change mitigation, energy demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks