Cited by 646Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate variability and models

Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change

Clark, Peter U., Shakun, Jeremy D., Marcott, Shaun A., Mix, Alan C., Eby, Michael, Kulp, Scott, Levermann, Anders, Milne, Glenn A. +14 more·2016·Nature Climate Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nclimate2923

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nations that may have large ERW potential, including China, the United States and India, are all vulnerable to climate change and resultant sea-level rise.

    “Nations that may have large ERW potential, including China, the United States and India, are all vulnerable to climate change and resultant sea-level rise 34 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, P. U., Shakun, J. D., Marcott, S. A., Mix, A. C., Eby, M., Kulp, S., Levermann, A., Milne, G. A., Pfister, P. L., Santer, B. D., Schrag, D. P., Solomon, S., Stocker, T. F., Strauss, B. H., Weaver, A. J., Winkelmann, R., Archer, D., Bard, E., Goldner, A., Lambeck, K., Pierrehumbert, R. T., & Plattner, G.-K.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Boston College (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Climate Central (US)
  • Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • American Association For The Advancement of Science (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Clark, Peter U.
Venue
Nature Climate Change
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
360-369
ISSN
  • 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6798
OpenAlex
W2253610007
Cited by
646
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 2
FWCI
45.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
long-term climate change, sea-level change, anthropogenic climate change, climate policy, CO2 emissions, Holocene, deglaciation, climate change projections, climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, civilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review